LuckyCoin.com - The Casino with Zero to hide - now live in Beta mode

[LuckyCoin_]

Marketing yourself using transparency as a keyword and claiming you are a casino where there is nothing to hide will actually get you some attention. Compared to some other casinos, you are relatively very new in the market, which means you have a lot to prove.

The slogan Transparency is the same as the Betmode casino that used to be here but eventually this casino left the forum due to problems from contests that were not paid out if I'm not mistaken.

Luckycoin is also still under the same company ONCHAIN Technologies Ltd so they do show bankrolls, which is a bit different as this casino now has a Sportsbook whereas the others still don't have one.

Point taken, please check by reply to julerz12 above hopes that explains it.

/T

[DYING_S0UL]

Thanks, we do think the L is pretty clear but I will fwd the feedback to our creative department. Who knows the logo might change in the future 
First time Ive heard about the random strings on the referral code we will definitely look in to that as well. Thanks for the feedback.

I was being sarcastic, LOL.
Btw this is what I was referring to...hid part of it since I didn't know that that was.
Are they some sort of tracking link?

Btw, don't make multiple posts in a row, that's rule no 32 you have broken. Reply to all of us in a single post. That's more neat and clean approach.

[DPHOR]

Whenever a new project is launch and coming up with their copper membership rank it give me join because I know that someone who already knows how the forum operates has already brief them on how to navigate through the forum. Anyway welcome to the community and a nice place where to run your marketing, there are lot gamblers here were i think that your project will surely gained the experience required.
However, to gain the attention required this your casino must do; quick withdrawal and deposit reflection, less kyc requirements, quick customer service and list the required sets of games need by the community, of course I wouldn't exclude sportsbook as well, when all these are included you should be sure that success is the next name of your gambling site.

Congratulations. Should you need any campaign manager, do not hesitate to hire little mouse, upgrade00 or Hhampuz for marketing campaigns.

[panjul07]

LuckyCoin is a separate casino brand with its own management team, commercial setup, product direction and community strategy. The fact that other brands may operate under the same licensed entity does not mean they share the same management, funding, player balances, roadmap or operational standards.

How can it be separated casino if all the casinos under the same license as mentioned by julerz12 also using the same bankroll?
I've checked betmode, rollchain, wagmi and all shares the same hotwallet.

The addresses for hot wallet and cold wallet from all the casinos are:
https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0x0c532e1e916219007f244e2d8Ef46f8530Ec75DE
https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0x95af98c907611fCAf1Ac1A3d965AC2DCcDd872c3 (USDSM)

You said that under the same license does not mean same funding but above fact proves that the funding come from the same wallet.

[Haunebu]

I have a bad feeling when it comes to sites with names like Lucky something since those usually tend to be scams in my experience. Not saying this is a scam site or anything, but the link that @julerz12 pointed out does not bode well at all.

There are spelling mistakes all over the homepage and the rewards are pretty average. Be cautious people!

[keyscore44]

I have a bad feeling when it comes to sites with names like Lucky something since those usually tend to be scams in my experience.

yeah sure.. 2 weeks ago:

[LuckyCoin_]

LuckyCoin is a separate casino brand with its own management team, commercial setup, product direction and community strategy. The fact that other brands may operate under the same licensed entity does not mean they share the same management, funding, player balances, roadmap or operational standards.

How can it be separated casino if all the casinos under the same license as mentioned by julerz12 also using the same bankroll?
I've checked betmode, rollchain, wagmi and all shares the same hotwallet.

The addresses for hot wallet and cold wallet from all the casinos are:
https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0x0c532e1e916219007f244e2d8Ef46f8530Ec75DE
https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0x95af98c907611fCAf1Ac1A3d965AC2DCcDd872c3 (USDSM)

You said that under the same license does not mean same funding but above fact proves that the funding come from the same wallet.

Hey panjul07,

Sorry for late reply.

Just to clarify — Lucky Coin is run through a completely separate company and raised its own funding independently.

And yeah, the reward/payout wallets are shared across sites on the same license setup. It keeps the operation lean, improves liquidity, and makes sure payouts are always flowing smoothly.

