biggerz scam casino. closed account without any reason to steal winnings 6.75btc

[aleks86]

Hello aleks86,
I wasn’t aware of your case until yesterday, when a forum member sent me a PM about it. I’ve since spoken with the management, and they are working with Casino Guru to resolve the issue. Hopefully, we’ll see some positive developments in your case soon.

While I was reading the comments from users I found you had issues with other casinos too. Especially they got my attention to the following sites:

I played whole days. In result I had balance about 41000 usd.

2up.io casino scam 41000 usd:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5573145.msg66358223#msg66358223
2UP.io: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3730494

One day i won more that 24000 usd

500play.com SCAM SITE: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5467820.0
UserU: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1452494

this casino metaspins scammed me with amounth more that 180 000 usdt.

metaspins casino scammed me with amount more that 180 000 usdt: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5500582.0
Metaspins.com: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5416178.0

500casino approved withdraw only after casino guru accepted complaint. Now casino guru are absolutely unfair site. betsofa.com scammed me with 15000 euro, but casino guru closed complaint.
At this moment only vavada.com and bspin.io make withdraws without dirty unfair tricks. this is 2024 year reality.

You had issue with betsofa.com too
I could not find any Ann from them on the forum yet.

Can you update me the status of all four cases above that happened with you?

As far as I’m concerned, I don’t think anything good will come of this. For nearly four months, the VIP manager kept telling me that everything was fine and that I would receive my winnings. Then the casino realized that I wasn’t going to lose my money and that I actually wanted to receive it (withdraw it).

Either they’ll manage to fabricate some kind of evidence, or they’ll just be left with a 3.0 rating; I suspect that, under no circumstances, do they want to send me my money.

It’s the same thing as 2up.io, only the amount was different. When my balance reached around 50k USD, they asked me what strategy I used to win that kind of money (I just played video slots, and only video slots). Absurd

about betsofa casino and complaint about 15-17k euro, there casino closed, they do not respond and lawyer said that no any reason to try to get money back.

[aleks86]

I’m also curious about this point mentioned in the review on CasinoGuru, is this an official statement from biggerZ (verifiable)?

casino wrote that they will apply limits, 10k per day, 40 per week, 100 per month. on April they approved about 65000 euro, from the end of April I do not received any withdraw. At this moment balance is about 360000 euro.

I was under the impression that this matter had reached a final resolution and that no further reviews would take place. Alternatively, could it be that biggerZ intends to adopt this approach only if the OP passes the review?

if you are gambler you know this tactics so good. when you got huge win casino apply withdraw limits, only for one reason, to push you to gamble again and again, and in result to loose all balance. This time I found enough strength not to do it. In result, at first, they wrote that there was a delay, but that everything was okay. Then, three months later, they closed my gaming account, claiming that they had, in fact, discovered some kind of fraud.

Biggerz is scam casino.

[aleks86]

This scheme would be presented by "smart users" at a certain point. Something similar we have seen with coldcard/trusted services.
It's evident that if a website confirmed as scam continues to be depicted as "legit team we are in contact" create a fake image of trusted service.
Just matter of time, this is an experiment to verify the amount of trusted users/reaction of real users to all of these scams.

We talk a lot about decentralization and at the end we have to follow as "trusted" users "by default" that at best would present well known scammers.
Frogbet, scoras, lizex now biggerz, I don't care they are in contact with scammers. This would not change anything and is really worst they think people have to deal with them.

You can check other references online K*w*farm the same "groups" of guys have been clearly described years ago and are still around here...  
Personally I would consider any of these sites they will endorse as like as the same to make a donation to some keyboardwarrior - it's much more probably you will get scammed/waste time and not have any profit.

Add these guys to your trust list, it would help more to get scammed - or maybe you can be the next guy scammed.

...
Nowadays, nobody pays any attention to scam accusations anymore. It’s clear that there’s a double standard at play. You just have to pay more, and everyone turns a blind eye.

Still now https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5596833.0 They cannot answer on how to avoid the 6th consecutive scam by the same scam casino!
For 1xbit they was red-tagging users that was showing their signature. Nowadays there is a clear support on these scammer operators.
It has been created an easy way that they are providing scams and even if you get scammed you can't complain - or worst, some users would not enjoy some of these "promotional scam".
@aleks86
They are "working" with the third party to find a way to hide your complaint/find a way to not pay you. This is an huge sum. They can't prove even to have this amount but they show to be able to pay for it.
Don't be optimistic on this, as you can see they are starting to find something in your previous post history just to depict your gambling habit something bad that lead to not get a payout.

