Also, there are again dormant wallets that have begun dumping their bitcoins. It appears that these HODLERS are not anymore believing in what they HODL heheheeh.
Unfortunately the note doesn't specify if it was a P2PK coin. Every P2PK wallet which is moved is better for Bitcoin, because there are thus less vulnerable coins for quantum.
The problem is that it’s true, and we’re not talking about short periods of time, but rather more than one cycle (4–5 years).
It is not a
problem for Bitcoin if the first, more bumpy and "exciting", adoption phase is over, only for the "Get Rich Quick" folks.

And most of the time these users are also cherrypicking to justify their bad decisions. They're comparing the last gold bubble with the last Bitcoin bear market, which is comparing two quite short timeframes, or do a comparison with the 2021 top and the 2026 bearish bottom.
Well, "buy high, sell now" may have still worked in 2011. It doesn't work anymore, and that's true for most more or less mature assets.
So, it will be a boring but safe asset, basically.
Still less boring than ETFs, more like gold. The SMA-200 weekly (long term price trend) is still
more than 20% up each year.
Eventually it will be as boring as ETFs though, but in this case, I can imagine it to work more contrarian to the economy as there are only indirect connections to stock markets. Not like now when each hickup on the stock market is followed or even amplified by traders who have no idea about fundamentals, but follow herd behavior.
This kind of herd behavior without fundamental grounding will wane away once Bitcoin becomes safer and its fundamentals are better understood.
Actually, we are on the verge of ending the year with a negative return for the second year running – a situation unprecedented in the history of Bitcoin – so the scenario you’re describing seems plausible.
This is again cherrypicking. A calendar year doesn't mean nothing (less so in an asset that trades 24/7 and has no quarterly or yearly SEC filings) , and in this case it is even caused by a bullish event, the late 2024 pump. The reason 2025 was "bearish" is because the last stage of the bull market had moved to an earlier calendar year.
And the reasons were obvious: the ETFs euphoria moved the whole bull market schedule to an earlier date, and the expectation of Trump's victory in November 2024 led to the last big bullish pump to 100,000$+.
Potential in what sense? My fear is that those parents and grandparents wouldn’t buy actual bitcoin, but rather ETFs and other financial products.
It is also healthy that people keep buying stocks and ETFs to keep Capitalism running. But for some Bitcoin will be more attractive, due to the potential of a contrarian evolution (see above). There are many studies that have signalled that even if only a few % of the middle class's saving capital is put into BTC then its price would be much higher than now.
I'm not expecting much more than that. I expect also the younger cohorts of "parents and grandparents" (those born, let's say from 1965-1970 onwards) already being more open to BTC because they knew it already in their "active" life, not only when they were already retired.
The reality is that it's not a good time for neither crypto nor Bitcoin, it was a revolutionary thing but well, there are other revolutionary things on the market now, and it's no longer the point of interest. People look at returns and once you cut the 2010-2017 period from the picture, it's not that good anymore.
Yes, Bitcoin isn't revolutionary anymore. And this is exactly my point - the "get rich quick" folks are looking into other options. Where there will also be bubbles. And this is a process that's happening a lot of time already. 2015 was less steep than 2021, 2021 was less steep than 2017, and even 2017 was less steep than 2013.
In early times (2013) it was said that the high volatility in the early bumpy bull markets was necessary to attract attention. But eventually, as also @mindrust wrote, any asset has to mature. There is no infinite growth. And if Bitcoin wants to stay successfull, it needs to change the focus from the "get rich quick" to the "save money from inflation" crowd. (It's highly likely that for the "get rich on medium speed" as you call them, there will be some opportunities still

)