Wallet-login casinos without a licence: what would make you trust one?

[Itz-prisigold]

by wallet do you mean like one of those from decentralized finance?
I haven't tried it yet but it seems really dangerous to give access to your wallet via the web
Maybe I'm an old-fashioned person who doesn't trust these things at all.

If you ask me, i don't believe you’re old fashioned simply because you’re trying to be careful. After all, it's your hard earned, so it very right that you don’t want to take any chances with it. Correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t think that just connecting a wallet to a website doesn’t automatically mean the casino can be able to take your money, but I still believe that you really need to be careful on the kind of things you approve.

Personally, I will never want to connect my wallet to any casino whether I trust the casino or not, or whether the casino has license or not. I would prefer to research on how the site functions before putting any of my funds.

[danadc]

by wallet do you mean like one of those from decentralized finance?
I haven't tried it yet but it seems really dangerous to give access to your wallet via the web
Maybe I'm an old-fashioned person who doesn't trust these things at all.

If you ask me, i don't believe you’re old fashioned simply because you’re trying to be careful. After all, it's your hard earned, so it very right that you don’t want to take any chances with it. Correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t think that just connecting a wallet to a website doesn’t automatically mean the casino can be able to take your money, but I still believe that you really need to be careful on the kind of things you approve.

Personally, I will never want to connect my wallet to any casino whether I trust the casino or not, or whether the casino has license or not. I would prefer to research on how the site functions before putting any of my funds.

We should be wary of casinos that require wallets. This reminds me that some casinos allow us to register using our wallets, which seems a bit dangerous to me. I don't know much about security; it might be difficult to compromise wallets, but our wallets should be sacred, and we shouldn't leave them exposed in places that could be vulnerable to attacks.

I wouldn't think we're old-fashioned for having some respect for these things. After what happened with Ledger, some things now terrify me.

[qwertyup23]

The biggest factor that influences me in creating an account (necessarily a wallet) on an unlicensed gambling platform would be its general reputation on the public.

Regardless if an unlicensed casino offers better/less rewards and/or privileges, if that casino has a questionable reputation then everything would be for naught. The most important factor, in my opinion, would be its reputation and how it is perceived in the public. Your most consideration should always be its reputation because that will determine its longevity in the future of its operations.

him saying that is so funny, because he didn't make a single reply about the "mistakes others have already called out" on the casino thread.

I went through the thread, he literally abandoned the thread after the post from logfiles, I guess he’s just recruited for the account with little knowledge about the Casino itself or they just cooked up lies to cover up for their Casno..

Forgot to add that we will still tag any existing user who eventually raises future scam accusations unless they answer the questions and clear the air before the accusations.

Well, this makes things awkward. Scam accusations are created in order to answer any allegations regarding its reports. Failure to answer to any would be considered as a waiver to such.

[promise444c5]

Well, this makes things awkward. Scam accusations are created in order to answer any allegations regarding its reports. Failure to answer to any would be considered as a waiver to such.

That’s not really what I meant though  ..definitely not tagging anyone except RhinoBetting  .
Just a way of saying every gambler here should be aware of the situation without making the mistake of being scammed even when the existing  hasn’t been cleared.

Neither concluding that RhinoBetting is a scam yet  but so far they are looking like one since they failed to answer the questions and accusations thrown at them.

[Queen uloma]

Probably fair it self doesn’t mean that a casino is trustworthy. I will still check their withdrawal history, how long have they operate and if they have transparent way to handle disputes.

 Wallet connection may protect personal information but it can’t eventually make the platform safe. Since this casino doesn’t have license yet, what am expecting is a  strong transparency and proof that they pay users. Any casino that delay withdrawal or get hidden rules for me is  a red flag

[Mr_Brilliant$]

The main thing is here is the license. That is a no no. Whether the casino is good or not, it doesn't matter. As there is no license and offering does benefits looks like a bait. Other casinos have licence and do that bait like that and people even trust them a little.

Looking at a casino without license is scary. I wouldn't even thing of depositing. Let's look at this from the angle of the customers or gamblers. They have no protection if something goes wrong. And from a customers angle, I wouldn't advice anyone to join that casino.

[Nightwatchmare]

Normally connecting wallet in a platform is damn risky, you can give a third party access to your wallet without knowing. This is my first time of hearing about the RhinoBetting platform and i think it is not trustworthy for me to connect my wallet since it is not a well known gambling platform. But since you asked what to check before depositing on a site like RhinoBetting platform my answers are, i will check the minimum withdrawal of the site and how fast it can take for withdrawal to receive, i will also check how long the gambling platform have stay.

