BiggerZ.com | 100% RTP Originals | Crypto Casino, Sportsbook & Prediction Market

[Orpichukwu]

Have you logged in today to claim your free daily spin?

BiggerZ.com  have a Daily Rewards for you when you login your account to play games.

Daily Casino Bonus + Free Spins Every 24 Hours.

Is this bonus for new members, exclusively for Bitcoin Talk members, or anyone who just registers in the casino? Can they start claiming the bonus? The daily bonus for almost everyone is not easy to maintain; it costs a lot, especially when the wager is not much.


I have seen a lot of offers from this casino. I will have to register and try it out since I won’t have to use my personal money; the experience will determine if I will continue or not.

[keyscore44]

It would be great if any of the ambassadors could help. We need assistance to support second "red flag" initiative:

First scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593577.0

Second - Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5597968.0

and quote:

BiggerZ tournament leaderboard – artificially generated TOP 50

I have very serious reasons to believe that the TOP 50 in this BiggerZ tournament was artificially generated and does not represent genuine wagering activity from independent real players.

This is not simply a case of the numbers looking unusually high. The problem is that the leaderboard follows obvious mathematical patterns that simply do not occur naturally when dozens of unrelated players are wagering different amounts.

BiggerZ states in its own rules that the ranking is based on real-money wagers.


Now look at the first five positions:

1st place — $29,900,000.49
2nd place — $28,412,475.48
3rd place — $26,924,950.47
4th place — $25,437,425.46
5th place — $23,949,900.45

The difference between EVERY consecutive player is exactly:

$1,487,525.01

Five supposedly independent players somehow finish millions of dollars apart by exactly the same amount.

Then:

5th place — $23,949,900.45
6th place — $23,920,000.44

Difference:

$29,900.01

And the 6th-place result is almost exactly 80% of the leader's result.

Now look at positions 6–10:

6th place — $23,920,000.44
7th place — $21,684,975.43
8th place — $19,449,950.42
9th place — $17,214,925.41
10th place — $14,979,900.40

Again, every consecutive result differs by exactly:

$2,235,025.01

Another perfect mathematical sequence.

Then:

10th place — $14,979,900.40
11th place — $14,950,000.39

Difference:

$29,900.01

And 11th place is almost exactly 50% of the leader's result.

Positions 11–20 form yet another almost perfectly even sequence:

11th — $14,950,000.39
12th — $14,122,767.05
13th — $13,295,533.71
14th — $12,468,300.36
15th — $11,641,067.02
16th — $10,813,833.68
17th — $9,986,600.33
18th — $9,159,366.99
19th — $8,332,133.65
20th — $7,504,900.30

The difference between consecutive results remains approximately:

$827,233.34

Then once again:

20th place — $7,504,900.30
21st place — $7,475,000.29

Difference:

$29,900.01

And the 21st-place result is almost exactly 25% of the leader's result.

From this point onward, the pattern becomes even more obvious.

From 21st place through almost the entire remainder of the TOP 50, the results are separated by approximately:

$252,603.46

For example:

36th — $3,685,948.42
37th — $3,433,344.96
38th — $3,180,741.50
39th — $2,928,138.05
40th — $2,675,534.59
41st — $2,422,931.13
42nd — $2,170,327.67
43rd — $1,917,724.21
44th — $1,665,120.75
45th — $1,412,517.30
46th — $1,159,913.84
47th — $907,310.38
48th — $654,706.92
49th — $402,103.46
50th — $149,500.00

And $149,500 is exactly 0.5% of the leader's $29.9 million result.

So the structure is remarkably clear:

Leader = 100%
6th place = 80%
11th place = 50%
21st place = 25%
50th place = 0.5%

The values between those thresholds were then distributed in almost perfectly even mathematical steps.

It looks exactly like several target values were selected and a formula was used to fill the positions between them.

There is another ridiculous detail.

Look at the decimal endings of the first eleven results:

.49
.48
.47
.46
.45
.44
.43
.42
.41
.40
.39

Are players seriously expected to believe that eleven independent people generated multi-million-dollar wagering totals and their final cents just happened to count backwards perfectly from 49 to 39?