Thanks, Tomas

[LuckyCoin_]

I have a bad feeling when it comes to sites with names like Lucky something since those usually tend to be scams in my experience. Not saying this is a scam site or anything, but the link that @julerz12 pointed out does not bode well at all.

There are spelling mistakes all over the homepage and the rewards are pretty average. Be cautious people!

Hey Haunebu,

Maybe we’ve gone a bit blind from staring at the product for too long  but could you point us toward where you noticed the spelling mistakes?

And regarding the promos — I wouldn’t personally call a $10k Race during launch week, combined with Instant Rakeback and Weekly Cashback, weak… but maybe that’s just me 

/Tomas

[LuckyCoin_]

Thanks for all the feedback and questions today everyone — we really appreciate the interest and support. We hope we managed to clear up some of the concerns and give a better picture of what we’re building.

We’re doing our best to answer everyone as quickly as possible, and while we’re still very early and currently in beta, there’s a lot more coming soon in terms of improvements and features.

Stay tuned 

[yahoo62278]

LuckyCoin is a separate casino brand with its own management team, commercial setup, product direction and community strategy. The fact that other brands may operate under the same licensed entity does not mean they share the same management, funding, player balances, roadmap or operational standards.

How can it be separated casino if all the casinos under the same license as mentioned by julerz12 also using the same bankroll?
I've checked betmode, rollchain, wagmi and all shares the same hotwallet.

The addresses for hot wallet and cold wallet from all the casinos are:
https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0x0c532e1e916219007f244e2d8Ef46f8530Ec75DE
https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0x95af98c907611fCAf1Ac1A3d965AC2DCcDd872c3 (USDSM)

You said that under the same license does not mean same funding but above fact proves that the funding come from the same wallet.

Hey panjul07,

Sorry for late reply.

Just to clarify — Lucky Coin is run through a completely separate company and raised its own funding independently.

And yeah, the reward/payout wallets are shared across sites on the same license setup. It keeps the operation lean, improves liquidity, and makes sure payouts are always flowing smoothly.

Thanks, Tomas

Ok so I am confused a little. You are a part of 4 different sites, and you all use the same license, you all raised your own funding, but all share the same bankroll? Is this correct?

You being associated with a team that is scamming its users (betmode) in some fashion would not make me feel comfortable playing with any of the 4 casinos associated within your group. How would we know whether or not the same team operates all 4 brands? How do we know that you won't just pull the same stuff and open a new casino under the same license next week?

Now don't take that as me accusing, IMO these are fair questions that everyone should be asking themselves.

Then to come in here claiming you have nothing to hide but then a user contacts you on telegram and after a few questions you make them pay to talk more seems a little shady as well. I don't feel like you handled that correctly at all. You think you're the only busy person in the world?

You also need to read the RULES of the forum so you can see you are breaking the rules by answering back to back. You can quote multiple users and answer in the same post.

[keyscore44]

Ok so I am confused a little. You are a part of 4 different sites, and you all use the same license..

Actually there is more than 4 cosinos under same license:

This is the second company I've encountered recently that sells software and shared licensing in this way.
I have mixed feelings about billing sharing, but I'll wait and see how the community approaches it.

[yahoo62278]

Ok so I am confused a little. You are a part of 4 different sites, and you all use the same license..

Actually there is more than 4 cosinos under same license:

This is the second company I've encountered recently that sells software and shared licensing in this way.
I have mixed feelings about billing sharing, but I'll wait and see how the community approaches it.

4 brands 8 brands 100 brands, my point was it's hard to trust the entire group.

[LuckyCoin_]

LuckyCoin is a separate casino brand with its own management team, commercial setup, product direction and community strategy. The fact that other brands may operate under the same licensed entity does not mean they share the same management, funding, player balances, roadmap or operational standards.

How can it be separated casino if all the casinos under the same license as mentioned by julerz12 also using the same bankroll?
I've checked betmode, rollchain, wagmi and all shares the same hotwallet.

