Underdeveloped countries

[Lida93]

One of the major problem of underdeveloped countries is the kind of leader they put in power. A good leader is very important in developing a nation,  but in the case of underdeveloped nation,  they have bad government that don't care about the people or even try to develop the state rather they are more interested in enriching themselves and their families and this has been a major problem for these nations. Underdeveloped nations mostly have greedy leaders,  despite all the resources that these nations have, they still remain poor and underdeveloped, while the politicians are getting rich on the expense of the people. It is such a pity that the people can't even do anything to safe themselves from this leaders.

Underdeveloped countries will remain underdeveloped if they fail to do what is expected of them to do. It's takes a good leadership to develop a country not a selfish leader, voters today know who is here to develop their country but access them by the pocket not experienced they acquired at pass, because whenever people are ready to develop their country they have join hands in speak in voice, looks into pass experience of whoever wants to contest their passed, like their track record and manifestation, someone that will be there to tackle what the societies are facing not the contestants that will only enrich their selves. But today many people don't put all these into consideration rather someone that will share money or someone that is from the same tribe with them and many more.

There's much to fight about on the issue of underdevelopment in the LDCs and the discourse on the citizens uniting to vote in a good leader is rather secondary to the discussion of development than it's taken to be primary cause of the problem of underdevelopment, particularly in the African continent for example. The imperial interventionists in the political and economic dynamics and policies formulation in these countries are more weightier to it cause of underdevelopment than just the citizens been smoked screened to believe that it's because they haven't united to vote in a good leader.

How many of these leaders in these underdeveloped worlds who are dancing to the drum beats of the imperialists that has being attacked or accosted despite how corrupt and bad they are with the governance of their country? But try be the nice guy to your country and stubborn guy to the foreign powers and see how they manufacture ways to truncate the government by making situations difficult for your administration. All this points to the natural resources in these LDCs, most of them are naturally blessed with much rare earth materials that the first world think they deserve to be in control of for supplies to their technological developments.

[Rockson1]

One of the major problem of underdeveloped countries is the kind of leader they put in power. A good leader is very important in developing a nation,  but in the case of underdeveloped nation,  they have bad government that don't care about the people or even try to develop the state rather they are more interested in enriching themselves and their families and this has been a major problem for these nations. Underdeveloped nations mostly have greedy leaders,  despite all the resources that these nations have, they still remain poor and underdeveloped, while the politicians are getting rich on the expense of the people. It is such a pity that the people can't even do anything to safe themselves from this leaders.

When incompetence become the order of the day what do such expect from those in power, when good leaders come into power there decisions and policies will help in developing a country, when you look at those countries that has not tasted good leadership, it is easy to know, we have many of them in African not that the countries are lacking resources for development but because the leaders prioritize embezzlement of public funds to developing the country they are leading, in most African countries, what we have are criminals not leaders and of course criminals will mainly be concerned about themselves every other person should survive if they can, it is so disturbing to see all these things happening in many underdeveloped countries.

[Bitcoin_people]

The reason for poverty in underdeveloped countries is mainly the greed of the government and political parties of the country that does not lead the country towards development. When a corrupt government is in charge of a country, it never sees the sufferings of the people, and does not look at the condition of the country, but rather launders money from the country to keep itself in a good position in a developed country. However, if it wants, a government and political party can develop a country only if they have a plan to reform the rights of the people and the economic infrastructure of the country. But at present, in most countries, the government does not work for the country, but works for itself so that they can go to developed countries and build a house. Therefore, if the government keeps the financial position good in an underdeveloped country, it will go towards development and the government plan must be positive.

[Jessie2121]

Poverty truly exists in underdeveloped countries, even though they are not, in fact, poor countries. They possess abundant resources, but a highly corrupt government makes them underdeveloped and hinders progress and development. I truly wonder how they (the government and officials) in these countries can be so greedy and greedy that they are willing to create a system that tortures and impoverishes their own people. These are truly cruel and inhumane actions and practices.

