Reference for flag on Rating Place

[Rating Place]

[...] Admitting to being swayed by money (sig) in the Betpanda case said it all.[...]

Quote me where I admit that I am being swayed by money in betpanda case, be it by sig or any other form.

Somehow I missed this. He continues to tell straight up lies, hoping nobody will notice.

RP, saying something this stupid is enough to get you tagged on its own, don't you understand that? You are continuing to undermine the credibility of someone who is actually trying to accomplish things here without presenting any evidence to back your words. Its been a recurring theme for you, and it still is as everybody can see now.

I don't plan on responding to him any further unless he's telling lies about me, then yeah I'm kind of baited into defending myself unless someone else shows up.

edit: if its not even a very good lie, then I probably won't respond

double-ninja-edit: RP, in the interest of working toward a resolution, here is my offer to you: be nice, respectful and courteous in Scam Accusations for 30 days. If you can do that, I will withdraw my flag.

triple-not-so-ninja-edit: my offer has been rejected so I am withdrawing it, and from future consideration.

BetPanda was having problems. Holy switched his sig campaign to BetPanda and started covering for BetPanda. When the sig campaign ended, holy reopend a BetPanda case saying

“I admit openly that there is a bias in my previous judgment and your question to me made me see in new perspective.”

Yahoo said that the first red trust by holydarkness was borderline trust abuse. You then continued with another red trust and then holy put up a flag and you followed with a flag. Others also followed.

You know what you did is wrong. You really should stop bullying people. It doesn’t affect me but it’s not right to those that monetize their account or trade. It’s also not your right to run new people off the forum.

You think by red tagging someone and creating false flags that it will change someone’s behavior. In your case, it’s  just a form of bullying. Trust is used as a warning, not for bullying.

[holydarkness]

[...]

“I admit openly that there is a bias in my previous judgment and your question to me made me see in new perspective.”

Yahoo said that the first red trust by holydarkness was borderline trust abuse. [...]

yahoo62278 you said that?

[Rating Place]

[...]

“I admit openly that there is a bias in my previous judgment and your question to me made me see in new perspective.”

Yahoo said that the first red trust by holydarkness was borderline trust abuse. [...]

yahoo62278 you said that?

Yahoo

  . The red tag from holydarkness is borderline trust abuse IMO and should be a neutral.
   

No one agreed except Nutildah.

[dragonvslinux]

[...]

“I admit openly that there is a bias in my previous judgment and your question to me made me see in new perspective.”

Yahoo said that the first red trust by holydarkness was borderline trust abuse. [...]

yahoo62278 you said that?

Yahoo

 . The red tag from holydarkness is borderline trust abuse IMO and should be a neutral.
  

No one agreed except Nutildah.

RP please quote users properly so that others don't have to waste their time locating it in future, as well to provide the time-frame and availability of fuller context (such as the 9 pages of discussion over that tag). This quote is otherwise sourced to the following:

The red tag from holydarkness is borderline trust abuse IMO and should be a neutral.

Noting that this was 2 months ago, before receiving another 5 tags, and active flag. Only yahoo can answer if they still stand by that statement or not. A lot has changed since then, like other tags and an active flag. For example holydarkness/nutildah could remove their tags, withdraw their support for the flag, and very little would change apart from being -4 not -6. Trying to pick on holydarkness or nutildah isn't going to convince anyone else here. Nutildah doesn't have the technical ability to remove the flag even if they wanted to... without convincing enough other members to remove their support that is. Ergo, you're not convincing anyone else with your arguments so far. In fact the opposite is true, you are confirming the legitimacy of such tags and flag.

[Rating Place]

[...]

“I admit openly that there is a bias in my previous judgment and your question to me made me see in new perspective.”

Yahoo said that the first red trust by holydarkness was borderline trust abuse. [...]

yahoo62278 you said that?

Yahoo

 . The red tag from holydarkness is borderline trust abuse IMO and should be a neutral.
  

No one agreed except Nutildah.

RP please quote users properly so that others don't have to waste their time locating it in future, as well to provide the time-frame and availability of fuller context (such as the 9 pages of discussion over that tag). This quote is otherwise sourced to the following:

The red tag from holydarkness is borderline trust abuse IMO and should be a neutral.

Noting that this was 2 months ago, before receiving another 5 tags, and active flag. Only yahoo can answer if they still stand by that statement or not. A lot has changed since then, like other tags and an active flag. For example holydarkness/nutildah could remove their tags, withdraw their support for the flag, and very little would change apart from being -4 not -6. Trying to pick on holydarkness or nutildah isn't going to convince anyone else here. Nutildah doesn't have the technical ability to remove the flag even if they wanted to... without convincing enough other members to remove their support that is. Ergo, you're not convincing anyone else with your arguments so far. In fact the opposite is true, you are confirming the legitimacy of such tags and flag.

Sorry, will do it a little later today when I’m at home.




I didn't fight the first flag a couple of years ago because it was from a sportsbet guy that didn't like the rating given to them so they retaliated. Same with neutral.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579974.60

My point.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5585336.0

[nutildah]

You're not doing it right, let me help, there now I believe we've reached the ultimate conclusion:

[Rating Place]

You're not doing it right, let me help, there now I believe we've reached the ultimate conclusion:

I admit when wrong. Being unfamiliar with the reputation section, the way that I’ve posted in reputation has been awful. Because of the false narrative that you’ve created for months, I can understand how others were persuaded.

You caught me in one gotcha moment that I corrected and added that to your smear campaign. What you’ve been posting is far from true.

This isn’t just with me, it’s your pattern. The only two people that I’ve ever had a problem with are you and holy. What I’ve said is true. You treat people totally different based on their rank.