Did he copy chatbot output without even check the format? Anyway, any reader who's not familiar with this eCash fork should start by reading
https://thebitcoinmanual.com/articles/ecash-fork/ instead. IMO the drivechain addition is interesting, but re-distribute half of eCash coin that assumed to be mined by Satoshi to other people is controversial choice.
But their Discord server is very active, if you can tolerate some of the members posts (or read them for the lols), you can consider joining to get the latest news.
I wont post a link though.
I won't ask for discord link, but how is it compared with discussion on GitHub (such as
https://github.com/bitcoinknots/bitcoin)?
Looking at the eCash thing it's 1000x better then 110. Or as of now at least gives the appearance of it.
Plans, testing, strategy, replay protection. We can disagree with it, but it's being done in a way that lets them go off and do their own thing without any of the crap that 110 is doing.
And, they don't even claim they are
BTC. Why? Probably because they are mature adults with a team that knows how things work.
Looked at the knots Discord server. It's about a dumb as you would expect. More of less an echo chamber of a bunch of people telling each other that they are #1 and are going to take over
BTC and the 99% of the people who are on the old chain are going to be wrong. You can't help these people.
I would give more sympathy to the stupid, and misinformed who were merely influenced and manipulated by people who were supposed to look after them. I would still laugh at them and tell them "I told you so", BUT to hope that something bad happens to another person is definitely not good.
2 different groups.
If you were as you say "stupid, and misinformed" then yes I do have some sympathy.
There are very very very very few of them from what I can see.
Most are like the ones we see here. PepeLapiu, Greg Tonoski, and a couple of others. Just spewing out their crap. Full on cult members.
-Dave