BIGGERZ SCAM Tournaments

[keyscore44]

And to be fair, your position is somewhat understandable considering that you are the campaign manager for BiggerZ on this forum. But that is also exactly why your response does not look particularly impartial.

You are correct, and that's something I have to acknowledge. Usually, I don't spend much time on the Scam Accusations board unless a campaign I'm managing becomes the subject of an accusation.

However, when an accusation is backed by sufficient evidence, I don't hesitate to take appropriate action, even if that means leaving negative feedback or supporting a flag against a project I've worked with. As far as I can remember, the most recent example was Lizex, where I left a red tag and supported a Type 3 flag.

I hate tagging businesses, but I hate scammers more. I hope this team does not make me regret the decision to change the tag.

For the record, I saw your post just as I had finished writing my earlier response and clicked the Post button. After posting, I checked their feedback page, read your red tag, and shared it with the team as well. I also noticed AHOYBRAUSE's feedback.

I think once the Casino Guru case is reopened and reassessed, and a conclusive decision is reached, we will have a better understanding of the situation.

Nobody likes scammers, and I certainly don't want to see anyone getting scammed. However, as a campaign manager, or even as an ordinary forum member with a sense of responsibility, I believe I should take my time to carefully evaluate the available evidence before reaching conclusions. I need to be mindful that a premature or incorrect judgment on my part could potentially cause financial harm to others.

That doesn't mean ignoring warning signs or giving anyone a free pass. It simply means making sure my decisions are fair, and well-informed. After all, my responsibility is not only to protect people from potential scammers but also to avoid unfairly harming legitimate businesses.

Stop talking bullshits. Everyone can see that this casino is a scam. Their excuses are just as ridiculous as yours. It’s obvious that you’re just looking to pocket some cash for a week of work.
 You won’t last any longer than that - want to make a bet that right after end of this week campaign you will close it?

[RedFlix]

There is another point that makes this even harder to believe: the sheer scale of the alleged wagering.

According to BiggerZ's own leaderboard, the TOP 50 supposedly generated around:

$458.5 MILLION

in real-money wagering during a single weekend tournament.

Almost half a billion dollars.

Now put that into perspective.

Stake, one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world, receives approximately:

98 million website visits per month.

BiggerZ receives only around:

654,000 visits per month.

That means Stake has roughly 150 times more website traffic than BiggerZ.

Yet BiggerZ wants players to believe that this relatively small site somehow had just 50 players generating nearly half a billion dollars of real-money turnover during one weekend tournament.

Even huge operators such as Stake, Gamdom and Sportsbet.io run major daily and weekly races, yet their public leaderboards do not normally show anything remotely resembling this bizarre combination of enormous wagering totals and perfectly constructed mathematical sequences.

So the question is simple:

Does BiggerZ seriously think its players are stupid enough to believe this?

If these figures were genuine, BiggerZ would be showing wagering activity completely out of proportion to the size of the platform — activity you would expect from an operator far larger than Stake, not from a site with only a tiny fraction of Stake's traffic.

In other words, either BiggerZ has somehow become one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world without anybody noticing, or these leaderboard numbers are simply not real.

Why did the official BiggerZ representative not respond to this point? Are you bigger than the largest casinos in the business because of the same error you described to explain the fake tournament numbers? In my opinion, the campaign manager ought to be required to halt all project-related promotions until more information is obtained. But how someone could explain the lies he used mathematics to made?

[cruso]

There is another point that makes this even harder to believe: the sheer scale of the alleged wagering.

According to BiggerZ's own leaderboard, the TOP 50 supposedly generated around:

$458.5 MILLION

in real-money wagering during a single weekend tournament.

Almost half a billion dollars.

Now put that into perspective.

Stake, one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world, receives approximately:

98 million website visits per month.

BiggerZ receives only around:

654,000 visits per month.

That means Stake has roughly 150 times more website traffic than BiggerZ.

Yet BiggerZ wants players to believe that this relatively small site somehow had just 50 players generating nearly half a billion dollars of real-money turnover during one weekend tournament.

