lumeire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1009
Next-Gen Trade Racing Metaverse
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:26:41 PM |
|
I have stopped voting for Mintpal ! 22,4% of our friends are going to dump all their coins immediately after listing on Mintpal ! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576303.20Let yourself dumpers vote ! Generally, I have a suggestion! Let's distribute the remaining 80M coins among those participants who still have not sold more than 5% of their coins! Then others will think! When the dump comes, we can at last get some bigger holders. COMM is too evenly distributed at present, needs some big holders to really get motivated on big projects. So I'm saying that developers need to encourage those who keep their coins and we will have BIG holders! Why so afraid of a dump? It's gonna happen even if you don't want it to.
|
|
|
|
jcarl987
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:27:14 PM |
|
I have stopped voting for Mintpal ! 22,4% of our friends are going to dump all their coins immediately after listing on Mintpal ! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576303.20Let yourself dumpers vote ! Generally, I have a suggestion! Let's distribute the remaining 80M coins among those participants who still have not sold more than 5% of their coins! Then others will think! You might be right, but also these people could just be trying to force the price down to buy before it goes in Mintpal. Who knows if the 22% are even holders of COMM.
|
|
|
|
mamamia2014
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:27:28 PM |
|
I have stopped voting for Mintpal ! 22,4% of our friends are going to dump all their coins immediately after listing on Mintpal ! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576303.20Let yourself dumpers vote ! Generally, I have a suggestion! Let's distribute the remaining 80M coins among those participants who still have not sold more than 5% of their coins! Then others will think! When the dump comes, we can at last get some bigger holders. COMM is too evenly distributed at present, needs some big holders to really get motivated on big projects. So I'm saying that developers need to encourage those who keep their coins and we will have BIG holders! That's what's the dev's plan. As the dev said, those who missed the 2nd distribution and still held most of their coins, like me , will be rewarded by another stake.
|
|
|
|
mamamia2014
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:28:51 PM |
|
Congratz COMM reaches 50000 on Mintpal.
+1 Let's still vote. Let's dumpers dump.
|
|
|
|
samysamy1
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:29:30 PM |
|
I'm organizing twitter promo/marketing group for CommunityCoin.
PM me if interested with your twitter name. Also post here quoting this post.
Pm'd you
|
|
|
|
Adriano
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1286
Merit: 1085
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:29:46 PM |
|
Hello Everyone,
I just commited some changes into github to block transactions from the lost wallet. I tried it both in an existing installation and in a fresh one (which requires the blockchain to be downloaded) and it seems to be working ok.
I'd like to have it peer-reviewed and tested by some of you before we build the official wallets.
Thanks,
Adriano
I'm sure you will have thought of this already, but can you confirm that transactions are still blocked if the private key is exported and then imported to a new wallet? Yep, the patch is watching two places: 1. New transactions, not yet in a block. Do not accept any new transaction spent coins tied to that address into mempool (this prevents such transaction being add in block generated by authentic wallets); 2. When receiving a new block, it checks if there are any transactions sent from that address in blocks higher than 28647 (this is the last block containing a valid transaction on the wallet before its key was lost. Adriano
|
--
|
|
|
jcarl987
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:31:54 PM |
|
Hello Everyone,
I just commited some changes into github to block transactions from the lost wallet. I tried it both in an existing installation and in a fresh one (which requires the blockchain to be downloaded) and it seems to be working ok.
I'd like to have it peer-reviewed and tested by some of you before we build the official wallets.
Thanks,
Adriano
I'm sure you will have thought of this already, but can you confirm that transactions are still blocked if the private key is exported and then imported to a new wallet? Yep, the patch is watching two places: 1. New transactions, not yet in a block. Do not accept any new transaction spent coins tied to that address into mempool (this prevents such transaction being add in block generated by authentic wallets); 2. When receiving a new block, it checks if there are any transactions sent from that address in blocks higher than 28647 (this is the last block containing a valid transaction on the wallet before its key was lost. Adriano Ah excellent, so importing a private key still counts as a transaction that shows up on the block chain? I tried to test it myself but still wasn't sure either way. Edit: If this does work then I think you deserve an additional stake or at least some bounty
|
|
|
|
Adriano
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1286
Merit: 1085
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:32:07 PM |
|
I am so happy that devs are close to resolve issue with lost coins, this will throw away all trolls and "exposers" from our path to the moon!
how is it solved?? please account for it , thanks. Best. A patch was applied which blocks any new transactions spending coins on that address. Also this patch doesn't accept blocks which try to spend coins on that address if the block Height is higher than 28647 (last valid transaction was in this block). Adriano
|
--
|
|
|
brightlight
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:32:24 PM |
|
Hello Everyone,
I just commited some changes into github to block transactions from the lost wallet. I tried it both in an existing installation and in a fresh one (which requires the blockchain to be downloaded) and it seems to be working ok.
