Could This Be a Pattern Or Strategy That Works

[Fortify]

There are clever betting strategies out there, but you have to remember that the bookmakers will immediately recognize patterns from players who end up beating them and figure out what it is pretty quickly. Bookmakers are using AI just as much if not more than players, constantly probing the odds to figure out any weaknesses or undetected flaws in their calculations. They could lose a lot of money if they don't and the major gambling companies all have teams of very clever people trying to figure out the next strategies. You might be able to play these sort of ideas for a little while before they get neutralized, or you might think you've got a smart theory but it was already calculated into the odds ten years ago. It's if you can squeak out enough of a margin from using more variables or clever combinations compared to what they're currently doing, like incorporating news about players to determine their state of mind before a game.

[vs2014]

At first your strategy may look attractive and looking cause a team with two goals lead around 80th minutes has good chance of winning. However the small odds are the biggest concern causes you may win 30-40 bets continuously but one unexpected results can turn your all previous wins into losses. Football score can change quickly even in the last minutes and so there's no guarantee of future success. Even you can see Argentina's goal statistics in this world up and realize how surprising a team can comeback from last minutes. In my opinion, this strategy is risky for the long term and bettors should set strict limits, avoid high stakes and focus on responsible betting

[stompix]

Good strategy op, having the patience to do wait until that exact time to place your bet is quite commendable, not every bettor has such level of patience.

If it's such a good strategy, why don't you try it and tell us how this worked for you in a week?
The level of this section is going down the drain, how can you call it a strategy when there are no numbers, no facts, no results, no nothing on the table?

Not for long, but this has given me an idea. In the long run it is unavoidable to lose the bet and therefore lose also the profits obtained up to that point, but maybe it's not such a bad strategy to bet a few times for limited profits, and then stop.

What happens if the first one is the losing one?

Let's go with a simple example: for each bet you get say 1% of your wager, and the probability to lose is also 1% (we know it's greater, because of the house edge, but let's keep the example simple). So you would need to win 100 times to double your wager, and 1 out of 100 times you would lose.

So to make $1 out of a 1.01 odds game, you need to have a bankroll of at least 10k ready!
10k would earn you $2 a day put in bonds with no risk of losing any money and not doing a thing.
Now do tell me why anyone should try it?

[Proty]

I have not used this strategy before, however I know exactly the reason behind this strategy. Betting at the 80th minute will make a gambler to have more information rather than just sticking with what they predicted earlier before the starting of the match. It will be wrong to stake or bet with more than what we can afford to lose because of low odd , the chances of losing is still there. It is possible for a team to lose even when leading with two goals in the 80th minute. The best thing is to continue with an amount that you can afford to lose and watch how things goes before deciding whether the strategy is profitable.

[Merit.s]

You just have to gamble for fun and forget about looking for any strategy to be profitable consistently, because that strategy can even fetch you more losses than when you didn't bother to use it because you will be confident in yourself and bet with a higher amount of money than your initial amount. Dtrategies are just for fun because it doesn't guarantee you profit since gambling is a game of luck and luck come by chance.

[swogerino]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

Sounds like a good strategy to win bets but do you win substantially, I highly doubt that unless the stake is really high that you win money otherwise it is just fun to have during the bets. I wonder why the "high rollers" as this is how people playing bets with a lot of money are called in the section of latest bets in many casinos, they keep playing like 1.50 odds by choosing up to three games to make it when they can use this strategy to win some money as I also agree that it is really difficult for the team being down 2 goals and with just 10 minutes to left to play. Of course if it is a strong team like Real or Bayern I would refrain to betting because these type of teams can turn the result upside down even in less than 10 minutes as they are big for a reason.

[suzanne5223]

Has anyone ever tried this?

Yes, I have tried it, and this is a strategy i tried yesterday. It's a pattern that works but requires a level of understanding of the game and the chance of the opponent scoring goals or equalizing the goals scored, so I don't choose every team for this strategy. Whenever i want to use the strategy, I use it for a parlay to bump up the odds as you said the winning is always small so i consider this strategy as something good for gamblers who are higher risk taker.

