Reputation: Meretrix is a cunt. ✔

[Meretrix]

R E P U T A T I O N:
🙑 Meretrix 🙗
is a cunt. ✔

Hello, Bitcoin Forum.  I’m the Meretrix (u=1935564).  This is my official reputation thread.

For you see, I’m a whore—and whores need to be ethical.  After all, in jurisdictions where it’s repressed by law such as this forum’s USA location, whoring is purely a trust-based business.  [...]

Accordingly, whores work on reputation.  Green trust (= cash USD bills) means that a girl has a reputation for being extremely slutty:  You trust that if you hire her simply to spend an hour alone with you in a hotel room—which is legal—then independently of the money, she’ll most likely choose to have sex with you—which is also legal; it’s 100% legal to be a slut who enjoys casual sex with strangers, even five or more times per day with different people.  Legally, she would fulfill her agreement by sitting there with her clothes on, and staring at the wall for an hour.  If she doesn’t want sexual intercourse, you have no legal recourse to get a refund.  It’s all about reputation!

I care deeply about my reputation—oh, so deeply.  Accordingly, I invite the forum to social intercourse about my well-established reputation as a cunt.

🙑 Table of Contents 🙗

• This OP.
• My tip addresses:  If I’m a whore, I ought to be better at making money than nully is.  If I’m a cunt, you need a place to stick it in.
• Reserved in case I want to insert more forum art.
• Whence Meretrix
• Wherefore Meretrix
• Reserved for Whither Meretrix (not yet posted; work in progress)
• Reserved more forum history.
• Reserved in case I want to insert more forum art.
• Reserved ’coz I’m a bitch, and I’m gonna reserve an extra post for whatever.
• A belated reply:  It is the immediate impetus to start this thread.  Amidst ongoing discussion about me in another thread, a pea-brained OP had an an aneurysm, and locked the topic.

This OP shall be edited to flesh out the TOC, and/or to make it more sexier, more artistic.

🙑 Local Rules 🙗

• This is a sex-positive, cunt-positive thread.  This local rule bans general negativity towards the body and its erotic parts, and particularly the shaming of the female body.  Therefore, any use of the word cunt as a term of opprobrium shall be censored with extreme prejudice.  At my pleasure, I may make contextual exceptions for serious-minded social critique, or for satire—but if I have even the slightest suspicion that you may be insincerely trolling me with this loophole, I will delete your post (and any replies) without comment.  Please don’t try my patience about this.
• Use of the term “NSFW” is forbidden, except to criticize it.
• The “nullius” (u=976210) account is banned from this thread.  Perhaps I may someday relax or delete this rule—perhaps by popular demand?  But for now, it is the rule.  Everybody knows that nullius is a cunt; this irrefutable fact (not opinion) is certified by multiple DT1 members.  I’m here to steal the glorious title from him, preferably at a glory hole.
• The OP and major supporters of the troll thread this parodies are banned here.  I don’t care about status symbols that only impress newbies:  Whoever you are, if you create or strongly support an ad hominem attack thread of that type for no purpose but to insult, degrade, and harass someone, then you’re a troll, and you’re the type of toxic character whom I’d ban from my own community.  This bitch doesn’t forgive, and doesn’t forget.
• Religious evangelism is banned as off-topic.
• Political conspiracy theories with no or inadequate evidence are banned as off-topic—unless the theory is that I rule the world, in which case you may regale me at great length.
• I may revise these rules.
• Be nice to others.  This thread is my attempt to re-imagine the Bitcoin Forum as a place where people are kind and courteous to each other.

[Meretrix]

🙑 Tip the Meretrix 🙗

My addresses won’t fit neatly in my signature, so I’ll sig-link to this post.  Anyway, for security, it’s good to have them signed by nullius’ well-known PGP key.

nullius sucks at making money.  WTF, he wore an unpaid, unsolicited ChipMixer ad instead of joining the paid campaign!  I must laugh sadly at such foolishness.

Given my aptitude for the oldest profession, I am incontestably superior at the art of money!  Behold my hot tip addresses; I’ll sly seduce you into sticking in coins.  You know you want to.