Now look at what happens immediately after the TOP 50:

50th — $149,500.00
51st — $29,961.00
52nd — $5,492.63
53rd — $5,000.03
54th — $4,461.93
55th — $3,000.16
56th — $2,005.57
57th — $1,707.77
58th — $1,627.82
59th — $1,528.98
60th — $1,430.77
61st — $1,218.23
62nd — $1,048.61
63rd — $795.60

And suddenly the leaderboard starts looking normal.

No identical gaps.
No perfect percentages.
No mathematical sequences.
No artificially descending decimal endings.

Just ordinary, irregular wagering totals.

Even the usernames change.

The TOP 50 contains names such as MysticHazel, PixelNomad, BraveKiwi, GoldenGecko, RustyMeteor, HoneyRacer, CoralRocket, AzureRabbit and VioletCipher.

Immediately below the TOP 50, normal masked usernames start appearing: tomo*****, TTar*****, mduz*****, amee*****, roze***** and others.

The real players effectively start from 51st place.

There is another point that makes this even harder to believe: the sheer scale of the alleged wagering.

According to BiggerZ's own leaderboard, the TOP 50 supposedly generated around:

$458.5 MILLION

in real-money wagering during a single weekend tournament.

Almost half a billion dollars.

Now put that into perspective.

Stake, one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world, receives approximately:

98 million website visits per month.

BiggerZ receives only around:

654,000 visits per month.

That means Stake has roughly 150 times more website traffic than BiggerZ.

Yet BiggerZ wants players to believe that this relatively small site somehow had just 50 players generating nearly half a billion dollars of real-money turnover during one weekend tournament.

Even huge operators such as Stake, Gamdom and Sportsbet.io run major daily and weekly races, yet their public leaderboards do not normally show anything remotely resembling this bizarre combination of enormous wagering totals and perfectly constructed mathematical sequences.

So the question is simple:

Does BiggerZ seriously think its players are stupid enough to believe this?

If these figures were genuine, BiggerZ would be showing wagering activity completely out of proportion to the size of the platform — activity you would expect from an operator far larger than Stake, not from a site with only a tiny fraction of Stake's traffic.

In other words, either BiggerZ has somehow become one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world without anybody noticing, or these leaderboard numbers are simply not real.

And this is not an isolated case.

BiggerZ uses the same strategy in its other tournaments: advertise large prize pools, fill the highest positions with fictitious players and artificially huge wagering totals, and create the impression that the platform is full of high-stakes gamblers.

In this particular tournament, the TOP 50 is not made up of genuine independent players. The repeated identical gaps, exact percentage thresholds, sequential decimal endings and the immediate transition to completely normal irregular results from 51st place onward make this clear.

The TOP 50 was artificially generated by BiggerZ. The real players start from 51st place.

This allows BiggerZ to advertise impressive prize pools and make the site look far larger and more active than it really is.

And if most of the highest-paying positions are occupied by fictitious accounts generated by the casino, then those supposedly huge tournament prize pools cost BiggerZ very little compared with what real players are led to believe.

This is not a genuine real-money leaderboard. It is a manufactured leaderboard designed to create fake activity, fake high-stakes players and the illusion that BiggerZ is a much larger gambling platform than it really is.




FALSE TOURNAMETNS

https://www.biggerz.com/casino/tournaments?tournament=823651

[UpTober]

The bid is getting higher BALLON D’OR 2026 and predictions market odds may going to change as events keep changing, just like Kylian Mbappés stake on the predictions market, increasing sharply from ~20-30%, making him second in position

England's Harry Kane is the number one man on the list, with a 64% percentage.

It is very likely that this year's Ballon d'Or will go to Harry Kane. I have learned from some sports-based media that Lamine Yamal has received 23 percent of the votes, Mbappe has moved away from Messi's place to win the Ballon d'Or, so now it can be said with a lot of certainty that in the end, Harry Kane may be ahead of everyone and it is only a matter of time before this highest individual honor in football is won by Harry Kane. However, after the previous Ballon d'Or ceremony, Harry Kane commented that this season is the season with the most potential for him to win the Ballon d'Or and that is what is happening, that is, the Ballon d'Or is going to go to Harry Kane.

[Call_Me_Guru]

The bid is getting higher BALLON D’OR 2026 and predictions market odds may going to change as events keep changing, just like Kylian Mbappés stake on the predictions market, increasing sharply from ~20-30%, making him second in position

England's Harry Kane is the number one man on the list, with a 64% percentage.

