MORE DISAPOINMENT for nutildah

[More Disapoinment]

Disappointing to see one of the worst AI posters of all-time recently accepted to a signature campaign, even after 3 neutral tags on their account emphasizing how terrible their post quality is. I have issued this user a 360-day sigban.

I saw nutildah rant about worst spammers on earth just got into a signature campaign even after received so many tag. I realized I only use like 10% of my ChatGPT subscription this week, so I figured why not use it since I already pay for it? the AI look for more cases like that. but the results isn't as good as I hoped, so I also manually check and filter obviously wrong case.

Basically I prompt it to look AI Spam Report Thread and filter based on AI poster is in signature campaign and not in banned list and not in sigbanned list. Turns out, at least 21 user (or maybe all of them belong to farmer) just chilling, sitting in live campaigns, and farming money. To nutildah, stop say being disapointed, just sigban all of them. your being too merciful. Here's the result (ChatGPT result that I filtered manually)


Rainbet [OFNP] — 5 tier-1 accounts
campaign thread

user: fredericktaylor
campaign evidence: sheet row 70 in tab Round 95
link to accusation post: link 1, 2, 3
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 4/5, so obvious. certain legendary would say 'from the usual local board'

user: Donneski
campaign evidence: sheet row 67 in tab Round 95
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 4.5/5, word salad post

user: Humblevirus
campaign evidence: sheet row 104 in tab Round 95
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 4/5, glut of text

user: Mr_Brilliant$
campaign evidence: sheet row 55 in tab Round 95
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 3.5/5, mid post

user: programmer3666
campaign evidence: sheet row 114 in tab Round 95
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 3.5/5, another mid post

WeLive Crypto [OFNP] — 1 tier-1 accounts
campaign thread

user: Sg4j1n3ll0
campaign evidence: sheet row 21 in tab W11; 2 posts in the campaign thread
link to accusation post: link 1, 2
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 2
my score: 3.5/5, yet another mid post

Bitvest.io [CFNP] — 2 tier-1 accounts
campaign thread

user: Mehmet69
campaign evidence: sheet row 30 in tab W11; 4 posts in the campaign thread
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 4.5/5, WTF 10 sentence in one paragraph

user: Sarah Jordan
campaign evidence: sheet row 38 in tab  Week 005; 2 posts in the campaign thread
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 2
my score: 4/5, nothingburget string

Bitz.io(LM) [CFNP] — 1 tier-1 account
campaign thread

user: abhiseshakana
campaign evidence: sheet row 11 in tab W45; 3 posts in the campaign thread
link to accusation post: link 1, 2, 3
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 4.5/5, what a tragic downfall

Dustbit.com [CFNP] — 1 tier-1 account
campaign thread

user: yudi09
campaign evidence: sheet row 8 in tab Round 23; 2 posts in the campaign thread
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 2
my score: 3.5/5, L post

Rollbit.io [CFNP] — 1 tier-1 account

user: OsaiEmma
campaign evidence: red carpet welcome
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 2
my score: 4.5/5 technobabble shit

Earnbet.io [CFNP] — 1 tier-1 account
campaign thread

user: cryptoaddictchie
campaign evidence: sheet row 9 in tab W56; 1 post in the campaign thread
link to accusation post: link 1, 2, 3
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 2
my score: 4/5 nothingburger

Not in campaign yet

the AI mistakenly said they are in campaign, so I moved it here.

user: casey15
link to accusation post: link 1, 2, 3
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 4/5, another from you know the local board

user: Fragrance1122
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 2
my score: 3.5/5 same old mid post

user: jasonjm
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 2
my score: 3.5/5, so-so post

user: ObeyKnock
campaign evidence: 1 post in the campaign thread
link to accusation post: link 1, 2, 3
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 3.5/5, one more mid post

user: malekbaba
campaign evidence: 1 post in the campaign thread
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 3
score by AI 1: 5 | score by AI 2: 5 | my score: 4/5, retro one line spam

user: TopT3ns
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 3
my score: 4/5, pretending to know about gambling

user: Publictalk792
link to accusation post: link 1, 2, 3
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 3
my score: 5/5, someone actually get 7 NEGATIVE feedback

user: johnsaributua
link to accusation post: link 1
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 4.5/5 wall of text, try hard apply on all campaign

user: seoincorporation
link to accusation post: link 1, 2, 3
spam-worded trust feedback from trusted members: 1
my score: 3/5 nice story bro, totally real

[decodx]

As far as I can see, half these reports are years old... have you considered that the individuals in question might have improved in the meantime, after receiving a warning tag? I'm sure most of these campaign managers actually know what they're doing and vet all the candidates before bringing anyone on. So unless you've got actual proof a specific user is actively spamming right now, what's even the point of this thread?

By the way, why a brand-new account for this? You are afraid to discuss this with your main account?

[casey15]

I have nothing to say to you actually... Keep agending whatever agenda you are trying to agenda. But then I have a total of 521 posts on the forum and as much as you are pushing a narrative of AI spamming I would like to know across all my posts how many of them can you confidently point out to be AI written with evidence let's say for the past 120days.....I've tried to stay on my own but you guys keep looking for things to push. Because someone writes so well does not mean their posts are AI generated... While AI can be used for assistance, that doesn't mean that the post is AI generated.... Because right now everyone is trying to feel important and feel big by downplaying the effort of other users
I'll leave you at that and wont say anything more to you

[More Disapoinment]

As far as I can see, half these reports are years old... have you considered that the individuals in question might have improved in the meantime, after receiving a warning tag? I'm sure most of these campaign managers actually know what they're doing and vet all the candidates before bringing anyone on. So unless you've got actual proof a specific user is actively spamming right now, what's even the point of this thread?

