BIGGERZ SCAM Tournaments

[MarioGls]

BiggerZ tournament leaderboard – artificially generated TOP 50

I have very serious reasons to believe that the TOP 50 in this BiggerZ tournament was artificially generated and does not represent genuine wagering activity from independent real players.

This is not simply a case of the numbers looking unusually high. The problem is that the leaderboard follows obvious mathematical patterns that simply do not occur naturally when dozens of unrelated players are wagering different amounts.

BiggerZ states in its own rules that the ranking is based on real-money wagers.


Now look at the first five positions:

1st place — $29,900,000.49
2nd place — $28,412,475.48
3rd place — $26,924,950.47
4th place — $25,437,425.46
5th place — $23,949,900.45

The difference between EVERY consecutive player is exactly:

$1,487,525.01

Five supposedly independent players somehow finish millions of dollars apart by exactly the same amount.

Then:

5th place — $23,949,900.45
6th place — $23,920,000.44

Difference:

$29,900.01

And the 6th-place result is almost exactly 80% of the leader's result.

Now look at positions 6–10:

6th place — $23,920,000.44
7th place — $21,684,975.43
8th place — $19,449,950.42
9th place — $17,214,925.41
10th place — $14,979,900.40

Again, every consecutive result differs by exactly:

$2,235,025.01

Another perfect mathematical sequence.

Then:

10th place — $14,979,900.40
11th place — $14,950,000.39

Difference:

$29,900.01

And 11th place is almost exactly 50% of the leader's result.

Positions 11–20 form yet another almost perfectly even sequence:

11th — $14,950,000.39
12th — $14,122,767.05
13th — $13,295,533.71
14th — $12,468,300.36
15th — $11,641,067.02
16th — $10,813,833.68
17th — $9,986,600.33
18th — $9,159,366.99
19th — $8,332,133.65
20th — $7,504,900.30

The difference between consecutive results remains approximately:

$827,233.34

Then once again:

20th place — $7,504,900.30
21st place — $7,475,000.29

Difference:

$29,900.01

And the 21st-place result is almost exactly 25% of the leader's result.

From this point onward, the pattern becomes even more obvious.

From 21st place through almost the entire remainder of the TOP 50, the results are separated by approximately:

$252,603.46

For example:

36th — $3,685,948.42
37th — $3,433,344.96
38th — $3,180,741.50
39th — $2,928,138.05
40th — $2,675,534.59
41st — $2,422,931.13
42nd — $2,170,327.67
43rd — $1,917,724.21
44th — $1,665,120.75
45th — $1,412,517.30
46th — $1,159,913.84
47th — $907,310.38
48th — $654,706.92
49th — $402,103.46
50th — $149,500.00

And $149,500 is exactly 0.5% of the leader's $29.9 million result.

So the structure is remarkably clear:

Leader = 100%
6th place = 80%
11th place = 50%
21st place = 25%
50th place = 0.5%

The values between those thresholds were then distributed in almost perfectly even mathematical steps.

It looks exactly like several target values were selected and a formula was used to fill the positions between them.

There is another ridiculous detail.

Look at the decimal endings of the first eleven results:

.49
.48
.47
.46
.45
.44
.43
.42
.41
.40
.39

Are players seriously expected to believe that eleven independent people generated multi-million-dollar wagering totals and their final cents just happened to count backwards perfectly from 49 to 39?

Now look at what happens immediately after the TOP 50:

50th — $149,500.00
51st — $29,961.00
52nd — $5,492.63
53rd — $5,000.03
54th — $4,461.93
55th — $3,000.16
56th — $2,005.57
57th — $1,707.77
58th — $1,627.82
59th — $1,528.98
60th — $1,430.77
61st — $1,218.23
62nd — $1,048.61
63rd — $795.60

And suddenly the leaderboard starts looking normal.

No identical gaps.
No perfect percentages.
No mathematical sequences.
No artificially descending decimal endings.

Just ordinary, irregular wagering totals.

Even the usernames change.

The TOP 50 contains names such as MysticHazel, PixelNomad, BraveKiwi, GoldenGecko, RustyMeteor, HoneyRacer, CoralRocket, AzureRabbit and VioletCipher.

Immediately below the TOP 50, normal masked usernames start appearing: tomo*****, TTar*****, mduz*****, amee*****, roze***** and others.

The real players effectively start from 51st place.

There is another point that makes this even harder to believe: the sheer scale of the alleged wagering.

