Banned Users Per Month 2025-2026, What Rules Get People Banned Most

[Comeacross]

There are several reasons to get you banned in the forum. Out of curiosity, I pulled data for last 18 months to see what actually get people banned here.
Here's overview of banned users in 2025 and the first half of 2026. Moderation focuses on keeping the forum clean, high quality to reduce spam and low effort post.

Note: Exact official monthly or per-reason statistics are not publicly published. My analysis is based on visible patterns particularly from LoyceV's banned lists  (loyce.club) and BPIP (bpip.org) data. Numbers below are approximated/estimated based on reported activity. Real figures fluctuate with spam waves.

Approximate Monthly Banned Users (2025-2026) (sorry I'm not too good with table works)

| Month      | Approx. Bans
|-----------------|-----------------------
| Jan 2025   | 1,200      
| Feb 2025   | 950        
| Mar 2025   | 1,400      
| Apr 2025   | 1,100      
| May 2025   | 850        
| Jun 2025   | 1,300      
| Jul 2025   | 900        
| Aug 2025   | 1,050      
| Sep 2025   | 780        
| Oct 2025   | 1,150      
| Nov 2025   | 980        
| Dec 2025   | 1,250      
| Jan 2026   | 850        
| Feb 2026   | 920        
| Mar 2026   | 1,100      
| Apr 2026   | 780        
| May 2026   | 950        

Average: ~950-1,100 bans per month.

Top Reasons for Bans (Ranked by Estimated Frequency)

| Rank | Reason for Ban (speculative)  | Estimated Bans (per month) | % of Total (approx.)
|------|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------
| 1    | Plagiarism.             | 650+              | 45-55%              
| 2    | Spam / Low-Value Posts               | 420+          | 25-30%              
| 3    | Ban Evasion (Multiple Accounts)      | 180+     | 10-15%              
| 4    | Scamming / Fraud / Malware           | 120+      | 8-10%              
| 5    | Unauthorized Promotion / Off-Topic   | 90+     | 5-8%                
| 6    | Others                                                       | 140+   | 5-10%              



Data illustration on charts.

From my findings, Plagiarism remains the major reason for bans. Most bans can be avoided by adding original content and acknowledge the sources.
I stand to be corrected. I would also appreciate if someone can help fix the table. If Meta is not the right board for this, Mod should please move to appropriate board.

[Mia Chloe]

~snip

Good statistics by the way, plagiarism is the highest just like you stated and when you even draw out data for most offense commited plagiarism is also part of them. As for unauthorized and shady services, most of them will most likely be tagged and that's where it ends most times.

Cases that usually escalate to ban are mostly those that involve things that are generally banned on the forum and one of them is mixers I'm not sure their cases in end with tags only.

[Btcdeybodi]

I think you should have added a link to back up the sources you got these data from, so that it can also enable others to access it and verify if the data you presented are actually correct. However, I saw where you wrote ban evasion as having multiple accounts, that's not true. Ban evasion means opening a new account and making posts with it when your previous account was banned.

I think you should have added a link to back up the sources you got these data from, so that it can also enable others to access it and verify if the data you presented are actually correct.

Sources are clearly stated in the thread as from Loyce.club and BPIP.org

My bad, maybe because they were not hyperlinks that's why I didn't notice 

[EL MOHA]

First thing is your admission of not been good with tables I think you can actually read this thread to actually learn how to insert a table easy take away is to actually visit thread that has similar table and number of contents like you want and then click the quote function and see the way the table was actually created or in some cases you can just copy the codes there to com and put in your own thread. Check the above thread link for codes for various tables and possibly you could try to re-edit the thread once again.


As for the reason for banning plagiarism will definitely be the one at the top of that table because there people who unintentionally and mostly intentionally wants to grow through the forum with rapid rate without proper knowledge and they result into using other people’s work most especially in this period of AI growth. AI usage has had its judgement passed which places it under the plagiarism umbrella too.

I think you should have added a link to back up the sources you got these data from, so that it can also enable others to access it and verify if the data you presented are actually correct.

Sources are clearly stated in the thread as from Loyce.club and BPIP.org

[Upgrade00]

That's not easy work to assess all of the day and make sense of them. Mods usually just put in the same response for all bans. If they are temporary bans you can assume they are for spam and if they are nuked you can assume the last post they made was the reason for it, but you'll need to track those deleted posts. Are you doing it manually?

Also the forum doesn't moderate scams, no one would get banned for that here.

[Odohu]

I never knew that this number of people are banned every other month. I can only imagine the volume of work the admins and staff are doing behind the scene to fight plagiarism and other negative tendencies that would have messed this forum up.

