Casinos, players don't only serve for profits.

[len01]

-snip

The problem is from the gamblers as they don't agree that they're addicted that's why it's very difficult for you to help them out and most times the casinos can not do anything hence the features which they have introduced is of no value. Many gamblers do not care about anything else because all they care about is how they can deposit and start gambling.

Hey, this isn't always about addiction, and I don't think I ever said it was. Have you ever seen gamblers who only gamble when they have some money left over?

Not every gambler who ignores features like self-exclusion and similar tools is addicted. Some people only place bets when they have spare money and don't expect anything in return other than enjoying their free time. So if they don't care about those features, that's perfectly understandable.

[iv4n]

Casinos, players don't only serve for profits.

Some players lose, some players win. And the more you spend/wager, the more rewards are waiting for you... whether you win or lose. It's like that...

Many casinos already comply with many new laws, but before that, you need to know your limits. The entire talk about how "casinos" need to "control" you is a foolish thing to think... why do you expect someone to do the things for you? Can you control yourself? That's the important question... are you aware of what happens when you deposit some money to gamble?

[leonair]

Casinos have to worry about the mental and financial health of their players. There has to be a loss limit, lock the account for a week, a month, even forever. On the casino's page, visible for everyone to see on the casino's first page, bankroll management tips, psychological counseling available to help their clients. Because an addicted player who loses a lot of money will probably never want to participate in gambling again, and will become a testimony and example to other people, who will speak bad and stay away from any casino. So the casino that worries about its clients will be well respected, will have more credibility and more profit and will be a highlight in the segment, and with this many more players, the casino will be recognized because it worries about the mental and financial health of its players and doesn't only aim for profit, and will differentiate itself from its competitors positively, everyone wins, casino and players.

Casino sites offer responsible gamblers the option to take a break by locking their accounts for a few days. You can lock your account for a few days if you want. And if you don't find that option, you can message their customer support and lock your account through them. Actually, if you are an addicted gambler, then locking your account will not be a big solution because you can create an account on another platform if you want or create multiple accounts on that platform and gamble. If you want to protect yourself from gambling, then you must have a limit and keep yourself busy with other things to keep yourself away from gambling. Moreover, it is never possible to keep yourself away from a gambling addiction.

[Unsoldier]

Casinos, players don't only serve for profits.

Some players lose, some players win. And the more you spend/wager, the more rewards are waiting for you... whether you win or lose. It's like that...

Many casinos already comply with many new laws, but before that, you need to know your limits. The entire talk about how "casinos" need to "control" you is a foolish thing to think... why do you expect someone to do the things for you? Can you control yourself? That's the important question... are you aware of what happens when you deposit some money to gamble?

I agree that a person should control themselves. But the problem is that there are players who, in a moment of strong emotions, no longer realize that they could lose everything. That is why deposit limits, self-exclusion, and other responsible gaming tools must be mandatory for any casino. They are needed not instead of self-control, but as an extra protection when a person stops thinking rationally.

[Grace333]

Casinos have to worry about the mental and financial health of their players. There has to be a loss limit, lock the account for a week, a month, even forever. On the casino's page, visible for everyone to see on the casino's first page, bankroll management tips, psychological counseling available to help their clients. Because an addicted player who loses a lot of money will probably never want to participate in gambling again, and will become a testimony and example to other people, who will speak bad and stay away from any casino. So the casino that worries about its clients will be well respected, will have more credibility and more profit and will be a highlight in the segment, and with this many more players, the casino will be recognized because it worries about the mental and financial health of its players and doesn't only aim for profit, and will differentiate itself from its competitors positively, everyone wins, casino and players.

What's your opinion?

While this might sound like a good idea do you know that casinos aren't the cause of irresponsible gambling habits? Which means gamblers may likely login to another casino to continue their gambling. What will actually help is teaching gambler the way to gamble responsibly and casino can achieve this by giving gamblers a continuous 10secs tutorial before each time they login that is if casinos truly care about the mental health of their bettors.
Though their profit may reduce if they take on this approach but there would always be profit for them due to the house edge.

