⚠️ SCAM ALERT - SHUFFLE.COM STOLE MY $17,000 ⚠️

[Rimi Mav]

⚠️ SCAM ALERT - SHUFFLE.COM BLOCKED MY $17,000 AFTER VERIFIED STATUS ⚠️


SHUFFLE.COM, RELEASE MY $17,000 NOW.

I deposited, I played, I won over $17,000. You refuse to pay.

Here is the exact timeline, with proof:

€28 withdrawal: APPROVED INSTANTLY. No liveness. ✅
$17,000+ withdrawal: BLOCKED. Liveness demanded. ❌

My account was fully verified L1/L2/L3 on 28 July 2026. Marked "Verified" on your platform. ID + proof of address already approved.

So why liveness only now?

This is KYC Inversion:

    Deposits: No friction
    Small withdrawals: No friction
    Large winnings: BLOCKED

You take money without controls, you block winnings with controls.

Why this is illegal under YOUR OWN license:

You are Natural Nine B.V., License OGL/2024/1337/0628 Curaçao Gaming Control Board.

Your own license requires AML/KYC to be proportionate and risk-based. My risk did not change between my €28 withdrawal and my $17k withdrawal. Same account, same name, same IP. Approving one and blocking the other is discriminatory.

Under EU law and Curaçao rules, you cannot retain funds without legal cause. This is unjust enrichment.

📸 I HAVE ALL THE PROOF:

    Screenshot account Verified L1/L2/L3 - 28 July 2026
    Screenshot €28 withdrawal - approved instantly
    Screenshot KYC status - Verified
    Screenshot demand for liveness - only for $17k

And I provided MORE than a selfie, which proves nothing:

    Screen recording of me logging into the OFFICIAL Sogedo website with MY personal credentials
    Official PDF water bill from Sogedo site, with my name, address, IBAN matching my KYC

A fraudster can fake a face. He CANNOT have my Sogedo login.

WHAT I PROVIDED:
✅ Passport
✅ Proof of address
✅ Verified account since 3 weeks ago
✅ Video proving I am the bill holder

WHAT YOU PROVIDED:
❌ Silence
❌ New obstacles
❌ Double standard
❌ Blocked $17,000

WHAT I DEMAND: RELEASE MY $17,000 NOW.

⚠️ WARNING TO PLAYERS: DO NOT DEPOSIT ON SHUFFLE.COM

They will:

    Accept your deposits freely
    Let you play
    Block your withdrawal when you win big

Complaints filed:

    Curaçao Gaming Control Board
    AskGamblers
    Casino.Guru

If this happened to you, post below. I have link to similar case: bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5558371.0


#ShuffleScam #KYCInversion #Shuffle




This is what https://casino.guru/shuffle-casino-review says about Shuffle Casino.

On https://casino.guru/shuffle-casino-review Shuffle has Safety Index 4.8 LOW.

On https://casino.guru/shuffle-casino-review it shows 9,429 black points for high value of withheld winnings.

Check https://casino.guru/shuffle-casino-review yourself. All complaints on https://casino.guru/shuffle-casino-review are the same: L3 verified, small amount paid, big amount blocked with fake liveness.

My case is on https://casino.guru/shuffle-casino-review - $17,770 - Domi01 - 22 Aug 2026.

Everything is documented on https://casino.guru/shuffle-casino-review.

[Rimi Mav]

UPDATE - Email from Gregory, Shuffle Support, 21 Aug 21:08:

This is where Shuffle destroys its own case.

Gregory says:

    "Your proof of address is not clear and not approved"

LIE. My Sogedo bill was approved 28 July 2026 for L3. And same bill was used to APPROVE my 28€ withdrawal SAME DAY 21 Aug. How can same document be clear for 28€ and not clear for $17k? Screenshot proof attached.

    "Liveness check indicates male individual vs female ID"

LIE BY OMISSION. My account was granted L3 on 28 July WITHOUT any liveness. My 28€ withdrawal was approved 21 Aug WITHOUT any liveness. Liveness only requested AFTER I won $17k.

Sumsub link used: https://in.sumsub.com/websdk/p/cUko6kQZm7iLdI3z

Sumsub does NOT keep video under GDPR, only text log "gender mismatch". Shuffle has NO photo of a male. They have a log that says "male 68%". I am a woman with very short hair, my son was next to me during check. AI misclassified.Shuffle allowed deposits, allowed play, granted L3, paid 28€, all without liveness. Now they use liveness as excuse to block $17k.

