Mighty_Conan (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2014, 03:56:46 PM |
|
Hey,
I do not understand the discussion in here. Very soon, ASICs are history and replaced with GPUs and FPGAs. So where is the big deal ?
Conan
|
|
|
|
dropt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2014, 04:25:39 PM |
|
Hey,
I do not understand the discussion in here. Very soon, ASICs are history and replaced with GPUs and FPGAs. So where is the big deal ?
Conan
What on earth are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
Phoenix1969
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
LIR DEV
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 16, 2014, 04:45:25 PM |
|
Hey,
I do not understand the discussion in here. Very soon, ASICs are history and replaced with GPUs and FPGAs. So where is the big deal ?
Conan
This guy makes Jelin look like pure Genius.
|
|
|
|
Mighty_Conan (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 11:50:47 AM |
|
Hey,
I do not understand the discussion in here. Very soon, ASICs are history and replaced with GPUs and FPGAs. So where is the big deal ?
Conan
What on earth are you talking about? About that GPUs and FPGA are faster then ASICs, they do not tell you so you can buy the ASICs like sheeps on the way to be slaughted. Pure shovelselling. Conan
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 12:01:08 PM |
|
Hey,
I do not understand the discussion in here. Very soon, ASICs are history and replaced with GPUs and FPGAs. So where is the big deal ?
Conan
What on earth are you talking about? About that GPUs and FPGA are faster then ASICs, they do not tell you so you can buy the ASICs like sheeps on the way to be slaughted. Pure shovelselling. Conan I think his English is not the best and he implies that a gpu and fpga is a better buy. We all know a gpu is not faster at sha256 compared to an asic, but with the way btc diff progresses I wouldn't buy into any of these sha miner pre orders, even the bitmain is too darn expensive based on mining profitability.
|
|
|
|
Mighty_Conan (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 12:11:32 PM |
|
Hey,
I do not understand the discussion in here. Very soon, ASICs are history and replaced with GPUs and FPGAs. So where is the big deal ?
Conan
What on earth are you talking about? About that GPUs and FPGA are faster then ASICs, they do not tell you so you can buy the ASICs like sheeps on the way to be slaughted. Pure shovelselling. Conan I think his English is not the best and he implies that a gpu and fpga is a better buy. We all know a gpu is not faster at sha256 compared to an asic, but with the way btc diff progresses I wouldn't buy into any of these sha miner pre orders, even the bitmain is too darn expensive based on mining profitability. Yes, my English is not the best and your math competence zero. Let me write this slowly because I know that you cannot read fast. Calculating a hash takes <1s, due to a special condition it is a bit more complicated with Bitcoins. They way they do it today is Brute Force. ASICs are perfect for this. Expensive in developing, very cheap in producing. But you cannot do anything else with them. Once they do not use Brute Force anymore, they are dead and GPUs are much faster, because general purpose. Got it ? Conan
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 12:12:46 PM |
|
this is fun ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
btcusr
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 405
Merit: 255
@_vjy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 12:28:35 PM |
|
Yes, my English is not the best and your math competence zero. Let me write this slowly because I know that you cannot read fast. Calculating a hash takes <1s, due to a special condition it is a bit more complicated with Bitcoins. They way they do it today is Brute Force. ASICs are perfect for this. Expensive in developing, very cheap in producing. But you cannot do anything else with them. Once they do not use Brute Force anymore, they are dead and GPUs are much faster, because general purpose. Got it ?
Conan
even 10 years down the line, your gpu is not going to hash as much as an usb powered ASIC. bitcoin ASICs are useless for anything other than hashing, but GPUs are now useless with bitcoin mining. world will never ever mine with GPUs again..
|
|
|
|
Mighty_Conan (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 01:09:13 PM |
|
Yes, my English is not the best and your math competence zero. Let me write this slowly because I know that you cannot read fast. Calculating a hash takes <1s, due to a special condition it is a bit more complicated with Bitcoins. They way they do it today is Brute Force. ASICs are perfect for this. Expensive in developing, very cheap in producing. But you cannot do anything else with them. Once they do not use Brute Force anymore, they are dead and GPUs are much faster, because general purpose. Got it ?
Conan
even 10 years down the line, your gpu is not going to hash as much as an usb powered ASIC. bitcoin ASICs are useless for anything other than hashing, but GPUs are now useless with bitcoin mining. world will never ever mine with GPUs again.. Yes, there was also a time when people believed the world is flat. World will use GPUs again, because they are much faster. Maybe you should leave the current orthodoxy about the world is flat. And in 10 years down the line, ASICs for hashing are dead, I would say already after summer, but this is just a rough estimation. Conan
|
|
|
|
vesperwillow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 02:56:26 PM |
|
Yes, there was also a time when people believed the world is flat. World will use GPUs again, because they are much faster. Maybe you should leave the current orthodoxy about the world is flat. And in 10 years down the line, ASICs for hashing are dead, I would say already after summer, but this is just a rough estimation.
Conan
You haven't explained how ASICs will be dead after summer, or even why?
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 02:59:26 PM |
|
Yes, there was also a time when people believed the world is flat. World will use GPUs again, because they are much faster. Maybe you should leave the current orthodoxy about the world is flat. And in 10 years down the line, ASICs for hashing are dead, I would say already after summer, but this is just a rough estimation.
