Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 09:07:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: united states country starts off 2012 with a bang  (Read 2024 times)
TheHeroMember
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
January 02, 2012, 04:48:47 AM
 #21

update: See the third post for more resources.




BANG!

Hey Guys! WWW.FREEBITCOINS.ORG introduces "Epic December Contest" where you can Win Sweet Casascius Coins !!!
1713863239
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713863239

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713863239
Reply with quote  #2

1713863239
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713863239
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713863239

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713863239
Reply with quote  #2

1713863239
Report to moderator
1713863239
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713863239

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713863239
Reply with quote  #2

1713863239
Report to moderator
1713863239
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713863239

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713863239
Reply with quote  #2

1713863239
Report to moderator
mizerydearia (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 507



View Profile
January 02, 2012, 02:08:57 PM
 #22

I'm not sure how mizerydearia did it, but I would have gone to each site and search NDAA, checking the date of the latest article. Upon seeing none, I would have considered that they haven't published anything yet. (or something like that, I would have done)


Yeah.  I searched for 'NDAA' and also 'National Defense Authorization Act' because some articles didn't contain reference of NDAA.  Also, I noticed even one article didn't contain either of those references, but I found it from other methods.  So, it may be likely that the list is not entirely accurate and if the list is at all useful, it may be more useful to prepare it in a wiki so that everyone can update it rather than just myself.
mizerydearia (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 507



View Profile
January 02, 2012, 03:14:55 PM
 #23

TheHeroMember
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
January 03, 2012, 07:56:42 AM
 #24



He's cute.

Hey Guys! WWW.FREEBITCOINS.ORG introduces "Epic December Contest" where you can Win Sweet Casascius Coins !!!
P4man
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 03, 2012, 08:44:48 AM
 #25

Quote
“My administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens. Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation.”

Translated:

This does not mean that further administrations will not authorize this shit that I just signed into law.

Exactly.
Also, its unclear if the current bill applies to US citizens or not. Its quite ambiguous, and thats probably by design. That means it will be up to the supreme court to decide one day, but that will only happen after US citizens have been detained by the military for who knows how many years. And even then it would be surprising to see the US supreme court uphold the constitution for once.

Last point; its very disappointing Obama signed this, but its nor fair to put the blame with him, rather than congress primarily. Particularly all the advocates of "limited government".

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!