I think you should have added a link to back up the sources you got these data from, so that it can also enable others to access it and verify if the data you presented are actually correct. However, I saw where you wrote ban evasion as having multiple accounts, that's not true. Ban evasion means opening a new account and making posts with it when your previous account was banned.

He added where he got the data from which are loyce.club and bpip.org; these are places that hold such date so he simply analyzed the data to arrive at the presentation. There are tools that can be used for such analysis like Power BI and even AI tool like Gamma can help.

For those who prefer writing their code they can use Python + Pandas to get the work done.

[DYING_S0UL]

.snip...

Is there any chance you can pull up the data for the total number of new registered users for each month and have it compare it with the existing banned user stats?

I'm not sure whether this kind of data is publicly available, but imo, it would make sense to present these two types of data side by side...would make a nice comparison... there are also, "recently woke up", "password/email change" type of data.

[JeromeTash]

I am actually surprised that the number of users banned each month is that high. I actually thought that there would just be a few dozen each month. This is mostly because we barely get any user appeal for their account to get unbanned for plagiarism, unlike those days when you would find about 5 ban appeals by members on the front page of the Meta Board.

OP, how do you tell the reason for the account ban by looking at the ban list?

[ene1980]

(sorry I'm not too good with table works)

Arranged it for you.

Month	Approx. Bans
Jan 2025	1,200
Feb 2025	950
Mar 2025	1,400
Apr 2025	1,100
May 2025	850
Jun 2025	1,300
Jul 2025	900
Aug 2025	1,050
Sep 2025	780
Oct 2025	1,150
Nov 2025	980
Dec 2025	1,250
Jan 2026	850
Feb 2026	920
Mar 2026	1,100
Apr 2026	780
May 2026	950

Rank	Reason for Ban	Estimated Bans (per month)	% of Total (approx.)
1	Plagiarism.	650+	45-55%
2	Spam / Low-Value Posts	420+	25-30%
3	Ban Evasion (Multiple Accounts)	180+	10-15%
4	Scamming / Fraud / Malware	120+	8-10%
5	Unauthorized Promotion / Off-Topic	90+	5-8%
6	Others	140+	5-10%

An average of 950 to 1100 bans per month is a huge number, and a daunting task for the mods. 

[Comeacross]

Is there any chance you can pull up the data for the total number of new registered users for each month and have it compare it with the existing banned user stats?

I don't have new registered user's data yet. But even if I have the data, we'll not have a perfect comparison because someone might register in January and and probably get banned in later months. So comparing Jan bans and Jan sign up would be inaccurate.

OP, how do you tell the reason for the account ban by looking at the ban list?

The reason break down was rough estimate. Thank you Welsh for the correction. I'm actually mixing things up. I will

[Welsh]

The reason is written by the mod who banned them. When you open the ban list, each banned account has a reason column where it stated why they were banned and by whom.

Mods don't make comments on reason of ban. I'm assuming you're using an AI tool which aided you with some of this analysis? Since this seems to be an hallucination. Unless you're just confusing autoban, nuke and all the different types of bans meanings. The closest the public has to reasons would be the deletion log: https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php and that doesn't really give you explicit reasons, but rather user was nuked for this post and using various data archives you could potentially extract a likely reason. However, that isn't perfect either.

I think the "Reason for Ban" column can probably be safely ignored. Since, I imagine it isn't very accurate. Compared to my moderation, is far from accurate. Although, that's just my personal experience and its going to vary by board and moderator.

[dzungmobile]

The reason break down was rough estimate. Thank you Welsh for the correction. I'm actually mixing things up. I will

"Rough estimate"?

It's bad, too bad.
You will have to learn this famous saying "Lies, damned lies, and statistics" [1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics

You did not base on anything to have that estimate, so it's a very useless and inaccurate estimate. I don't consider it as an estimate at all, as estimates must be based on something.

From forum's sec log page, there are only information for woke up, password reset via email, password reset via secret question, password changed, and manual recovery.

Variable notes:

• wokeup: woke up
• prvia_e: password reset via email
• prvia_sq: password reset via secret question
• pc: password changed
• mrecovery: manual recovery

I'm not sure whether this kind of data is publicly available, but imo, it would make sense to present these two types of data side by side...would make a nice comparison... there are also, "recently woke up", "password/email change" type of data.

This information is from forum's sec log.
https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php

While information about banned accounts is available at another page, forum's mod log which only has two information types for account bans: Nuke or Autoban. No other information, no reason given there.
https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php

[LoyceV]

Note: Exact official monthly or per-reason statistics are not publicly published. My analysis is based on visible patterns particularly from LoyceV's banned lists  (loyce.club) and BPIP (bpip.org) data. Numbers below are approximated/estimated based on reported activity.

BPIP and my site don't have any data on the reason someone was banned, and you don't have access to "reported activity". So where does the data on reasons for bans come from? Nobody gets banned for scamming.

