That separation only happens here with us and doesn’t get to go out there for most of the narratives.
When people hear the term cryptocurrency, what always comes to their minds is Bitcoin before anything else. Out here, we make that separation to put Bitcoin in a category of its own but, that’s the much we can get with it really.
Most people in the real world are stupid, that is not an argument it is just a descriptive observation of what is around us. What is important is the truth of the matter, regardless of who believes what about it. If people are too dumb to separate a basic concept i.e. the difference between Bitcoin and a shitcoin, perhaps they deserve to get scammed due to their ignorance -- it is a consequence of their own actions. If you want to navigate the world with a low chance of being cheated, you have to learn and grow all the time in order to reduce that probability.
The birth of alternate cryptocurrencies came when bitcoin started its revolution in order to capitalize with its technology. When people realized that lots of people were purchasing altcoins, they suddenly created this rug-and-pull scheme were they would dump tons of supply on the market and sell almost everything after it garnered some price.
Actual rug pulls are not related to the major shitcoins such as ETH, that is reserved for blatantly scam projects often run by anonymous individuals. Therefore, neither is this a new concept nor is there anything special that it should be brought up into mainstream discussion.
While there may be cryptocurrencies that are scams, generalizing that every bit of them is a scam should not be considered. In fact, there are genuine and legitimate cryptocurrencies created for a niche purpose depending on what you need. The key here would be the purpose of the project, the feedback from its investors, and their long-term projected goals that make everything genuine as a whole.
False. 99.9% of shitcoins are scam, and just because a few exceptions exist to the rule that does not mean that not calling them scams is the correct thing to do -- actually based on that data point, only calling them scams is the right thing to do. All the top shitcoins that were funded with money are basically scams.
Adding precision. ETH genesis was 72,009,990 exactly - 60M to ICO (2014), 6M to Foundation, 6M to early contributors. XRP 100B at creation, 80B to Ripple Labs.
BNB same shape: 200M initial, 100M to 2017 ICO, 80M to team, 20M to angel investors.
Pattern repeats across launches.
Not all launches are the same simply because they use the same model, some projects are going to be more scams than others such as ETH and XRP in your example. Going with your example, the current supply of BNB is 134M, ETH 120M.