[Humblevirus]

I have also been using that kind of strategy before, and seriously, at the beginning, I was winning back to back and making little profits. But with time, I started losing, and the amount I was losing was a big amount. From that time, I stopped it because I think the money you use to stake the bet for the profit is not really worth it.Someone can stake $100, and the profit they will see may not even be up to $10. That is when someone picks many games in combined like four or seven games, before getting that kind of odds that will bring that amount of odds profit because the odds are always small.The point is that someone can try it, and the first time it may end up losing. As far as there is no guarantee of continuing to win, I don't think it is worth the risk.Let's not forget that gambling is not for making profit. No matter what strategy a gambler tries to use, it can still end up losing money to the betting company.

[DiMarxist]

If it's such a good strategy, why don't you try it and tell us how this worked for you in a week?
The level of this section is going down the drain, how can you call it a strategy when there are no numbers, no facts, no results, no nothing on the table?

Just because i like how the strategy was presented doesn't mean that I would just jump into it, for the fact that op clearly stated what he has achieved in the last few days it does seem like a good strategy but does that mean that i would rush into applying it? empathetically no. This isn't the first gambling strategy we have seen on this section and if you want to try every strategy you stumble on you would be disoriented. I pointed out the fact that it's a good strategy but I'm not going to implement it because I'm not a fan of betting on live games.

[BALIK]

There have been many stories in the past about gamblers who became too confident in a 2-0 lead and ended up losing their entire bankroll.
For me, 1.01 is simply not an attractive price because the potential return does not justify the risk.

The curtain has just come down on match between Barcelona and Levante.
Barcelona was leading 3-0 at the end of first half.
However Levante scored two goal in second half, bringing score to 3-2 by 88th minute.

I am certain that many novice bettor like OP, placed wager on Barcelona victory after they had secured that 3-0 lead.
But if Barcelona had somehow conceded another goal in dying moment and the match had ended 3-3, those bettor would have lost significant amount of money.

Therefore my advice is never to place bet involving very large amount of money. Even with some experience in sport betting, making accurate prediction remain challenging. There is simply no need to risk huge sum by following dubious strategy.

[Cantsay]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

I have also noticed and used it in the past too. The thing with this strategy is the fact that there are too many things at stake for just a little profit, the odds are very low, and you could use it to win multiple times and just a single loss is going to set you back to multiple times what you have won from it.

So to me it is a very risky strategy, and I wouldn't really advise anybody to use it, if you want to just do it for fun, then that's fine but if you want to use it as a long term thing, then just don't think about it because you are going to lose too much.

[Fiatless]

I have not used this strategy before, however I know exactly the reason behind this strategy. Betting at the 80th minute will make a gambler to have more information rather than just sticking with what they predicted earlier before the starting of the match. It will be wrong to stake or bet with more than what we can afford to lose because of low odd , the chances of losing is still there. It is possible for a team to lose even when leading with two goals in the 80th minute. The best thing is to continue with an amount that you can afford to lose and watch how things goes before deciding whether the strategy is profitable.

Betting using the pattern the OP said is a waste of time and resources. The wins from these games are too insignificant, so you need to place bets with a high amount to win something reasonable. It is also essential to note that betting on clubs a few minutes before the end of the game doesn't guarantee wins. I'd rather take the risk of placing bets on games with high odds because the returns are higher. I know it is riskier, but small amounts could bring higher returns.

[Hatchy]

The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

I've thought about this too, but I've never really tried it because, like you said, the odds are extremely small, and I would have to risk a lot to make a reasonable profit. I'm pretty sure we aren't the first people to think about placing bets like this.Personally, I still prefer placing my bets before the match starts because it gives me time to analyse the game beforehand and have a better idea of what might happen. However, the chances of winning become even slimmer compared to betting after the match has already started, when we can simply bet on the team that has the upper hand..The casino already knows that people will think this way, which is why they offer such low odds on these types of bets..