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

The official whore-money addresses of Meretrix (u=1935564):

Zcash (ZEC):
u1aqxtts72axwy5k5zdr64cyy4fvgjv3s36ah9zp5cswkl2w4pzw9qnaefl2x4c0juxr4cd2l4qex37u3jsc2arfe02tkazchkpnhtn8ygdt9mj056v3uq9lx44a9agfhsycle2emxny338nuasw0gftjttr64se7et6waefjwy5c7utsj

Monero (XMR):
83rWuRXixaHijXWNVSUp6XTGFxAbLE6jtcbwxpKCSmAgQigUGPTpBypHPMssWNh98nb5PEfKJf9fL4TeTq2NQYu8GJMbFLz

Bitcoin (BTC):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5476162.msg67321386#post_i_swear_i_reject_taint

Certified for the Meretrix by:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQSNOMR84IlYpr/EF5vEJ5MVn575SQUCavIvcgAKCRDEJ5MVn575
STc9AQCQzEkzxJWYBkr+BufhPHb2KWf+fA6SwoYqPZ0dcK4JUQEA02dJxMmqjqxx
yRV+APa3aX9jeMe4HbLjStKDMZXYuQY=
=BTUs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

The opacity of my addresses is a feature, not a bug.  Although I’m an exhibitionist, I think that showing off all of your naked financial transactions to the whole world is a ridiculously sick fetish—your kink is not okay!

As a political statement, BTC is not currently accepted.  Whore though I may be, when it comes to taint, I want my coins as pure as the driven snow.  If you only have BTC, use a no-KYC exchange like DEX.fo to swap to me.

...a Bitcoin UTXO is now an NFT, with its value decreed partly by fiat of an “AML check” veto...

I will never use an “AML checker”.  I shall remain forever ignorant of how the fuck to use an “AML checker”.  I swear that I will learn to submit to public ballbusting [sexually explicit link] before I ever use a so-called “AML checker”.  Who knows?  Perhaps cock and ball torture [sexually explicit Wikipedia link] may be pleasureful?  An “AML checker” surely is not.  I could be open-minded about getting my dick stomped on an anvil [sexually explicit link]; I am absolutely closed-minded about “AML checkers”.

[Meretrix]

Reserved in case I want to insert more forum art.

[Meretrix]

🙑 Whence the Meretrix 🙗

For better or for worse, my name rose from a scandal.

And though my thus effort with alia was mislaid in the sense of the best-laid plans of mice and men, I turn lemons into lemonade:  I accidentally became the subject of the forum’s most famous sex scandal!  [...]  Sex scandals are always popular, in the sense of “panem et circenses”; and my dubious distinction as the subject of the forum’s most famous sex scandal has, after all, become a part of my reputational panache.

It all started when a forum Newbie, an alleged camgirl named alia, added an erotic twist to an otherwise boring complaint about the then-new merit system:

⇾ Re: Why the merit system is heavily lopsided in favour of older users
Merited by PoolMinor (8‌), TMAN (6), The Sceptical Chymist (1), suchmoon (1), iluvbitcoins (1), nullius (1), zikabra (1)

You're a Newbie but already have 9 Merit... This system seems working for you 

I think I'm an outlier. If I have 100 merit in 30 days, I'll eat all my words and post a vid of me masturbating to a merit infographic

This intrigue got attention in high places:

If I have 100 merit in 30 days, I'll eat all my words and post a vid of me masturbating to a merit infographic

Let's see if this is too subtle for forum users to take the hint...

Awhile later, it caught the eye of nullius.

* nullius is not a fool, but reasonably relied on alia’s neutral trust feedback as GirlsGoneBitcoin verified.

Consistently with his own name, nullius made a pun on merit:  He called the putative camgirl by a Latin loanword that literally means “(female) earner”, by implication one who earns from sex.

⇾ Alia’s merit challenge: Forum destiny awaits thee!
Merited by alia (16), Foxpup (6), Lauda (2), akamit (2), LoyceV (1), BTCforJoe (1)

I think I'm an outlier. If I have 100 merit in 30 days, I'll eat all my words and post a vid of me masturbating to a merit infographic

Hello, Alia, you sly meretrix.  [...]

’Twould be a business doing pleasure with you.

The nullian idea of business quickly led to what could’ve, should’ve been a forum classic thread:  The sexually explicit “Ciphersex 101”, in which nullius gave alia cryptography lessons in the form of live public cybersex.  It brought the highest critical acclaim.

This is better than Shakespeare.

Some context is required; I doubt Leo meant that literally!  At the time, Leo and “Michael Cassio (AKA Nullius)” had a running gag about Shakespeare.

Yet it takes not less than two to dance—and alas, there was at hand a scam which, inter alia, wound up with Leo and RGBKey popping hardcore maths in alia’s face.