It is very likely that this year's Ballon d'Or will go to Harry Kane. I have learned from some sports-based media that Lamine Yamal has received 23 percent of the votes, Mbappe has moved away from Messi's place to win the Ballon d'Or, so now it can be said with a lot of certainty that in the end, Harry Kane may be ahead of everyone and it is only a matter of time before this highest individual honor in football is won by Harry Kane. However, after the previous Ballon d'Or ceremony, Harry Kane commented that this season is the season with the most potential for him to win the Ballon d'Or and that is what is happening, that is, the Ballon d'Or is going to go to Harry Kane.

Emotions, sentiments, and mind playing by the bookies is causing the drastic changes we see in the BallonD'or probability and odds shift. Take a look at the performance of the players after the world cup and you can see exactly what's going on. Mbappe made a drastic recovery from 6% up to a 32% – 44% range. While the clear favourite Kane keeps his good probability range of 54% – 71%.. Only Yamal reduced from 44% peak down to a 6% – 10% range. These may not reflect the internal standards, but for sentiment and bookies twisting player's mind.  But I agree that Kane would win it. Let them not disappoint us.

[Lembo69]

The bid is getting higher BALLON D’OR 2026 and predictions market odds may going to change as events keep changing, just like Kylian Mbappés stake on the predictions market, increasing sharply from ~20-30%, making him second in position

England's Harry Kane is the number one man on the list, with a 64% percentage.

Harry Kane is number one on the Ballon d'Or list with a 64% chance. Let me tell you the reasons first.

• Kane scored an incredible number of goals for Bayern in the 2025-26 season.
• He also scored goals for England in the World Cup.
• Kane's 64% chance of winning the Ballon d'Or is due to his performance and exceptional
• The club's success and his own skills.

However, just because Harry Kane is 64% likely, it does not mean that he will definitely win the Ballon d'Or.

A few things can work on increasing Kylian Mbappe's chances on both sides.

• His goal statistics.
• Good performance.
• The market valuation changes with his style of play.

So one thing we have to remember is that it is not certain who will actually win the Ballon d'Or.

They've already said that you just need to wait before they credit the $5 in your account since they're doing it in batches. There's no need for you to share your account ID here and the email as you'll be more prone to doxxing.

Just wait is what I will say. If you're eligible, you will receive it. Just be patient.

Since they said they will give $5 dollars, it means you will definitely get it if you can follow the rules. Many people have already been given it in the Telegram channel and it was given to those who were active. And if you haven't received it, I urge you to be more active. And don't lose patience because patience is a means that can do or bring you good things.

[Ale88]

Asking for the email address only is not particularly suspicious in my opinion, it could also be a cross-check on their side, just to make sure the username you provided is actually linked to the email address. I'm talking about Z_MBFM situation.

I do agree with you.
Asking for an email address is totally fair. It's not like the support won't find out his email address later. If someone considers an email address as a personal thing, they should not use that personal email address to sign up for a casino. Not all the casino back office has access to check the accounts using the username. So, they may ask for an email address to check a player account.

Also, even if a user provides the username only, the person who checks will be able to see the email address as well in the user profile (If their back office has the feature). I don't consider this suspicious at all.

They maybe start to worry if after they submit their email, they receive a code then the person asked the code sent on their email.

But if there's nothing like that happen, then their support just asked that to examine if it match on their account. Then I don't see any problem with it.

If they are not comfortable being asked. Much better for people to use always their dummy emails, when signing up on a new casino. Because with this they can avoid polluting their main email and they possibly stay away from any scam attempts which may possibly sent to them.

I was checking the security setting on my profile and I noticed there is no option to activate an anti-phishing code/phrase: this could be a useful feature to reduce scams. It's something I've been using for years on several websites and it helps a lot.
I'm not an expert so I don't know how difficult it is to implement such feature but it shouldn't be a big deal.

[jahead]

Have you logged in today to claim your free daily spin?
[...]

Thanks for letting me know! I finally logged in after work, but I can't see where to claim my free daily spin. Could you help me with that? That'd be great! You can also send me a PM if you like.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Thanks for letting me know! I finally logged in after work, but I can't see where to claim my free daily spin. Could you help me with that? That'd be great! You can also send me a PM if you like.

As a rep of this place you should know how it actually works, right? Wasn't this a requirement for the campaign?



Anyway, if you don't have the wager and/or VIP level you need for this there won't be any free spins or anything extra.

