Why not try to make things more explanatory and easier for members to comprehend? It will be very difficult for someone to easily understand the exact idea you are suggesting from the content you made.
Op tends to sound more technical in his ideal but even as that, the explanatory in the contexts seem very weird to be comprehend as much you pointed out.
Even me as I considered the data analysis of the thread I can't make a figurative out of it may be because I don't have technical knowledge to grasp the message though.
If he has also meant to emphasize on the market events that halves the rewards of the bitcoin miner's as the topic of may be hinted, I'd only say that what marks a cycle is the halving which halves miner's rewards in every 4 year's as a market cycle.
If there's any other events he may be referring in that case, then it should be the regular high volatility of the market which by chances can also be manipulated by trader's, whalers and institution investor's.
Do not overthink. Just look at the numbers:
BTC PRICES
$0.001 (starting)
$12.4 (the end of first cycle)
$651.8 (the end of second cycle)
$8579.8 (the end of third cycle)
BTC POTENTIAL PROFITABILITIES TOWARDS $100000
$100000:$0.001 = 100 000 000x (starting)
$100000:$12.4 = 8065x (the end of first cycle)
$100000:$651.8 = 153x (the end of second cycle)
$100000:$8579.8 = 11.66x (the end of third cycle)
Do you see
halvings (in log terms) ?