According to BiggerZ's own leaderboard, the TOP 50 supposedly generated around:

$458.5 MILLION

in real-money wagering during a single weekend tournament.

Almost half a billion dollars.

Now put that into perspective.

Stake, one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world, receives approximately:

98 million website visits per month.

BiggerZ receives only around:

654,000 visits per month.

That means Stake has roughly 150 times more website traffic than BiggerZ.

Yet BiggerZ wants players to believe that this relatively small site somehow had just 50 players generating nearly half a billion dollars of real-money turnover during one weekend tournament.

Even huge operators such as Stake, Gamdom and Sportsbet.io run major daily and weekly races, yet their public leaderboards do not normally show anything remotely resembling this bizarre combination of enormous wagering totals and perfectly constructed mathematical sequences.

So the question is simple:

Does BiggerZ seriously think its players are stupid enough to believe this?

If these figures were genuine, BiggerZ would be showing wagering activity completely out of proportion to the size of the platform — activity you would expect from an operator far larger than Stake, not from a site with only a tiny fraction of Stake's traffic.

In other words, either BiggerZ has somehow become one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world without anybody noticing, or these leaderboard numbers are simply not real.

And this is not an isolated case.

BiggerZ uses the same strategy in its other tournaments: advertise large prize pools, fill the highest positions with fictitious players and artificially huge wagering totals, and create the impression that the platform is full of high-stakes gamblers.

In this particular tournament, the TOP 50 is not made up of genuine independent players. The repeated identical gaps, exact percentage thresholds, sequential decimal endings and the immediate transition to completely normal irregular results from 51st place onward make this clear.

The TOP 50 was artificially generated by BiggerZ. The real players start from 51st place.

This allows BiggerZ to advertise impressive prize pools and make the site look far larger and more active than it really is.

And if most of the highest-paying positions are occupied by fictitious accounts generated by the casino, then those supposedly huge tournament prize pools cost BiggerZ very little compared with what real players are led to believe.

This is not a genuine real-money leaderboard. It is a manufactured leaderboard designed to create fake activity, fake high-stakes players and the illusion that BiggerZ is a much larger gambling platform than it really is.




FALSE TOURNAMETNS

https://www.biggerz.com/casino/tournaments?tournament=823651


https://ibb.co/BHNSQjCd

https://ibb.co/DsvB7GM  

https://ibb.co/VWmHmJ2Y

https://ibb.co/20BP0SMf


https://ibb.co/WpfzCJQs

[keyscore44]

Quoting images for better visibility:

[AHOYBRAUSE]

You forgot to mention the results of the previous week, which paint an even more unbelieving picture of this previous result:



I already foresee some excuse it's all a mistake, because nobody can actually believe these results make any sense. Even without the strange number jumps (which look like some stupid AI came up with those), a jump from 17000$ wager to 30 million is just hilarious.

Look at last week though it's also funny that somebody got a whopping 5000$ for a merely 17k wager, with RTP calculated in it cost him about 200$ to wager this amount and get this reward. Wonder if he actually got it though.

Edit: Additionally the same seems to happen at the daily race. You can't tell me the top 5 wager a combined 200 million on this site in the past 24 hours. No way in hell they have this action. What's also interesting, all those highroller are nowhere to be found in the list of the weekend "race", how is that? I mean gamblers mostly play on the weekend right? But every single one on the daily race list is nowhere to be found on the weekend thing? Yeah right!
I didn't cross check all of the names but stopped after not finding 1 reoccurring name after 20 tries.



There is something VERY wrong with these race results, and it's not looking good!

[yahoo62278]

Well this is kinda interesting, curious to see their response. Someone pm the rep so they see this thread.

[MarioGls]

You forgot to mention the results of the previous week, which paint an even more unbelieving picture of this previous result:



I already foresee some excuse it's all a mistake, because nobody can actually believe these results make any sense. Even without the strange number jumps (which look like some stupid AI came up with those), a jump from 17000$ wager to 30 million is just hilarious.

Look at last week though it's also funny that somebody got a whopping 5000$ for a merely 17k wager, with RTP calculated in it cost him about 200$ to wager this amount and get this reward. Wonder if he actually got it though.

Edit: Additionally the same seems to happen at the daily race. You can't tell me the top 5 wager a combined 200 million on this site in the past 24 hours. No way in hell they have this action. What's also interesting, all those highroller are nowhere to be found in the list of the weekend "race", how is that? I mean gamblers mostly play on the weekend right? But every single one on the daily race list is nowhere to be found on the weekend thing? Yeah right!
I didn't cross check all of the names but stopped after not finding 1 reoccurring name after 20 tries.



