[ANN][STD] StandardCoin - BUILT-IN EXCHANGE - Permanently Rising Rate

[ghibly79]

Fraudolent

Er what?  Have you got a smudge in your dictionary?  Misspelling the same word several times causes me to doubt your intelligence level, so I cannot trust anything you write.

Awww cute troll.

[hucker]

Remove yours and I'll remove mine (for your sake, not that I care about your negatives anyway).

Oh do grow up.

[ghibly79]

Kk xD

[hucker]

I have hard evidence and posted it over and over and over. Many can see it clearly (expecially other experienced users, weird). You cannot see it even after all the explanations? FINE TO ME just ignore my negative rating to the dev, you are free to do so. But if you insist I tag people without evidence allow me to disagree too, and to leave a negative back to you since you left to me in the first place.

Fair is fair.

Grow up man, get a life and have a good one !

You even left negative feedback on a guy that just came here never did anything to you other then just posted on this thread ... just by the evidence of his nickname .... ?
That is the evidence you need 
That's the exact same evidence you use to claim this is a Ponzi.
To be clear, there is a chance this is truly a Ponzi, but untill proven: IT IS NOT !
Just by statements you post here it doesn't make it so, you'r just 1 guy bro that ruined maybe good intentions.
Maybe the dev didn't made his calculations right, but that doesn't make him a criminal !
Untill now, the dev. came through for all what he promised.
If you have good solid evidence you are free to post it here on the forums, but to tag someone untrustfull before events occurred, you are wrong and should swallow your big headed pride and remove it from the guy !

And I'll answer in your age terms, maybe you understand that: "You remove my trust tag first then I will remove my trust tag from you  *child noise* ........ maybe *child gniffle*

Well said.  How many people must make a fool of this idiot before he leaves?

[hucker]

Fraudolent

Er what?  Have you got a smudge in your dictionary?  Misspelling the same word several times causes me to doubt your intelligence level, so I cannot trust anything you write.

Awww cute troll.

No, a simple observation.  Those who can spell tend to have higher intelligence, and have a clue about coins.

[ghibly79]

wow... so I do the right thing and defend this coin from the asshole that is ghibly79 and he is accusing me of being a sockpuppet? Just because someone disagrees with your actions doesn't mean they are a sock puppet. It is petty bullshit like this that ruins the forum.

Same here brother, lol this guy is on a mission !

I wonder why not all in here tag him as untrustworthy, as he didn't show us evidence, he just guess it by the commercials this coin made.

Because the trust system is worthless.  Only people who have trust themselves can change the score of anyone else.  It's not a democracy, it's a clique group of big headed egos.

idd

Ow my trust level is back at zero.
This was hard to do. Now I'm ready again to start pupetting.  
Good job of destroying that could be a good system on this forum ghibly79 !

I see your trust as -6

ghibly79  marked this account as well as untruthful, just by the evidence of the nickname, that's how he operates.

You totally got me with the double account Tekkerr ahah xD, must admit.
Well actually I should leave both your accounts tagged cause you are trying to abuse the trust system and then circumvent it, but I feel good and will remove it from the fake one with 3 "r"

[Tekkerr]

wow... so I do the right thing and defend this coin from the asshole that is ghibly79 and he is accusing me of being a sockpuppet? Just because someone disagrees with your actions doesn't mean they are a sock puppet. It is petty bullshit like this that ruins the forum.

Same here brother, lol this guy is on a mission !

I wonder why not all in here tag him as untrustworthy, as he didn't show us evidence, he just guess it by the commercials this coin made.

Because the trust system is worthless.  Only people who have trust themselves can change the score of anyone else.  It's not a democracy, it's a clique group of big headed egos.

idd

Ow my trust level is back at zero.
This was hard to do. Now I'm ready again to start pupetting. 
Good job of destroying that could be a good system on this forum ghibly79 !

I see your trust as -6

ghibly79  marked this account as well as untruthful, just by the evidence of the nickname, that's how he operates.

You totally got me with the double account Tekkerr ahah xD, must admit.
Well actually I should leave both your accounts tagged cause you are trying to abuse the trust system and then circumvent it, but I feel good and will remove it from the fake one with 3 "r"

Just quoting as evidence ... how you operate !

[hucker]

You totally got me with the double account Tekkerr ahah xD, must admit.
Well actually I should leave both your accounts tagged cause you are trying to abuse the trust system and then circumvent it, but I feel good and will remove it from the fake one with 3 "r"

The trust system is totally worthless, as 99% of us don't get a vote.

[ghibly79]

ghibly79  marked this account as well as untruthful, just by the evidence of the nickname, that's how he operates.