[348Judah]

Probably fair it self doesn’t mean that a casino is trustworthy. I will still check their withdrawal history, how long have they operate and if they have transparent way to handle disputes.

Some gamblers are playing all in the name of having fun while some are already with the motive to see justification to what they are using their money to play, this is why it is a major concern for every Gambler to see that a casino serve them right when it comes to withdrawals and other reputationer history about the casino.

Wallet connection may protect personal information but it can’t eventually make the platform safe. Since this casino doesn’t have license yet, what am expecting is a  strong transparency and proof that they pay users. Any casino that delay withdrawal or get hidden rules for me is  a red flag

You can expect me to connect my wallet to a gambling platform, because I am too informed to be deformed, this is the easiest route to get your wallet complicated if you are not being careful.

[Julien_Olynpic]

I think a license is sufficient to play at the casino mentioned in the introductory post. For a small amount of money and for fun, that's enough.
For larger amounts, you need a reputation, history, user base, ratings, and reviews. However, there are many people, myself included, who are drawn to testing little-known products. Perhaps this is simply a waste of time and irrational, but there are many such people. Small new casinos should certainly target these types of people in their marketing.

[yhiaali3]

Linking the wallet to any site requires high trust initially. I cannot link my decentralized wallet to any application even if it is decentralized, unless it is completely trustworthy to me.

It gets worse when the casino is unlicensed. If the casino is unlicensed and you have a negative mark on the forum, no one here can trust linking their wallet to the casino. If any problem occurs this means the loss of the wallet's assets.

[Asuspawer09]

I probably would never use a casino that needed to be connected to a wallet like Phantom or MetaMask or something like that, it just wasn't a thing, and it is vulnerable to draining. There are a lot of cases in the past years when cryptocurrency projects are trending where your wallet gets drained when you connect it to a website, so unless you are sure of the website or it is a popular exchange or something I wouldn't easily get it even though It might not have a balance at all.

This doesn't do anything to build trust, because it is just risky, the licensing was a thing, but even if it was a licensed casino, I still wouldn't connect a wallet.

Big red flags for me are KYC or KYC on withdrawal; I absolutely just hate doing KYC, and I wouldn't put any money on a gambling website that wants KYC. I mean it might not be a bad thing for some people but Im not risking my identity on some gambling platforms.

[Tetu100]

Op your casino don't look real to me and if I may ask, why am I connecting my wallet to your platform and what makes you think I will wanna take such risk? Moreover I will suggest you go and sort out the red tag on your profile before you can say anything here. Otherwise, you shouldn't be here saying all this.

However, your casino is very questionable and again they are not even licensed for cried out loud. Mate you have no concrete fact you can use in convincing anyone why they should give you a listening ear so I will advice you lock up the thread before you will attract more red tags to yourself.

[Ryu_Ar1]

I'm not asking anyone to sign up. I'd rather hear the criticism now than repeat mistakes others have already called out.

For some kesemaptan actually I prefer to look for options log in using other methods than the wallet like the method of the site you are using, it does not mean not to trust but this is just to keep moreover before I ever had a bad condition when logging in using the wallet.

So I try to avoid from the beginning regardless of whether the site is good or not I don't really care about it because from the beginning I was looking for other options to log in instead of using a wallet.
I think this can also be input for the site you are developing because for now some sites including large sites also provide several options for users to log in, can use email, some social media that can be associated even with a wallet. It is functioned to make its users comfortable wherever their choice.

[viljy]

~
I'm not asking anyone to sign up. I'd rather hear the criticism now than repeat mistakes others have already called out.

For clients (reasonable clients, not idiots) to agree to connect their wallet to your casino, you need at least to have certificates, and from several security auditors. Such a certificate used to cost at least around $30000 about five years ago, something like that from Certik.  I don’t know what the prices are now, but they’re probably even higher. And you need to have certificates from at least two different auditors.

If your casino doesn’t even have the money for a cheap offshore license, then it certainly doesn’t have the money for an auditor either. Or perhaps there’s no license and no audit because your casino won’t be able to pass the inspection, and you know it. Either way, both options look negative.

P.S. the logic is as follows: wallet connection --> you have a defi service --> show the auditor’s certificate... you don’t have to show it if your service is at least Polymarket

P.P.S. Very specific conditions that are completely uncharacteristic of casinos:

Deposits: from a connected wallet on Polygon, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, zkSync, Linea, Optimism, Ethereum or Avalanche. Minimum 2 USDT, and Rhinobetting charges no deposit fee (you only pay network gas)
Withdrawals: USDT on Polygon, Arbitrum or BNB Chain. Minimum 10 USDT, withdrawal fee 1 USDT
Bitcoin: not supported

[abel1337]

I don't really play on no license casino since there are so many casino option nowadays. To be honest I don't want to link my wallet into a casino that has no reputation or any other website. This is far worst than the usual deposit method that other casino is doing, since once you link your wallet, that itself is a risk.