There is something VERY wrong with these race results, and it's not looking good!

Look at the wagering totals:

1st — $17,440.29

2nd — $17,233.56 → difference: $206.73

3rd — $17,026.83 → $206.73

4th — $16,820.09 → $206.74

5th — $16,613.36 → $206.73

6th — $16,406.62 → $206.74

So we are supposed to believe that six independent players finished the tournament with wagering totals separated by almost exactly $206.73–$206.74 each.

That looks like a sequence generated by a formula, not the natural wagering activity of real players.




What genuinely amazes me is how absurd the thinking behind BiggerZ must be.

They know perfectly well that BiggerZ is a relatively small casino, yet through these tournament leaderboards they seem determined to create the illusion that they are somehow one of the biggest gambling companies in the world.

Just look at the numbers they are presenting. In one daily race, The player in 1st place supposedly generated almost $59 MILLION in wagering within 24 hours.

That is completely absurd.

You do not normally see individual players producing numbers like that even on some of the biggest gambling platforms in the world, yet we are supposed to believe this is happening regularly on BiggerZ?

And it is not just the size of the numbers. Almost every BiggerZ tournament I check contains some kind of strange mathematical pattern: perfectly spaced wagering totals, repeated differences between players, artificial percentage thresholds, sequential decimal endings, or the same suspicious-looking accounts appearing again and again.

What makes it even more ridiculous is that they do not even seem capable of making these leaderboards look remotely believable.

If you are going to manufacture the appearance of huge player activity, at least make the numbers look natural. Instead, BiggerZ produces leaderboards that look like somebody generated them in Excel using a simple formula and assumed nobody would ever bother checking.

The more of these tournaments you examine, the more absurd it becomes. BiggerZ is a small operator trying to present itself through these leaderboards as if it had wagering activity on a scale that would be extraordinary even for the largest gambling companies in the world.

The numbers are not just suspiciously high — they are often mathematically ridiculous.

[panjul07]

Seems that it is exactly a generated number with specific pattern, I did quick check the previous 2 days race but for the top 10 rank only and the pattern is the same.
The pattern is:
Rank 1-5: The same difference between each rank
Rank 5-6: small difference. 
Rank 6-10: The same difference between each rank.
The decimal ending is always the same for all the daily races (starting from .49 to .40 for the top 10 ranks).
To bad there is no way to check the profile of those players, I tried to check some usernames from the chatroom but all users statistic seems to be hidden.
Surprisingly there is no feature to hide user's statistic (unless I missed it), so I guess the system is indeed made to hide all the user's statistic hidden.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Look at the wagering totals:

1st — $17,440.29

2nd — $17,233.56 → difference: $206.73

3rd — $17,026.83 → $206.73

4th — $16,820.09 → $206.74

5th — $16,613.36 → $206.73

6th — $16,406.62 → $206.74

True, I didn't even catch that cause I was laughing too hard about this. In the meantime, since my screenshot, the top 5 wagered another combined 40 million, in less than 1 hour. And all of them are online and playing, makes sense. This must be the worst executed deception I have seen lately.

Oh, found another funny thing. I wonder where "SilverSaber" is in the weekly race?? hahahaha This is getting ridiculous, what a rabbit hole.





The whole execution is so amateurish, it baffles me!!

[yahoo62278]

Look at the wagering totals:

1st — $17,440.29

2nd — $17,233.56 → difference: $206.73

3rd — $17,026.83 → $206.73

4th — $16,820.09 → $206.74

5th — $16,613.36 → $206.73

6th — $16,406.62 → $206.74

True, I didn't even catch that cause I was laughing too hard about this. In the meantime, since my screenshot, the top 5 wagered another combined 40 million, in less than 1 hour. And all of them are online and playing, makes sense. This must be the worst executed deception I have seen lately.

Oh, found another funny thing. I wonder where "SilverSaber" is in the weekly race?? hahahaha This is getting ridiculous, what a rabbit hole.





The whole execution is so amateurish, it baffles me!!

67 million wagered in the daily but not in the weekly list, they aren't even trying to hide it it don't seem.

@AB de Royse777 mind having your client come here to explain?