I'd like to have it peer-reviewed and tested by some of you before we build the official wallets.
Thanks,
Adriano
I'm sure you will have thought of this already, but can you confirm that transactions are still blocked if the private key is exported and then imported to a new wallet? Yep, the patch is watching two places: 1. New transactions, not yet in a block. Do not accept any new transaction spent coins tied to that address into mempool (this prevents such transaction being add in block generated by authentic wallets); 2. When receiving a new block, it checks if there are any transactions sent from that address in blocks higher than 28647 (this is the last block containing a valid transaction on the wallet before its key was lost. Adriano Sounds promising. Do you need help for testing?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:33:46 PM |
|
I have stopped voting for Mintpal ! 22,4% of our friends are going to dump all their coins immediately after listing on Mintpal ! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576303.20Let yourself dumpers vote ! Generally, I have a suggestion! Let's distribute the remaining 80M coins among those participants who still have not sold more than 5% of their coins! Then others will think! When the dump comes, we can at last get some bigger holders. COMM is too evenly distributed at present, needs some big holders to really get motivated on big projects. So I'm saying that developers need to encourage those who keep their coins and we will have BIG holders! Why so afraid of a dump? It's gonna happen even if you don't want it to. yep, let them dump, so we can buy (close to) free coins... (actually what make you think that people answers honestly the poll... crypto is all about market manipulation... )
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:34:12 PM |
|
Adriano, correct me if I'm wrong.
You got a fix. It will be with the new version of wallet, lets say 1.4. So here will be fix only in new wallet. What happens if somebody will use older version of wallet?
That's also my question. I hope all problems have been resolved. Anyway, Thank you for hard work! If someone use the older version his wallet will accept transactions made by that address (if there are any, which probably won't be as that address' privkey was lost). In this case, the block won't be accepted by other clients and won't spread in the network. Adriano Any possible bad luck that coins distributed from this address might disappear from stakeholder wallet?
|
|
|
|
Adriano
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1286
Merit: 1085
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:34:36 PM |
|
Hello Everyone,
I just commited some changes into github to block transactions from the lost wallet. I tried it both in an existing installation and in a fresh one (which requires the blockchain to be downloaded) and it seems to be working ok.
I'd like to have it peer-reviewed and tested by some of you before we build the official wallets.
Thanks,
Adriano
I'm sure you will have thought of this already, but can you confirm that transactions are still blocked if the private key is exported and then imported to a new wallet? Yep, the patch is watching two places: 1. New transactions, not yet in a block. Do not accept any new transaction spent coins tied to that address into mempool (this prevents such transaction being add in block generated by authentic wallets); 2. When receiving a new block, it checks if there are any transactions sent from that address in blocks higher than 28647 (this is the last block containing a valid transaction on the wallet before its key was lost. Adriano Ah excellent, so importing a private key still counts as a transaction that shows up on the block chain? I tried to test it myself but still wasn't sure either way. even importing the privkey on another wallet, what that new wallet will do is sign a transaction trying to spend the coins received in previous transactions, and those transactions are the ones we are monitoring and blocking. Adriano
|
--
|
|
|
SuperKing
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:35:39 PM |
|
WoW, That's great!!! 50K votes, Its a big done!
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:36:14 PM |
|
5068 5072
CM not allowed vEa
now you just need to: 1. Choose a secret phrase 2. Calculate the SHA256 hash of ur phrase ( http://www.xorbin.com/tools/sha256-hash-calculator) and post your hash to the thread
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
*Sakura*
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1005
I wish you all love and profitable investments!!!