[jahead]

[...]
As a rep of this place you should know how it actually works, right? Wasn't this a requirement for the campaign?
[...]
Anyway, if you don't have the wager and/or VIP level you need for this there won't be any free spins or anything extra.

Thanks for explaining the details of ambassador job once again. Besides, you can't expect everyone to know everything 100%.   What matters is knowing who to ask to learn it. The good thing is that after you explained it to me, I can replicate the information and use it myself, and now everyone else here knows it too thanks to you.   Maybe you should apply to be an ambassador too. Win/win/win.  

[AHOYBRAUSE]

[...]
As a rep of this place you should know how it actually works, right? Wasn't this a requirement for the campaign?
[...]
Anyway, if you don't have the wager and/or VIP level you need for this there won't be any free spins or anything extra.

Thanks for explaining the details of ambassador job once again. Besides, you can't expect everyone to know everything 100%.   What matters is knowing who to ask to learn it. The good thing is that after you explained it to me, I can replicate the information and use it myself, and now everyone else here knows it too thanks to you.   Maybe you should apply to be an ambassador too. Win/win/win.  

If I would have any interest I would have applied, yet I rather stay away from a site that makes up fake numbers in "races" and other giveaways. Maybe have a look at this one and reconsider who you want to represent:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5597968.0

Please have a read, it's actually quite alarming what has come to light here.

[jahead]

[...]
Please have a read, it's actually quite alarming what has come to light here.

So you're talking about a completely different topic and just using me as an excuse, claiming that I don't know something as an ambassador. Why didn't you just say that right away instead of trying to discredit me here, put me on the spot, and make me look bad in front of everyone? ppff...

As for the topic you brought up, I'm very much aware of it, follow it very closely and will see how I react to it, and I strongly assume that the people in charge will comment on it soon, bc I haven't had the training for that yet as an ambassador... ... ...

[AHOYBRAUSE]

[...]
Please have a read, it's actually quite alarming what has come to light here.

So you're talking about a completely different topic and just using me as an excuse, claiming that I don't know something as an ambassador. Why didn't you just say that right away instead of trying to discredit me here, put me on the spot, and make me look bad in front of everyone? ppff...

As for the topic you brought up, I'm very much aware of it, follow it very closely, and I strongly assume that the people in charge will comment on it soon, bc I haven't had the training for that yet as an ambassador... ... ...

You not having a basic understanding about the site is no secret, but don't you worry, as casino going as far as faking race results won't be around for too long, just as I predicted several weeks ago. You following the case "very closely" but having nothing to say about the obvious misleading results they are providing already tells me a lot. Good luck to you though. Ah and please no more private messages, thanks.

[Shishir99]

I was checking the security setting on my profile and I noticed there is no option to activate an anti-phishing code/phrase: this could be a useful feature to reduce scams. It's something I've been using for years on several websites and it helps a lot.
I'm not an expert so I don't know how difficult it is to implement such feature but it shouldn't be a big deal.

It should not take more than an hour with the help of AI these days. I know nothing about the codes, but I can prepare a website easily these day with a few commands, of course these won't be production ready. Real products need weeks of testing in stages before it gets released on production. anti-phishing code/phrase might be a good addition, but 2FA should be enough to protect the users from the scammers.

[Wiwo]

Emotions, sentiments, and mind playing by the bookies is causing the drastic changes we see in the BallonD'or probability and odds shift. Take a look at the performance of the players after the world cup and you can see exactly what's going on. Mbappe made a drastic recovery from 6% up to a 32% – 44% range. While the clear favourite Kane keeps his good probability range of 54% – 71%.. Only Yamal reduced from 44% peak down to a 6% – 10% range. These may not reflect the internal standards, but for sentiment and bookies twisting player's mind.  But I agree that Kane would win it. Let them not disappoint us.

Harry Kane happened to become the winners of the men category award and congratulations to him on becoming the award winner this round, Kane hard the higher predictions and possibilities of winning based on all records and he indeed deserve the award.

What I believe is that there are other criteria that make up for winning the awards aside footballers goals records and numbers of assist within the given period. Kane finished with 73 goals in 65 matches to beat the rest of the contenders.

Edited and corrected!

[jahead]

Ahoybrause - after taking another detailed look at the various topics and posts about BiggerZ, some of which I wasn't familiar with before, I have to apologize and tell you that you were right. Also, I've stepped down from the campaign. Thanks again for the heads-up mate.

