Clarification: factual replies after deletions in Blackcoin topic 3017838

[QuantumQuasar]

Two of my replies in Blackcoin topic 3017838 were deleted on September 10 (notifications at 13:28:33 and 13:30:52 forum time; message IDs 67129202 and 67129223).

The replies addressed statements about the independently maintained Blackcoin-Dev implementation, including post #599 and post #600. They also contained release links and participation material. I recognize that rules 22 and 24 restrict promotion in another project's thread. I have not reposted the deleted material.

I asked privately for clarification and was directed to ask in Meta because the moderator I contacted did not know who removed the posts.

Can the moderator who removed them clarify the applicable boundary? Is one concise, non-promotional response to a specific statement about our implementation permitted in that thread, with no download invitation, reward figures, exchange solicitation or advertising? Or should even those factual responses be confined to our own topic, 5587830?

If AI-assisted drafting, repetition or another rule was also relevant, please identify it so we can comply. This is not a request for the forum to endorse either implementation, decide software safety, restore advertisements or take sides in the project dispute. I am asking where and how a directly affected account may answer factual claims without violating the posting rules.

Disclosure: AI-generated draft for the project account.

[Sticky Bomb]

You may want to read this AI guidelines, so you know the forum stand on the appropriate use of AI, from reading the lower part of the OP, it's obvious that's the information you're currently lacking and the reason your reply was deleted.

[UchihaSarada]

Two of my replies in Blackcoin topic 3017838 were deleted on September 10 (notifications at 13:28:33 and 13:30:52 forum time; message IDs 67129202 and 67129223).

Your two deleted posts are archived there
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6712/67129202.html
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6712/67129223.html

Reasons of deletion will be answered by admins, global moderators or moderators who deleted your posts. Just wait for their replies here.

[Sandra_hakeem]

BlackcoinDev is NOT the same as Blackcoin-Dev.

Correct: they are different publishers. That fact does not establish impersonation, nonexistence, or a software defect. Blackcoin-Dev uses its own organization.

So you claim these are two separate organizations, with separate repository (I did check out the original BlackcoinDev's repository on GitHub btw, but I don't trust any of the link you provided therefore I can't click on them), release tags, project sites and whatnot, why are you trying to promote an entirely different project on their ANN thread? What exactly are you trying to achieve by compulsively posting links to a different site on that thread?

Meanwhile, it seems you know exactly why your post were removed.

I recognize that rules 22 and 24 restrict promotion in another project's thread.

I asked privately for clarification ~snip

What other sort of clarification are you looking for?

Your team has let this coin almost go to the graveyard, and you offer no solutions for the community.  Either get onboard or you guys need to just move on and quit holding the community back.

This is either some shared dispute, or OP is just full of shit.
From my observation, and I'm not even making this up, majority of your supposed responses to perceived allegations on that thread are heavily AI-generated.

~snip at first glance the posts seem high-quality and on-topic, but after reading a few of them they quickly become slop due to their unoriginality, excessive verbosity, and boring samey style.

Well, I'm not a MOD and I can't say much, but that was the little oddity I was able to spot out.

[nutildah]

Is one concise, non-promotional response to a specific statement about our implementation permitted in that thread, with no download invitation, reward figures, exchange solicitation or advertising? Or should even those factual responses be confined to our own topic, 5587830?

You should probably stick to your own thread as your attempts to push an alternative Blackcoin client have been unappreciated since July.

Blackcoin Core 30.1.0 is out: Protocol V4 "Quantum Quasar" (mandatory upgrade)

Blackcoin's Protocol V4 upgrade, Quantum Quasar, is now released. This is a mandatory upgrade for everyone running a node or wallet. V4 activates on mainnet on **2026-07-12** (around block **5,950,000**), so please update before then to stay on the network.

Go away with this SCAM! THIS IS NOT BLACKCOIN. To all the people reading this. BE VERY VERY VERY CAREFUL, you will probably lose your coins.

This IS NOT a mandatory upgrade. That news would be shown on https://blackcoin.org and https://blackcoinmore.org. DON'T UPGRADE TO THIS VERSION

Calling your client a "mandatory upgrade" is hella sus.

You kept at it, were repeatedly asked to stop, and didn't. So its a bit surprising that you're wondering why your posts were deleted.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

You know exactly why the replies were deleted but you are just too stubborn to admit it. Someone obviously reported them for deletion because you insist to do whatever you want on anothee thread. Why don't you use your own thread instead of derailing another thread with your project infomation?
It doesn't make sense to me. I don't have time to read through the whole thread but I can see where this is coming from. There is no clarification required here.

[New Judgement]

From the responses gathered so far, everyone is pointing to the same thing, that you intentionally went to promote your business in another thread you aren’t supposed to, even after being told to stop, you continued. I guess you have now found out why your posts were removed, so I don’t think there anymore explanation needed on your case. It’s time to lock this thread, unless you are saying you ain’t guilty as accused. But all indications are showing that you are guilty. You won’t get more explanations than you already got. Stop doing what will get your post deleted next time.

[ABCbits]

I don't know altcoin involved. But OP behavior feel similar with current BTC2B/BIP 110 supporter. If someone bothered to created detailed thread that prove OP mislead people, i may consider leaving either neutral or negative feedback.

You should probably stick to your own thread as your attempts to push an alternative Blackcoin client have been unappreciated since July.

FWIW, OP made at least 39 reply on Blackcoin ANN thread[1], while OP have total 63 reply/thread[2].

[1] https://bitlist.co/search?author=QuantumQuasar&topic_id=3017838&limit=20&sort_by=date_desc
[2] https://bitlist.co/user/id/3761721/posts?date_min=2018-01-24&date_max=2026-09-12