Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 07:22:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: new wallet, only 1 tx of 0.001BTC and now I have 0.004BTC. How?  (Read 1105 times)
marked (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 08, 2012, 01:11:40 PM
 #1

Hi,

Using the bitcoin 0.5.1 client, with a new bitcoin datadir and blockchain I had 0.001BTC sent to one of my addresses, and there are no other transactions.

The client shows 0.004 for that transaction.

The client shows no other transactions.

pywallet -dumpwallet shows no other transaction.

Blockexplorer shows the address as having 0.001BTC.

a -rescan does not change this. What do I actually have and how can I find out? I'm running on Windows.



Regards,

marked
1714807326
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714807326

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714807326
Reply with quote  #2

1714807326
Report to moderator
1714807326
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714807326

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714807326
Reply with quote  #2

1714807326
Report to moderator
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714807326
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714807326

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714807326
Reply with quote  #2

1714807326
Report to moderator
1714807326
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714807326

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714807326
Reply with quote  #2

1714807326
Report to moderator
BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1131

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2012, 02:48:05 PM
 #2

What is the address and what is the transaction?

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
marked (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 08, 2012, 03:33:46 PM
 #3

Bruce,


address:  1EWutuYe5kkpfQ8KuNhwgDuzbau2sWzYFo
              http://blockexplorer.com/address/1EWutuYe5kkpfQ8KuNhwgDuzbau2sWzYFo

tx:          http://blockexplorer.com/tx/0ed42aaecd3a704ebea81ac16ffb5ce3b784c58aef2e93aabf064a1955b3c366#o208

should I try each of the other keys from the dumpwallet output to see if they contain the +.003?

marked
BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1131

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2012, 03:36:05 PM
 #4

My name is Burt (damn I need to change my username I guess).  No relation to Bruce.

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
casascius
Mike Caldwell
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136


The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2012, 03:40:20 PM
 #5

Were you sent 0.001 by that same person at the same time to different addresses?

That transaction is a "send many" transaction. If more than one of the transaction outputs goes to you, they are lumped together into the same transaction by the satoshi client.

Companies claiming they got hacked and lost your coins sounds like fraud so perfect it could be called fashionable.  I never believe them.  If I ever experience the misfortune of a real intrusion, I declare I have been honest about the way I have managed the keys in Casascius Coins.  I maintain no ability to recover or reproduce the keys, not even under limitless duress or total intrusion.  Remember that trusting strangers with your coins without any recourse is, as a matter of principle, not a best practice.  Don't keep coins online. Use paper or hardware wallets instead.
marked (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 08, 2012, 03:41:48 PM
 #6

My name is Burt (damn I need to change my username I guess).  No relation to Bruce.

oops. Sorry, got used to reading about bruce and misread the username...

marked

BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1131

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2012, 03:43:09 PM
 #7

This is the last straw - I am checking into seeing if I can get it changed  Smiley

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
marked (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 08, 2012, 04:14:45 PM
 #8

Were you sent 0.001 by that same person at the same time to different addresses?

That transaction is a "send many" transaction. If more than one of the transaction outputs goes to you, they are lumped together into the same transaction by the satoshi client.

So far I've found 0.004 from

208 | Not yet redeemed | 0.001 | 161167 | http://blockexplorer.com/address/1EWutuYe5kkpfQ8KuNhwgDuzbau2sWzYFo
223 | Not yet redeemed | 0.001 | 161167 | http://blockexplorer.com/address/1FZ5GXuoJ4VkRqY7ri26kQs3iM633dS9kT
224 | Not yet redeemed | 0.001 | 161167 | http://blockexplorer.com/address/1G8c9NzvyrU8p97y9WMkNfncoquoUeuXyq
317 | Not yet redeemed | 0.001 | 161167 | http://blockexplorer.com/address/1P7yR6FL9NyXPTw6t8ZygJTQJpzgZzWT1R

So, 4 x 0.001 tx from a single originator each of which were sent to 4 different addresses. How is it determined that 0.004 is shown as a single tx and how does it determine that it was for the 1EW.. address? Just because it is first?



Regards,
Mark





marked (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 08, 2012, 04:19:31 PM
 #9

So, 4 x 0.001 tx from a single originator each of which were sent to 4 different addresses. How is it determined that 0.004 is shown as a single tx and how does it determine that it was for the 1EW.. address? Just because it is first?

and does this accumulation apply to other clients not just the mainstream client.

marked
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2012, 05:24:29 PM
 #10

This is the last straw - I am checking into seeing if I can get it changed  Smiley

I want my name changed, too. People think I have a whole in my head.

~Bruno~ (and my real name was used as the title for that gay movie)
casascius
Mike Caldwell
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136


The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2012, 06:42:06 PM
 #11

The system deems this all as one transaction because it was sent by the sender that way.

Sendmany's are rare and are often used to do bulk distribution of bitcoins with minimum transaction fees, it also cuts down on the number of kb's the transaction takes. I load casascius coins with sendmany.  The idea that one transaction contained 0.004 to you - even if spread across 4 transactions - is a reasonable view for a client to take, that is how the network sees it, it is one transaction on the network of which 0.004 is yours.

Companies claiming they got hacked and lost your coins sounds like fraud so perfect it could be called fashionable.  I never believe them.  If I ever experience the misfortune of a real intrusion, I declare I have been honest about the way I have managed the keys in Casascius Coins.  I maintain no ability to recover or reproduce the keys, not even under limitless duress or total intrusion.  Remember that trusting strangers with your coins without any recourse is, as a matter of principle, not a best practice.  Don't keep coins online. Use paper or hardware wallets instead.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!