Could This Be a Pattern Or Strategy That Works

[NewRevelation]

That is a very safe approach, or I can say a safe betting strategy. Most users apply this strategy because it can give you a maximum success rate for your bets. You wait until the end, and when you are totally sure about the results, then you place your bet. This will be the best strategy for new users who want small profits. However, the drawback of this strategy is that you can only place a large stake because of the low odds, and if you lose, then all your profits can be gone. Sometimes, at the end, unexpected things happen for example, in the last two minutes, players can score one or maybe two goals, which will result in a loss for your bet. So keep this in mind too.

I suppose such an approach to gambling is very arguably a way to get a mere profit. The profit obtained is very low when compared to the capital used, I think this is not at all worth it even though it is not prohibited at all. I wouldn't do it, it's too risky because no one knows exactly what will happen in the last few minutes. After all, what makes a gambler really want to apply this approach?

To some level, it's just like a waste of time. I just wonder what the odd will be if a team is leading 2:0, and at about 88 minutes, you are placing a bet that the leading team wins the match. In most cases, you wouldn't even see such options because it's even more clear that the game will play. If you manage to see the option, then the odds is the problem.

Why don't you just do it with a game that is still in the 60th minutes with the same goal lead Margin, at least, this would be better and with a little odd to bet on. If you fear loss too much, then you stay away from gambling. If you are gambling, you should take some risk then. I think the 60th minutes risk is more okay compared to the 88th minutes with just 2 minutes left to play in normal time regulations. That bet even if it plays may even give nothing in return, and there is still a chance of loss.

[letteredhub]

This looks like a good strategy that's working until it starts getting bad and you begin to lose more than you have made from previous winnings. I don't fancy this strategy that much, and the reason is because the risk in disguise looks appealing to take but the loss to it when it comes is usually high because it would demand the gambler to pick many legs due to it's extreme small odds and accumulating many legs creates more risk to loss because 2:0 result can change with a comeback in no time.

[Odusko]

What you have to know to is that some times, when you make an analysis you should know that there are possible chances that you bets will hit in most cases, but that should not be taken as a working strategy you should rely on for your daily betting and expecting to win all the time you are going to get disappointed when the losses start coming in.

[MorganaX]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

It's crazy that you are just thinking of this now which shows big the entire gambling world is, because I can say for certainty that this is strategy that so many gamblers have used and i can tell you for free that this particular strategy might look easy and would feel like it's gonna get you somewhere but just one big loss in this sort of strategy and you are based to the very stage of struggles again. It's a good technique if you can continually winning but we all know that's not possible so I don't think it's a good strategy at all.

[SatoPrincess]

You just have to gamble for fun and forget about looking for any strategy to be profitable consistently, because that strategy can even fetch you more losses than when you didn't bother to use it because you will be confident in yourself and bet with a higher amount of money than your initial amount. Dtrategies are just for fun because it doesn't guarantee you profit since gambling is a game of luck and luck come by chance.

When we say “gamble for fun”, we don’t mean you should gamble without putting thought and effort into it. OP’s strategy is one that works imo. I thought making a bet on the Manchester derby when Micheal Oliver gave Foden a red card. Betting on Manchester City to win at that time would have been really good odds, it’s a shame I didn’t get around to it.

[Alvin_talk]

Has anyone ever tried this?

I have never tried this before and I strongly discourage you from continuing this so called strategy. It looks more like greed to me and you're gonna definitely end up losing big time in the long run. I'll always encourage people to play with with an amount you can afford to lose for your sanity sake. This strategy requires a high stake to make it profitable, and even if you succeed with 6 consecutive wins, two losses is just enough to do damage all your wins.

[Agbamoni]

It can't be a pattern. It is a strategy. Many bettors have used this strategy, including me.

All I can say about that strategy is that it is not sustainable. I think it is too risky. To get long-term profit from sports betting, you need to use a low-risk and sustainable strategy. The strategy you are using is too risky.

[Crypto Library]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

This will work only when we use a huge amount for betting, it is not perfect for small betting.