Even huge operators such as Stake, Gamdom and Sportsbet.io run major daily and weekly races, yet their public leaderboards do not normally show anything remotely resembling this bizarre combination of enormous wagering totals and perfectly constructed mathematical sequences.

So the question is simple:

Does BiggerZ seriously think its players are stupid enough to believe this?

If these figures were genuine, BiggerZ would be showing wagering activity completely out of proportion to the size of the platform — activity you would expect from an operator far larger than Stake, not from a site with only a tiny fraction of Stake's traffic.

In other words, either BiggerZ has somehow become one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world without anybody noticing, or these leaderboard numbers are simply not real.

Why did the official BiggerZ representative not respond to this point?

Thats because they can't. Its indefensible. 100% RTP 

[aleks86]

BiggerZ tournament leaderboard – artificially generated TOP 50

I have very serious reasons to believe that the TOP 50 in this BiggerZ tournament was artificially generated and does not represent genuine wagering activity from independent real players.

This is not simply a case of the numbers looking unusually high. The problem is that the leaderboard follows obvious mathematical patterns that simply do not occur naturally when dozens of unrelated players are wagering different amounts.

BiggerZ states in its own rules that the ranking is based on real-money wagers.


Now look at the first five positions:

1st place — $29,900,000.49
2nd place — $28,412,475.48
3rd place — $26,924,950.47
4th place — $25,437,425.46
5th place — $23,949,900.45

The difference between EVERY consecutive player is exactly:

$1,487,525.01

Five supposedly independent players somehow finish millions of dollars apart by exactly the same amount.

Then:

5th place — $23,949,900.45
6th place — $23,920,000.44

Difference:

$29,900.01

And the 6th-place result is almost exactly 80% of the leader's result.

Now look at positions 6–10:

6th place — $23,920,000.44
7th place — $21,684,975.43
8th place — $19,449,950.42
9th place — $17,214,925.41
10th place — $14,979,900.40

Again, every consecutive result differs by exactly:

$2,235,025.01

Another perfect mathematical sequence.

Then:

10th place — $14,979,900.40
11th place — $14,950,000.39

Difference:

$29,900.01

And 11th place is almost exactly 50% of the leader's result.

Positions 11–20 form yet another almost perfectly even sequence:

11th — $14,950,000.39
12th — $14,122,767.05
13th — $13,295,533.71
14th — $12,468,300.36
15th — $11,641,067.02
16th — $10,813,833.68
17th — $9,986,600.33
18th — $9,159,366.99
19th — $8,332,133.65
20th — $7,504,900.30

The difference between consecutive results remains approximately:

$827,233.34

Then once again:

20th place — $7,504,900.30
21st place — $7,475,000.29

Difference:

$29,900.01

And the 21st-place result is almost exactly 25% of the leader's result.

From this point onward, the pattern becomes even more obvious.

From 21st place through almost the entire remainder of the TOP 50, the results are separated by approximately:

$252,603.46

For example:

36th — $3,685,948.42
37th — $3,433,344.96
38th — $3,180,741.50
39th — $2,928,138.05
40th — $2,675,534.59
41st — $2,422,931.13
42nd — $2,170,327.67
43rd — $1,917,724.21
44th — $1,665,120.75
45th — $1,412,517.30
46th — $1,159,913.84
47th — $907,310.38
48th — $654,706.92
49th — $402,103.46
50th — $149,500.00

And $149,500 is exactly 0.5% of the leader's $29.9 million result.

So the structure is remarkably clear:

Leader = 100%
6th place = 80%
11th place = 50%
21st place = 25%
50th place = 0.5%

The values between those thresholds were then distributed in almost perfectly even mathematical steps.

It looks exactly like several target values were selected and a formula was used to fill the positions between them.

There is another ridiculous detail.

Look at the decimal endings of the first eleven results:

.49
.48
.47
.46
.45
.44
.43
.42
.41
.40
.39

Are players seriously expected to believe that eleven independent people generated multi-million-dollar wagering totals and their final cents just happened to count backwards perfectly from 49 to 39?