[Zlantann]

While this might sound like a good idea do you know that casinos aren't the cause of irresponsible gambling habits? Which means gamblers may likely login to another casino to continue their gambling. What will actually help is teaching gambler the way to gamble responsibly and casino can achieve this by giving gamblers a continuous 10secs tutorial before each time they login that is if casinos truly care about the mental health of their bettors.
Though their profit may reduce if they take on this approach but there would always be profit for them due to the house edge.

Most casinos are out for profit and nothing more. Some reputable ones might want to help users control their gambling activities. With the rate of new casinos that are springing up, it would be unlikely to see many casinos that care about the mental health of gamblers. However, casinos operate under licences and regulations. And some of these laws require them to make provisions that will help users avoid addiction. They have options for bankroll management, self-exclusion, deposit limits, time alerts, and others, which could be helpful to gamblers.

[Nwada001]

What you are proposing is going to be a casino of the future, and such can’t even happen, as they will see it as a means of reducing the possible profit they can make from players. And another thing too is unless licensing authorities add such in their terms, like "before any casino will be licensed to operate, they will make sure they give out enough welcoming warnings to players, which they can read, especially the danger of gambling if one loses control." If not, this might be considered too much by the casino owners.

[Muba20]

Casinos who think about gamblers are undoubtedly appreciable. It is not possible to maintain the popularity of a gambling platform in the long term if it is operated solely with the hope of making profit. Good quality casinos definitely have different policies in place. They set a limit for a gambler to stop. It is not their goal to let a gambler give away all their life's wealth through gambling. Although everyone creates such companies for profit, there is a limitation in it. But there are many casinos that do not have time to think about gamblers or know what is good for them. Their only goal is to get the money into their wallet as quickly as possible. If the gambler can control himself and gamble, it is better and if he ignores it, then he is responsible for it. There are some restrictions for casino companies that are licensed but there are no restrictions or limitations for those that are not license based. It is certainly unreasonable to expect casinos to exercise self-control.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

Casinos have to worry about the mental and financial health of their players. There has to be a loss limit, lock the account for a week, a month, even forever. On the casino's page, visible for everyone to see on the casino's first page, bankroll management tips, psychological counseling available to help their clients. Because an addicted player who loses a lot of money will probably never want to participate in gambling again, and will become a testimony and example to other people, who will speak bad and stay away from any casino. So the casino that worries about its clients will be well respected, will have more credibility and more profit and will be a highlight in the segment, and with this many more players, the casino will be recognized because it worries about the mental and financial health of its players and doesn't only aim for profit, and will differentiate itself from its competitors positively, everyone wins, casino and players.

What's your opinion?

Do you think gambling casinos needs your respect? All they need is your money, and for that reason, it is enough for any individual who wished to venture into gambling to know that he bears the full responsibility of whatever comes out as the outcome of whatever bet been made, and likewise gamble responsibly. Because to be honestly speaking, i literally don't know how will a casino be able to identify who is addicted or not by their betting history, because I'm 100% sure that their are some gambles who won't mind spending $1000 to $5000 daily just to gamble, and they are willing to keep gambling and spending that exact amount gambling daily, simply because they could afford to lose such money. So how will you be able to differentiate such gambler and a regular job seeker who just gamble and lost everything. Because I think that's the reason why gambling casinos initiated the Self exclusion feature on casinos, so that each gambler can be able to turn it on when they feel they are losing too much. Moreover, there have been numerous news about casinos supporting cases of people struggling with gambling and other forms of addictions

[fredericktaylor]

What you are proposing is going to be a casino of the future, and such can’t even happen, as they will see it as a means of reducing the possible profit they can make from players. And another thing too is unless licensing authorities add such in their terms, like "before any casino will be licensed to operate, they will make sure they give out enough welcoming warnings to players, which they can read, especially the danger of gambling if one loses control." If not, this might be considered too much by the casino owners.

