Evil Vs good or both for a better economy?

[Promocodeudo]

Well sometimes it is good for bad things to happen, for people to learn, but that doesn't mean that people don't know bad from good. Evil is evil and good is good, we don't need to witness it before we can change. It's often said that we learn from what happens to others, this means that we can avoid bad things from happening to us from afar if we avoid them earlier enough. But sometimes people are tempted to try evil and they later face the rot, that will make them see more reason not to be tempted to do evil.

We can't stop evil from happening sometimes but it is not good for evil to happen even if it has some lessons to teach people I totally don't buy this idea, for sure good and bad can easily be differentiated we know that already, humans are the evil themselves, everything that's happening in the world today is orchestrated by humans wether good or bad it is humans and there's no way these humans won't know that what they are actually doing is evil, practicing evil is a decision and I don't want to believe that someone will say he doesn't know that it will later come back hunting him or her.

[ZAINmalik75]

I have a theory that evil in terms of wars, famine, corruption, hardship etc. are necessary for a better economy. For instance, if people don't see the negativity in evil, they won't respect good. As the only purpose of good is to preserve better things. For such things to be created, evil has to find loopholes in those good things and chaos comes to disrupt. Change happens and good again comes into play and then is preserved.

Hardship creates innovation. When things are hard, humans with intellect or those that hate hardship create a system for ease. Good is only valued when evil is experienced.
For a better economy, competition and conflict are necessary and people will see the negativity in it and choose good to preserve. When greed, corruption or scarcity comes into play, economic growth emerges to tackle those problems. So, without problems, a better society is not possible.

With what I have said, are you of the opinion that for a better economy, good has to be valued as evil forces that to happen?

It's obviously not possible and also not important for the evil to be completely eradicated, but it is also important that it doesn't occupy the most of the space so that the good doesn't get enough space to stay because we know that both have the ability to grow. In society, if there is more bad than good, there will be high chances of the bad part to cover the good part as well and make it bad. Similarly, if there is more good than bad, the good will spread and possibly force the bad to become good as well. That's why, in an economy, it's important for evil to stay but it shouldn't be too prevalent.

In any economy where evil is more widespread than good, there is basically no possibility for the economy to flourish, because the evil won't let that happen, and as I said, the evil will slowly convert the good into bad as well using all the powers they have, and we know that they do have powers, political power, financial power, and these two are enough to turn the good into bad as well.

[SquallLeonhart]

You do need some evil to grow. USA grows with evil, how do you think all of those huge companies became huge and dominated the world market and brought so much money to USA? By playing nice? Jeff Bezos literally works people like slaves, giving them minimum wage, and making them pee in bottles because they can't get a toilet break, and that's how he got rich, but that also allowed USA to have one of the biggest companies.

Or Nvidia who pumps prices of AI stocks and value to max, while not providing anything real, worths biggest amount in the world, biggest company in the world, but have absolutely nothing new to show for, and ruin nations with mining just to make those chips, you think they are actually nice? Or any other, like apple, who uses sweatshops in China (not anymore from what I am hearing) to build their phones. Overall, if it's good for your country, and allows your GDP to grow, most likely that came from someone evil.

[bhadz]

I have a theory that evil in terms of wars, famine, corruption, hardship etc. are necessary for a better economy. For instance, if people don't see the negativity in evil, they won't respect good. As the only purpose of good is to preserve better things. For such things to be created, evil has to find loopholes in those good things and chaos comes to disrupt. Change happens and good again comes into play and then is preserved.

This is why we see some factions that are built in my country to be a type of terrorist that fights the government. But right now, they're now being friendly to the government because they are starting to be a part of it. It sucks and I feel bad looking at it when these factions or groups that have been killing our countrymen as they occupy the boondocks as their base and fights our military. So, we appreciate the fight against them but I don't think that it is necessary to do it, what can make an economy better is about us being united and being patriotic putting our countrymen first and not the politicians and personal interests.

[Abdulzuruku01]

Check all the nations of the world that are first world today they have a dark history of hardship and suffering which they experienced before getting to this place. Countries like the united arab emirate were all desserts, are we to talk about China which was suffering some decades back. America too is not excluded hardship is what actually brings out the best in an individual which translates to the entire nation. If not of hardship places like Singapore will not be as it is so to a large extent you are correct OP that hardship has a way of bringing out the best in a person, people and nation in general.

Honestly I agreed with your point, but the world has reach some peak which is full of high technologies and ideas, and I can't see any reason of practicing evil for the benefit of economic growth, I have understood that some countries are starting wars today just to test their newly developed weapons and to also use that advantage to loot assets of other countries for the benefit of their own economy.  A person can not create a disease or spreading virus that capable of killing millions of people just for the world to develop solutions to it. So For my opinion the world should look for other alternatives for better economy.

[Youngrebel]

Honestly I agreed with your point, but the world has reach some peak which is full of high technologies and ideas, and I can't see any reason of practicing evil for the benefit of economic growth, I have understood that some countries are starting wars today just to test their newly developed weapons and to also use that advantage to loot assets of other countries for the benefit of their own economy.  A person can not create a disease or spreading virus that capable of killing millions of people just for the world to develop solutions to it. So For my opinion the world should look for other alternatives for better economy.

Technology has actually shown its relevance in this gen z era and it has made advancements and human knowledge very easy and I believe with this knowledge there should be better ways to achieve economic growth than through conflict, or making decisions that will end up harming the innocent people in the society .

[Samlucky O]

Surely all this are what makes a country strong, there is no strong country or Nation without scars. There will definitely be something that will happen in one economy or the other which after that they will unite and bond together, they will not allow such thing to happen again knowing the implications of the previous encounters. But that doesn't mean that they must happen everywhere for people to learn. A lot  is happening already in the whole world today, some countries has become one victim or the other while some are yet to happen. But it doesn't mean it must go round doe them to learn. They can learn from others who had same cases in the past.