Bitcoin Documentary Released

[mitzie]

Very professional work. Keep it up

[dreamspark]

Felt like I watched some pro regulation propaganda to be honest not much in the ways of arguments as to why regulation may be a bad thing.

Well made and interesting but very pro regulation. From the storyline given I thought we would see more of both sides of the coin.

I don't think it's propaganda, but any intelligent person knows for it to become a legit currency where you can actually spend it on shit there's gonna be some 'regulation' and taxation. It's not a bad thing, but like one of the interviewees said, they can't touch the actual protocol so i don't see why it really matters much.

Whether regulation is good or bad is besides the point.

I was saying that it felt pro regulation bias and I expected to see more from the other side of the argument is all.

Of course it matters though, thats like saying I dont mind having my emails read , regulated and my history stored because its still the SMTP behind it...

[windpath]

Awesome! Very good documentary. Thank you

[franky1]

Felt like I watched some pro regulation propaganda to be honest not much in the ways of arguments as to why regulation may be a bad thing.

Well made and interesting but very pro regulation. From the storyline given I thought we would see more of both sides of the coin.

watch it again the regulations were talking about FIAT gateways..

there was no side of the coin involved.. just a one sided view on paper money

[hilariousandco]

Felt like I watched some pro regulation propaganda to be honest not much in the ways of arguments as to why regulation may be a bad thing.

Well made and interesting but very pro regulation. From the storyline given I thought we would see more of both sides of the coin.

I don't think it's propaganda, but any intelligent person knows for it to become a legit currency where you can actually spend it on shit there's gonna be some 'regulation' and taxation. It's not a bad thing, but like one of the interviewees said, they can't touch the actual protocol so i don't see why it really matters much.

Of course it matters though, thats like saying I dont mind having my emails read , regulated and my history stored because its still the SMTP behind it...

I don't see how they're the same. I think you need to tell me what sort of regulation you have in mind.

[dreamspark]

Felt like I watched some pro regulation propaganda to be honest not much in the ways of arguments as to why regulation may be a bad thing.

Well made and interesting but very pro regulation. From the storyline given I thought we would see more of both sides of the coin.

I don't think it's propaganda, but any intelligent person knows for it to become a legit currency where you can actually spend it on shit there's gonna be some 'regulation' and taxation. It's not a bad thing, but like one of the interviewees said, they can't touch the actual protocol so i don't see why it really matters much.

Of course it matters though, thats like saying I dont mind having my emails read , regulated and my history stored because its still the SMTP behind it...

I don't see how they're the same. I think you need to tell me what sort of regulation you have in mind.

I dont have any regulation in mind.

You made the point that any regulation doesn't matter due to the protocol not being changed which I refuted with an example of how you don't have to change the protocol to change the way in which it is used and monitored. Lets not get into a debate on whether regulation is good or bad thing, my opinion that it promoted the idea of regulation without giving much counter argument is my opinion and still stands.

[hilariousandco]

Felt like I watched some pro regulation propaganda to be honest not much in the ways of arguments as to why regulation may be a bad thing.

Well made and interesting but very pro regulation. From the storyline given I thought we would see more of both sides of the coin.

I don't think it's propaganda, but any intelligent person knows for it to become a legit currency where you can actually spend it on shit there's gonna be some 'regulation' and taxation. It's not a bad thing, but like one of the interviewees said, they can't touch the actual protocol so i don't see why it really matters much.

Of course it matters though, thats like saying I dont mind having my emails read , regulated and my history stored because its still the SMTP behind it...

I don't see how they're the same. I think you need to tell me what sort of regulation you have in mind.

I dont have any regulation in mind.

You made the point that any regulation doesn't matter due to the protocol not being changed which I refuted with an example of how you don't have to change the protocol to change the way in which it is used and monitored. Lets not get into a debate on whether regulation is good or bad thing, my opinion that it promoted the idea of regulation without giving much counter argument is my opinion and still stands.

I meant what regulation you had in mind when you were arguing against it.

