Bitcoin Forum
August 14, 2026, 05:41:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Successor of Vlad2Vlad, Julien_Olynpic source merit abuse at CHAMBY meme token  (Read 941 times)
Lucius
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4060
Merit: 7712



View Profile WWW
August 13, 2026, 01:10:54 PM
 #21

~snip~
 Shocked Shocked you're taking the forum seriously. As long as the accusations are true, you shouldn't be afraid to post them from your main account. There are a few reasons to create an alt account, and this certainly shouldn't be one of them.


I think the OP did the right thing by doing this with the alt account, because the people he touched are very vindictive if someone gets in their way. What's strange to me in this case is that the admin didn't notice anything considering that this has been going on for a long time, and he checks the merits sources from time to time.

This is already the third case of a malicious merit source in a short time, and there are likely to be more.

notocactus
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 5114


Glory to Ukraine!


View Profile
August 13, 2026, 03:18:51 PM
 #22

This is already the third case of a malicious merit source in a short time, and there are likely to be more.
Only removed, no demerit action on spammers that are not deserved with their ranks.

Five years are long time enough for ranking up many spammers.

From 21171 sourced merit in 30 days to 34139 merits in 30 days, it was about 13k increase and it has last for about 5 years. Even now, total sourced merits each 30 days are still much higher than the figure in June 2020.

More source merits, more merits per merited post while quality looks to not increase, but decrease significantly and there are actually reasons.

Dataset
Code:
     +----------------------------------+
     |      date   meritsource   smerit |
     |----------------------------------|
  1. | 01aug2026            85    30972 |
  2. | 07jun2025            88    33138 |
  3. | 15sep2024           109    33190 |
  4. | 01may2024           109    32990 |
  5. | 22mar2024           108    32890 |
  6. | 28nov2023           109    33140 |
  7. | 31jul2023           109    33940 |
  8. | 11jul2022           110    33989 |
  9. | 06jul2021           111    34139 |
 10. | 28jun2020            97    21171 |
There is currently no such thing as a "demerit". I'm hoping that the positive merits alone will be fine. I could add demerits pretty easily later on if necessary, though.
When?
I'm still thinking about ways to resolve this issue, possibly involving rejiggering how merit works.

 
 b1exch.to 
  ETH      DAI   
  BTC      LTC   
  USDT     XMR    
.███████████▄▀▄▀
█████████▄█▄▀
███████████
███████▄█▀
█▀█
▄▄▀░░██▄▄
▄▀██▄▀█████▄
██▄▀░▄██████
███████░█████
█░████░█████████
█░█░█░████░█████
█░█░█░██░█████
▀▀▀▄█▄████▀▀▀
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 22470


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2026, 06:14:37 PM
Last edit: Today at 07:47:02 AM by LoyceV
 #23

What I have done is to leave a neutral tag.
Should the former Merit source receive a similar tag?

¡uʍop ǝpᴉsdn pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇᴉʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool no⅄
Free Market Capitalist
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 3614



View Profile
Today at 07:27:20 AM
Last edit: Today at 07:39:34 AM by Free Market Capitalist
 #24

What I have done is to leave a neutral tag.
Should the former Meric source receive a similar tag?

Off, course, the Meric source should also receive a tag. In the heat of the moment, I didn't think about it—thanks for bringing it up.

By the way, Julien_Olynpic is on DT2 having sent only 3 feedback in ten years of the forum and with this trust list:



I'm going to distrust him

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████▀█▀████████████████▀████████████████▀█████████████████████████████▀████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀██████▀█████▀████████▀█████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████▄█▄████████████████▄████████████████▄█████████████████████████████████▄██████▄█████▄████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
 
 🍒   ⚽️    IIIIIFASTEST GROWING CASINO & SPORTSBOOK     Play Now    
BitBakerr1
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 533



View Profile
Today at 10:45:41 AM
 #25

We only have power to determine how we send out our merit, but we don’t have the power to determine how we receive merit.
We can only abuse the merit system from how we send out our merit and not how will receive, because we don’t determine how we receive merit, except you are receiving from your AIt account.

If I received more merit from a particular person, and the sender is not connected to me as my AIt account, have I done something wrong or has my account gone against the forum for receiving more merit from an individual in a particular thread.

