Red trust for nuking a doxx on another forum

[dragonvslinux]

Is this an appropriate use of red trust?



Red trust link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5585350.msg66821527#msg66821527
Neutral trust link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5585350.msg66821644#msg66821644

For reference sake the doxx was indeed nuked by me, there was also this follow up topic regarding it: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=342763.0 (created by reputable member philipma1957 who would be able to confirm it's existence)

Some other members from here who posted in it can also confirm it existed, if there is any doubt. Hate to tag DT member @jokers10 but he can also confirm it existed as another reviewing mod there, should that be necessary.

Pinging current DT members who are sponsoring this tag:
@HostFat, @babo, @Cyrus, @ibminer, @jeremypwr, @stompix, @JayJuanGee, @examplens, @LFC_Bitcoin, @LoyceV, @TryNinja, @Lafu, @icopress, @Lakai01, @YOSHIE, @bullrun2024bro, @Charles-Tim.

Are you all OK with retaliatory tagging against moderators of another forum who nuke doxxing of a member of this forum ? If so, I must be in the wrong place.

Regards,
-dragon

[JustBeKause]

Because he didn't doxx? I read Vod's thread on there. Everything in that thread was already public info. He didn't release anything new. You just needed an excuse to get rid of it because you're tired of Vod vs Og (everyone is), and couldn't stand for it bleeding onto altcoinstalks. At least be honest with yourself. I thought you said you didn't give a fuck about Vod feedback?

I'll see if I can convince him to remove those tags on you dragon. He made them out of stress and anger (I THINK) thanks to Bitcoingirl.club making her thread, Ognasty meriting/bumping tecshare old threads, and pedophile accusations happening (STILL).

Maybe you can put his mind at ease by updating your vod dt strength topic?

[LoyceV]

Pinging current DT members who are sponsoring this tag:

I'm not "sponsoring" this tag, and I like to stay out of any drama coming from that third-party forum.

[bullrun2024bro]

Same here. Not getting involved in 3rd party drama.

[dragonvslinux]

In case there is any confusion here, the trust feedback is on this forum, not on any third party forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1170966

Pinging current DT members who are sponsoring this tag:

I'm not "sponsoring" this tag, and I like to stay out of any drama coming from that third-party forum.

As you yourself wrote, when you include members into your trust list, you are doing so because of the following (emphasis included):

You should add users who left accurate feedback and have good Trust lists to your Trust list, and you should exclude users who leave inaccurate feedback.
This means your Trust list should be based on how you value the users' judgement on others, and it should not be based on whether or not you Trust those users (with money) or traded with them.

The primary question was: "Is this an appropriate use of red trust?" specifically directed towards those who are sponsoring the member providing it. I think that's a pretty reasonable question isn't it? The semantics would agree you are not sponsoring the tag directly, the support is indirect at best, but each DT1 inclusion holds 6-9% of the weight towards it's existence here at present (depending on how you'd like to calculate it). If you agree with the tag, that's fine, thanks for your feedback. If you don't, then you know what to do. I don't understand the diminishment of responsibility as playing any role as that's not how trust lists work on this forum. You are also welcome to argue "the good outweighs the bad", but I shouldn't have to provide justification hand outs to experienced users who know full well how the trust system works here. In absence of an answer to the question, I'll wait for further feedback.

Maybe you can put his mind at ease by updating your vod dt strength topic?

Nobody should have to "earn" a tag to be removed based on completely unrelated activity, that's utterly ridiculous and the suggestion is an abuse of the system in itself. The feedback from each user is either considered accurate by DT1 members, or it is not.