[zolace]

Very good idea and great documentary!Thanks for sharing it .

[iraszl]

Great video.

[evoked22]

this looks awesome! I hope they keep on making more.

Like all coins once they set the foundation they can allow the price to reach great heights!

[giszmo]

Half way through watching it.
Great so far! Please spread and translate it!

Criticism: you don't mind putting your logo into the whole video but if you are not familiar with the speakers, you would appreciate seeing their names all the time, too. Or at least a 2s reminder every time you switch. I watch and I care a lot to connect names with faces and statements.

Wonder if evorhees approves of the sentiment of the second part. WTH!?!? What mind's child was this video of?

[hilariousandco]

Half way through watching it.
Great so far! Please spread and translate it!

Criticism: you don't mind putting your logo into the whole video but if you are not familiar with the speakers, you would appreciate seeing their names all the time, too. Or at least a 2s reminder every time you switch. I watch and I care a lot to connect names with faces and statements.

Haha, I actually kept hoping their names would pop up every now and again, but it is only a short documentary.

[ib927]

Y u make me pay. I dont want im poor

[hilariousandco]

Y u make me pay. I dont want im poor

Y u no make sense? Pay for what?

[ib927]

Y u make me pay. I dont want im poor

Y u no make sense? Pay for what?

Subscription to watch the full video...

[hilariousandco]

Y u make me pay. I dont want im poor

Y u no make sense? Pay for what?

Subscription to watch the full video...

Do you? I didn't realise. How long is the full length version?

[unick]

thanks for sharing 

[Bit_Happy]

Y u make me pay. I dont want im poor

Y u no make sense? Pay for what?

Subscription to watch the full video...

Do you? I didn't realise. How long is the full length version?

What is the price?

[NattyLiteCoin]

Great flute-driven tune in the middle of the production, liked the cohesion with the message.

[Swordsoffreedom]

Just released our short Bitcoin documentary on https://www.SQ1.tv

The Bitcoin Phenomenon

Starring:

- Gavin Andresen
- Trace Mayer
- Erik Voorhees
- Fred Ehrsam of Coinbase
- Jeremy Liew (venture capitalist)
- Peter Vessenes of Bitcoin Foundation/Coinlab
- Bennett Hoffman of Buttercoin
- Angela Keaton of Antiwar.com

The primary storyline looks to show the difference in perspective between the libertarians/early-adopters and VCs/entrepreneurs looking to take Bitcoin mainstream. "There is clash of ideology and ideals" as noted by Jeremy Liew. Erik Voorhees offers a steadfast position. The central question asked is does Bitcoin need to shed its politics in order to pursue mainstream adoption.

We also have full-length interviews with all of the subjects above as bonus footage.

https://www.SQ1.tv/bitcoin

Now that I have seen it, can comment it was pretty good I liked how they explained transactions and made it a knowledge based video interesting stuff sort of a note guide of the general video topics.

-   Presents a Novel Interesting Solution to problems
-   Cash for the Internet also a payment network
-   Piece of digital information that has value as long as no one else knows that information value belong to you
-   NSA in the 1970s spread in the 1990s Public Key Cryptography
-   Used by everyone
-   Solved the double spending how do you prevent it from being sent to two different people at the same time if It is digital easy to copy, but Satoshi made it so everyone notices one is noticed the other is just ignored, key technical breakthrough
-   Could a bunch of people who don’t trust each other just by passing messages create a working function system
-   Don’t need to pay anyone to make sure system is valid paid by the system itself
-   Tied into the creation of new Bitcoins make sure double spends do not happen
-   System validates the transactions and make sure no one cheats
-   Tied into the creation of new Bitcoins
-   People validate the transactions miners make sure no one cheat and are awarded Bitcoins
-   Need to validate the mining supply proof of work
-   Miners need to run algorithm
-   All validate transactions participate in reality to see who is rewarded Bitcoins
-   Fundamental promises made by Bitcoin network
-   Supply too complex every four years half are given out (halving)

Keeps going but it was neat