Under LOK Article 35, KYC must be done BEFORE allowing play, not after a win.

Shuffle = win-based KYC = illegal.

📸 Proof added: Gregory email + L3 verified + 28€ approved.



https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/08/22/U5Za1l.jpg
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/08/22/U5ZXe1.jpg
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/08/22/U5ZwfW.jpg
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/08/22/U5ZuGm.jpg

[Nathrixxx]

I can only see that they are complaining that your proof of address cannot be verified. When issues like this happen, it may be because you are unable to clear the KYC level that permits you to make such a huge withdrawal. I advise you to try withdrawing a smaller amount to see if you will be granted access or not.

[Rimi Mav]

Screenshot account Verified L1/L2/L3 - 28 July 2026

KYC, AML and CFT monitoring and all KYC procedures  must be clearly described in the initial T&Cs to curb abusive, last-minute checks at withdrawal. Under new LOK framework, CGA states all KYC procedures must be clearly described in initial T&Cs to curb abusive, last-minute checks at withdrawal. My L3 was granted 28 July before any big win, re-requesting same KYC after $17,770 win violates LOK.

Under CGA LOK 2024 framework, CGA guidance states: "KYC, AML and CFT monitoring — and all KYC procedures — must be clearly described in the initial T&Cs to curb abusive, last-minute checks at withdrawal" and "Operators are now required to implement KYC checks before account activation".

In my case:

    KYC was fully implemented and account activated with L1/L2/L3 on 28 July 2026.
    No additional KYC was listed in T&Cs for large wins.
    On 21 Aug 2026, after $17,770 win, operator performed abusive last-minute check, re-requesting same proof of address (SOGEDO) already approved 28 July and re-approved via 28€ withdrawal same day, and inventing Sumsub gender mismatch without human review.



https://agbrief.com/news/world/09/04/2026/curacao-tightens-tcs-rules-under-new-lok-framework/

"they are discouraged from introducing additional friction unless strictly required under AML/CFT obligations, a direct response to industry complaints about withdrawal delays being disguised as compliance checks."


Additional proof - CGA official policy 09 April 2026 reported by AGB: Source: https://agbrief.com/news/world/09/04/2026/curacao-tightens-tcs-rules-under-new-lok-framework/ Quote: "they are discouraged from introducing additional friction unless strictly required under AML/CFT obligations, a direct response to industry complaints about withdrawal delays being disguised as compliance checks." My 28€ withdrawal approved instantly same day with same SOGEDO bill, $17,770 blocked same bill = withdrawal delay disguised as compliance check = prohibited under new LOK T&Cs policy.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

LOL, bunch of nonsense actually. They can ask for KYC at any time. If you don't like the TOS (apparently you didn't bother to read them), don't play there.

Sure, the thing with reuploading the address document is annoying, but it is what it is. If you did nothing wrong and nothing is wrong with your ID, your address and your face then there shouldn't be a problem.

Nothing is stolen yet, they just ask you for verification because you are in profit, every site does that once a player is in the green, guess that's the first time for you.

By the way, why do you have your kid on the screen while doing a KYC video thing? That's stupid and strange. Scammer before brought this excuse like "oh my mother was next to me" and blabla. If you do something serious then you know you have to do it alone. 

You can talk smart with all the laws and license articles and whatever, that doesn't help you. Only a successful KYC solves this matter, plain and simple.

[DPHOR]

This is actually so sympathetic with how they happens to accept those details when your balance where low, but as you have doubled your account and make winning it has now became a thing to carefully monitored to know if there is any illegal gambling or not. However, this not something new anymore as I have seen complainant came from gamblers to them in regards to their balance as well while trying to make withdrawal from the gambling site, they would find one problems or the other in order to limit and stop them from having that particular amount got withdrawn from them. I would like to mention Holydarkness over here to look into this case if there would any assistant that could come from him, but note in mind that there is no guaranteed that he may solved it for you but just try your best you could be lucky if he would have their direct contacts.

[Rimi Mav]

LOL, bunch of nonsense actually. They can ask for KYC at any time. If you don't like the TOS (apparently you didn't bother to read them), don't play there.

