[AMA] I am a proponent of the BIP-110 (a.k.a RDTS) - ask me anything

[Greg Tonoski]

I am a proponent of the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110 a.k.a. RDTS - Reduced Data Temporary Soft-fork, bip110.org) scheduled for activation in August 2026. I run a Bitcoin node, learn from other Bitcoiners, live a healthy lifestyle. I am male, straight. I am interested in Bitcoin's security, economics and monetary properties.

[Karl_3000]

This is just another bitcoin knot spam, I have been seeing many topics that many of you have been posting which is not necessary at all. If you care about the health of bitcoin, you should know that BIP110 is not necessary at all.

Yes it is good to live a healthy lifestyle but stop spamming this forum with irrelevant BIP110 topics. You can discuss it on a single topic.

[BlackHatCoiner]

I am an opponent of the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110 a.k.a. RDTS - Reduced Data Temporary Soft-fork, bip110.org) scheduled for activation in August 2026.

I run a Bitcoin node, stack sats, bully no-coiners, and my healthy lifestyle is sustained entirely by caffeine, 4L of water and beef. I am as straight male as it gets, and highly aware that this is a Bitcointalk post and not a Tinder bio.

I am interested in Bitcoin's security, economics, and protecting its monetary properties from moronic ideas like BIP-110.

[DaveF]

I am an opponent of the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110 a.k.a. RDTS - Reduced Data Temporary Soft-fork, bip110.org) scheduled for activation in August 2026.

I run a Bitcoin node, stack sats, bully no-coiners, and my healthy lifestyle is sustained entirely by caffeine, 4L of water and beef. I am as straight male as it gets, and highly aware that this is a Bitcointalk post and not a Tinder bio.

I am interested in Bitcoin's security, economics, and protecting its monetary properties from moronic ideas like BIP-110.

Amen. To That.

And do no forget your other thread: How to spot a No-Coiner https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5586295.0
Nobody who has any measurable amount of BTC would ever support 110 or any proposal that could tell them how and where and for what they could spend their BTC on.

But with their 0.2% of blocks signaling support of if this period: https://wickedsmartbitcoin.com/bip110_signaling
And that fact that most knots nodes are going to fork off in 44 days from this post https://jlopp.github.io/knotzi-death-march/
It does not really matter. Since they are going to go off on their own chain. And as the saying goes. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way our.
And you will be welcome in the altcoin discussion part of this forum.

In the next couple of weeks expect to see SHA256 rental prices go though the roof as all the 110 supporters start to rent everything so they can show that there is "support" for it.

-Dave

[PrivacyG]

live a healthy lifestyle. I am male, straight

This got really dubious from one word to another.  Why does sexuality matter in the support for BIP-110?

You BIP-110 supporters are really suspicious people.

[DaveF]

live a healthy lifestyle. I am male, straight

This got really dubious from one word to another.  Why does sexuality matter in the support for BIP-110?

You BIP-110 supporters are really suspicious people.

Well they all seem to be worried about porn stored in the blockchain so you have to figure they are probably in some porn movies that they don't want people to see.
At least that is my guess.

-Dave

[PrivacyG]

Well they all seem to be worried about porn stored in the blockchain so you have to figure they are probably in some porn movies that they don't want people to see.

They are definitely bringing more attention to any porn and 'dick butt jpegs' that is stored on the Blockchain than the Blockchain itself ever did!

[BlackHatCoiner]

Has anyone verified that there's actually a 'dick butt jpeg' embedded in a transaction? Pardon me, but I don't look up porn on the blockchain on my free time, so it may as well not be true.

[DaveF]

Has anyone verified that there's actually a 'dick butt jpeg' embedded in a transaction? Pardon me, but I don't look up porn on the blockchain on my free time, so it may as well not be true.

If there is not we should put some in before 110 splits off so no matter what they will always have to have a copy of it in their blockchain.
*Well probably not since they are going to deem transactions that they don't like not worthy and probably remove them from the blockchain. They can just start from the genesis block and recreate bitcoin with only the TXs they deem worthy.


-Dave