Casino competition is real in our current time and straying on the usual casino specification doesn't mean you will get the specific gamblers market. There are casinos that did the same thing as you but doesn't end up as good as they are expecting, this is why the usual casinos are still prevailing and most of them collects KYC.

I believe that many gambler nowadays accepted the fact that KYC is a thing that casino will collect, it just depends on the severity on how often they collects it. Licenses are also a standard. Big and reputable casino came way up there for a reason and it doesn't need no-KYC or wallet log-in casino. Gamblers want a reputable, stable and good bonuses since gamblers play for profit and also entertainment.

It's hard to go from no name casino to a big reputable casino but I advise you to clear up the negative trust you had, it is severely impacting your reputation here.

[YellowSwap]

Who helped the developer of such casino to come up with this plan? Are they trying to beat all other competitors or what? Because so far they have only proven to have failed, casinos are better when you make deposits on them rather than connecting your crypto wallet.

Keystone data was breached days ago and people aren't having it, many are angry for the fact that these breaches keeps happening and I believe this is because we have AI now, what if connecting crypto wallet to any gambling platforms is a begining to a disaster?

Because it sure looks like it, I can remember claiming many free tokens many years back, I used my metamask to connect into many Dex and DeFi platforms for trading purposes and my metamask got hacked, there is no way this casino wallet connects won't end same way.

Scrap this idea and do what other online casinos are doing.

[gracreavix]

We have the lowest licence you can acquire. At least get that one if you can't get the all exclusive once.

I won't ever gamble in a casino that doesn't have licence. They are mostly fake and pretend to offer higher rewards and bonuses than your regular casinos.

That alone will scare people. No licensing still same as no protection for gamblers. You can just wake up one morning and decide to shut down. Nobody is going to hold you accountable. That's what those licensing are for. Not having that is an automatic red flag already.

[fredericktaylor]

The main thing is here is the license. That is a no no. Whether the casino is good or not, it doesn't matter. As there is no license and offering does benefits looks like a bait. Other casinos have licence and do that bait like that and people even trust them a little.

Looking at a casino without license is scary. I wouldn't even thing of depositing. Let's look at this from the angle of the customers or gamblers. They have no protection if something goes wrong. And from a customers angle, I wouldn't advice anyone to join that casino.

Even if the casino has a valid license, has been operating for a long time and is completely transparent in terms of rules and regulations, I am not willing to gamble in a casino by connecting my personal wallet, I will definitely avoid those casinos that have such strange rules. Before using my hard-earned money anywhere, I will definitely do proper research on the matter and then take a decision. I am not willing to gamble in a casino that allows gamblers to do whatever they want with no one to hold them accountability.

[alastantiger]

When a casino is not fair and tries to lie to their players' minds once it’s discovered, there is no amount of sweet talking that will make me consider the casino to be trustworthy. A good example of what I’m referring to is your casinos claiming to be registered earlier than when they were actually started, and casinos that claim to have licensed when they don't... licensed don’t really matter much if the casino can operate fairly, especially when they are starting up, but just don’t lie about it.

I find it already difficult to trust new casinos hence if I trust one new one that I begin to use them then I discovered that they lied about some things like them not having a licence but had a fake one on their websites then I will have to srop making use of them immediately and I also do not think there is anything that can even make me to make use of such casinos against.

When casino lie about their credentials then they can also lie about other things and it could be that they will end up scamming their customers when they have gathered enough money to make their running away he worth it. Some casinos are created with the intentions of scamming from the beginning. it is better they come out clean and say they do not have a licence than lie about it to attract customers to use their casino for gambling.

[xenomorfo]

The main thing is here is the license. That is a no no. Whether the casino is good or not, it doesn't matter. As there is no license and offering does benefits looks like a bait. Other casinos have licence and do that bait like that and people even trust them a little.

Looking at a casino without license is scary. I wouldn't even thing of depositing. Let's look at this from the angle of the customers or gamblers. They have no protection if something goes wrong. And from a customers angle, I wouldn't advice anyone to join that casino.

Oh God.. let's always remember who issues the licenses, the state.
Do you really trust the state?
Do we want to remember the biggest scams that have been carried out recently?
subprime mortgages
ftx the exchange
bernand madoff

I don't think the state was absent in these three scams.