Sure, the thing with reuploading the address document is annoying, but it is what it is. If you did nothing wrong and nothing is wrong with your ID, your address and your face then there shouldn't be a problem.

Nothing is stolen yet, they just ask you for verification because you are in profit, every site does that once a player is in the green, guess that's the first time for you.

By the way, why do you have your kid on the screen while doing a KYC video thing? That's stupid and strange. Scammer before brought this excuse like "oh my mother was next to me" and blabla. If you do something serious then you know you have to do it alone.  

You can talk smart with all the laws and license articles and whatever, that doesn't help you. Only a successful KYC solves this matter, plain and simple.

Thanks but outdated info. This is not 2022 master licence era. LOK since Dec 2024.

Facts, not opinions:

    L3 verified 28 July (highest level)
    28€ withdrawal approved 21 Aug with SOGEDO bill
    $17,770 withdrawal blocked SAME DAY 21 Aug claiming same SOGEDO bill "not clear"
    Account now restricted/suspended, $17,770 held hostage, cannot play

CGA policy 09 April 2026 (LOK):
"The CGA has issued detailed policy guidelines governing T&Cs" [...] "they are discouraged from introducing additional friction unless strictly required under AML/CFT obligations, a direct response to industry complaints about withdrawal delays being disguised as compliance checks." Source: https://agbrief.com/news/world/09/04/2026/curacao-tightens-tcs-rules-under-new-lok-framework/

Also: "KYC procedures must be clearly described in initial T&Cs to curb abusive, last-minute checks at withdrawal."

This is not "KYC at any time". LOK requires risk-based, proportionate, transparent. Same IP, same payment, same country, same doc = no risk change. Approving 10€/28€ but blocking $17,770 = profit-based, not risk-based = prohibited.

@holydarkness would appreciate if you can look. Case Domi01 - Shuffle OGL/2024/1337/0628 - CGA case already filed. L3 + 28€ vs $17,770 same day = clear LOK violation.



Shuffle T&Cs violation:

Shuffle T&Cs states "We reserve the right, at any time, to ask you for KYC documentation if we deem it necessary... for any other purpose" Source: https://shuffle.com/info/terms

This clause is non-compliant with CGA new T&Cs guidance April 2026 which requires KYC procedures must be explicitly described in initial T&Cs to curb abusive last-minute checks at withdrawal. "At any time for any purpose" is vague, disproportionate, not risk-based, and directly prohibited by new LOK policy.

[Rimi Mav]

Official Shuffle T&Cs Section 4.1: "We reserve the right, at any time, to ask you for KYC documentation if we deem it necessary in order to determine your identity, location or age, or for any other purpose." Source: shuffle.com/info/terms

This exact clause is now prohibited under new LOK (Dec 2024) and CGA T&Cs guidance April 2026:

CGA says: "KYC, AML and CFT monitoring and processes are explicitly set out in initial T&Cs to prevent operators applying extra measures at withdrawal" and "they are discouraged from introducing additional friction unless strictly required"

My case:

    28 July: L3 verified with documents only. Account status = CONFIRMED / VERIFIED. No liveness requested at that time. That means per Shuffle's own practice, KYC was complete.
    21 Aug: 28€ withdrawal APPROVED with SOGEDO bill.
    21 Aug SAME DAY: $17,770 withdrawal BLOCKED claiming same SOGEDO bill "not clear" + suddenly requiring liveness.
    Now: Account restricted/suspended, $17,770 held hostage, cannot play.

Question: If my documents were insufficient, why was L3 confirmed 28 July without liveness? Why 28€ approved 21 Aug same bill? Why suddenly insufficient only for $17,770?

Under LOK, liveness if required must be requested at L3 inception (28 July), not 1 month later only on big win. Approving small and blocking big with same doc = profit-based, not risk-based = Article 35 LOK violation.

Domi01 - OGL/2024/1337/0628 - CGA case filed.

@holydarkness

[Rimi Mav]

Does Shuffle T&Cs even mention liveness can be requested in these conditions?

No.

T&Cs 4.1 says: "We reserve the right, at any time, to ask you for KYC documentation if we deem it necessary in order to determine your identity, location or age, or for any other purpose."

Where is liveness mentioned? Where is "1 month after L3 confirmation"? Where is "SOGEDO bill must be ultra clear"? Where is "small withdrawal approved, big withdrawal same doc blocked"?

Nowhere.

