Could This Be a Pattern Or Strategy That Works

[Mate2237]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

[Ronsbit]

I could say it is a strategy as I personally do this. I have been doing this for quite a long time before now and it works most times. I pick draw after studying the game as I do this like 15mins to go.  Although it is rare to see a goal less opportunity to bet on and also sometimes draw which is not oftentimes in the picture. But I take advantage of such opportunity as it avails itself. I mostly do that on live betting but the rewards is basically very little except if my bet is high.

[Orpichukwu]

I could say it is a strategy as I personally do this. I have been doing this for quite a long time before now and it works most times. I pick draw after studying the game as I do this like 15mins to go.  Although it is rare to see a goal less opportunity to bet on and also sometimes draw which is not oftentimes in the picture. But I take advantage of such opportunity as it avails itself. I mostly do that on live betting but the rewards is basically very little except if my bet is high.

I also bet on live matches, but the strategy I don’t feel safe with is this: your draw. Anything is possible under 15-20 minutes. I can go with the op patterns, but the return can be very small, almost equal to nothing. But you see, when you are betting on a draw, even 89 minutes – that 1 minute left is enough to change the game outcome. I’m always afraid to bet on a draw; I'd rather go for a straight win than a draw.

[Oshosondy]

I have used the strategy before, it failed.

It will encourage you to use all the money won also on the next bet, but later in one of the matches, the opportunity will later score and draw or maybe win.

Just be careful about it.

It will let you also spend more time gambling which may not be good.

The odds are so small that it can just be 1.02. $100 to win $2 or less is not worth it.

[giammangiato]

It could be defined as a strategy, I do it too, but usually the odds are really very low, maybe to win just over 10 cents you have to wager at least $10, of course it's still a profit, but how many games does it take to at least repay the bet?
I don't love this kind of approach, low risk = low yield.
I prefer to risk more with impossible games, very low economic risk, very low success rate, but if I guess the result the win is really satisfactory, it allows me to play for a long time.
Really hard to get results with my method, but I find it more fun.

[DanWalker]

Best thing about your approach as far as I'm concerned is that you aren't trying to force this bet in every match. That kind of discipline is crucial in live betting.

However I wouldn't consider two goal lead in 80th minute sufficient signal.
If it were me then I would also look at factor like match momentum, red card, substitution, attacking pressure and amount of stoppage time remaining.
If that team leading 2-0 switch to any purely defensive mode while losing side launch wave after wave of attack then those 1.10 or 1.15 odds might not be as safe in reality as they appear.

[Makus]

Well, There are is not betting strategy that's guaranteed, I advice you to be careful especially if you are betting with a huge amount because winning steaks don't last. The most important thing is to make sure that you bet with an amount you can afford to lose. Personally I don't like to bet on games with low value odds because you are risking a lot for so little. Imagine losing 200 dollars all because you are chasing less than 10 percent win. No Pattern is safe, not even betting on single games, in soccer you should always be prepared for anything to happen.

[nelson4lov]

I think I have tried a strategy like this before. You will win a lot of time but it only takes one loss to take all of those wins off the table and if you go into a losing streak (which is unlikely btw), there would be even more devastating returns. Its a high win rate strategy and you will win a lot but any loss will bring down the entire equity/bankroll curve.

A live strategy I like is when odds that was super tiny in prematch rise several points higher during the same. A great example of this was Bayern's UCL game this week against Bodo glimt. There was no over 1.5 goals market in prematch but since Bayern was held to a first half draw, the odds for over 1.5 became available and it was pushed as high as over 1.35. Over 3.5 that was like 1.39 in prematch went to 4.5 odd.

It doesn't always work though because just a few days before that UCL game, Bayern had a goalless draw with Schalke 04.  

[Ryu_Ar1]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

Technically the chances of success will be high even though there will always be some unexpected things still the probability will be quite large but there are some disadvantages to direct matches like this when in live betting then the odds will be much smaller for example when there is a match with an advantage of 2 or 3 goals then the odds are likely to only be at 1.xx even I would doubt if the odds are above 1.5 especially when the favorite club wins.

So when in live betting like this though it will be quite possible to win but when a small win it will feel useless especially when the bet we do is just under $10.
In successful conditions there will still be even big but the risk when losing and the odds that we will have are not too worth it for small bettors.

[Findingnemo]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

Good luck with your strategy but don't think that you are the one who ever tried this.

2 goals in 10 minutes is possible and we had seen some historic performances in the important games but let's assume this is just a normal day and the odds of turning around is low then the odds will be low and almost negligible at that point when we feel the match is almost guaranteed now. I won't be surprised even if we get the odd of 1.10x for those games.

But the one odd game that turned the opposite will take away all the progress and you need to start over.

[Karl_3000]

I think I have tried a strategy like this before. You will win a lot of time but it only takes one loss to take all of those wins off the table and if you go into a losing streak (which is unlikely btw), there would be even more devastating returns. Its a high win rate strategy and you will win a lot but any loss will bring that the entire equity/bankroll curve.

I have also tried it before and I used it to lose high amount of money. You will be winning very well but the amount won each time are very small, so a single loss will be a big blow that will wipe almost all the money the person has in the gambling account. People that want to win in gambling compulsorily will later know this failed strategy, use it and fail.

[Showlove01]

It can be a strategy for you but for me i do not really consider it a strategy because the odd the cassino will be giving team that is winning with 2 goals ahead in the 80th minute can be little or nothing and the only case you can see casino give odd is when the team winning is not really favorite or better than the team they are winning because if the team winning is favorite trust me, in most cases you will not see anything like odd, they will lock it. it is also funny how you said equalizing in this time is not possible, i hope you know a team can use a 1 minute or 2 to equalize goals, Real Madrid did it in champions league few seasons ago and i think it was Rodrigo.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

I think I have tried a strategy like this before. You will win a lot of time but it only takes one loss to take all of those wins off the table and if you go into a losing streak (which is unlikely btw), there would be even more devastating returns. Its a high win rate strategy and you will win a lot but any loss will bring that the entire equity/bankroll curve.