The addresses for hot wallet and cold wallet from all the casinos are:
https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0x0c532e1e916219007f244e2d8Ef46f8530Ec75DE
https://explorer.etherlink.com/address/0x95af98c907611fCAf1Ac1A3d965AC2DCcDd872c3 (USDSM)

You said that under the same license does not mean same funding but above fact proves that the funding come from the same wallet.

Hey panjul07,

Sorry for late reply.

Just to clarify — Lucky Coin is run through a completely separate company and raised its own funding independently.

And yeah, the reward/payout wallets are shared across sites on the same license setup. It keeps the operation lean, improves liquidity, and makes sure payouts are always flowing smoothly.

Thanks, Tomas

Ok so I am confused a little. You are a part of 4 different sites, and you all use the same license, you all raised your own funding, but all share the same bankroll? Is this correct?

You being associated with a team that is scamming its users (betmode) in some fashion would not make me feel comfortable playing with any of the 4 casinos associated within your group. How would we know whether or not the same team operates all 4 brands? How do we know that you won't just pull the same stuff and open a new casino under the same license next week?

Now don't take that as me accusing, IMO these are fair questions that everyone should be asking themselves.

Then to come in here claiming you have nothing to hide but then a user contacts you on telegram and after a few questions you make them pay to talk more seems a little shady as well. I don't feel like you handled that correctly at all. You think you're the only busy person in the world?

You also need to read the RULES of the forum so you can see you are breaking the rules by answering back to back. You can quote multiple users and answer in the same post.

Hey,

Fair enough, and we understand the skepticism.

To clarify: Lucky Coin is its own company with separate funding and management. What’s shared is mainly the license infrastructure (extremely common in teh industry) and liquidity wallets for rewards/payouts, which helps keep payouts smooth and reliable.

Regarding Telegram — that situation clearly came across the wrong way, and that’s on us. There was no intention to avoid questions or make anyone “pay to talk" ofcourse..

Thanks for pointing out the forum rules to a newbie

/Tomas

[slapper]

In your reply to Julez you literally say this:

...does not mean they share the same management, funding, player balances, roadmap or operational standards...

LOL. But then Tomas comes in and confirms that the payout wallets are literally shared across all sites. So which one is it? Those two statements directly contradict each other.

... the reward/payout wallets are shared across sites on the same license setup... It keeps the operation lean, improves liquidity, and makes sure payouts are always flowing smoothly.

You cannot say "separate funding" in one post and then say "shared wallets for liquidity" in the next and expect people not to notice. If the wallets are shared, the funding is shared.

...It keeps the operation lean, improves liquidity, and makes sure payouts are always flowing smoothly...

Not only that, but the logic is flawed. These are what you would say if it was a single operation that was acting as multiple brands. That is what lean means here. One treasury, one bankroll, more than one front door.

LuckyCoin is truly independent, show us the separation. Right now the on-chain data is telling a very different story.

I also stumble on a minor detail/evidence here.

Rollchain marketing/affiliate representer seems to also be Tomas

[keyscore44]

This is the second company I've encountered recently that sells software and shared licensing in this way.
I have mixed feelings about billing sharing, but I'll wait and see how the community approaches it.

4 brands 8 brands 100 brands, my point was it's hard to trust the entire group.

Yes, of course I understand your point.

I mean, is it okay for a company or someone to buy a shared license and software?
In my opinion, buying software is fine. If someone buys a casino script from an unknown source, it's even worse. Here developer must build his trust if he want do this business, so we can belive that it should be audited good.
Regarding the license, if they have one, that's good, even if is shared. After all, many casinos operate here without a license and everything is fine. A few years ago, it was even better if they didn't have a license.

However, I have doubts about shared billings. I think someone good in security stuff should comment on this.

Perhaps the main question we should be asking is who is responsible for the deposits at each of these casinos? Because if the company providing them software has access to all deposits, that would mean they could turn off the lights at any time in all casinos, or in each individual casino.

[masulum]

Issuer: https://www.stablemint.io (and the MFSA public register confirms the EMI authorisation).

Thanks, Tomas

Thank you for giving the information, I hope this information also will help other member to find out about USDSM.

well, in this forum there is a rule to not reply post with new post in a row and it will be considered as spam. You can quote the post you want to reply one by one and send it in 1 reply only. I hope you can pay attention to this.