CGA T&Cs guidance April 2026: "KYC, AML and CFT monitoring and processes are explicitly set out in initial T&Cs to prevent operators applying extra measures at withdrawal. They are discouraged from introducing additional friction unless strictly required."

And LOK Article 35: Proportionality. No discrimination based on profit.

If Shuffle wanted to be able to request liveness 1 month after L3 verified, they had to explicitly write it in T&Cs at inception: "liveness check may be required for withdrawals over $X even after L3 confirmation".

They didn't. They wrote a vague "at any time for any purpose" clause which is now non-compliant and prohibited under LOK.

Therefore the $17,770 block is based on a non-compliant T&Cs clause and an abusive last-minute check.

Domi01 - OGL/2024/1337/0628

Proof sent.

Formal CGA complaint filed today for $17,770 held hostage.

Shuffle T&Cs 4.1 "at any time for any purpose" = non-compliant with CGA April 2026 guidance which requires explicit KYC procedures at inception to curb last-minute checks at withdrawal.

L3 confirmed 28 July docs only.
28€ approved 21 Aug SOGEDO.
$17,770 blocked same day same SOGEDO "not clear".
Account restricted.

24h deadline given to Shuffle compliance to release funds before I publish CGA case number and escalate to CasinoGuru.

Domi01 - OGL/2024/1337/0628

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/08/22/U5nRlT.jpg

[Woodie]

This is the hurdle I hate about gambling,  you deposit your personal funds without any fuzz but when the time to withdraw comes they choose to make it a nightmare for its customers, so annoying !!

Anyway two things :

• First take a deep breath and remember at this point Shuffle has leverage over you, that L3 proof of address you used to withdraw  your 28€, why don't you give them an updated proof of address and see where this goes..sometimes it's miscommunication that can be holding your money, try play along.
• Secondly,  review your Sumsub records because any document updates will affect the kyc process especially if on record docs are expired or anything in those lines.

Do check your sumsub account to if everything checks out https://id.sumsub.com/

[Rimi Mav]

This is the hurdle I hate about gambling,  you deposit your personal funds without any fuzz but when the time to withdraw comes they choose to make it a nightmare for its customers, so annoying !!

Anyway two things :

• First take a deep breath and remember at this point Shuffle has leverage over you, that L3 proof of address you used to withdraw  your 28€, why don't you give them an updated proof of address and see where this goes..sometimes it's miscommunication that can be holding your money, try play along.
• Secondly,  review your Sumsub records because any document updates will affect the kyc process especially if on record docs are expired or anything in those lines.

Do check your sumsub account to if everything checks out https://id.sumsub.com/

Thanks for the advice, but you missed the core issue here.

According to Shuffle's own official KYC guide dated July 29, 2026:

    "Authenticity check (liveness) [...] are both extremely rare and only requested under exceptional circumstances."

My facts:

    L3 confirmed with documents only on July 28, no liveness
    Aug 21: SOGEDO bill APPROVED for €28 withdrawal
    Aug 21 SAME DAY SAME DOCUMENT: SOGEDO REJECTED for $17,770 withdrawal + liveness requested

So my question is: what "exceptional circumstance" occurred between my €28 withdrawal and my $17,770 withdrawal on the same day, same document, to justify this "extremely rare" check by their own definition?

There is none. The only difference is the amount.

If liveness is "extremely rare", why is it triggered 1 month after L3 confirmation only when I win big, while the same document was approved hours earlier for a small amount?

This is not a miscommunication. This is profit-based discrimination, prohibited by CGA Guidance April 2026 and LOK Art 35 Proportionality.

Formal complaint already filed with CGA under license OGL/2024/1337/0628. I will not provide a new document and legitimize their non-compliant demand.

[Slow death]

Would you mind telling me how much money you deposited into the casino that made you win that $17,000? I've seen some cases on this forum where people deposited small amounts of money and managed to win a lot of money on SHUFFLE.COM, and to be honest, I've started to be very suspicious of their great luck.
I'm not accusing you of anything, but could you show us pictures of your deposits and winnings so we can see if everything is alright?

Maybe the casino noticed something strange and that's why they insist on this KYC thing, and after that I believe things like "we are investigating your account" will appear to see if you cheated. Casino games rarely have large consecutive wins, but strangely I've seen some people using SHUFFLE.COM win large amounts consecutively and in short intervals. That's why I'm curious to know how much you deposited in your case.