You can use this plan but here too there is a risk factor because sometimes even after 80 minutes or 85 minutes have passed, the opposing team can score goals and win, and the main problem here is that the money we can earn by winning 10 matches, that money will be lost if we lose one match, and at the same time a big amount will come to our loss account. Which we will not be able to recover, even if we win 100 such bets later.

Finally, I would like to give one caution, and that is never think that any specific strategy or skill will bring you guaranteed profits. Because in this case, skill and strategy make us overconfident and often force us to bet beyond our ability to lose, which results in the amount of our losses causing our financial crisis.

[Floczy]

The probability of a successful bet will actually be high in this case..

2 goal  after the 80th will be indeed hard to equalise. But it does depend on the situation of the match. There are things that should be studied before taking such bets in oder to increase the strategy winning rate.

First of all if the match is with a lot of goals, like 6-4, 4-3 etc.. but with the 2-0 difference, know that the 2 teams are good at scoring and that will automatically reduce probabilities of profit on that match when using this strategy

Also if you notice that the opposite team picked up in better performance, it is better you don't bet with that strategy as well
There are more you should put into considerations, like red card injured player from this winning team, all these will have to change your decision making when betting with it.

[TopTort777]

Not sure if you have found something new. Strategy - possibly, call it as strategy if you like. But that definitely is not a patters. I am not sure if you are going to win a significant amount of money by gambling like that. To feel any profit you must play all-in. Otherwise tiny odds wont make you feel any happiness from winning. After dozens of wins, one loss will cross out all your profit or will make you lose all. Believe me. It look like you have found a gem, but one loss will spoil everything and you will stop using this strategy.

[Sobz]

This looks like a good strategy that's working until it starts getting bad and you begin to lose more than you have made from previous winnings. I don't fancy this strategy that much, and the reason is because the risk in disguise looks appealing to take but the loss to it when it comes is usually high because it would demand the gambler to pick many legs due to it's extreme small odds and accumulating many legs creates more risk to loss because 2:0 result can change with a comeback in no time.

The risk is still there in other strategy of betting and i dont see anything wrong with this strategy but the only problem about this strategy is having the mindset of it being a sure game. This strategy still have the same risk as every other strategy. In gambling when their are no limit and one choose to gamble to win desperately, their is a negative effect for this.  So anyone who choose to go for this strategy must understand and gambling accordingly so that it doesn't make one go bankrupt.

[Smack That Ace]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage.

This is not anything new, mate. honestly it is an old strategy.
However only new gambler tend to use such kind of strategy.

There is no doubt that you will make profit initially. But I am certain that, at some point, you will suddenly lose large sum. You are well aware that odds here are very low. This mean you have to risk around $30 to $40 just to win $1. Let’s assume you have won 10 match using your method. But if even any single match ends in draw then you will lose huge amount of money. We have seen this happen many time in football. Where team might be leading by 2 or more goal but match still ends in draw. So while this strategy might work in short term but it is very risky in long run.

[jossiel]

I have tried that before but as you've said, the profit might be small but that's how its risk goes. The lesser the risk, the lesser profit yet more chance of winning.

IMO, as long as it's a profit of like around $5 to $10 per bet then you'll make at least 4 of it maybe in a day and that's already an acceptable amount that you can say it's a day.

Just control of how big you'll have to bet for the small risk you'll be getting there. Because it's about chances and you'll still have the chance to lose even if the game is favorable to your bet ATM.

[Z_MBFM]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute, I simply use that to my advantage. N/B:I only make this bets when I find such opportunities instead of forcing them. The only down side to this is that the odds can be extremely small and this might require you to take stake high on each bet. I have made four different bets so far and I have been on a winning streak, even though the profits are quite small but it's a work in progress. As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

I haven't tried this because it seems to me to be much riskier than regular betting. As you say, if one side is ahead by 2 goals at the end of the 80th minute of the game, then their odds will be very small, which is probably 1.05-1.1, and it doesn't seem like they will offer odds bigger than that. And from here, if you want to make a good profit, you will have to place a very large bet. But unfortunately, if somehow the opposing team draws the match by 2 goals, then you will lose your entire bet. A lot can happen in 2 minutes of the game, as we have seen many times before. So I am never interested in taking such big risks. I always prefer to place small bets on big odds. If you win, you get a good profit, and if you lose, the loss is not very large.

