Fake trust by Icopress. 4th because of the $30k match fixing

[nutildah]

Wow, the one person I thought might be on RP's side in these matters:

You did not get these red tags because of the shuffle case.

This is spot on. RP doesn't realize that the more he talks, the bigger of a bullshitter he comes across as. And nobody likes a bullshitter.

What's the verdict on this one, Kaz? Crony? Right, of course. Must be another danged crony. They're just popping up out of everywhere.

[Rating Place]

It is with a heavy heart that i have to say... you have lost the plot. And a long time ago.

Firstly, we should get some things straight.

You did not get these red tags because of the shuffle case. In fact it had absolutely nothing to do with that case.
 snip

Holy gave me a red tag early. The rest piled on during the Shuffle case.

• holydarkness — 2026-04-12: Accuses me of spinning narratives and butchering words.
• nutildah — 2026-05-09: Calls me a relentless harasser of "reputable" members.
• Stalker22 — 2026-05-10 and 2026-05-17: Claims I'm lying, smearing people, and abusing trust as retaliation.
• icopress — 2026-05-21: Mentions harassment.

No one has shown any of the above to be true. Throw out holy because we disagree on sports cases. Who do I harass?

Here's the evidence where it changed from match mixing to something else. The evidence showed no match fixing. In match fixing normally you'll find players with many turnovers or awful shooting. 2 turnovers was the high by any player.

Pato Basquete Box Score

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO
Danilo Penteado	29	14	6	0	0	0	1
Nathan Gomes	22	12	7	1	1	0	1
Tradavis Thompson	23	11	1	4	0	0	2
Michel Souza	22	11	3	1	2	0	2
Grigor Vieira	15	9	6	1	0	0	1
Naka	16	8	2	2	1	0	0
Edu Marília	25	6	14	3	1	2	1
Mateus Oliveira	13	2	3	1	0	0	0
João Fidelis	15	2	4	2	0	0	1
Willker Zonzini	1	2	0	0	0	0	0
Raekwon Horton	14	2	0	1	1	0	0

[nutildah]

Its amazing how this guy just casually plows on after getting swept up in a tornado of his own shit. He's completely unbothered. Simply fascinating.

[Rating Place]

Its amazing how this guy just casually plows on after getting swept up in a tornado of his own shit. He's completely unbothered. Simply fascinating.

I asked you to stay out of the thread. Please stop trolling. I'll make a self moderated thread if you continue to troll.

[Vod]

I asked you to stay out of the thread. Please stop trolling. I'll make a self moderated thread if you continue to troll.

You can always call him something horrible and untrue then ignore him until he removes what he said about you.  Just be careful - that is considered blackmail.  Don't shoot to kill over a simple insult or the escalation will bring you down, not him.  

[T1HGO]

Wow, the one person I thought might be on RP's side in these matters:

I am on the side of common sense. And this has crossed the stupidity line along time ago.

Holy gave me a red tag early. The rest piled on during the Shuffle case.

• holydarkness — 2026-04-12: Accuses me of spinning narratives and butchering words.
• nutildah — 2026-05-09: Calls me a relentless harasser of "reputable" members.
• Stalker22 — 2026-05-10 and 2026-05-17: Claims I'm lying, smearing people, and abusing trust as retaliation.
• icopress — 2026-05-21: Mentions harassment.

Exactly. During. And what does the title of this thread say? "Because". Just because it happened "during" doesn't mean it was "because".

I cannot believe that, with the case already with a closing statement, and you're still talking about matchfix and posting images about it. What the hell does this have to do with anything? What the actual fuck man.

Whenever you react to someone's comment, you should calmly read the whole post, and understand it. Because most of the time, it feels like you read 3 words out of a 15 word paragraph, and draw conclusions from the 3 words you read. Relax.

I already said at the time, holydarkness's tag should have been neutral. Every tag you got afterwards was by your doing and no one else. You kept escalating, thread after thread.

You say you didn't harass holydarkness.

Because you have minimal gambling knowledge, the sports books are playing you and you've become their mouth piece.