[Rimi Mav]

Would you mind telling me how much money you deposited into the casino that made you win that $17,000? I've seen some cases on this forum where people deposited small amounts of money and managed to win a lot of money on SHUFFLE.COM, and to be honest, I've started to be very suspicious of their great luck.
I'm not accusing you of anything, but could you show us pictures of your deposits and winnings so we can see if everything is alright?

Maybe the casino noticed something strange and that's why they insist on this KYC thing, and after that I believe things like "we are investigating your account" will appear to see if you cheated. Casino games rarely have large consecutive wins, but strangely I've seen some people using SHUFFLE.COM win large amounts consecutively and in short intervals. That's why I'm curious to know how much you deposited in your case.

I won't share deposit history publicly. My account is L3 verified since 28 July. Same address doc was accepted for a €28 withdrawal on 21 Aug, and rejected same day for $17,770 with a new liveness request. I have video proof of the doc source + native PDF, both sent to CGA. This is a LOK 33.2 compliance issue, not a gameplay issue. Awaiting CGA decision.

[Rimi Mav]

SHUFFLE.COM OGL/2024/1337/0628 - DOCUMENTED CONTRADICTORY KYC WITH WRITTEN PROOF FROM GREGORY


1. COMPLAINANT Domi01 $17,770 - rimimavro1912@gmail.com - French

    28 July 2026: KYC L3 VERIFIED via Sumsub. French ID + Sogedo. Status GREEN Approved. Shuffle confirmed L3.
    21 Aug 2026 14:32: Withdrawal €28 PAID by Shuffle with SAME French ID + Sogedo. Proves KYC valid.
    21 Aug 2026 SAME DAY 14:32: Withdrawal $17,770 BLOCKED with SAME docs.
    21 Aug 2026 21:08 PM (7 hours after €28 paid): Email from Gregory from Shuffle (screenshot gregory.jpg) - 14 hours ago - claiming:

    "Justificatif de domicile : Le document fourni n'est pas suffisamment clair/lisible pour que nous puissions vérifier les informations requises. Veuillez fournir un nouveau justificatif de domicile clair et lisible montrant votre nom complet, votre adresse résidentielle, la date du document et l'entité émettrice."

    "Vérification de vivacité/identité : Le résultat de la vérification de vivacité est incohérent avec le document d'identité soumis. Plus précisément, le contrôle de vivacité indique un individu masculin, tandis que le document d'identité fourni concerne une personne de sexe féminin. Cette divergence doit être résolue"

    "votre vérification KYC n'a pas encore été réussie, et nous ne pouvons donc pas libérer le retrait à ce stade."

This is FALSE and proves contradictory KYC under new Curaçao LOK:

How can same Sogedo be clear enough to PAY €28 at 14:32 and not clear enough at 21:08 same day to block $17,770? LOK Art 3.1 and 4.2 forbids retroactive invalidation after payment.

How can account be "KYC not yet successful" on 21 Aug 21:08 when it was L3 VERIFIED on 28 July? Shuffle already allowed deposits and play for 3 weeks after L3.

Gender mismatch "masculin vs féminin" is pretextual - Same French ID used on Stake.com to withdraw $150,000 in under 2 hours with no gender issue.

2. PROOF OF SELECTIVE SUPPORT - Sunday 23 Aug 15:22 - 0 MINUTE

    15:22: Email from huberweb69@gmail.com "Je voudrais deposer 1 BTC sur Shuffle, je fais comment?"
    15:22 (0 MINUTES): Reply from Brooklyn from Shuffle "Bonjour, Après avoir terminé le L1, veuillez vous rendre dans la fenêtre Portefeuille et sélectionner l'onglet Dépôt..."

scam.jpg shows 4:22 PM (1 minute ago) question, 4:22 PM (0 minutes ago) answer.

Same Sunday, support answers deposit in 0 min, ignores 10+ emails rimimavro1912@gmail.com for $17,770.

Breach LOK Art 6.1 complaints handling.

3. PATTERN - PLATINUM 1 verzisor69 $34,426 BLOCKED

Player verzisor69 - PLATINUM 1 - Top VIP, hundreds of thousands wagered:

    -$15,191 In review
    -$19,235 In review
    Total $34,426 blocked In review.

If PLATINUM 1 blocked for $34k, it's not KYC, it's win-blocking. Even best customers scammed.