[Ashawowo(OS)]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute

Well, is this a strategy? We can say yes.
Can it be sustained over a long period? That we don't know yet.

The only time I can do this is as a person when I'm sure the team winning is the stronger team. If the stronger team is the one losing, I'll be skeptical to do that since they've a better chance to equalize those goals and we're talking about a very high stake here which might not be what I can afford to lose.

A good example to try this now is PSG which is currently winning Brest 0:1  from away, they're the favorites and winning, but I'm not staking beyond my budget on them since nothing is guaranteed.

[Cleanshit]

So recently I decided to try out a live betting strategy instead of betting on the match before it starts I patiently wait until the game is far into the second half but since it is something that I have been studying for a while I deligently wait and take out time to test my theory. What I do is that I place a bet on the team winning with 2 goals ahead during the 80th minute knowing that it would be difficult for their opponents to equalize at that dying minute

Well, is this a strategy? We can say yes.
Can it be sustained over a long period? That we don't know yet.

The only time I can do this is as a person when I'm sure the team winning is the stronger team. If the stronger team is the one losing, I'll be skeptical to do that since they've a better chance to equalize those goals and we're talking about a very high stake here which might not be what I can afford to lose.

A good example to try this now is PSG which is currently winning Brest 0:1  from away, they're the favorites and winning, but I'm not staking beyond my budget on them since nothing is guaranteed.

For this strategy to be worth taking won’t be decided from only the score line alone even with a team with a leading score of 2-0 if they are under pressure situations can change quickly.

A live betting also should involve what happening on the game not only the numbers of goals and time. Generally again as a bettor bet what you can afford to lose.

[Sticky Bomb]

As someone that has a level of experience with sports betting I know it is possible for the opponent to equalize with the team that's 2 or 3 goals ahead within a space of two minutes, nothing is totally guaranteed.
Has anyone ever tried this?

It's good you found a working strategy for yourself, but personally, this strategy isn't for me since I don't like the idea of stalking huge at all, it's the fastest way to auction and chasing recovery. I do this, but on a kind of reverse mode. I like to pick out a match where a favorite team is losing at halftime or deep into second half and place 2 different bets on them, to draw and to win the match, winning comes with better odds and if I'm lucky, I end in good profits.

A good example to try this now is PSG which is currently winning Brest 0:1  from away, they're the favorites and winning, but I'm not staking beyond my budget on them since nothing is guaranteed.

If you had placed your stakes on this, you would've won. The match saw no more goals and PSG won.

[ejikeme24]

It is not a new thing, of course I used to do that most of the time. I bet with this strategy recently and I won , but in my own case I don't wait until they get to 80th minutes before I will bet. I target those matches that is already in 65-70th minutes with 2 or 1 goals that's depending on the performance of the team, yeah I use to check possession on live before betting in that minute, if I see that they are not performing well I will just double chance them that's home to win or draw or any side to win. And Sometimes it worked while sometimes it failed. The truth is gambling is full of uncertainty, there's no strategy you will use that will guarantee wining.

[Bright0515]

There are lots of strategies In sports betting, everyone comes up with one after the other until they find out that it doesn't work eventually. Whatever strategy that you use the most important thing is to make sure it is backed up by risk management. Playing a live game at that time into the game usually comes with drastic off changes leaving you with nothing more than 1.05 odds most times, that seems like a waste of time to me.

[Josefjix]

I have tried that multiple times and it do works but the odds are way too small, if you are not a high staker, then that strategy is not for you. The riskiest factor in this kind is accumulating multiple games together, it do hurts most times.

Saying this because, top club might be loosing 2 zeros while at the 80th minutes, they can equallise to 2:2, you only use this strategy when the top club is winning 2 zeros to the underdogs, it would be harder for them to equallise.

So careful picking and accumulating games when top club is winning is the strategy to work with, then staking with higher amount is sure for good outcome.