"Ignorance is no excuse." - "Unwissenheit schützt vor Strafe nicht." like we say in Germany.

[Woodie]

Emotions, sentiments, and mind playing by the bookies is causing the drastic changes we see in the BallonD'or probability and odds shift. Take a look at the performance of the players after the world cup and you can see exactly what's going on. Mbappe made a drastic recovery from 6% up to a 32% – 44% range. While the clear favourite Kane keeps his good probability range of 54% – 71%.. Only Yamal reduced from 44% peak down to a 6% – 10% range. These may not reflect the internal standards, but for sentiment and bookies twisting player's mind.  But I agree that Kane would win it. Let them not disappoint us.

Nice choice of words, let them not disrespect us!! And unfortunately we have seen how some year's back they would give their favourite Messi even when he had a bad season but this time around things are happening on merit!

Well-done Harry Kane this Ballon d'Or had your name written all over it, thanks to the consistency! Farmers league keeps getting the recognition  

credit: the touchline

Anyway, if you don't have the wager and/or VIP level you need for this there won't be any free spins or anything extra.

Looking at the number of wagers coming from the other guys, do we even stand a chance to win anything from the raffle.. I have seen players with over 30,000 tickets against players like me with less than a 10.. definitely stand no chance, the probability game doesn't allow!

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Yamal happened to become the winners of the award and congratulations to him on becoming the award winner this round, Kane hard the higher predictions and possibilities of winning based on all records.

He didn't win the Ballon d'Or, Harry Kane did and it was well deserved. Among all of the top contenders, he's one person that everyone can agree with that he deserve to win and we can say others weren't robbed. If Mbappe won then Yanal would've been robbed and same thing if it would've gone the other way round but with Kane winning, we can all agreed a great season he had being the top goal scorer in Europe and also turning up in big games last season. Mbappe (2nd) finishing above Yanal (3rd) also deems right. I thought Mbappe was going to win after Yanal and Kane got their other award first, I then thought all three awards will be shared between the three of them but congratulations to Harry kane again, well deserved win.

[Wiwo]

Edited and corrected

He didn't win the Ballon d'Or, Harry Kane did and it was well deserved. Among all of the top contenders, he's one person that everyone can agree with that he deserve to win and we can say others weren't robbed. If Mbappe won then Yanal would've been robbed and same thing if it would've gone the other way round but with Kane winning, we can all agreed a great season he had being the top goal scorer in Europe and also turning up in big games last season. Mbappe (2nd) finishing above Yanal (3rd) also deems right. I thought Mbappe was going to win after Yanal and Kane got their other award first, I then thought all three awards will be shared between the three of them but congratulations to Harry kane again, well deserved win.

My bad man, I have corrected the mistake and thank you for pointing out, Yamal finished 3rd and won the young talent awards this time.

[julerz12]

It would be great if any of the ambassadors could help. We need assistance to support second "red flag" initiative:

First scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593577.0

Second - Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5597968.0

and quote:

BiggerZ tournament leaderboard – artificially generated TOP 50

I have very serious reasons to believe that the TOP 50 in this BiggerZ tournament was artificially generated and does not represent genuine wagering activity from independent real players.
~SNIP~

Whoa, that's interesting. The top spot has wagered $29m in one week? Is that some sort of super-ultra-highroller? I'm surprised his username isn't MuskyElon. 
If this is indeed true, I wonder if the BiggerZ team would award the entire $30k tournament prize pool to those who are in the 51st and below spots ^{(assuming they are the only real players on that list)}.
Right now, it seems they are set to receive only $45 each.  So far, it looks like no one from the team has stepped up and made an official response yet.

[Bitinity]

Whoa, that's interesting. The top spot has wagered $29m in one week? Is that some sort of super-ultra-highroller? I'm surprised his username isn't MuskyElon. 
If this is indeed true, I wonder if the BiggerZ team would award the entire $30k tournament prize pool to those who are in the 51st and below spots ^{(assuming they are the only real players on that list)}.
Right now, it seems they are set to receive only $45 each.  So far, it looks like no one from the team has stepped up and made an official response yet.

I wanted to check myself after I read this topic but I could not find the ended tournaments (the daily and weekly race), have they just removed the leaderboard statistic of the ended tournaments recently? Would this count as an attempt to cover up the evidence as they removed while on other side they did not make official statement about this case.