Archival snapshot March 06, 2018, 12:12:44 PM, as it’s lulzy to see how everyone’s accounts looked.

If the script does not yield 20% ROI 18 times out of 20, I will admit that I "lied", and will leave the forum. I will also send a few bits to people who warned against me.
If the script yields 20% ROI 18 times out of 20 (or more)... well, then I guess my point has been proven.

18 times of 20 is 90%. ROI - 20%. Expected value is 1.08. There's a chance of 92.5% to reach so easy target without using any scripts. So, you would not prove anything.

At a 1% house edge, which both of these sites have, the simple chance of 20% return is 82.5%. The chance of alia getting 18, 19, or 20 of these 82.5% chances in a group of 20 is as follows:



(For those unfamiliar, this uses the Binomial Distribution to find the chance of k successes out of 20 trials. Here we are interested in k=18, k=19, and k=20 so we sum those results).

This comes out to 0.294233 (rounded to the 6th decimal place), or 29.4233%.

So basically, the chance of alia's script working (according to the known laws of probability) are around 29.4%.

I have my doubts about the legitimacy of this because screen recordings can be faked, livestreams could have been pre-recorded and such, but I won't get any more into that in this post.

It is also worth pointing out that 20 runs is statistical noise.

I set up a contigency table, played with the numbers and ran some chi-squared tests on them. I calculated for a p-value of 0.05 (This means that the results we achieve would be achieved by random chance 5% of the time i.e. we are 95% confident the script is working as advertised. This is a common minimum standard required across most fields of scientific.)

Even if the script could completely eliminate the house edge (which it can't), we would need around 6000 runs to obtain a p-value of <0.05. If the script could half the house edge from 1% to 0.5%, we would need around 23000 runs to obtain a p-value of <0.05.

alia couldn’t take a hard mathing like a good ciphersex girl.

I'm really not interested in the mathematical mumbo jumbo... all I care about is proving that the script works.

* nullius faints.

For the sake of cryptological education, where can we find a genuine numberslut?

Hello, Alia, you sly meretrix.

’Twould be a business doing pleasure with you.

Name:	Meretrix
Position:	Copper Member
Date Registered:	March 13, 2018, 01:59:50 AM

To be honest, I only paid extra because I thought “Copper Member” came with a copper dildo.  theymos owes it to me good and hard.  I mean, a copper dildo is good and hard—or maybe, an ancient Chinese bronze dildo plus a jade butt plug [linked news article contains photos of ancient Chinese dildo and butt plug].

After all, I’m a cunt.  I deserve to play with a Copper Member. ✔

[Meretrix]

🙑 Wherefore the Meretrix 🙗

Well, first of all...

[Porn is] the canary in the free speech coal mine.

...if there’s anything above all for which good old nully is known, it is freedom of speech.  For fuck’s sake, nullius has defended free speech for Donald Trump and Josh Hawley.  That goes way beyond my own squick limit, but I love nully’s devotion to the right to pornography. 

It’s outrageous that in the past eight, almost nine years since my creation, there’s been a massive push to “clean up” the Internet.  Literally outrageous, with the effect that I am outraged.  Against the “cleanup” of the Internet, I am here to “dirty” it.  This is a political protest:  The expression of a repressed form of speech to fight for the right to that speech.

And zeroth of all, the promise of Ciphersex has not been fulfilled.

Subject: On the virtue of Ciphersex

I am appalled at how few users of cypherpunk money show even the slightest interest in actual “crypto”.  I’m afraid that >95% of alleged “Bitcoin users” are seeking only get-rich-quick and/or a new form of Paypal.  I want to change that—that, and more.

Overall, I am ideologically motivated to educate people about strong cryptography—and most importantly, to make more people actually use it.

Point blank, sex sells.  If I could seduce (what I believed to be) a 19-year-old woman into learning how to secure her data and her communications, then that’s a “win-win” scenario on multiple levels.  So much the better if I could take that public with an exhibitionist camgirl, and thus titillate a wider audience into enjoying an otherwise dry discussion of practical cryptography[.]

Last edit: March 08, 2018, 01:38:27 AM by nullius

[Note:  One of my motives which led to my unlucky assocation with Alia was my desire for someone to work with for an erotic Bitcoin art project.  For now, I will leave my intentions a mystery; but girls who have really gone Bitcoin should feel free to contact me if curious.  Moreover, I will revive and continue this thread if/when I have suitable other(s) with whom to make cryptolove.  For I believe in the virtue of Ciphersex, q.v. — nullius, 2018-03-08]

If alia was a dishonest fiction, why not replace her with an honest fiction?