Wrong account! You got the troll attempt right, now don't do mistakes

[ghibly79]

You totally got me with the double account Tekkerr ahah xD, must admit.
Well actually I should leave both your accounts tagged cause you are trying to abuse the trust system and then circumvent it, but I feel good and will remove it from the fake one with 3 "r"

The trust system is totally worthless, as 99% of us don't get a vote.

You get but your vote is "worth less". And for good reason it seems, you are just clueless trolls with no trade history. It's far from perfect, I agree, but in this case it's working extremely well

[hucker]

You totally got me with the double account Tekkerr ahah xD, must admit.
Well actually I should leave both your accounts tagged cause you are trying to abuse the trust system and then circumvent it, but I feel good and will remove it from the fake one with 3 "r"

The trust system is totally worthless, as 99% of us don't get a vote.

You get but your vote is "worth less". And for good reason it seems, you are just clueless trolls with no trade history. It's far from perfect, I agree, but in this case it's working extremely well

My vote is worth nothing, it changes the score not one iota.
No trade history?  On here perhaps.
As for trolls, it's YOU that's the troll, and that's almost unanimous.

[ghibly79]

You totally got me with the double account Tekkerr ahah xD, must admit.
Well actually I should leave both your accounts tagged cause you are trying to abuse the trust system and then circumvent it, but I feel good and will remove it from the fake one with 3 "r"

The trust system is totally worthless, as 99% of us don't get a vote.

You get but your vote is "worth less". And for good reason it seems, you are just clueless trolls with no trade history. It's far from perfect, I agree, but in this case it's working extremely well

My vote is worth nothing, it changes the score not one iota.
No trade history?  On here perhaps.
As for trolls, it's YOU that's the troll, and that's almost unanimous.

Points of view. Let's agree to disagree and over then. Ignore my ratings and ignore me too if you want.
And yes, no trade history here. Makes sense: you are posting here, so your 200000 feedbacks on ebay or whatever don't count.

[Tekkerr]

You totally got me with the double account Tekkerr ahah xD, must admit.
Well actually I should leave both your accounts tagged cause you are trying to abuse the trust system and then circumvent it, but I feel good and will remove it from the fake one with 3 "r"

The trust system is totally worthless, as 99% of us don't get a vote.

You get but your vote is "worth less". And for good reason it seems, you are just clueless trolls with no trade history. It's far from perfect, I agree, but in this case it's working extremely well

No serious man I got a few idea's for ya.

• Get in touch with this Coinadmin (yes you, as you are attacking him) get an IRC channel (record it if you will, but say it first) tell him your concerns and let him explain this miss understanding.
• Gather real evidence, other then apples and oranges count ups, get real blockchain TXid's, get coin adresses, calculate on that other then apples. And provide us with real evidence
• Remove all those negative trust levels (I don't even care about mine) as for now you are just destroying the forums only real level of security. You really do miss use this system as you just marked him a criminal before given REAL evidence other then a calculation of apples.

Do you even consider that this guy made a very beautiful website, a whole trading system and that you just destroy'd this in a mouse click ?
The time this costed could be used to launch a legit coin, with a 1-2% prémine, succeed and made him more then this so called Ponzi ?
Or this admin is really dumb to try this Ponzi or he is legit, and untill then you should consider him as legit.
Now I've read your calculations a long time before and it is indeed a bit fishy, no disagreement there but how you handle it is utterly wrong !
Work of those 3 little points above and come back, but untill then you should revoke those trust levels, for your own good.

[ghibly79]

Won't be the first time someone make a good looking website and whatnot just to scam. Never underestimate people when (possibly big) money is involved. I've seen it countless times before.

I don't need to contact the dev, he has all the info and concerns written right here, over 2 threads (he knows perfectly, anyway xD).

Only way I MAY remove the warning is if he changes the description, making it clear that it's not true there always will be enough btc to buy back std at GER (cause that's false xD) and that you can lose money there.

I said "MAY" because that won't cancel the fact he tried to mask the whole thing while holding all the money at his private exchange. Shady as hell even if he corrects the description. But I'll think about it.
He can use an escrow maybe: you send btc to the escrow address and he releases STD. Then I'll definetly remove all.

As for your rating, already answered: remove your one, which is an abuse, and I'll remove mine.

[hucker]

And yes, no trade history here. Makes sense: you are posting here, so your 200000 feedbacks on ebay or whatever don't count.

And the people who trade elsewhere and discuss here have no say?  How pointless and stupid.  The name of the site is bitcoinTALK, not bitcoinTRADE.

[hucker]

No serious man I got a few idea's for ya.

• Get in touch with this Coinadmin (yes you, as you are attacking him) get an IRC channel (record it if you will, but say it first) tell him your concerns and let him explain this miss understanding.
• Gather real evidence, other then apples and oranges count ups, get real blockchain TXid's, get coin adresses, calculate on that other then apples. And provide us with real evidence
• Remove all those negative trust levels (I don't even care about mine) as for now you are just destroying the forums only real level of security. You really do miss use this system as you just marked him a criminal before given REAL evidence other then a calculation of apples.