Now look at what happens immediately after the TOP 50:

50th — $149,500.00
51st — $29,961.00
52nd — $5,492.63
53rd — $5,000.03
54th — $4,461.93
55th — $3,000.16
56th — $2,005.57
57th — $1,707.77
58th — $1,627.82
59th — $1,528.98
60th — $1,430.77
61st — $1,218.23
62nd — $1,048.61
63rd — $795.60

And suddenly the leaderboard starts looking normal.

No identical gaps.
No perfect percentages.
No mathematical sequences.
No artificially descending decimal endings.

Just ordinary, irregular wagering totals.

Even the usernames change.

The TOP 50 contains names such as MysticHazel, PixelNomad, BraveKiwi, GoldenGecko, RustyMeteor, HoneyRacer, CoralRocket, AzureRabbit and VioletCipher.

Immediately below the TOP 50, normal masked usernames start appearing: tomo*****, TTar*****, mduz*****, amee*****, roze***** and others.

The real players effectively start from 51st place.

There is another point that makes this even harder to believe: the sheer scale of the alleged wagering.

According to BiggerZ's own leaderboard, the TOP 50 supposedly generated around:

$458.5 MILLION

in real-money wagering during a single weekend tournament.

Almost half a billion dollars.

Now put that into perspective.

Stake, one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world, receives approximately:

98 million website visits per month.

BiggerZ receives only around:

654,000 visits per month.

That means Stake has roughly 150 times more website traffic than BiggerZ.

Yet BiggerZ wants players to believe that this relatively small site somehow had just 50 players generating nearly half a billion dollars of real-money turnover during one weekend tournament.

Even huge operators such as Stake, Gamdom and Sportsbet.io run major daily and weekly races, yet their public leaderboards do not normally show anything remotely resembling this bizarre combination of enormous wagering totals and perfectly constructed mathematical sequences.

So the question is simple:

Does BiggerZ seriously think its players are stupid enough to believe this?

If these figures were genuine, BiggerZ would be showing wagering activity completely out of proportion to the size of the platform — activity you would expect from an operator far larger than Stake, not from a site with only a tiny fraction of Stake's traffic.

In other words, either BiggerZ has somehow become one of the biggest gambling platforms in the world without anybody noticing, or these leaderboard numbers are simply not real.

And this is not an isolated case.

BiggerZ uses the same strategy in its other tournaments: advertise large prize pools, fill the highest positions with fictitious players and artificially huge wagering totals, and create the impression that the platform is full of high-stakes gamblers.

In this particular tournament, the TOP 50 is not made up of genuine independent players. The repeated identical gaps, exact percentage thresholds, sequential decimal endings and the immediate transition to completely normal irregular results from 51st place onward make this clear.

The TOP 50 was artificially generated by BiggerZ. The real players start from 51st place.

This allows BiggerZ to advertise impressive prize pools and make the site look far larger and more active than it really is.

And if most of the highest-paying positions are occupied by fictitious accounts generated by the casino, then those supposedly huge tournament prize pools cost BiggerZ very little compared with what real players are led to believe.

This is not a genuine real-money leaderboard. It is a manufactured leaderboard designed to create fake activity, fake high-stakes players and the illusion that BiggerZ is a much larger gambling platform than it really is.




FALSE TOURNAMETNS

https://www.biggerz.com/casino/tournaments?tournament=823651


https://ibb.co/BHNSQjCd

https://ibb.co/DsvB7GM  

https://ibb.co/VWmHmJ2Y

https://ibb.co/20BP0SMf


https://ibb.co/WpfzCJQs

I was that stupid man, which believed that this casino are enough large and enough fair. In result was scammed with balance 6.75 bitcoins, now it is about 500000 (500 thousands) of euro.

But now I understand, that a lof of things in this casino are fake. For example Hi Rollers table, where you can see that some players played slot with max bet, which is not possible to choose.

[Rikafip]

another thing from the leaderboard in the OP, besides the wagering volumes, is the usernames of those 50 high rollers. they all look randomly generated from a word list.
i mean, there is no way in hell that 50 random high rollers from all over the world would pick a 2 words username with zero personality:

Good to see that I am not the only who noticed that.

I always thought that majority of these online casinos fake leaderboards in order to attract new players, but at least they do it in a more intelligent way. This looks like an amateur hour.