OgNasty has a history of acting
one way when publicly posting, and acting
an entirely different way when privately posting/interacting. While he continues to shit-post in the sports section for satoshis, brag about his immense wealth, and pose as a benevolent force within the forum by facilitating free giveaways and supporting stroke victims, I would like this thread to serve as documentation for anyone that is interested:
_____________________________________________
If you have been on the receiving end of OgNasty threatening you via a private message interaction (by violence, or otherwise),
or/and,
have been on the receiving end of OgNasty twisting words/order of events of interactions that took place in private messages,
then post here in the following format:
1.) Quote and/or short description of the public lie, misconstruing of, or otherwise false narrative of the interaction taking place in private messages. Add link to post if possible.
2.) Screenshot(s) of the private interaction that transpired which proves the former (1.) to be a lie, misconstruing of, or otherwise false narrative.
3.) Any short comments that you feel add necessary context to help understand/clarify (1.) and (2.).
_____________________________________________
Example of threatening by violence or otherwise in private messages:1.)
As for anonymousminer, he threatened me with violence many times via PM and in my opinion should have been banned for his behavior. I think in a vast majority of internet communities he would have been. A negative feedback is a slap on the wrist and he likely deserved jail time for his threats.
2.)
I have the PMs about you "killing me with your gun" and making threats to my family.
3.) Anonymousminer would clarify how
(1.) is a lie or false narrative if needed. (i.e. who threatened who first?)
Example of twisting words/order of events in private messages:1.)
If you really want to have your mind blown... theymos actually told me NOT to remove the negative feedback rating I left for Lauda.
2.)
I pressured several people to remove inappropriate, unconstructive ratings amongst each other. When OgNasty replied telling me that he perceived real trust issues with Lauda, I responded:
If this is what you believe, then you shouldn't remove the rating, but then it wouldn't be fair for me to pressure Lauda to remove ratings against you. Personally, I find Lauda's history gray, not red. And the trust system is only going to work if there's some level of forgiveness and de-escalation. But if you really believe that Lauda isn't safe to deal with, then you should leave the rating.
Then there was an exchange between OgNasty and Lauda in which Lauda kept a laudably
cool head, and OgNasty was able to reach a point where he could feel OK removing the rating.
The ratings did all end up being removed, which I'm happy with, and I appreciate the willingness to de-escalate and forgive from the people involved in this case. The fact that this issue came up at all indicates that the trust system isn't working perfectly (and I am considering future system changes), but it's still a good outcome.
3.)
I'm sure most would agree that suggests that theymos told him not to remove laudas negative feedback.
Indeed. This clearly suggests theymos told him something like "please don't remove the negative trust you left on Lauda's profile" or even "I agree with you Lauda deserves negative trust as he either scammed or tried to scam".
OgNasty wrote that in a way there's a technicality to avoid explicitly accusing him to lie but, after reading the actual quote and explanation posted by theymos, I now know quotes posted by OgNasty can't be trusted unless I have access to the whole story and have read the whole conversation.
I very much doubt OG would try to mislead the reader to that degree.
I thought that too but I was clearly mistaken. He can mislead to that degree as long as he finds a way to avoid bringing accused of lying.
_____________________________________________
This goes without saying, but adhering to format isn't super-necessary and doesn't have to be precise. It's just a guide. The idea is to
bring light to violent and deceptive behavior. You guys get the idea, so yeah. Have at it, discuss, whatever. Just make it short, simple, and not too overly convoluted.
I'm gunna go eat a taco. Here's a cool quote from a cool person:
Funny how you tell me to report PMs to admins instead of using the tools they provided for me to distrust those who engage in pathetic threats. Admins here don’t do anything but tell you to file a police report. Maybe if you stood up to these abusive users and got some death threats sent to you instead of supporting their behavior then you’d know that already.
I have received death threats and I have reported them. Apparently you
again have no clue what you're talking about and just looking for way to justify your trust abuse. You have a history of sending inappropriate PMs and misrepresenting private conversations so you can't be trusted on your claims about some secret threats.
What any of this has to do with some newbie getting scammed, I have no idea. I guess anytime I comment in this section I can count on suchmoon using it as an opportunity to spread lies and try to get me to remove valid ratings for her extortionist and wannabe tough guy buddies.
Feel free to remove your off-topic posts. Speaking of lies, neither anonymousminer nor minifrij are my "buddies" so trying to paint this as some sort of conspiracy is quite pathetic even by your narcissistic standards.