Nothing can be done, because they simply refuse to accept criticism and suggestions from their own people, due to their utter greed and avarice. Therefore, a country's economy is completely destroyed when it is led by corrupt leaders, government, and officials. They have no plans to develop the nation, they only plan to enrich themselves.

Sometimes we should blame those who are highly in charge of so many important positions in a country for the lack of economic growth of a country, they know how to make things work for the country to come out of hardship but they choose instead to enlarge their pockets than see what can help the people. For me no country are meant to be underdeveloped in any way, everything is already given to a particular set of people to live a more better lives but the greed and evil behavior of men could not allow them to make the rich of the country to be know. All these things are always happening when a set of individuals are the ones to discover how to control the resources of that particular country and they have to trust them to do the right thing which will only end badly for everybody.

It is easier to say that no country should be underdeveloped I mean it is a good thing if that can be possible but the truth is that the power is not in your hands though some countries have the necessarily resources that could transform the country in to a developed country but becomes backward as a result of bad governance from the leadership of the country while some other countries may likely not have the resources in their present time to be become developed and the citizens may likely not know this and overly put the blames on the leadership of their country, I agree with you if all things were to be equal no country should be actually be underdeveloped as no one can forbid good things of life and in aboudance.

The resources are there to be used for the development of a particular country that isn't developed but again I see it as a shift of major power, like those who colonized a country that isn't developed may be the ones calling the shorts whereas the leaders of that particular country can not act against when the superior gives the order, that is how I see it and when this backwardness start happening in not showing concerns in developing the country it gets into the heads of the leaders to keep forgetting what they are suppose to do for their country by focusing more on eating the money and expanding their pockets and it also makes them to stick with making useless decisions with their resources, that is where we place the leaders as bad government but little did we know that their actions was influenced by those who colonized the country, that is how I see it.

[WillyAp]

The reason for poverty in underdeveloped countries is mainly the greed of the government and political parties of the country that does not lead the country towards development.

Most governments abandon their people.
Only the countries like China, North Corea among a few others have a big say in what people do.

[henmark]

Corruption certainly plays a major role in holding many countries back, especially when public resources that should be invested in infrastructure, education, healthcare and economic development are diverted for personal gain.

Indeed. Good leadership and good governance can do wonders. Just look at where Singapore was and where it stands today. Much of its transformation can be attributed to having a patriotic and visionary leader. Yes, I'm talking about Lee Kuan Yew! He transformed Singapore from a poor, resource-scarce nation into one of the world's leading economies. A country where many of the biggest companies are eager to establish a presence.

It's frustrating to see nations with immense natural and human resources struggle while a small group benefits disproportionately, in addition to corruption, w have weak institutions, poor governance structures, historical challenges, conflict and sometimes external economic pressures can all contribute to underdevelopment of a country.

This is why sometimes I feel a good dictator is better than a foolish democracy. I'm not advocating for dictatorship by any means, knowing what's happening in North Korea but at least with a dictator, there is a vision and corruption stops, or at least stops at the grassroots level.

Once the leaders are answerable to the people, the government is on its way to deliver a good term for sure

That and the voters must ask the real questions. I see a lot of countries struggle because they are more concerned about less viable topics, such as religion. They will vote for a corrupt leader because he favours a certain religion.

[WatChe]

When incompetence become the order of the day what do such expect from those in power, when good leaders come into power there decisions and policies will help in developing a country, when you look at those countries that has not tasted good leadership, it is easy to know, we have many of them in African not that the countries are lacking resources for development but because the leaders prioritize embezzlement of public funds to developing the country they are leading, in most African countries, what we have are criminals not leaders and of course criminals will mainly be concerned about themselves every other person should survive if they can, it is so disturbing to see all these things happening in many underdeveloped countries.

In Africa there are countries that are rich in natural resource like Sierra Leone which is famous for its diamond deposits but its still one of poorest country of the world. The reason why Sierra Leone and few other such countries of Africa are poor is because the big powers want to control their natural resource. For this reason they first create civil war in such countries and then send their troops under the cover of UN peace keeping mission. This is also one of sad reality of modern world that countries that talk too much about human rights and equality are also involved in abusing these rights for their own interest.