[Mate2237]

Are you sure you're actually doing this, and didn't just completely make it up?  
It seems to me that if you were actually doing this, you could cite specific figures instead of just saying the "odds are very low". As for the fact that you won four bets, there is nothing surprising about that, since at this stage of the game, given such a significant advantage, the odds generally fall within the 1.03 - 1.05 range (assuming the favorite wins). Place at least 20 such bets, or better 100 and then we’ll see the results.

Most definitely, adding the figures would have definitely made it more clearer, so far I have had four wins and as you know playing such an option at that time frame means that the odds would be significantly reduced. The first game was an odd of 1.08, second was 1.03, 1.09 and then the game was 1.13, I was able to get that value because I was prompt to place the bet before the odds were being reduced.

But just because the odds fall to such value does mean that there might not be surprises, this is something that is inevitable I'm sports betting and I'm always mentally prepared for whatever outcome I might get.

[JunaidAzizi]

That is a very safe approach, or I can say a safe betting strategy. Most users apply this strategy because it can give you a maximum success rate for your bets. You wait until the end, and when you are totally sure about the results, then you place your bet. This will be the best strategy for new users who want small profits. However, the drawback of this strategy is that you can only place a large stake because of the low odds, and if you lose, then all your profits can be gone. Sometimes, at the end, unexpected things happen for example, in the last two minutes, players can score one or maybe two goals, which will result in a loss for your bet. So keep this in mind too.

[icebar]

I had previous experience with your strategy, and I did not get the results I expected, so I am not interested in using such a strategy anymore. I also bet after 80 minutes. I thought that I would win that match, but I lost. If I had put money on a 50-50 bet, then if I won, my winnings would have increased, but if I won in such bet, the profit would be very small and if I lost, I would have lost a lot. In this case, my reasoning is that I may have won two or four consecutive wins in such a bet, but the next time I lose, I will have to lose more than my previous wins. Moreover, in football, many goals are scored even after 90 minutes, so there is no certainty. If someone has the opportunity to profit consistently by applying this strategy, then the strategy is good for him, but I think it is risky.

[skarais]

That is a very safe approach, or I can say a safe betting strategy. Most users apply this strategy because it can give you a maximum success rate for your bets. You wait until the end, and when you are totally sure about the results, then you place your bet. This will be the best strategy for new users who want small profits. However, the drawback of this strategy is that you can only place a large stake because of the low odds, and if you lose, then all your profits can be gone. Sometimes, at the end, unexpected things happen for example, in the last two minutes, players can score one or maybe two goals, which will result in a loss for your bet. So keep this in mind too.

I suppose such an approach to gambling is very arguably a way to get a mere profit. The profit obtained is very low when compared to the capital used, I think this is not at all worth it even though it is not prohibited at all. I wouldn't do it, it's too risky because no one knows exactly what will happen in the last few minutes. After all, what makes a gambler really want to apply this approach?

[uneng]

The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet.

That is where the sports book make sure it's not feasible on long run for gamblers. The fact odds are extremely low means you will have to win lots of times  to cover the loss faced in a single match (which will inevitably happen from times to times). At some point, it's unsustainable for you to keep placing bets and remaining in profit. Let's say odds are 0.10x. If you win 10 times and lose once, you are already with zero profit. And if you win 10 times and lose twice, you are already accumulating losses.

Actually, the pattern is the loss you are going to face the more you try this strategy.

[Queen uloma]

Your strategy is a good one and it really makes sense to me because you’re patiently waiting for a good opportunity rather then forcing bets before match eventually start. But even when team are still leading with two goals at 80th minute, it’s not still guaranteed.

 The small odds can make a person increase their stake to chase a good profit, and that one can be very dangerous. I always have the mindset that discipline and proper bankroll management is very crucial than winning streak.

[Odohu]

Such live bet will give you very low odds and by extension means that one loss is enough to cancel several winnings you might have had. I'm not against live bets but I try my best to seek options that is not too risky for me and have considerable odd too. My target is always to get odd that is at least 2 so that my winning can cover two losses.