Conan
You haven't explained how ASICs will be dead after summer, or even why? here comes the punchline; "Pre-Order the 'Mighty Conan' 100TH/s of pure water-fuelled hawaiian hashpower - all you need is 300 hamsters to run the waterwheels and a dynamo."
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
timmmers
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 03:52:25 PM |
|
Yes, my English is not the best and your math competence zero. Let me write this slowly because I know that you cannot read fast. Calculating a hash takes <1s, due to a special condition it is a bit more complicated with Bitcoins. They way they do it today is Brute Force. ASICs are perfect for this. Expensive in developing, very cheap in producing. But you cannot do anything else with them. Once they do not use Brute Force anymore, they are dead and GPUs are much faster, because general purpose. Got it ?
Conan
even 10 years down the line, your gpu is not going to hash as much as an usb powered ASIC. bitcoin ASICs are useless for anything other than hashing, but GPUs are now useless with bitcoin mining. world will never ever mine with GPUs again.. Yes, there was also a time when people believed the world is flat. World will use GPUs again, because they are much faster. Maybe you should leave the current orthodoxy about the world is flat. And in 10 years down the line, ASICs for hashing are dead, I would say already after summer, but this is just a rough estimation. Conan ok. Since you are obviously getting a word wrong, you can't mean faster we know that...no GPU can hash as fast an ASIC when mining bitcoins. GPUs can do other things, like mining other coins, playing games, and being sold on Ebay for those purposes. Do you mean better and not faster? Let's test your confident but fucked up statement. Post the GPU that can beat a KNC mercury. One board. We'll all check and then we'll know what to say when we call the doctor to collect you.
|
|
|
|
smoothrunnings
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 04:59:00 PM |
|
Yes, my English is not the best and your math competence zero. Let me write this slowly because I know that you cannot read fast. Calculating a hash takes <1s, due to a special condition it is a bit more complicated with Bitcoins. They way they do it today is Brute Force. ASICs are perfect for this. Expensive in developing, very cheap in producing. But you cannot do anything else with them. Once they do not use Brute Force anymore, they are dead and GPUs are much faster, because general purpose. Got it ?
Conan
even 10 years down the line, your gpu is not going to hash as much as an usb powered ASIC. bitcoin ASICs are useless for anything other than hashing, but GPUs are now useless with bitcoin mining. world will never ever mine with GPUs again.. Yes, there was also a time when people believed the world is flat. World will use GPUs again, because they are much faster. Maybe you should leave the current orthodoxy about the world is flat. And in 10 years down the line, ASICs for hashing are dead, I would say already after summer, but this is just a rough estimation. Conan GPU's are dead for mining Bitcoins, unfortunately ASICs are getting closer to their death that next step will be something like quantum computing. This is how technology evolves so using your logic would mean that at some point we would have, or would need to go back to the 8086 CPU. Btw, if you think the planets move around the sun in a geocentric orbit then you already believe the world is flat.
|
|
|
|
smoothrunnings
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 05:21:15 PM |
|
With the way technology is going and the transistors getting tighter together it won't be long before we have to start using liquid plasma to cool the chips; like they use in some of the CRAY supercomputers. And yes I am referring to ASICs too! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
vesperwillow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 17, 2014, 05:39:46 PM |
|
With the way technology is going and the transistors getting tighter together it won't be long before we have to start using liquid plasma to cool the chips; like they use in some of the CRAY supercomputers. And yes I am referring to ASICs too! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) My take on the technology leaps, it's more likely we'll hit a point within this century where we plateu for awhile until the next major breakthrough, due to power draw and/or cooling issues. This would push for greater enhancements to energy use.
|
|
|
|
raskul
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 18, 2014, 05:59:41 AM |
|
Dr Bunsen had a brainwave i see ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
tips 1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 20, 2014, 08:46:52 PM |
|
This guy is right about GPUs being faster. But he forgot to tell you an abacus is actually the fastest way to mine bitcoins. Will likely even replace cpus.
edit: sheeple
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 21, 2014, 03:11:10 PM |
|
you guys really fall for a simple troll like this lmao
|
|
|
|
thomashrev89
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 21, 2014, 04:57:49 PM |
|
Hey,
I do not understand the discussion in here. Very soon, ASICs are history and replaced with GPUs and FPGAs. So where is the big deal ?
Conan
What on earth are you talking about? About that GPUs and FPGA are faster then ASICs, they do not tell you so you can buy the ASICs like sheeps on the way to be slaughted. Pure shovelselling. Conan I think his English is not the best and he implies that a gpu and fpga is a better buy. We all know a gpu is not faster at sha256 compared to an asic, but with the way btc diff progresses I wouldn't buy into any of these sha miner pre orders, even the bitmain is too darn expensive based on mining profitability. Let me write this slowly because I know that you cannot read fast. HAHA, You are funny.
|
|
|
|
ChuckBuck
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 21, 2014, 06:56:27 PM |
|
That'd be so awesome if regressing in technology would lead to faster hashrates. If I could mine with my Commodore 64, I'd be a Bitcoin Billionaire! ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
|