Date Registered:

March 13, 2018, 01:59:50 AM

As envisioned in 2018, I’m a mathematically talented girl who’s developed a sexual fetish for cryptographic money.  Such was my path to prostitution:  I’m so aroused by the form of payment, I’ve come to work for it by the obvious means.  When I’m getting my bits twiddled by my clients, when I feel the quadratic residues of their pleasure within the primal prime-order field of my elliptic curves, when I achieve Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus with mutually untrusting strangers in an adversarial network environment, when I do kink with torsion points and hash chains, I’m driven by lust for cypherpunk money.

[Meretrix]

🙑 Whither the Meretrix 🙗

Work in progress.

[Meretrix]

Reserved more forum history.

[Meretrix]

Reserved in case I want to insert more forum art.

[Meretrix]

Reserved ’coz I’m a bitch, and I’m gonna reserve an extra post for whatever.

[Meretrix]

I'll just defer to my default "Yes, dear, obviously I'm wrong and your right" answer.  Besides, arguing with a bitch may make a cunt out of me, and that's the last thing I want.

That’s sweet of you!   Zcash (ZEC) funds are still required to fuck me.

(An unevidenced claim that the account was made to troll is not hot, though I could cope with it by getting out my dominatrix whip.)

Careful there,

I think that ship has sailed.

Is Ciphersex good for you, Wolfie?  For those who aren’t hot for zcashes, I take XMR as an alternative.

You're going to give the pea-brain that started this thread an aneurysm if you keep that up.

Does it make it better or worse that I always write my posts while naked?

Edit:  Is locking the thread evidence of an aneurysm?

This post, including that last line, was originally written 2026-10-31; it was much longer.  Most of its content has become the seed of some earlier posts in my hereby new Reputation thread. 

[owlcatz]

Hey, what did I say before!?

[Meretrix]

Hey, what did I say before!?

Hello there, owly.

Thanks for reporting the violation of local rules.  It will be dealt with promptly.  He did try before.  If he doesn’t want this to become an extreme S&M show, he’d better STFU.

So, are you in the mood for a key signing party?  I don’t mean with PGP—well, I don’t mean only with PGP.  I’m working on my post-quantum encryption key, and GnuPG with x448_ky1024 plus AEAD cipher mode has me so hot and bothered, I need some relief.

[DireWolfM14]

Is Ciphersex good for you, Wolfie?

I've been alive longer than the internet has been around, and I've yet to have cybersex, so I kind doubt Ciphersex is going to float my boat.

You're going to give the pea-brain that started this thread an aneurysm if you keep that up.

Does it make it better or worse that I always write my posts while naked?

Thanks for visual.  I'm be in the laundry room bleaching my eye balls.

Edit:  Is locking the thread evidence of an aneurysm?

This post, including that last line, was originally written 2026-10-31; it was much longer.  Most of its content has become the seed of some earlier posts in my hereby new Reputation thread. 

I doubt it, and honestly I'm glad.  I don't wish an aneurysm on anyone.  However, I have no doubt it's evidence of a severe case of butthurt.

Reserved ’coz I’m a bitch, and I’m gonna reserve an extra post for whatever.

This is where you'll apologized to me, and tell me I was right all along when you come to the realization that the world is indeed run by satanic, war mongering pedophiles.

[Meretrix]

Reserved ’coz I’m a bitch, and I’m gonna reserve an extra post for whatever.

This is where you'll apologized to me, and tell me I was right all along when you come to the realization that the world is indeed run by satanic, war mongering pedophiles.

When I did brothel work for awhile, my professional colleagues told me that I have a knack for the really weird requests.  Accordingly, I offer that for 1.0 ZEC/hour, I’ll suspend just for you the new local rule that I just added:

Political conspiracy theories with no or inadequate evidence are banned as off-topic—unless the theory is that I rule the world, in which case you may regale me at great length.

Otherwise, it’ll be enforced henceforth.

Edit to reply to edits I didn’t see while I was juggling a bunch of different browser tabs and windows:

...so I kind doubt Ciphersex is going to float my boat.

I know that extreme hardcore algorithmic number theory isn’t for everyone.  In that case, perhaps this may not be the thread for you.  It’s too bad, as I get downright primal if someone has just the right touch for factoring me.

Thanks for visual.  I'm be in the laundry room bleaching my eye balls.

Whip in hand, this is a warning that Rule 1 will be enforced.