Of course, they will find out that I had issues with withdrawals at other casinos as well—because the casino market is full of fraudulent casinos. And these fraudulent casinos are friends and colleagues of Biggerz.

[Murat]

Create a type 3 flag using this link <>

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;addflag=3770783

A red warning will appear on their profile and ANN thread. I think many users are un aware of their scam.

Create the flag asap if you want them to negotiate with you.

[AB de Royse777]

they asked me what strategy I used to win

How I can get my casino betting history, I do not know I have just few screenshots, where I got winnings 50k, 100k, 140k, 180k, 240k

I have a few questions I’d like to ask, and I expect honest answers. Please understand that I have been provided with certain details regarding the case, and the management is working on reopening it with Casino Guru based on this information. Some of the supporting evidence is confidential and cannot be shared publicly, so I hope you can understand that not all details can be disclosed in the forum.

BiggerZ conducted an extensive investigation into your entire gaming history, reviewing a total of 69,135 rounds played between December 2025 and May 2026. During this investigation, they identified a highly structured and repetitive betting strategy that was focused almost exclusively on a single game.

May I know the name of the game you played? That particular game represents 94% of your activities. You were repeatedly playing at very high stakes.
Could you also share the high stakes per bet you played? I have even given the average speed per round you go with too.

Whenever you loss your balance, you would redeposit and repeat the exact same pattern. As soon as you hit a major win, you would immediately drop your stakes to €5–€15. BiggerZ identified the exact sequence across 199 separate runs. In 45 out of 57 runs involving a win of 100x or more, you stopped the high-stakes sequence on the exact winning round.

I asked them why would then they paid you €65,000?
According to them those were part of their previous attempts to resolve the situation. That time they did not go deeper of the case. Offering you the settlement at that time do not mean that their investigation cleared your activity or that they accepted all your winnings as legitimate. Their final decision later wasn't based on the fact that you won €226,702 in a single round. It was based on the full investigation including your repeated playing patterns. There are more flags involved but let's discuss these later.

[aleks86]

they asked me what strategy I used to win

How I can get my casino betting history, I do not know I have just few screenshots, where I got winnings 50k, 100k, 140k, 180k, 240k

I have a few questions I’d like to ask, and I expect honest answers. Please understand that I have been provided with certain details regarding the case, and the management is working on reopening it with Casino Guru based on this information. Some of the supporting evidence is confidential and cannot be shared publicly, so I hope you can understand that not all details can be disclosed in the forum.

BiggerZ conducted an extensive investigation into your entire gaming history, reviewing a total of 69,135 rounds played between December 2025 and May 2026. During this investigation, they identified a highly structured and repetitive betting strategy that was focused almost exclusively on a single game.

May I know the name of the game you played? That particular game represents 94% of your activities. You were repeatedly playing at very high stakes.
Could you also share the high stakes per bet you played? I have even given the average speed per round you go with too.

Whenever you loss your balance, you would redeposit and repeat the exact same pattern. As soon as you hit a major win, you would immediately drop your stakes to €5–€15. BiggerZ identified the exact sequence across 199 separate runs. In 45 out of 57 runs involving a win of 100x or more, you stopped the high-stakes sequence on the exact winning round.

I asked them why would then they paid you €65,000?
According to them those were part of their previous attempts to resolve the situation. That time they did not go deeper of the case. Offering you the settlement at that time do not mean that their investigation cleared your activity or that they accepted all your winnings as legitimate. Their final decision later wasn't based on the fact that you won €226,702 in a single round. It was based on the full investigation including your repeated playing patterns. There are more flags involved but let's discuss these later.

I played my favorite game  which is named All lucky clovers 100, the largest bet in this casino was 140 euro, with such bet I gained max win, that day that was 226702 euro. yes, I like to play with highest possible bet, and I played this slot in most casinos. This slot allows for bets ranging from a small amount up to 140 euros. Yes, I play with varying bet sizes - perhaps exactly as described. Others might not play this way, but it’s not against the rules. And when I lost, everything was fine

I didn't quite follow your point about the high and low stakes. Are you suggesting that this slot is broken, or what?