This doesn’t change my mind in that holy is a very dishonest person and what he’s doing in scam accusations should be criminal.

Instead of being a fair arbitor, you are playing the book’s lawyer.

Isn't this harassment? Even if everything you said is true, is it with misleading thread titles, unproven claims, misplaced quotes, AI slop without showing prompts, that you expect to convince people you're right?

Imagine if holydarkness or anyone else, went to your casino tier list thread, and questioned every position change you made, and said you were being paid to give A+ to a casino and D- to another. That you were crooked and corrupt with every change. Wouldn't that be harassment?

Every thread you open, you are just drawing attention to yourself. People that were not aware of what's going on, will eventually catch on, and you will keep collecting red tags. Every thread you open, you're closer to a new red tag.

Wake the fuck up man, seriously.

[Rating Place]

Wow, the one person I thought might be on RP's side in these matters:

I am on the side of common sense. And this has crossed the stupidity line along time ago.

Holy gave me a red tag early. The rest piled on during the Shuffle case.

• holydarkness — 2026-04-12: Accuses me of spinning narratives and butchering words.
• nutildah — 2026-05-09: Calls me a relentless harasser of "reputable" members.
• Stalker22 — 2026-05-10 and 2026-05-17: Claims I'm lying, smearing people, and abusing trust as retaliation.
• icopress — 2026-05-21: Mentions harassment.

Exactly. During. And what does the title of this thread say? "Because". Just because it happened "during" doesn't mean it was "because".

I cannot believe that, with the case already with a closing statement, and you're still talking about matchfix and posting images about it. What the hell does this have to do with anything? What the actual fuck man.

Whenever you react to someone's comment, you should calmly read the whole post, and understand it. Because most of the time, it feels like you read 3 words out of a 15 word paragraph, and draw conclusions from the 3 words you read. Relax.

I already said at the time, holydarkness's tag should have been neutral. Every tag you got afterwards was by your doing and no one else. You kept escalating, thread after thread.

You say you didn't harass holydarkness.

Because you have minimal gambling knowledge, the sports books are playing you and you've become their mouth piece.

This doesn’t change my mind in that holy is a very dishonest person and what he’s doing in scam accusations should be criminal.

Instead of being a fair arbitor, you are playing the book’s lawyer.

Isn't this harassment? Even if everything you said is true, is it with misleading thread titles, unproven claims, misplaced quotes, AI slop without showing prompts, that you expect to convince people you're right?

Imagine if holydarkness or anyone else, went to your casino tier list thread, and questioned every position change you made, and said you were being paid to give A+ to a casino and D- to another. That you were crooked and corrupt with every change. Wouldn't that be harassment?

Every thread you open, you are just drawing attention to yourself. People that were not aware of what's going on, will eventually catch on, and you will keep collecting red tags. Every thread you open, you're closer to a new red tag.

Wake the fuck up man, seriously.

holy darkness has admitted to being bias. It was your case. He switched over to the BetPanda campaign while they were having problems. Then he closed your BetPanda case and admitted to being bias.

Give me links to my quotes so I can see what happened. I want to see if holy wrongly backed the player costing him money and threw the first insults.

Name one other person that can be considered harassment by me. On my phone but I look at your links to show what happened.

Thanks again to Vod for the solid advice. I’m still learning the reputation section.

edit- this is our normal conversation.

April 26 case opened.
May 20 is my first post. I try to wait 3 weeks or so before saying anything.

I want to rule out value betting and holy replies with wanting to make a bet.

[T1HGO]

Give me links to my quotes so I can see what happened. I want to see if holy wrongly backed the player costing him money and threw the first insults.

Name one other person that can be considered harassment by me. On my phone but I look at your links to show what happened.

The quotes i posted, if you click them, it will direct you to them,

As far as i know, and saw, you didn't harass anyone else. But, you didn't get the other 3 tags because you harassed the people that tagged you, but because they saw how you were harassing holydarkness. I'm sure your misquotes and topic deflections didn't help either, but i think that was the main reason(feel free to correct if i'm wrong, taggers).