[bitbollo]

this is not the first site that there is fake traffic/volume of bets.  they are just getting money and advertising scam as done with his friend @Little mouse .
Anyone can verify dozens of scam they have advertised and these users are the "trusted of the forum".

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation against Little Mouse
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0 scam accusation 2nd topic Little Mouse/frogbet.com
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3590 FLAG LITTLE MOUSE
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3591 FLAG FROGBET
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67184623#msg67184623 there are at least 4 scam accusations against websites advertised by Little Mouse in the last month

I have also shared this screenshot below but the "barking" of the various users, or maybe due collateral of their vicious actions, unfortunately, they have hidden another scam.  
This is "due diligence" that can be done also by a dog barking and it's evident they are a strong confidence only with the shit they advertising (the same site has 3 stars in Casino Guru for failing in a complaint).
As mentioned, in the past the community was reacting with red tag also for users wearing signatures....

This is the example of another "due diligence" . Same scheme already seen for all of these fake casino game.
They have many details about shady operation, have you seen someone winning few time all these jackpot in the same website?



3 players Multiple winner. Just look these "lucky winners" The amount they play and these slot machines that rewards always the same guys!
These scam casino can be verified in matter of minute. As FROGBET and all of the others posted in this topic he has never admit the SUPPORT OF THESE SCAM!
I would never trust someone that has promoted all of these scams for all of this time. Proofs speak by itself and anyone that don't like to get scammed can verify by himself what I have posted.

This is the issue: the "trusted" users of the forum have decided to not comment on this case. They are worried about "surprises?

Now I can't wait to read another hymn anyway its not easy to deal with such black belt keyboard warrior.

[Murat]

Please support my flag vs scam casino Biggerz : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3770783;page=iflags

they already have inactive flag, If you did not support it yet. Do it now!

[AB de Royse777]

@AB de Royse777 mind having your client come here to explain?

I noticed this thread after receiving a PM from AHOYBRAUSE, already informed the owner about it in the group and he tagged a member to respond about it and expecting an explanation about it today. It's obvious that the numbers are not real.

[keyscore44]

@AB de Royse777 mind having your client come here to explain?

I noticed this thread after receiving a PM from AHOYBRAUSE, already informed the owner about it in the group and he tagged a member to respond about it and expecting an explanation about it today. It's obvious that the numbers are not real.

Since they’ve finally found the time to respond to that scam accusation, perhaps they could also address this scam accusation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593577.0

and this: https://casino.guru/complaints/biggerz-casino-player-s-withdrawal-has-been-delayed-1

[aleks86]

This scam site Biggerz already had issues on Casino Guru with tournament manipulations. Everyone can check on casino guru site (complains).

[cruso]

The numbers are so unreal, its laughable.

A $25k daily race after the suspicious leaderboard patterns already exposed, who believes these promotions are genuine?

One player shows a single 10,000 trx bet but sits outside the top 50. The site claims 20,200 casino players online, 7000 on sports and 6800 on predictions. Games supposedly offer 100% RTP.

Where is the proof any of these numbers are genuine?

This looks increasingly like manufactured iactivity designed to lure players in.

Bigger zed needs to explain itself. Players, be careful.

[panjul07]

Do they experience a system error? Just logged in now and I saw some unusual things:
1. History of the past races are all gone
2. Prize pool of the daily and weekly race is adjusted significantly.
3. One thing that surprised me, there is $1670+ worth of TRX in my account while I should not have it.


Edit: #2 and #3 back to normal after I reloaded the page few times.

[AB de Royse777]

Edit: #2 and #3 back to normal after I reloaded the page few times.

Possibly they are working on the site.
I got a response from them earlier today  (they are working on a post). The summary I got from my conversation with them is:
They went through a transition from point based scoring to wager based scoring for this type of races. There was a multiplier on the previous point based calculation that remained active which ultimately affected the wager values created the error. However, after recalculating the effected result values against the original wager records they already paid the winners correctly.

That being said, we can wait for their official statement from their forum profile.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Edit: #2 and #3 back to normal after I reloaded the page few times.

Possibly they are working on the site.
I got a response from them earlier today  (they are working on a post). The summary I got from my conversation with them is:
They went through a transition from point based scoring to wager based scoring for this type of races. There was a multiplier on the previous point based calculation that remained active which ultimately affected the wager values created the error. However, after recalculating the effected result values against the original wager records they already paid the winners correctly.

That being said, we can wait for their official statement from their forum profile.