I see that you have indeed gained some access to my gaming history; I would be happy to share my experience of playing.

[AB de Royse777]

I played my favorite game  which is named All lucky clovers 100

That's correct. Thanks for being honest with this part.

I didn't quite follow your point about the high and low stakes.

Let me rephrase it for you to understand it better. You start your game with x,y,z stake per bet which is comparatively high stake than usual gamblers gamble if you win then you drop your stake to €5–€15 per bet. In the process if you start to lose while playing with the stakes, you redeposit and continue. The pattern is structured and repetitive.

You already mentioned one stake amount

the largest bet in this casino was 140 euro

Like the game name could you please tell what other stakes size you prefer when starting with the high stakes?

I see that you have indeed gained some access to my gaming history; I would be happy to share my experience of playing.

Yes, indeed. Unlike others, I’m approaching you with an understanding of the situation rather than making assumptions out of ignorance.

[aleks86]

I played my favorite game  which is named All lucky clovers 100

That's correct. Thanks for being honest with this part.

I didn't quite follow your point about the high and low stakes.

Let me rephrase it for you to understand it better. You start your game with x,y,z stake per bet which is comparatively high stake than usual gamblers gamble if you win then you drop your stake to €5–€15 per bet. In the process if you start to lose while playing with the stakes, you redeposit and continue. The pattern is structured and repetitive.

You already mentioned one stake amount

the largest bet in this casino was 140 euro

Like the game name could you please tell what other stakes size you prefer when starting with the high stakes?

I see that you have indeed gained some access to my gaming history; I would be happy to share my experience of playing.

Yes, indeed. Unlike others, I’m approaching you with an understanding of the situation rather than making assumptions out of ignorance.

about stakes. yes, I changed stakes. I can play in one session with bet 140 and then with 20 or 10 or 5. Yes, that is exactly how I play. And here you are trying to suggest that something isn't right. This slot, *All Lucky Clovers*, is a popular one, and you can play it at a great many casinos—with the option to adjust the bet size, too.

about other large bet, also I played GIFT RUSH with max bet, and was 100 and 355 euro at your site. also I tried few more games, Dice Million and Ultra burn.
at Vavada casino I play ULTRA BURN with bet 1000 euro and then with 1 euro, but VAVADA casino do not try to steal winnings if I hit x300 (and it is 300000 euro). So I can not understand , what you try to create with that fact that I playing and changing bet from lower to highest.

[aleks86]

So, right now you’re telling us that winnings of around 500,000 euros were confiscated because I changed my bets? Nice strategy.


I think this is really great proof that Biggerz Casino is a total scam.

[rokuen]

I still don't understand what exactly BiggerZ is accusing this guy of. He mostly played one slot, used high stakes and lowered them after big wins. So what? Since when is changing your bet size against the rules?

If they think he exploited some bug in All Lucky Clovers 100, why not provide evidence from BGaming to Casino Guru? His €226,702 win is within the game's advertised limits, and apparently the slot is still available at BiggerZ.

So far, all I see is a casino refusing to pay a player because they don't like his betting patterns. If there's really something wrong with the game, show some actual proof. Otherwise, what's the justification for confiscating his winnings? And what about his deposits?

Also, it's worth mentioning that Royse777, who's now defending BiggerZ, previously promoted BitLucy and even publicly introduced himself as its "Co-Partner & Marketing Director". Yes, the same BitLucy that later became notorious for scamming its players. Funny how he's now questioning someone else's credibility.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5395791.msg59956927#msg59956927

[AHOYBRAUSE]

I still don't understand what exactly BiggerZ is accusing this guy of. He mostly played one slot, used high stakes and lowered them after big wins. So what? Since when is changing your bet size against the rules?

If they think he exploited some bug in All Lucky Clovers 100, why not provide evidence from BGaming to Casino Guru? His €226,702 win is within the game's advertised limits, and apparently the slot is still available at BiggerZ.

So far, all I see is a casino refusing to pay a player because they don't like his betting patterns. If there's really something wrong with the game, show some actual proof. Otherwise, what's the justification for confiscating his winnings? And what about his deposits?

