⛓️ Sushistakes.com ⚖️ Provably Fair ⭐ Non-KYC ⚡NEW

[gangz]

[Obim34]

Now you’ve done much better with your ANN presentation than earlier.

I think you were adding little deposit for first few users to test the casino, is it still on?

Welcome to Bitcointalk forum in your official thread.

[gangz]

Now you’ve done much better with your ANN presentation than earlier.

I think you were adding little deposit for first few users to test the casino, is it still on?

Welcome to Bitcointalk forum in your official thread.

We carefully considered every comment and adjusted accordingly, it took us awhile but we got it done. 

For a free 1 dollar and the ability to participate in chatrain:

Code: talk1

[adultcrypto]

I checked your websites and matched that with what you posted here and everything like fine especially on the aspect of KYC which you stated in you TOS that it will not be required. My concern however, is if there is amount a user will win that might trigger you to initiate KYC. Most no-KYC platform usually engrave a clause in their KYC that stipulates that they are at liberty to request for KYC if they see the need for that. This is contrary to your platform that will never ask for that irrespective of what happens hence, the need for clarification from you.

[gangz]

I checked your websites and matched that with what you posted here and everything like fine especially on the aspect of KYC which you stated in you TOS that it will not be required. My concern however, is if there is amount a user will win that might trigger you to initiate KYC. Most no-KYC platform usually engrave a clause in their KYC that stipulates that they are at liberty to request for KYC if they see the need for that. This is contrary to your platform that will never ask for that irrespective of what happens hence, the need for clarification from you.

No, there is no winning amount that will automatically trigger a KYC request on our platform.

I think terms are something you go to when something goes wrong and feel scammed.

[Slow death]

Welcome to the forum. Your casino has a very nice design, and your announcement thread looks great too, but I didn't see a license for your casino. Maybe I'm just not looking in the right place on your site, but I can't find the license. I also read the Terms of Service, and to my surprise, I saw a $1 withdrawal fee for Litecoin; I don't understand why there would be a $1 fee for Litecoin withdrawals when the coin has very low transaction fees. Just to give a few examples: on the Binance exchange, the Litecoin withdrawal fee is $0.01 ( which is 0.001 LTC ) and Stake Casino charges the same amount. Look at the difference compared to the withdrawal fee charged by your casino it's a huge difference.



source: https://sushistakes.com/terms

I kept reading the terms of service and came across something that made me think for over ten minutes; I wondered if I was misinterpreting everything, because I couldn't find where the license was. Usually, casinos set up a company often one that doesn't even have a physical office and that company registers the casino's license. This effectively makes the casino the property of that company. In short, it’s a way to conceal the identities of the casino's owners. Well, I didn't see that in your casino, but I did see this:

These Terms are governed by the laws of the jurisdiction in which Sushi Stakes operates, and any dispute that cannot be resolved through support is subject to the courts of that jurisdiction. If any provision is found invalid, the rest remains in force.

source: https://sushistakes.com/terms

And what jurisdiction is it where Sushi Stakes operates? Finally, I checked your casino's Twitter account; it was created in October 2014. Yes, I read that right we're talking about an account that's over 10 years old. I spent a long time scrolling down to see more posts from this Twitter account, and this is all that shows up:



source: https://x.com/SushiStakes

What is happening with your casino's Twitter account?

[IcaroAugusto]

That's a thorough breakdown, and I think transparency on licensing and fees would go a long way here. Hopefully the casino can clarify these points soon.

[gangz]

That's a thorough breakdown, and I think transparency on licensing and fees would go a long way here. Hopefully the casino can clarify these points soon.

We'd like to address all comments meaningfully, it's easy to promise things for the future...

Litecoin fee's will be looked into along with a license for 3rd party games.

I think a license would mean blocking certain countries, adding KYC and provide little protection to players. However, a license will likely come one day as it's a requirement for providers and we will give fair notice to anyone who might be effected.

[Ronsbit]

Welcome OP.  For the first time I am seeing a casino stating no KYC and having nothing to do with KYC in their terms of service. This is commendable and I hope it would not be added discreetly just the way it is always said that casino's owns the sole responsibility to update their term's of services without the consent of their user's.
Your transaction fee seems to be on the high side looking at what you have on your website.
Bitcoin and Litecoin fees are on the high side and I will suggest you review them because we all know that as little cents we send for transaction, it is confirmed speedily onchain so review your fee to normal.

[Haunebu]

Great ANN presentation and the site design is kinda cute op, but the licensing part is a real issue which Slow Death already pointed out above. Y'all can still do well without any sort of licensing, but it's going to be tougher gaining trust when compared to licensed sites.

Also, I checked your post history and you did mention that KYC would be requested if y'all suspected something odd. Did your stance regarding this change?

[Joy- maker]

Welcome to the forum. I took a closer look at your platform it's very attractive and well designed I believe it has a lot of potential and I look forward to seeing how it develops within the community.  I also noticed your platform doesn't support sportsbook betting, and I believe adding this feature in the future would make your platform more appealing to a wide range users.  I also sent you a PM incase you are interested in running a signature campaign on the forum, feel free to write me on telegram @joymakerbtc.

[LastKiss]

I tried to register a new account but it said “New sign-ups are temporarily closed”, Is anyone getting the same error?

Also, I’m curious about how much we need to wager before we can withdraw our deposit from the platform cause I couldn’t find anything about this or we're able to withdraw our deposit without making any wager 

[hosemary]

I don't understand why there would be a $1 fee for Litecoin withdrawals when the coin has very low transaction fees.

I just checked that table, and they have lowered the Litecoin withdrawal fee to $0.05.
They have also lowered the USDT withdrawal fee on Binance Smart Chain to $0.25. It was $1 when you took the screenshot.

I tried to register a new account but it said “New sign-ups are temporarily closed”, Is anyone getting the same error?

I just tried to create an account and got the same error message.

[Tetu100]

No, there is no winning amount that will automatically trigger a KYC request on our platform.

If you guys can be able to meet up to this very standard you have layed down, then it's fine. Because there so many  casinos out there that will say they're a no KYC casino, but at the end after start demanding for your details even when the winnings that's involve isn't that huge. Hence, situation like this can mostly pissed me up towards a particular casino, and that is the end of our business.

I think terms are something you go to when something goes wrong and feel scammed.

That is how it's supposed to be and not the other way around . However, it shouldn't be only when a player is at the point of cashing big win, that is when they will remember that they are supposed to be carrying out some verification. However, if there should be a data collection, then let it be mandatory even before accepting the initial deposit from the user. This way is better.