I highlighted the part you say "name one other person..." This to me seems like you admit, you might have gone too far with holydarkness, and can understand how this can be seen as harassment.

This is all started because you disagree with his methods. It is okay to disagree with him. If you want to call him out, call him out with facts. All you have been doing for the past 3 weeks is "ooga booga matchfix". The moment you went to personal attacks, you lost the plot. And i told you this. I told you you were fighting a lost battle. You chose to keep escalating. This is the consquence. This shouldn't be a surprise.

Edit: While i was typing this, you edited your comment. Okay.

April 26 case opened.
May 20 is my first post. I try to wait 3 weeks or so before saying anything.

I want to rule out value betting and holy replies with wanting to make a bet.

(https://talkimg.com/images/2026/05/22/UV8ohP.jpeg) (FORUM: disabled on this page for security.)

(https://talkimg.com/images/2026/05/22/UV840q.jpeg) (FORUM: disabled on this page for security.)

So, out of nowhere, you bring a completely unrelated case to what we've been discussing. What does this has to do with anything being discussed in this thread? Isn't the title of the thread about the 30k case? Does this make any sense?

[Rating Place]

Give me links to my quotes so I can see what happened. I want to see if holy wrongly backed the player costing him money and threw the first insults.

Name one other person that can be considered harassment by me. On my phone but I look at your links to show what happened.

The quotes i posted, if you click them, it will direct you to them,

As far as i know, and saw, you didn't harass anyone else. But, you didn't get the other 3 tags because you harassed the people that tagged you, but because they saw how you were harassing holydarkness. I'm sure your misquotes and topic deflections didn't help either, but i think that was the main reason(feel free to correct if i'm wrong, taggers).

I highlighted the part you say "name one other person..." This to me seems like you admit, you might have gone too far with holydarkness, and can understand how this can be seen as harassment.

This is all started because you disagree with his methods. It is okay to disagree with him. If you want to call him out, call him out with facts. All you have been doing for the past 3 weeks is "ooga booga matchfix". The moment you went to personal attacks, you lost the plot. And i told you this. I told you you were fighting a lost battle. You chose to keep escalating. This is the consquence. This shouldn't be a surprise.

Holy throws punches and I do get caught up at times. I'll look later but my images above show our normal conversation. You cherry picked quotes from 5,000 posts.

No one has gotten their winnings paid by holy in 2 years (from memory) because of his actions. We have overturned his recommendations and players get paid winnings. The only way to get people paid is by showing rules and countering holy. The $30k case got brought to light because it's binding. The same thing has gone on for 2 years. There are fictitious rules and for my eyes only viewing.

[Stalker22]

Holy gave me a red tag early. The rest piled on during the Shuffle case.
~

How about you get your fucking facts straight for once?  Where did you get the delusional idea that my negative trust on your profile has anything to do with your disagreement with holydarkness or the Shuffle case?  Did I ever say or even imply that?

I thought I explained it clearly enough in my reply to your PM.  Just go back and actually read the trust comment and follow the reference link.

[T1HGO]

Holy throws punches and I do get caught up at times. I'll look later but my images above show our normal conversation. You cherry picked quotes from 5,000 posts.

No one has gotten their winnings paid by holy in 2 years (from memory) because of his actions. We have overturned his recommendations and players get paid winnings. The only way to get people paid is by showing rules and countering holy. The $30k case got brought to light because it's binding. The same thing has gone on for 2 years. There are fictitious rules and for my eyes only viewing.

Given the ammount of posts you make a day, it's fair to say i cherry-picked. But i gave 3 as an example only. There are more where you clearly cross the line.

But isn't this also cherry-picking?

No one has gotten their winnings paid by holy in 2 years (from memory) because of his actions.

Because this clearly isn't true.
Have you ever seen a casino, post sensitive information about player's cases, in a public forum board? I haven't.
Genuine question and i expect you do answer it: Do you see a better way, for casinos to show sensitive information about players, that isn't for-eyes-only of a reputable member of the forum? If you have a better idea, i would genuinely like to read it.