[LuckyCoin_]

In your reply to Julez you literally say this:

...does not mean they share the same management, funding, player balances, roadmap or operational standards...

LOL. But then Tomas comes in and confirms that the payout wallets are literally shared across all sites. So which one is it? Those two statements directly contradict each other.

... the reward/payout wallets are shared across sites on the same license setup... It keeps the operation lean, improves liquidity, and makes sure payouts are always flowing smoothly.

You cannot say "separate funding" in one post and then say "shared wallets for liquidity" in the next and expect people not to notice. If the wallets are shared, the funding is shared.

...It keeps the operation lean, improves liquidity, and makes sure payouts are always flowing smoothly...

Not only that, but the logic is flawed. These are what you would say if it was a single operation that was acting as multiple brands. That is what lean means here. One treasury, one bankroll, more than one front door.

LuckyCoin is truly independent, show us the separation. Right now the on-chain data is telling a very different story.

I also stumble on a minor detail/evidence here.

Rollchain marketing/affiliate representer seems to also be Tomas

I get why it can look contradictory at first glance, but there’s a difference between shared infrastructure and shared ownership/funding!

Lucky Coin has its own company setup, funding, roadmap and team. The shared wallets are simply part of the white-label/license infrastructure used for payouts and rewards processing across multiple brands.

And regarding me / Tomas / Rollchain — yes, I was involved there for a few weeks/months before joining this project. I decided to move over because the people and long-term vision here aligned more with what I personally wanted to build. Nothing secretive about that but please keep digging.

Good night
/Tomas

[Upgrade00]

Lucky Coin has its own company setup, funding, roadmap and team. The shared wallets are simply part of the white-label/license infrastructure used for payouts and rewards processing across multiple brands.

That's somewhat deceptive. If the different casinos were showing different bankroll balances it could be assumed to be their share of the summer liquidity, but in this case they are displaying the same amount across different casinos, we can't tell if an individual casino has just $20k in the shared liquidity or $1 million.
Either it's deceptive to inflate the bankroll of the individual casinos or the funding is not separate at all.

[Haunebu]

Maybe we’ve gone a bit blind from staring at the product for too long   but could you point us toward where you noticed the spelling mistakes?

Just check the homepage thoroughly and you will be able to find them pretty easily since I found them within seconds frankly speaking.

We’re doing our best to answer everyone as quickly as possible, and while we’re still very early and currently in beta, there’s a lot more coming soon in terms of improvements and features.

You haven't really clarified the shared wallet stuff properly since one of the sites in that group are scammers implying that the entire umbrella could be a nest for scammers including this new site. These are serious red flags that need to be addressed properly asap.

[The Cryptovator]

This type of structure is common in iGaming, where multiple casino brands can operate under the same licensed operator framework while still being managed and operated as separate brands.

LuckyCoin is a separate casino brand with its own management team, commercial setup, product direction and community strategy. The fact that other brands may operate under the same licensed entity does not mean they share the same management, funding, player balances, roadmap or operational standards.

We understand why players look at the broader licence structure, especially in crypto casino communities where trust matters. At the same time, each brand should be judged on its own conduct.

We cannot speak for every other brand operating under the same framework, but we can speak for LuckyCoin. Our focus is to build trust through clear communication, responsive support, fair promotions, reliable withdrawals and a long-term commitment to the community.

Feedback like this is valuable, and we are happy to answer reasonable questions about how the setup works.

Thanks, Tomas

If a couple of casinos operate under the same licence, then aren't they all under one company? I know the brand would be different and management would be different as well, but ultimately they are under the same company. Otherwise, a new company should obtain a new licence. In our country there are a lot of groups of companies that operate different brands under the same licence. We call them 'sister concerns', but the main company is liable for all the sister concerns.

The same goes for your brand; even if your brand is new, if it's been operating under the same licence that has previous issues, then the community would take it negatively. If I understand correctly, then the licence taker is the owner of all the brands and the company is liable for all the brands. Let's see how the community reacts since your old brands have some issues.