Do you even consider that this guy made a very beautiful website, a whole trading system and that you just destroy'd this in a mouse click ?
The time this costed could be used to launch a legit coin, with a 1-2% prémine, succeed and made him more then this so called Ponzi ?
Or this admin is really dumb to try this Ponzi or he is legit, and untill then you should consider him as legit.
Now I've read your calculations a long time before and it is indeed a bit fishy, no disagreement there but how you handle it is utterly wrong !
Work of those 3 little points above and come back, but untill then you should revoke those trust levels, for your own good.

Agreed.  Ghibly's actions amount to criminal damage.

[Tekkerr]

Won't be the first time someone make a good looking website and whatnot just to scam. Never underestimate people when (possibly big) money is involved. I've seen it countless times before.

I don't need to contact the dev, he has all the info and concerns written right here, over 2 threads (he knows perfectly, anyway xD).

Only way I MAY remove the warning is if he changes the description, making it clear that it's not true there always will be enough btc to buy back std at GER (cause that's false xD) and that you can lose money there.

I said "MAY" because that won't cancel the fact he tried to mask the whole thing while holding all the money at his private exchange. Shady as hell even if he corrects the description. But I'll think about it.
He can use an escrow maybe: you send btc to the escrow address and he releases STD. Then I'll definetly remove all.

As for your rating, already answered: remove your one, which is an abuse, and I'll remove mine.

So you completely ignore the statement I asked you to make real evidence ... other then some writings on his website are not to your liking.
I do agree he can make it into an escrow for his users safety and his legit.
But this does not make it into a Ponzi, as then every other escrow is a Ponzi in your eyes, so you are still not entitled to destroy his work.
You can warn people but not the way you did !
And no I won't remove my trust in you as you marked a forum user as untrusty without giving any evidence and/or proof that counts other then a small apples count. I don't even care about my own, because I won't normally use this forum ever again, besides just for some info I need. So thank you, you didn't only do it all wrong you shoo thrust full people away from here.

[ghibly79]

And yes, no trade history here. Makes sense: you are posting here, so your 200000 feedbacks on ebay or whatever don't count.

And the people who trade elsewhere and discuss here have no say?  How pointless and stupid.  The name of the site is bitcoinTALK, not bitcoinTRADE.

Yes, if not everyone can open 200 fake accounts and destroy ratings just for fun. Not perfect as I said, but not without sense either.

[ghibly79]

Won't be the first time someone make a good looking website and whatnot just to scam. Never underestimate people when (possibly big) money is involved. I've seen it countless times before.

I don't need to contact the dev, he has all the info and concerns written right here, over 2 threads (he knows perfectly, anyway xD).

Only way I MAY remove the warning is if he changes the description, making it clear that it's not true there always will be enough btc to buy back std at GER (cause that's false xD) and that you can lose money there.

I said "MAY" because that won't cancel the fact he tried to mask the whole thing while holding all the money at his private exchange. Shady as hell even if he corrects the description. But I'll think about it.
He can use an escrow maybe: you send btc to the escrow address and he releases STD. Then I'll definetly remove all.

As for your rating, already answered: remove your one, which is an abuse, and I'll remove mine.

So you completely ignore the statement I asked you to make real evidence ... other then some writings on his website are not to your liking.
I do agree he can make it into an escrow for his users safety and his legit.
But this does not make it into a Ponzi, so you are still not entitled to destroy his work.
You can warn people but not the way you did !
And no I won't remove my trust in you as you marked a forum user as untrusty without giving any evidence and/or proof that counts other then a small apples count. I don't even care about my own, because I won't normally use this forum ever again, besides just for some info I need. So thank you, you didn't only do it all wrong you shoo thrust full people away from here.

The fraudulent statement IS the evidence. More than enough. Lying to investors to lure money in, expecially when you are going to hold all of that means a big red tag in my books. You disagree. Ok. Not going to torture you, I assure

[hucker]

And yes, no trade history here. Makes sense: you are posting here, so your 200000 feedbacks on ebay or whatever don't count.

And the people who trade elsewhere and discuss here have no say?  How pointless and stupid.  The name of the site is bitcoinTALK, not bitcoinTRADE.

Yes, if not everyone can open 200 fake accounts and destroy ratings just for fun. Not perfect as I said, but not without sense either.

Surely the way is to prevent fake accounts?  Duh!

And it's utterly useless, it might as well not be here.  Especially when people like you abuse the system.  You should only have given the dev a negative if you had traded with him and lost money.  End of story.