Also, it's worth mentioning that Royse777, who's now defending BiggerZ, previously promoted BitLucy and even publicly introduced himself as its "Co-Partner & Marketing Director". Yes, the same BitLucy that later became notorious for scamming its players. Funny how he's now questioning someone else's credibility.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5395791.msg59956927#msg59956927

Royse777 is not defending them, he is actively looking into the case and tries to move things forward, which is the right thing to do. Without him this case would maybe still be in limbo, trust me on that. So give it some time maybe? Obviously he has his reasons trying to get this one solved since he previously went into a partnership with the site. I rather have a campaign manager that cares than the opposite!
Unfortunately all we have seen from the casino until now was an AI generated response, so trying to get some real intervention or possible attempt of a solution now but getting blamed for it makes no sense.

[cruso]

Oh yeah, the Bitlucy guy, partner, marketing manager, etc is now running cover for the latest scam casino in town. How ironic.

FYI: Playing the same slot repeatedly, varying bet sizes, continuing after losses, reducing stakes after a big win, and stopping while ahead are all normal betting decisions. None of these is cheating. Unless there is evidence of exploiting a vulnerability, manipulating the game, or violating a specific rule, betting patterns alone do not prove cheating.

[aleks86]

Oh yeah, the Bitlucy guy, partner, marketing manager, etc is now running cover for the latest scam casino in town. How ironic.

FYI: Playing the same slot repeatedly, varying bet sizes, continuing after losses, reducing stakes after a big win, and stopping while ahead are all normal betting decisions. None of these is cheating. Unless there is evidence of exploiting a vulnerability, manipulating the game, or violating a specific rule, betting patterns alone do not prove cheating.

at this moment casino representee seems want to show it like scam from my side

ofc, may be he want to understand situation and seems he has really some information from casino.

But I think, that in result he will write same like casino, that evidence are "secret" and they can not explain it here or somewhere.

[Shishir99]

And about the campaign applications, show me 5 recognizable members that have applied until this point, or make it 3. A campaign that has such a nice payout and only has 49 applications (in 44 hours) so far, with only 5 legendary and 9 hero members among them. So yeah, I know the "rules" of this campaign sound a bit too much, it's still proof that people Do care.

About their score on guru, they didn't reply/or show proof for their claim for 6 weeks so it seems, that's more than enough time to get shxt done.

Anyway, let's hope for all people involved this gets resolved, better for the player and better for the reputation of the site for obvious reasons. Since Royse is already in communications about it I am sure we will see something moving soon.

How many recognisable members are in the forum in total? What is the definition of a recognisable member? Of course, anyone would be picky when it comes to promoting a brand new platform. I am not a recognisable member, but I still did not apply in that campaign because I do not want to force myself to create more posts on different platforms to get paid more. Believe me, not everyone cares about reputation. For example, Metaspin has negative feedback, but people are still applying to that campaign; it's because the Metaspin campaign rules are simple. On the other hand, I myself did not applied in Biggerz campaign because the rules of that campaign are complicated. So, you should not judge the campaign just because it has a scam accusation. Sportsbet itself has negative feedback as well, but I see you are in their campaign.

We talk a lot about decentralization and at the end we have to follow as "trusted" users "by default" that at best would present well known scammers.
Frogbet, scoras, lizex now biggerz, I don't care they are in contact with scammers. This would not change anything and is really worst they think people have to deal with them.

Since you mentioned Lizex, I want to point out that Ab de Royse777 himself left negative feedback on Lizex's profile and supported the flag himself.

AB de Royse777

2026-10-05

Reference

Unsolved accusation and unfortunately the burden is on Lixex to prove innocence. Until there is a clear regulation of this case my negative feedback stays.

Also, he posted this one,

AB de Royse777

Lizex were my ex-clients, we have good business communication. The OP lost his fund and it's not good to see customers lose their funds but do not get a verifiable reasoning. The case is complicated which took my time to come to a conclusion.
 
I came to the conclusion that the burden is on Lizex to prove their innocence. There are no way to verify that the funds are not with them or with their liquidator. On the other hand, the OP lost his funds which is clear from the blockchain and the discussions I have with Lizex team.

- Lizex failed to proved the destination of the funds
- OP lost his funds

That leads me to decide that until Lizex proves their innocence my negative feedback stays. The flag has been supported too.

OP, sorry for your loss. I tried my best to find a good resolution but unfortunately it's out of hand now.

