Bitcoin Forum
November 09, 2026, 03:45:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 32.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: biggerz scam casino. closed account without any reason to steal winnings 6.75btc  (Read 2167 times)
keyscore44
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1019


View Profile
November 02, 2026, 09:41:18 PM
 #101

Are we still a community of users here in bitcointalk or we are trying to scam between us? Or for a few bucks we can start to endorse any possible scam?
Would we allow to see promoted 1xbit (that has exactly the same issues) or we can stop to admire blindly some internet scammer?

Double standards are clearly in full effect. It’s interesting that the people who gave me negative trust for participating in the 1xBit signature campaign aren’t saying anything in this case.

Because 1xbit was the biggest scam sit of all time here, and people still applied for the sig campaign while the site was scamming for a long time already. Also there have been several warnings and participants got contacted to delete the sig or live with the consequences, guess you took the latter.

As for me, I supported the flag here because after what came to light with the leaderboards and their silly excuse about it there was no more arguing that the site definitely isn't very trustworthy, at least in my opinion. I also hope more people would take a closer look into biggerz because what they are doing feels very shady to say the least.

But yeah, 1x was a very different story and you know it.

I asked you earlier: how many times does a scammer have to scam before, in your view, they become a scammer? You didn’t answer because you know perfectly well that it only takes one time to face the consequences. If a scam is proven, then everyone who promotes it should face the same consequences. But, as it turns out, some people prefer to pretend that nothing is happening, and BiggerZ is free to keep promoting - even though you yourself call them scammers and supporting red flag. Isn’t that hypocrisy and a double standard?
Or perhaps you need a specific number of scammed users in order to confirm this? If so, how many users have to be scammed?

bitbollo
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 5182


https://bit.ly/bitbollo


View Profile
November 03, 2026, 03:01:17 AM
 #102

I asked you earlier: how many times does a scammer have to scam before, in your view, they become a scammer? You didn’t answer because you know perfectly well that it only takes one time to face the consequences. If a scam is proven, then everyone who promotes it should face the same consequences. But, as it turns out, some people prefer to pretend that nothing is happening, and BiggerZ is free to keep promoting - even though you yourself call them scammers and supporting red flag. Isn’t that hypocrisy and a double standard?
Or perhaps you need a specific number of scammed users in order to confirm this? If so, how many users have to be scammed?

No one cares anymore since it's evident there isn't anymore a "bitcoiner" community.
If you check the scam accusations section, it can become likewise a local section fulls of "mammals".  What is worst, the same arguments have already been addressed dozens of times in the last years.  Just open references they are just making the same scam again and again.

Even once I have exposed a dozens of those, clearly with the same approach - and I am a well known gambler with bicoin since the time of SATOSHIBONES with the same bitcoinaddress I am still using after 13 years including a few tipster competitions won - they have find pretty useful harassing, open few threads for free insults, and removed from Default Trust Grin
Well done!  Meanwhile the scammers and the scam site are here.
That's the high level of committement we have right now to avoid users get scammed.  If you search the reputation online of biggerz you will scare even to click in their URL.
Imagine make a deposit or "advertise with signature".  You are pretty right for this. 
As you see they continue to point out that "has not passed enough time".  Likewise I was calling a clear scam "only after 7 days".
Anyone can verify that there cases of missing answers "only a couple of months". 
This is the actual "sense" of community we have here.  But it would not change nothing.  Scammers would receive a red tag in their profile, anyone can just VERIFY the proofs.
Right now, the solution is very easy: avoid all services advertised by "mammals".  It's very easy to recognize them.
I would not support any of these sites.  They can go to have a job in real life like anyone and stop to use this forum for polluting internet with these non-sense scams. 

JeromeTash
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 1607


Heisenberg


View Profile
November 07, 2026, 03:12:37 PM
 #103

I am inclined to leave biggerz a negative feedback based on the outcome of this case on Casinoguru and the amount involved - https://casino.guru/complaints/biggerz-casino-player-s-withdrawal-has-been-delayed-1
They have refused to have it resolved even with the independent mediators. I don't see how they can be trusted long-term.
It's better to clean up the mess before it's too late

AHOYBRAUSE
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 2135


よろしく


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2026, 03:27:47 PM
 #104

I am inclined to leave biggerz a negative feedback based on the outcome of this case on Casinoguru and the amount involved - https://casino.guru/complaints/biggerz-casino-player-s-withdrawal-has-been-delayed-1
They have refused to have it resolved even with the independent mediators. I don't see how they can be trusted long-term.
It's better to clean up the mess before it's too late

A while ago it was said that they are about to reopen this case, but this was about a month ago and looking at the casinoguru site it seems like nothing at all has been moved forward. Indeed it has only gotten worse with the leaderboard and other contests controversy. I mean if they really want to clean this mess up why are they so silent about it I wonder. The leaderboard "explanation/excuse" was a total mess and straight up lie, and the 6.75btc thing is also of course not proven yet but not a good look, especially because they handle it so amateurish.


cruso
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 141
Merit: 18


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2026, 12:09:59 PM
 #105

A while ago it was said that they are about to reopen this case, but this was about a month ago and looking at the casinoguru site it seems like nothing at all has been moved forward.

In their defence, they didnt actually say that themselves. it was their campaign manager. He or she should come back here and explain why this is taking so long. As for biggerz, I believe their conduct speaks for itself. I honestly dont understand how anyone can still defend or suggest otherwise.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!