By the way, why a brand-new account for this? You are afraid to discuss this with your main account?

So much assumption, WOWW. I always read their shitpost on last 2 page before giving score. Or maybe check their shitpost??? 13 sentence in one paragraph.

AC Milan beat Inter Milan 3-1 in Serie A, they performed very strongly in that match, but what happened to them in today's match? AC Milan can't survive at home against Ferencvárosi, so far they have only 1 shot on target, and they are already 2-0 down, a very good performance was expected from them in this match, at least considering their last match, but today they are in a very bad condition, AC Milan will not be able to win this match, it is very disappointing, they should have won this match. And Bournemouth is now ahead against Sparta Praha, if Sparta Praha had not received a red card in the 37th minute, the result of the match could have been a draw, because Sparta Praha performed very well and the first goal was scored by Sparta Praha.

For quote some time now, I’ve being avoiding having to favour AC Milan in my betslips. I always tend to lean towards betting against them than favouring their side. After their performance over the weekend against one of the best sides in the Serie A, where they happened to have won against Inter Milan in a 3:2 convincing defeat, which is an extension on how they’ve performed for some time now, I thought just maybe, maybe they would continue their winning streak with this Europa fixture but, I see now that I was mistaken.
Like, how are these guys loosing this badly in a game that should have being a work over. It’s just pathetic and my parlay is gone.

I also had a multi but all my happiness was ruined because of today's last match. It is unimaginable that a big-name team like AC Milan will perform so badly. Especially when they beat a team like Inter Milan by 3 goals, it means they are in very good form. My almost winning multi ended like this. In my opinion, we can blame the change in the XI as the reason for losing today's match. There were 6 new players in today's XI compared to the previous match. It is natural that so many changes will ruin the continuity of the team's previous performance. Because in football, it is very important to create a good understanding between the players. The kind of team performance they had against Inter Milan was not seen in today's match. Those who play together regularly usually have a good understanding on the field. But if there are many changes at once, it can be difficult to maintain that rhythm. So after the win against Inter, today's poor performance was due to this change in the XI. This poor performance was a very sad experience for me.

I have nothing to say to you actually... Keep agending whatever agenda you are trying to agenda. But then I have a total of 521 posts on the forum and as much as you are pushing a narrative of AI spamming I would like to know across all my posts how many of them can you confidently point out to be AI written with evidence let's say for the past 120days.....I've tried to stay on my own but you guys keep looking for things to push. Because someone writes so well does not mean their posts are AI generated... While AI can be used for assistance, that doesn't mean that the post is AI generated.... Because right now everyone is trying to feel important and feel big by downplaying the effort of other users
I'll leave you at that and wont say anything more to you

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66711424#msg66711424 LOL

[stompix]

I've tried to stay on my own but you guys keep looking for things to push. Because someone writes so well does not mean their posts are AI generated...

Wait a moment, let me get this right..
Did you just call your 4 lines of nonsense academic material too good to be understood by us plebs ?

By the way, why a brand-new account for this? You are afraid to discuss this with your main account?

Because Theymos said it's OK to do it and the rank of the account saying something should not cloud the judgment on the issue. "Don't shoot the messenger"!

Also, who the fuck still cares that it's a new account? Does this invalidate the accusations? Do we need KYC and a sperm sample verified and tasted by Bonnie Blue before posting here?
This is a deja vu from the other topic created a few weeks ago, eveyone was accusing the op because he was a newbie and had a hidden agenda and when Nutildah came and said the list is indeed disturbing, we saw an 180% swing!

If the list is bullshit, analyze the list and point the flaws in it, don't attack the poster, attack the material.

[Vod]

By the way, why a brand-new account for this? You are afraid to discuss this with your main account?

So much assumption, WOWW. I always read their shitpost on last 2 page before giving score. Or maybe check their shitpost??? 13 sentence in one paragraph.

It actually shows you are a brand new account in your profile, so how do you define assumption?  A word used to troll?

[decodx]

By the way, why a brand-new account for this? You are afraid to discuss this with your main account?

Because Theymos said it's OK to do it and the rank of the account saying something should not cloud the judgment on the issue. "Don't shoot the messenger"!

I'm not shooting anyone! I just asked if he's afraid of something, given that he isn't participating in the discussion using his main account. Surely you're aware that many such cases have ulterior motives behind them.

Also, who the fuck still cares that it's a new account? Does this invalidate the accusations? Do we need KYC and a sperm sample verified and tasted by Bonnie Blue before posting here?
This is a deja vu from the other topic created a few weeks ago, eveyone was accusing the op because he was a newbie and had a hidden agenda and when Nutildah came and said the list is indeed disturbing, we saw an 180% swing!

I care. It doesn't invalidate the accusations, per se, but I give it higher priority when it comes from a "senior" forum member. That's the whole point of forum ranks. It's one thing to express your political or other beliefs while wishing to remain anonymous, but it's another thing entirely to accuse fellow members of spamming while hiding behind a "newbie" account.  A bit hypocritical, don't you think?

If the list is bullshit, analyze the list and point the flaws in it, don't attack the poster, attack the material.

If you read my comment again, you'll see that I did, in fact, attack the material - or rather, the lack thereof. I'm not defending anyone here, but I believe it's up to the accuser to provide evidence for their claims, rather than just dumping an AI-generated list of members and expecting others to do the work for them.