[AMA] I am a proponent of the BIP-110 (a.k.a RDTS) - ask me anything

[Greg Tonoski]

I am a proponent of the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110 a.k.a. RDTS - Reduced Data Temporary Soft-fork, bip110.org) scheduled for activation in August 2026. I run a Bitcoin node, learn from other Bitcoiners, live a healthy lifestyle. I am male, straight. I am interested in Bitcoin's security, economics and monetary properties.

[Karl_3000]

This is just another bitcoin knot spam, I have been seeing many topics that many of you have been posting which is not necessary at all. If you care about the health of bitcoin, you should know that BIP110 is not necessary at all.

Yes it is good to live a healthy lifestyle but stop spamming this forum with irrelevant BIP110 topics. You can discuss it on a single topic.

[BlackHatCoiner]

I am an opponent of the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110 a.k.a. RDTS - Reduced Data Temporary Soft-fork, bip110.org) scheduled for activation in August 2026.

I run a Bitcoin node, stack sats, bully no-coiners, and my healthy lifestyle is sustained entirely by caffeine, 4L of water and beef. I am as straight male as it gets, and highly aware that this is a Bitcointalk post and not a Tinder bio.

I am interested in Bitcoin's security, economics, and protecting its monetary properties from moronic ideas like BIP-110.

[DaveF]

I am an opponent of the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110 a.k.a. RDTS - Reduced Data Temporary Soft-fork, bip110.org) scheduled for activation in August 2026.

I run a Bitcoin node, stack sats, bully no-coiners, and my healthy lifestyle is sustained entirely by caffeine, 4L of water and beef. I am as straight male as it gets, and highly aware that this is a Bitcointalk post and not a Tinder bio.

I am interested in Bitcoin's security, economics, and protecting its monetary properties from moronic ideas like BIP-110.

Amen. To That.

And do no forget your other thread: How to spot a No-Coiner https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5586295.0
Nobody who has any measurable amount of BTC would ever support 110 or any proposal that could tell them how and where and for what they could spend their BTC on.

But with their 0.2% of blocks signaling support of if this period: https://wickedsmartbitcoin.com/bip110_signaling
And that fact that most knots nodes are going to fork off in 44 days from this post https://jlopp.github.io/knotzi-death-march/
It does not really matter. Since they are going to go off on their own chain. And as the saying goes. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way our.
And you will be welcome in the altcoin discussion part of this forum.

In the next couple of weeks expect to see SHA256 rental prices go though the roof as all the 110 supporters start to rent everything so they can show that there is "support" for it.

-Dave

[PrivacyG]

live a healthy lifestyle. I am male, straight

This got really dubious from one word to another.  Why does sexuality matter in the support for BIP-110?

You BIP-110 supporters are really suspicious people.

[DaveF]

live a healthy lifestyle. I am male, straight

This got really dubious from one word to another.  Why does sexuality matter in the support for BIP-110?

You BIP-110 supporters are really suspicious people.

Well they all seem to be worried about porn stored in the blockchain so you have to figure they are probably in some porn movies that they don't want people to see.
At least that is my guess.

-Dave

[PrivacyG]

Well they all seem to be worried about porn stored in the blockchain so you have to figure they are probably in some porn movies that they don't want people to see.

They are definitely bringing more attention to any porn and 'dick butt jpegs' that is stored on the Blockchain than the Blockchain itself ever did!

[BlackHatCoiner]

Has anyone verified that there's actually a 'dick butt jpeg' embedded in a transaction? Pardon me, but I don't look up porn on the blockchain on my free time, so it may as well not be true.

[DaveF]

Has anyone verified that there's actually a 'dick butt jpeg' embedded in a transaction? Pardon me, but I don't look up porn on the blockchain on my free time, so it may as well not be true.

If there is not we should put some in before 110 splits off so no matter what they will always have to have a copy of it in their blockchain.
*Well probably not since they are going to deem transactions that they don't like not worthy and probably remove them from the blockchain. They can just start from the genesis block and recreate bitcoin with only the TXs they deem worthy.


-Dave

[ABCbits]

Has anyone verified that there's actually a 'dick butt jpeg' embedded in a transaction? Pardon me, but I don't look up porn on the blockchain on my free time, so it may as well not be true.

I don't want to search and verify it, but other people claim there are different kind of questionable or illegal content.

--snip--
It's just an example that i remember right away, there are all kinds of data stored on Bitcoin even since a decade ago[1]. Should i mention that research from few years ago discover some kind of content including hundreds link to child porn[2]? Should i also mention shortly after Ordinal launch, someone use it to add porn/explicit image[3]?

If you run non-pruned Bitcoin full node, your device already store such data.

[1] https://www.righto.com/2014/02/ascii-bernanke-wikileaks-photographs.html#ref14
[2] https://fc18.ifca.ai/preproceedings/6.pdf, section 4.3 Investigating Blockchain Files.
[3] https://crypto.news/bitcoin-ordinals-encounters-explicit-images-days-after-launch/

On a side note, i've verified there's actual malware and malware signature on Bitcoin blockchain. You can verify it on https://mempool.space/tx/85f1bf57386ff71f9e7cde9f6fc347065fa34e95389712fdc2b2fcb205273d8f?showDetails=true.

[Greg Tonoski]

On a side note, i've verified there's actual malware and malware signature on Bitcoin blockchain. You can verify it on https://mempool.space/tx/85f1bf57386ff71f9e7cde9f6fc347065fa34e95389712fdc2b2fcb205273d8f?showDetails=true.

Correct. In that transaction, the malicious spook Peter Todd deployed malware to all the nodes in the Bitcoin P2P network. Immediately afterward, he wrote and posted his tweet: "I just got a 100KvB transaction mined, full of OP_Returns containing the NASTIEST malware and viruses known to mankind, for Dos, Windows, Linux, Android, and MacOS!!!" (https://x.com/peterktodd/status/1965483876731801873). The malware can be used in a multi-stage attack on Bitcoin nodes.

Peter Todd collaborated with other malicious spooks:
- Christian Wind vel Coinjoined Chris (officer in the companies: Seedor GmbH and bitsurance GmbH; both in Germany) who wrote that he paid Peter Todd the amount of 0.001 BTC  to deploy the malware (https://x.com/coinjoined/status/1965138536652570680),
- Michele Morucci vel Metamick (officer in the company Geyser Inc registered in Delaware in a virtual office) who facilitated the money transmission in violation of the Geyser Fund terms (https://x.com/GregTonoski/status/1973771466807357936 and https://x.com/GregTonoski/status/1979567508861427881).

The attack was conducted three months after Bitcoin Core organization (maintainer Gloria Zhao vel glozow, sponsored by Brink) fast-tracked and merged the pull request 32406 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406 by Gregory Sanders vel instagibbs to demolish cap on OP_RETURN data and so further undermining Bitcoin.

In response Bitcoiners proposed the security update Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110 or BIP-444 a.k.a. RDTS) and scheduled it for activation via soft-fork in August 2026.

Are there questions?

[ertil]

Are there questions?

Yes. Why do BIP-110 proponents need so many topics on bitcointalk, about the same thing? I feel like there is no aspect, which is related to that, and was not yet discussed in that topic or another. And if so, then why repeating the same things over and over again is needed? Only after the block 961,632, the situation would be clear, but probably all possible scenarios were already discussed at least once, if not multiple times.

[Greg Tonoski]

I suppose that BIP-110 proponents realize that the improvement activation is important and that's why they open topics and discuss about it.