It is very important to control emotions through gambling, no matter how strict the casino authorities make the rules and regulations, it becomes very difficult to control an addicted person. If the gambler is not aware of himself through gambling, then no one can save him from the destruction of gambling. To be honest, controlling it through gambling is completely the gambler's own responsibility and it is completely wrong to blame anyone else for it. Gambling is definitely for entertainment, gambling is not right to make quick money, as a result, the risk of losing money increases manifold, so it is very important to gamble with awareness, as a result, self-control can be maintained and one can protect oneself from gambling addiction.

[icebar]

Casinos have to worry about the mental and financial health of their players. There has to be a loss limit, lock the account for a week, a month, even forever. On the casino's page, visible for everyone to see on the casino's first page, bankroll management tips, psychological counseling available to help their clients. Because an addicted player who loses a lot of money will probably never want to participate in gambling again, and will become a testimony and example to other people, who will speak bad and stay away from any casino.

By warnings gamblers are benefited but the casino does not, rather they lose if they want to survive in a competitive business. Some casinos have self-exclusion option. But gamblers have to apply for these. Casinos make gamblers think about such opportunities, gamblers have to make a decision to accept them. It is completely foolish to blame the casino if a gambler consciously gambles and later becomes addicted. A gambler must have a correct idea of ​​​​his limit. He must be aware of how much he will lose and face a big loss. You are the complete controller of your own money. Some casinos have given gamblers the opportunity to lock their accounts for a specific period of time to reduce their addiction. But one should not expect more from casinos in all these matters.

[boyptc]

So the casino that worries about its clients will be well respected, will have more credibility and more profit and will be a highlight in the segment, and with this many more players, the casino will be recognized because it worries about the mental and financial health of its players and doesn't only aim for profit, and will differentiate itself from its competitors positively, everyone wins, casino and players.

They will only worry about the service that they provide to their players. If they have not given the best customer service and experience, that's what they're going to improve.

The business model of casinos are very simple, if you don't have money to gamble with then you're not allowed to enter into their premises. And if it's online, you'll not be able to play their real games unless they have demo-modes and play money.

What you have said are the responsibilities of the players that shouldn't be passed on to the casinos. If we like to be mentally and financially healthy, we won't be gambling.

[ejikeme24]

From what I know, self-exclusion is still the most common tool offered by smaller casinos. Some bigger platforms may have systems that try to detect risky gambling behavior, but many casinos probably will not step in unless the gambler takes action first.

You're right about that, sometimes they don't even need a system to detect it for them, they can easily sense that through the behavior of a gambler. Let's take for example a gambler started with 5$ as Thier fixed amount maybe after going with this amount for some months they decided to increase it to 100$. at this point even without the system detecting it you that is in control of the system would know that it's unusual. But they can't stop you from gambling, instead they will be happy to see that you have increased your stake. I have never seen a casino stopping a gambler for not gambling responsibly, unless the gambler realize that he's literally becoming addicted to gamble and then decide to take self exclusion break.

[retreat]

What's your opinion?

My opinion is that casinos don't care about the mental and financial health of their players. They are businesses, and they are designed to make money from them. Their priority is generating profit, not protecting it. However, since they have regulations, they must comply with rules and regulations to reduce the potential for addiction in gamblers, such as self-exclusion features, betting limits, and various other features. Users can utilize these features to maintain control over their gambling. After all, the responsibility lies with the players themselves. Whether they use these features or not isn’t the casino’s concern.

[coinlary]

Unless there’s a system where players voluntarily sign up for it, allowing them to set a specific percentage of losses at which their account gets locked, that makes sense. But forcing it on every gambler won’t be approved by every gambler.

A system that allows gamblers to exclude themselves from having their losses tracked wouldn’t be bad either, but I don’t think every gambler would like their account to be placed on default tracking.

Both approaches make sense, but the first is more appropriate unless the government introduces a policy that makes it mandatory without any option for exclusion.

[Royal Cap]

Casinos who think about gamblers are undoubtedly appreciable.