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:37:22 PM |
|
I have stopped voting for Mintpal ! 22,4% of our friends are going to dump all their coins immediately after listing on Mintpal ! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576303.20Let yourself dumpers vote ! Generally, I have a suggestion! Let's distribute the remaining 80M coins among those participants who still have not sold more than 5% of their coins! Then others will think! When the dump comes, we can at last get some bigger holders. COMM is too evenly distributed at present, needs some big holders to really get motivated on big projects. So I'm saying that developers need to encourage those who keep their coins and we will have BIG holders! That's what's the dev's plan. As the dev said, those who missed the 2nd distribution and still held most of their coins, like me , will be rewarded by another stake. +100500
|
|
|
|
Adriano
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1286
Merit: 1085
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:40:01 PM |
|
Adriano, correct me if I'm wrong.
You got a fix. It will be with the new version of wallet, lets say 1.4. So here will be fix only in new wallet. What happens if somebody will use older version of wallet?
That's also my question. I hope all problems have been resolved. Anyway, Thank you for hard work! If someone use the older version his wallet will accept transactions made by that address (if there are any, which probably won't be as that address' privkey was lost). In this case, the block won't be accepted by other clients and won't spread in the network. Adriano Any possible bad luck that coins distributed from this address might disappear from stakeholder wallet? I tested for it and it is not supposed to happen. that's because all blocks up to 28647 are valid even if they have transactions signed by that address. Adriano
|
--
|
|
|
Turpomann
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:41:29 PM |
|
I have stopped voting for Mintpal ! 22,4% of our friends are going to dump all their coins immediately after listing on Mintpal ! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576303.20Let yourself dumpers vote ! Generally, I have a suggestion! Let's distribute the remaining 80M coins among those participants who still have not sold more than 5% of their coins! Then others will think! I think real percentage is going to be much higher. Kids who live with their parents and other unemployed will dump as soon as it hits 250 satoshi. I can afford to keep my coins and I'll probably buy more, because I have a real fuckin job!
|
I apologize my rally english. | (COMM) CVHe5HzG61dq7yULUKss9xzYzWzJnenFBN
|
|
|
Adriano
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1286
Merit: 1085
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:46:51 PM |
|
Hello Everyone,
I just commited some changes into github to block transactions from the lost wallet. I tried it both in an existing installation and in a fresh one (which requires the blockchain to be downloaded) and it seems to be working ok.
I'd like to have it peer-reviewed and tested by some of you before we build the official wallets.
Thanks,
Adriano
I'm sure you will have thought of this already, but can you confirm that transactions are still blocked if the private key is exported and then imported to a new wallet? Yep, the patch is watching two places: 1. New transactions, not yet in a block. Do not accept any new transaction spent coins tied to that address into mempool (this prevents such transaction being add in block generated by authentic wallets); 2. When receiving a new block, it checks if there are any transactions sent from that address in blocks higher than 28647 (this is the last block containing a valid transaction on the wallet before its key was lost. Adriano Sounds promising. Do you need help for testing? If you build your own wallet you can already start using it (backup your wallet before just in case), nothing is supposed to change, then check your balance, send and receive some transaction. This would test it for existing installations where blockchain is already downloaded. Another test would be deleting the blockchain and starting the wallet (again, don't forget to backup wallet). Then the same tests as before (balance, sending and receiving) For those who use the windows, linux or osx wallets we will need to wait until they are updated. Adriano
|
--
|
|
|
wasamata
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:48:15 PM |
|
I have stopped voting for Mintpal ! 22,4% of our friends are going to dump all their coins immediately after listing on Mintpal ! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576303.20Let yourself dumpers vote ! Generally, I have a suggestion! Let's distribute the remaining 80M coins among those participants who still have not sold more than 5% of their coins! Then others will think! When the dump comes, we can at last get some bigger holders. COMM is too evenly distributed at present, needs some big holders to really get motivated on big projects. So I'm saying that developers need to encourage those who keep their coins and we will have BIG holders! That's what's the dev's plan. As the dev said, those who missed the 2nd distribution and still held most of their coins, like me , will be rewarded by another stake. +100500 +1013004856485 and me
|
|
|
|
sameev29
|
|
April 19, 2014, 01:49:28 PM |
|
How many coins I can get daily if I start minting from wallet?
it depend on your stake interest is 30% annual Is keeping the wallet unlocked while minting safe from hackers?
|
|
|
|
|