What else do you expect from a manager, actually? I know you love manipulating things, and this is not the first time, right?

[AB de Royse777]

about stakes. yes, I changed stakes. I can play in one session with bet 140 and then with 20 or 10 or 5. Yes, that is exactly how I play.

Unfortunately you have not giving me a clear answer. Could you please correct me if I’m wrong about anything from the below numbers? You are free to disclose €x and €y.

BiggerZ identified the exact sequence across 199 separate runs. In 45 out of 57 runs involving a win of 100x or more, you stopped the high-stakes sequence on the exact winning round.

You played at €x, €y or €140 per round, at about 0.8 seconds per round. You exit on a large hit. Immediately after a large win, you dropped back to €5–15 stakes. You repeated this sequence in 199 separate runs. The round cited in the complaint (19 March 2026, a €226,702 payout at a €140 stake) follows it exactly: an 11-round run at €140, then straight down to €15.

Stake-dependent outcomes on your favorite game:
• At stakes up to €15, you had 47,372 rounds, a hit rate of 14.1% and a return of 101.7%.
• At stakes of €x and above, you had 17,440 rounds, a hit rate of only 1.1% and a return of 131.4%, a net of +€413,395.
• The payout profile at the higher stakes is materially different from the lower stakes on the same game.

Consistent method:
You repeated the same sequence in 199 separate high-stake runs:
• a fixed stake of €x, €y or €140, at around 0.8 seconds per round;
• a new deposit whenever the balance was exhausted;
• an immediate return to €5–15 stakes after a large hit.
• Of the 57 runs containing a win of 100x or more, 45 ended on that exact round.
• Winning round cited in the complaint: on 19 March 2026, a payout of €226,702 at a €140 stake (1,619x). It came at the end of an 11-round run at €140, after which you immediately reduced your stake to €15.

[aleks86]

about stakes. yes, I changed stakes. I can play in one session with bet 140 and then with 20 or 10 or 5. Yes, that is exactly how I play.

Unfortunately you have not giving me a clear answer. Could you please correct me if I’m wrong about anything from the below numbers? You are free to disclose €x and €y.

BiggerZ identified the exact sequence across 199 separate runs. In 45 out of 57 runs involving a win of 100x or more, you stopped the high-stakes sequence on the exact winning round.

You played at €x, €y or €140 per round, at about 0.8 seconds per round. You exit on a large hit. Immediately after a large win, you dropped back to €5–15 stakes. You repeated this sequence in 199 separate runs. The round cited in the complaint (19 March 2026, a €226,702 payout at a €140 stake) follows it exactly: an 11-round run at €140, then straight down to €15.

Stake-dependent outcomes on your favorite game:
• At stakes up to €15, you had 47,372 rounds, a hit rate of 14.1% and a return of 101.7%.
• At stakes of €x and above, you had 17,440 rounds, a hit rate of only 1.1% and a return of 131.4%, a net of +€413,395.
• The payout profile at the higher stakes is materially different from the lower stakes on the same game.

Consistent method:
You repeated the same sequence in 199 separate high-stake runs:
• a fixed stake of €x, €y or €140, at around 0.8 seconds per round;
• a new deposit whenever the balance was exhausted;
• an immediate return to €5–15 stakes after a large hit.
• Of the 57 runs containing a win of 100x or more, 45 ended on that exact round.
• Winning round cited in the complaint: on 19 March 2026, a payout of €226,702 at a €140 stake (1,619x). It came at the end of an 11-round run at €140, after which you immediately reduced your stake to €15.

I don’t have the same information you do. But even assuming that’s exactly how things happened - what’s prohibited about that?

[aleks86]

So, after all these investigations, what exactly will the conclusion be? Could it be that I have some sort of secret system?

[AB de Royse777]

I don’t have the same information you do.

You don't know what amount I meant with €x and €y?

[aleks86]

why Biggerz do not pay my winnings: The main reason for non-payment is:

Winning round cited in the complaint: on 19 March 2026, a payout of €226,702 at a €140 stake (1,619x). It came at the end of an 11-round run at €140, after which you immediately reduced your stake to €15.


hahaa, you are absolute clown

[aleks86]

You’ve described how I play slots. As for what’s supposedly prohibited here, that’s something only you seem to know. You’re a scam casino, Biggerz.