Signature Ban Appeal and Q&A : appeal your sigban here

[Yurkov]

Substandard posting habits considered in the decision to issue the ban include at least two of the following:

- Unoriginal or low effort replies, including inappropriate use of AI content.
- Repetitive, previously-expressed or generic comments that don’t add value or encourage conversation.
- Consistent burst posting (regularly writing posts less than 10 minutes apart).
- Off‑topic posting or shallow engagement (doesn't provide insight, analysis or perspective).
- Posting in principle for signature campaign payment and not for the sake of contributing actual discussion.

If you believe your signature ban is incorrect or you've made some improvement to your posting habits, please feel free to explain your case below.

I'm coming back to the topic because this answer is incomprehensible to me:

It really doesn't matter if you're responding to current situations or not, and there's no specific examples to address. The overall pattern of your posting behavior strongly suggests that you are only here to make signature campaign income..

You think my only goal in posting on this forum is income. I disagree with this. You're making an arbitrary judgment, but I can't prove it to you.
However, everyone can check my post history and judge it for themselves.

Could you please explain which second point of the rules also applies to my posts?

[nutildah]

Substandard posting habits considered in the decision to issue the ban include at least two of the following:

- Unoriginal or low effort replies, including inappropriate use of AI content.
- Repetitive, previously-expressed or generic comments that don’t add value or encourage conversation.

You think my only goal in posting on this forum is income. I disagree with this. You're making an arbitrary judgment, but I can't prove it to you.

You can prove it, by continuing to make posts. I mean, other than just arguing about the sigban.

I've already explained everything to you. Prove me wrong about your motivations, and by the time your ban expires, you won't have anything to worry about anymore.

[Welsh]

nutildah, are you ok with receiving personal messages of potential accounts to look into? I run into a few from time to time which aren't quite breaking forum rules, but are annoying and in my opinion are posting because of signature campaigns and given quite vague / empty replies. Ultimately you might not agree, but I can send some lists every so often. I'd probably wait until there's at least 20 or so (or 100, now that's saying something!) in the list so I'm not sending constant PMs.

[nutildah]

nutildah, are you ok with receiving personal messages of potential accounts to look into?

Sure. Would be great to have input from moderators.

[Yurkov]

You can prove it, by continuing to make posts. I mean, other than just arguing about the sigban.

Okay, I'll do that. But today, you caught my attention more.

I've already explained everything to you. Prove me wrong about your motivations, and by the time your ban expires, you won't have anything to worry about anymore.

You're the only one who thinks you've explained it all. Everything you wrote is just an arbitrary assessment.

[joker_josue]

Something like that. I just decided to add 90-day bans yesterday, and I will probably add a 30-day "warning" ban down the line.

What is the minimum ban duration?

If the idea is to have a thread to appeal to, it means the ban could be reversed before the initially indicated end date, right?

[LoyceV]

I am currently picking the lowest-hanging fruit, and there's a lot of it. No offense meant to the affected, but that's whats going on.

More than half of the accounts that were Sigbanned last night, were on my Ignore list. I'd say you're on to something

Could this be the loophole to these newly introduced controls, anybody that only posts in local boards and outside the lenses of  Nutildah is 100% safe. In short out of sight, is out of mind.

That's true. I'm not gonna attempt to analyze foreign language posts.

Especially on the Tech boards, it's very obvious when "local board users" drop by hoping to earn Merit. Many of them get reported for posting chatbot verbal diarrhea and other unhelpful posts. If they're shitposting on their local board, it's up to their local Mods to deal with it. But once they reach the English boards, they now risk losing their signature.
After years of seeing shitposts, I'm happy to see some real consequences for spammers.

You think my only goal in posting on this forum is income. I disagree with this.
~
However, everyone can check my post history and judge it for themselves.

I did check your post history: you were almost exclusively posting on the Gambling boards, until you got Sigbanned. Since then, you made 13 posts, and none of them about gambling, because you stopped earning from it.

nutildah, are you ok with receiving personal messages of potential accounts to look into?

I could just send my Ignore list, but it looks like nutildah is getting to them already on his own

[Yurkov]

You think my only goal in posting on this forum is income. I disagree with this.
~
However, everyone can check my post history and judge it for themselves.

I did check your post history: you were almost exclusively posting on the Gambling boards, until you got Sigbanned. Since then, you made 13 posts, and none of them about gambling, because you stopped earning from it.

It just so happened that yesterdaay this thread captured my full attention.
I was more about reviewing and opinion about previous posts and confirming that they were spam, unconstructive, unhelpful, and deserved a sigban.
But thanks for your time anyway.