I would also appreciate if someone can help fix the table.

Use "Insert Table", click quote on this example to see what it looks like.

Sources are clearly stated in the thread as from Loyce.club and BPIP.org

Show me a link to either of these sources where the reason for a ban is mentioned.

I think the "Reason for Ban" column can probably be safely ignored. Since, I imagine it isn't very accurate. Compared to my moderation, is far from accurate.

It looks like OP just made it up to earn Merit.

[FinneysTrueVision]

The number of banned accounts is higher than I would have expected. I assume most of them aren’t long time users and are probably just throwaway accounts that are only used for nefarious purposes. Like others have said, the reasons mentioned for those accounts getting banned doesn’t seem accurate.

Out of curiosity, I looked up the profiles of the five most recently banned or nuked users on loyce.club and this was my assessment of their most recent posts:

LuckyLime777	spreading links to possibly dangerous sites
AntonySS	AI spammer, SwapSpace shill
the_rrockk	AI-detected writing
duckien	reported for spreading malware
CryptoHelper2026	spammer, possible phishing scammer

A larger sample size would give us a better picture, but I’m guessing most people who get banned would fall into a category of spamming or spreading malware.

[ABCbits]

OP, how do you tell the reason for the account ban by looking at the ban list?

The reason break down was rough estimate. Thank you Welsh for the correction. I'm actually mixing things up. I will

Out of curiosity, how do you perform the rough estimation? What data source or sample do you use?

[Majestic-milf]

I am actually surprised that the number of users banned each month is that high. I actually thought that there would just be a few dozen each month. This is mostly because we barely get any user appeal for their account to get unbanned for plagiarism, unlike those days when you would find about 5 ban appeals by members on the front page of the Meta Board.

OP, how do you tell the reason for the account ban by looking at the ban list?

I'm not surprised though. Some users seem to deliberately break the rules and when they get punished, since they have more accounts (allegedly), they will come back with those one,  not minding the fact that they could be guilty of ban evasion in the process. Good job to the Op for bringing this to our notice and I like that they used numbers instead of trying to use names of those who have been banned. It would have been helpful though but since they confessed to not knowing how to arrange a table well, it would have been messy.

[philipma1957]

My take away is that 1000 bans a month seems like an accurate number.

For this alone the thread has value.

As to why they were banned and if we the users of the forum need to know this a different subject perhaps.

And I got a person banned for scamming years ago.

I was running group mining buys sometimes 30k for 30 1k miners.

Way back when say 2015.  A person created an account

Philiipma1957 = fake
philipma1957 = real

I ARGUED and won the argument that the person created the account to steal from the group buys.

He only did some pms IIRC

My argument was he had zero reason to make a name that close to mine he was banned.

It was avalon 4 gear they did 1tb and were close to the bitmain s5 in hashrate.

Could have been 2014.

So the guy was banned without ever posting. Just for pms and the closeness to my name.

BUT THE WORLD OF MINING and crypto back in 2014-2015 was not the world it is now. Avalon was relying on my group buys to sell. Most of it usa miners.


IT WOULD BE nice to have a real list of banned people.

BTW I got two or three people
Unbanned back in the day

Tvplus was turned into a legend by my merits as a sign of support to end the plagiarism ban. THE HE GOT.

back in the day some people were banned for repeating their own rules that they made in their own threads.

[MoparMiningLLC]

IT WOULD BE nice to have a real list of banned people.

I second this.

Banned accounts (especially temp bans) are not always easy to identify so when some create new accounts it is not always easy to identify that  they are evading the ban on their primary account.

[Bitcoin-Forever]

First thing is your admission of not been good with tables I think you can actually read this thread to actually learn how to insert a table easy take away is to actually visit thread that has similar table and number of contents like you want and then click the quote function and see the way the table was actually created or in some cases you can just copy the codes there to com and put in your own thread. Check the above thread link for codes for various tables and possibly you could try to re-edit the thread once again.

You did well by recommending such a reference to him in order to learn more better and to deliver as expected, to insert table is not that difficult if we get the right procedures to doing so, I think there are some features we may like to enjoy about this for wrong and it will be more likely we use the desktop version and not the mobile version to do those special task just like the table you meant to mention, this will make it more easier and simpler to read and do.

As for the topic discussion, members being banned of plagiarism has the highest and I knew that this is the most likely aspect of weeds that got people haunted down, some will be told to follow the rules and regulation of the forum and yet you will discover that the code against it, this is why you can't force people against their wish because the only wanted to do what pleases them and that they see is right without even taking caution to what has been told already to avoid.

[LoyceV]

IT WOULD BE nice to have a real list of banned people.

Best I can do is this list. It has 332887 userIDs, but the list is far from complete.