Thanks for the update. Yet the wager - point confusion explanation doesn't really explain why the top player from yesterday's daily race with "67 million wager" is not in the weekly race list despite this one individual should be 4th. Also, no other person from the daily/weekly race has any "points" in the tournament, which is highly unlikely.

Furthermore, a wager/point conversion doesn't explain why the made up numbers are:

Now look at the first five positions:

1st place — $29,900,000.49
2nd place — $28,412,475.48
3rd place — $26,924,950.47
4th place — $25,437,425.46
5th place — $23,949,900.45

The difference between EVERY consecutive player is exactly:

$1,487,525.01

And the rest goes for all the other amounts as well. So yeah, the story they came up with is not very believable, I guess you can see that as well.

[aleks86]

AB de Royse777 seems this man think that everyone is total stupid here.

Everytime you need to to write something nonsense and this one will explain everything.

[MarioGls]

Edit: #2 and #3 back to normal after I reloaded the page few times.

Possibly they are working on the site.
I got a response from them earlier today  (they are working on a post). The summary I got from my conversation with them is:
They went through a transition from point based scoring to wager based scoring for this type of races. There was a multiplier on the previous point based calculation that remained active which ultimately affected the wager values created the error. However, after recalculating the effected result values against the original wager records they already paid the winners correctly.

That being said, we can wait for their official statement from their forum profile.

Did you actually believe something as idiotic as what you wrote? If you buy into explanations like that, then I’m 100% certain that anyone could feed you any piece of nonsense, no matter how absurd.


Do you even grasp the mathematical logic behind the top 50 list I described in my first post? Do you realize that such a ranking couldn't have been created in any way other than by some stupid AI? It should be obvious that this couldn't have come from actual human players—that’s clear and self-evident to anyone with an IQ higher than an amoeba’s.

[BiggerZ.com]

BiggerZ Official Statement - Race Scoring & Rewards

We would like to address the recent concerns regarding our tournament leaderboards and provide clarification on how our race system operates.
First and foremost, we categorically reject the allegations of fictitious players and unpaid rewards. All accounts concerned are genuine, and their rewards were paid.
We have reviewed the points raised and would like to clarify two aspects of our tournament configuration.

1. Daily Race vs Weekly Race

Our Daily and Weekly Races were originally designed as separate competitions, each with its own participation requirements.
Under this configuration, participating in a Daily Race did not automatically enroll a player in the Weekly Race. Consequently, a player appearing on the Daily leaderboard would not necessarily appear on the Weekly leaderboard, regardless of their wagering activity.
This was an intentional part of our original tournament setup, not an indication of missing players or irregular activity.
That being said, we recognize that automatically connecting Daily and Weekly participation would create a more intuitive and seamless experience.
We actually consider this a good suggestion, and our team is already working on improving this functionality.
Our objective is to make participation easier to understand while maintaining flexibility across our different tournaments.

2. Race Scoring Configuration

We also want to clarify the numerical discrepancies highlighted in some of our leaderboard results.
During our recent transition from a points-based scoring system to a wager-based scoring system, a legacy multiplier from the previous calculation remained active in the processing of certain scores.
This resulted in inflated displayed race scores. We acknowledge the configuration error and take full responsibility for it.

The issue was related to the transition between scoring methods and the values presented on the leaderboard.

Following the identification of this discrepancy, we recalculated the affected results against the original wagering records rather than relying on the previously displayed figures.
The recalculation confirmed that the final rankings and reward entitlements remained unchanged. All rewards due were paid to the corresponding players.

This distinction is important: the scoring display contained an error, but the accounts participating in the competitions were genuine, and the rewards were distributed.

We understand why the numerical patterns raised questions, and we acknowledge that the displayed figures should have accurately reflected the underlying calculation.
We are improving our validation procedures and the presentation of tournament results to prevent similar inconsistencies.

3. Our Commitment to Players

BiggerZ continuously develops its platform, including its tournament mechanics, reward systems, and overall player experience.
As we introduce new features and update existing systems, we remain responsible for identifying technical issues and addressing them transparently.

In this case, we have explained the two matters raised: the independent participation structure of our Daily and Weekly Races, and the scoring configuration error during our transition to wager-based rankings.
Neither issue changes the authenticity of the participating accounts or the fact that the rewards concerned were paid.

We appreciate constructive feedback from the community. It helps us identify opportunities to improve the platform, and we will continue refining our tournament experience accordingly.
Thank you to everyone participating in BiggerZ.

BiggerZ Team