If I’m investing and promoting a particular crypto coin, and in the course of my discussion about the crypto coin in the appropriate board, and I receive merit from a particular person more, and the sender is not my AIt or from my local board. Should I also be blamed for receiving more merit from that individual.
Do I have the power to determine how and from whom I receive merit from?

 
█▄
R


▀▀██████▄▄
████████████████
▀█████▀▀▀█████
████████▌███▐████
▄█████▄▄▄█████
████████████████
▄▄██████▀▀
LLBIT▀█ 
  TH#1 SOLANA CASINO  
████████████▄
▀▀██████▀▀███
██▄▄▀▀▄▄████
████████████
██████████
███▀████████
▄▄█████████
████████████
████████████
████████████
████████████
█████████████
████████████▀
████████████▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████
████████████
███████████
██▄█████████
████▄███████
████████████
█░▀▀████████
▀▀██████████
█████▄█████
████▀▄▀████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████
████████████▀
........5,000+........
GAMES
 
......INSTANT......
WITHDRAWALS
..........HUGE..........
REWARDS
 
............VIP............
PROGRAM
 .
   PLAY NOW    
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3808
Merit: 11666



View Profile WWW
Today at 11:05:11 AM
 #26

If I received more merit from a particular person, and the sender is not connected to me as my AIt account, have I done something wrong or has my account gone against the forum for receiving more merit from an individual in a particular thread.

If I’m investing and promoting a particular crypto coin, and in the course of my discussion about the crypto coin in the appropriate board, and I receive merit from a particular person more, and the sender is not my AIt or from my local board. Should I also be blamed for receiving more merit from that individual.
Do I have the power to determine how and from whom I receive merit from?

You're not to blame, but also Free Market Capitalist's neutral tag makes sense. I don't think it would stop you from pursuing whatever it is you want to do here. You'll soon find out how much you (and everyone else commenting in the thread) really love this coin when you stop getting merits for posting about it.

1864jXLSdbZq319oQScCNG1m7nLYbGHuBX
Free Market Capitalist
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 3614



View Profile
Today at 11:19:00 AM
 #27

...

As nutildah's says, my feedback makes sense, I am just stating a fact.

I am pretty sure the sender is more to blame, but I don't know about the receivers, like you. Sometimes we see things like this that are just the tip of the iceberg, we start digging and digging, then we find much more.

If you are respecting the forum's rules and are able to earn a certain amount of merit in the future, I am open to delete the feedback, but it will take some time. I can understand it annoys you to have it on your profile but it won't stop you participating in signature campaigns or anything like that.

█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████▀█▀████████████████▀████████████████▀█████████████████████████████▀████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀██████▀█████▀████████▀█████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████▄█▄████████████████▄████████████████▄█████████████████████████████████▄██████▄█████▄████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
 
 🍒   ⚽️    IIIIIFASTEST GROWING CASINO & SPORTSBOOK     Play Now    
lovesmayfamilis
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2912
Merit: 5794


🧿🌿🕊️


View Profile
Today at 12:54:01 PM
Last edit: Today at 04:01:36 PM by lovesmayfamilis
 #28

...

As nutildah's says, my feedback makes sense, I am just stating a fact.

I am pretty sure the sender is more to blame, but I don't know about the receivers, like you. Sometimes we see things like this that are just the tip of the iceberg, we start digging and digging, then we find much more.

If you are respecting the forum's rules and are able to earn a certain amount of merit in the future, I am open to delete the feedback, but it will take some time. I can understand it annoys you to have it on your profile but it won't stop you participating in signature campaigns or anything like that.

So that others don't get offended. Grin

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3663803
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3745258

I think your tags on these two accounts are also fair. And it looks like they were trying to advertise the token quite actively.

Reading this promise, I was reminded of the oath that doctors or military personnel take. Let’s check this account: how will it fulfill its promise when the flow of merits for its profile posts stops? Cheesy


Am always keen in participating and supporting this project (Chamby Token) by contributing to the success of the project in any means or way I can, as it has been a promise that I have made to myself since I arrived in this community and I will do by definitely honouring my promise.

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!