4. COMPARISON & LINKS

    Same French ID: Stake $150k in 2h OK
    https://casino.guru/shuffle-casino-review Safety Index 4.8 Low 9,429 black points
    Bitcointalk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5592031.0
    Licence OGL/2024/1337/0628 accepting French without ANJ

5. EVIDENCE ATTACHED

    gregory.jpg - Gregory from Shuffle Fri Aug 21 9:08 PM claiming domicile not clear + gender mismatch + KYC not successful while L3 was verified 28 July and €28 paid same day 14:32
    L3 28 July Sumsub green
    €28 paid 21 Aug 14:32
    $17,770 In review
    verzisor69 PLATINUM 1 $34,426 In review
    Stake $150k 2h
    scam.jpg Brooklyn 0 minute
    10+ ignored emails log

Contact Domi01 rimimavro1912@gmail.com

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Somehow the whole thing sounds/smells fishy. All the barrage of text from a person claiming to be a woman, but somehow it feels different. Does somebody else here have the same feeling or is it just me? 

The whole behavior feels off to me somehow, but of course I can be wrong.

Speaking about shuffle, they are a big site and I don't think they do this for no reason, because they don't have to. Maybe it's just a big misunderstanding, but also maybe it's not.

[Rimi Mav]

Somehow the whole thing sounds/smells fishy. All the barrage of text from a person claiming to be a woman, but somehow it feels different. Does somebody else here have the same feeling or is it just me?  

The whole behavior feels off to me somehow, but of course I can be wrong.

Speaking about shuffle, they are a big site and I don't think they do this for no reason, because they don't have to. Maybe it's just a big misunderstanding, but also maybe it's not.

You say fishy? I will show you what is fishy.

Fishy 1 - Same docs, 2 different decisions same day Fri Aug 21:

    14:32 - Shuffle PAYS €28 with my French ID + Sogedo domicile = docs CLEAR, L3 verified since 28 July
    21:08 - Same day, same docs, Gregory from Shuffle says in email gregory.jpg: "Justificatif de domicile pas suffisamment clair/lisible" + "Vivacité indique masculin vs document féminin" + "KYC n'a pas encore été réussie" to block $17,770 Domi01

Same docs CLEAR at 14:32 for €28 and NOT CLEAR at 21:08 for $17,770 same day? This is fishy, yes, but from Shuffle.

Fishy 2 - 0 minute vs 3 days:

    Sunday Aug 23 15:22 huberweb69@gmail.com: "I want to deposit 1 BTC" → Brooklyn from Shuffle replies in 0 minute (screenshot scam.jpg 4:22 PM 1 minute ago + 4:22 PM 0 minutes ago)
    Sunday Aug 23 15:22 rimimavro1912@gmail.com Domi01 $17,770 withdrawal + PLATINUM 1 verzisor69 $34,426 (-$15,191 and -$19,235 In review) → 0 reply for 3 days since Gregory email Aug 21 9:08 PM

Same Sunday, deposit 1 BTC = 0 minute AI/bot reply, withdrawal $17,770 = 3 days ghost? This is fishy, yes, but from Shuffle.

Fishy 3 - Casino.guru Safety Index 4.8 Low:

https://casino.guru/shuffle-casino-review - 9,429 black points. Not me who gives 4.8, it's Casino.guru independent. Is Casino.guru fishy too?

Fishy 4 - About "claiming to be a woman":

My KYC is L3 verified since 28 July with French ID female, vivacité female, Sogedo female. Stake verified same docs and paid $150k in 2h. Shuffle says "vivacité indicates masculine vs feminine document" - my voice is low, I am a woman. Is my voice fishy? Is French ID fishy?

I have proofs, screenshots, emails, L3 date, €28 paid, Gregory email. The guy saying "fishy" has 0 proof.

Shuffle is big site yes, they don't have to scam for $17,770? Then why they block PLATINUM 1 verzisor69 $34,426? Even their biggest VIP In review?

If it's misunderstanding, why no reply since Fri Aug 21 9:08 PM? Why AI replies 0 minute for deposit on Sunday but no human for withdrawal?

I sent everything to tips@coindesk.com + news@theblock.co + complaints@cga.cw OGL/2024/1337/0628.

Domi01 rimimavro1912@gmail.com
L3 since 28 July - $17,770 blocked