A player's first hope should be their own control, not the casino's. Good casinos may offer various responsible gambling tools, but ultimately the player has to make the decision whether to use them or not. Most of the time, no one uses them.

It is certainly unreasonable to expect casinos to exercise self-control.

Exactly, casinos are a business, so their goal is to make a profit. But at the same time, a player should also understand that ultimately the responsibility for controlling their bankroll and emotions is their own. It is a bit like the wine bottle saying Drinking kills..

[uneng]

What's your opinion?

My opinion is that casinos don't care about the mental and financial health of their players. They are businesses, and they are designed to make money from them. Their priority is generating profit, not protecting it. However, since they have regulations, they must comply with rules and regulations to reduce the potential for addiction in gamblers, such as self-exclusion features, betting limits, and various other features. Users can utilize these features to maintain control over their gambling. After all, the responsibility lies with the players themselves. Whether they use these features or not isn’t the casino’s concern.

I agree with you. You described how things work for real, threfore, gamblers can't wait for casinos to protect them, neither anyone else. It's up to gamblers to protect themselves and become responsible for their own decisions and the consequences implied. In an ideal world, things could be different, but we don't live in an ideal world, so we have to adapt ourselves to the circumstances in order to avoid threats and prejudices.

[Ryu_Ar1]

Casinos have to worry about the mental and financial health of their players. There has to be a loss limit, lock the account for a week, a month, even forever. On the casino's page, visible for everyone to see on the casino's first page, bankroll management tips, psychological counseling available to help their clients. Because an addicted player who loses a lot of money will probably never want to participate in gambling again, and will become a testimony and example to other people, who will speak bad and stay away from any casino. So the casino that worries about its clients will be well respected, will have more credibility and more profit and will be a highlight in the segment, and with this many more players, the casino will be recognized because it worries about the mental and financial health of its players and doesn't only aim for profit, and will differentiate itself from its competitors positively, everyone wins, casino and players.

What's your opinion?

This rule is even now starting to be echoed by Singapore where they carry out strict regulation of gambling including some of the things you say as restrictions.

https://www.ncpg.org.sg/services/overview-of-exclusions-and-visit-limit
https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/153/841bb0bf-d6e9-4f86-9b66-36ab986da6fe/annex-a-media-factsheet-on-safeguards.pdf


So that in this case the casino that wants to have a license inevitably have to follow the existing regulations.
This is the part that must be followed because inevitably when they operate in a country because after all the government rules even though they do not make casinos or gambling as something illegal but on the one hand they must also have a policy on this matter.

[Odohu]

Casinos understand this concerns you raised and have even made efforts to help those who may be having issues with their gambling. For instance, casinos have demo version that people can gamble for fun rather than using money to gamble. In addition to this,  casinos also have self exclusion which some already mentioned. Those creations were made to help people facing the problem of gambling addiction.

[|MINER|]

Casinos have to worry about the mental and financial health of their players. There has to be a loss limit, lock the account for a week, a month, even forever. On the casino's page, visible for everyone to see on the casino's first page, bankroll management tips, psychological counseling available to help their clients. Because an addicted player who loses a lot of money will probably never want to participate in gambling again, and will become a testimony and example to other people, who will speak bad and stay away from any casino. So the casino that worries about its clients will be well respected, will have more credibility and more profit and will be a highlight in the segment, and with this many more players, the casino will be recognized because it worries about the mental and financial health of its players and doesn't only aim for profit, and will differentiate itself from its competitors positively, everyone wins, casino and players.

What's your opinion?

I think there is lots of casino who have the feature that name is self exclusion, the gambler could use that on that platform when there were in excessive gambling, but it should be realise from the inside of that gambler otherwise it will not be stay for long run because there is also example that player bypass  that or started gambling on the others platform.

And about the psychological counselling I can't remember but I have already saw that kind of things were also promote in gambling platform. So these are already staying on gambling sites, but my main question is, are they really being used here? Or are they just a show-off to show off? So that customers will increase? Although businessmen will not want to reduce their revenue.