I have also tried it before and I used it to lose high amount of money. You will be winning very well but the amount won each time are very small, so a single loss will be a big blow that will wipe almost all the money the person has in the gambling account. People that want to win in gambling compulsorily will later know this failed strategy, use it and fail.

The risk to lose is very small but that small can defeat you. just like betting 1-99 out of 100 and that 100 will get all your money. This is a good strategy but the wiining is very small. winning a hundred times can empty your wallet with just 1 game. So be very careful on this strat. sometimes your 1000 can only win 10-30.

[Grace333]

So basically you cannot have a pattern that can always work for you in sports betting but having a strategy can increase the chances of making profits. What you mentioned is something I have tried before and I can say that the chances of making profits are very high but as you stated the odds can be very low which doesn't totally worth eliminate the risk involved, it just reduces it. I also used the goals market in the same pattern also, after a particular team scores one goal I player over 1.5 goals, doesn't seem like a big deal right? because all they have to do is score another goal. As easy as it may seem I end up losing the bet in some cases because a team can score 1 goal 4 minutes into the first half and that would be the only goal through out the entire match.

[Iranus]

I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.

You need to proceed more calculatedly when placing large stake on bet with low odd. Winning 9 out of 10 bets at odds of 1.10 sound great but you might still not make any profit. Whatever small profit you accumulate a single large loss will wipe out most of them. That is why I never judge any strategy based on my winning streak.

If you want to test this seriously then you need to record your odds, scoreline, minute, league, red cards, major events and final result for every qualifying bet. After analyzing result of few hundred bet then you’ll be able to tell if your selection method actually offer any edge or not. You’ll also realize whether you are simply picking match where outcome was already heavily favored.

Four win is certainly good start. Now stick to rules and see how results shape up over long term.

[Ronsbit]

I could say it is a strategy as I personally do this. I have been doing this for quite a long time before now and it works most times. I pick draw after studying the game as I do this like 15mins to go.  Although it is rare to see a goal less opportunity to bet on and also sometimes draw which is not oftentimes in the picture. But I take advantage of such opportunity as it avails itself. I mostly do that on live betting but the rewards is basically very little except if my bet is high.

I also bet on live matches, but the strategy I don’t feel safe with is this: your draw. Anything is possible under 15-20 minutes. I can go with the op patterns, but the return can be very small, almost equal to nothing. But you see, when you are betting on a draw, even 89 minutes – that 1 minute left is enough to change the game outcome. I’m always afraid to bet on a draw; I'd rather go for a straight win than a draw.

I have been betting on draw and it has been working for me but I bet as little as can afford to lose in my local currency so that it doesn't affect me in the long run but to be frank it has worked for me many times whenever I do bet on such ods. I do that for strong teams playing and in most cases I go for the winning if the match involves a strong team and an average team.

[Pandu Geddon]

I am not interested in the odds offered on bets at the end of the match. Even if I were to place a bet directly, I could choose matches with at least one half remaining. There is already data we can use to make bets, although it will not guarantee a change in the situation. But with a 2-3 goal advantage, the odds offered are definitely very bad.

[nelson4lov]

I think I have tried a strategy like this before. You will win a lot of time but it only takes one loss to take all of those wins off the table and if you go into a losing streak (which is unlikely btw), there would be even more devastating returns. Its a high win rate strategy and you will win a lot but any loss will bring that the entire equity/bankroll curve.

I have also tried it before and I used it to lose high amount of money. You will be winning very well but the amount won each time are very small, so a single loss will be a big blow that will wipe almost all the money the person has in the gambling account. People that want to win in gambling compulsorily will later know this failed strategy, use it and fail.

Yup. That is my problem with this strategy. The wins will feel good since there are a lot of it but it only takes only loss to erase it all and you have to run it back again and encounter another loss a few bets into recovery, it would be too hard to come back then. This is why I wasn't excited when I read about the strategy from OP because its something I have tried and let go before I feel its not worth it in my books.

[Y3shot]

I have used the strategy before, it failed.

It will encourage you to use all the money won also on the next bet, but later in one of the matches, the opportunity will later score and draw or maybe win.

Just be careful about it.

It will let you also spend more time gambling which may not be good.

The odds are so small that it can just be 1.02. $100 to win $2 or less is not worth it.

It is a strategy that works for me many times, but it is very addictive if one is not careful. Especially for those it has favored more, it can make one feel as if winning is certain, and if you are not careful, you may decide to play with an amount that can't be afforded to lose.

Because of the high amounts used in this game and high expectations, it makes one feel tense and scared of losing. It is good when this game is played with understanding and with an amount one can afford to lose.

[rachael9385]

I could say it is a strategy as I personally do this. I have been doing this for quite a long time before now and it works most times. I pick draw after studying the game as I do this like 15mins to go.  Although it is rare to see a goal less opportunity to bet on and also sometimes draw which is not oftentimes in the picture. But I take advantage of such opportunity as it avails itself. I mostly do that on live betting but the rewards is basically very little except if my bet is high.

Betting on a draw few minutes before the game ends, playing an under option or anything to take advantage of the little time that's left before the match ends, all those strategies are not really guaranteed of being on our profitable. I remember staking extremely high amounts of money on games with low reward but i always assumed that losing was impossible due to how low the value of the odd is but one thing about betting is that you are going to learn or gain experience the more you engage in it. Now I read about other Bettors strategies and I'm completely unphased.