⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐BEST BITCOIN SPORTSBOOKS (2021)⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

[iram3130]

directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2

I'd really like to hear why anonibet was rated a 2 (TWO!)? Especially from a 3-day old account. Nothing against new players but I do think that he could have even made a '1' or '0' without any questions asked. Likewise, why 3 for nitrogen and 5 for direct bet? Seems like slightly suspicious ratings.

I think in order to turn this into a quality community review thread, you should require a 1 sentence reason behind each rating (as most have been doing anyway); and a sportsbook could jump in to say 'actually yes we do allow anonymous deposits' (or whatever the case may be). Otherwise it promotes shilling and prevents finding the 'true' crowd-wisdom-based ratings.

Another trick is look at the account activity AFTER the rating - you'll find some of them don't log in after posting their rating (literally the last they logged in was to post the rating )

I do think you should do this retrospectively btw; or, wait till you get more reviews then replace the old fake ones with real ones from real people.

Well spoted Betmoose! Thank you.

That is the reason I asked Ryank to set some critirea before accpting any rating. Because making new account is just some click away and another thing it is acceptable here. You can hold more then 1 account there.

[Jaybird]

I like the idea of having a 10 post minimum or setting something else to prevent shills. DirectBet voting 5 is a DirectBet shill. He voted low ratings for the top two books which doesn't make sense for a true voter.

Books should stay out of this thread and not promote their case. This is a great thread but keep the books out of here. It will be a unique rating guide.

[chaosPT]

I am voting for Nitrogen !

They have good support and they answer my question quickly or even have any problem .

[iram3130]

I am voting for Nitrogen !

They have good support and they answer my question quickly or even have any problem .

Give points between 1-5 not just I am voting for Nitrogen.

[rriky92]

Maybe a good idea is also to make a table with all the features that sportbook has/hasn't

[RyanK]

directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2

I'd really like to hear why anonibet was rated a 2 (TWO!)? Especially from a 3-day old account. Nothing against new players but I do think that he could have even made a '1' or '0' without any questions asked. Likewise, why 3 for nitrogen and 5 for direct bet? Seems like slightly suspicious ratings.

I think in order to turn this into a quality community review thread, you should require a 1 sentence reason behind each rating (as most have been doing anyway); and a sportsbook could jump in to say 'actually yes we do allow anonymous deposits' (or whatever the case may be). Otherwise it promotes shilling and prevents finding the 'true' crowd-wisdom-based ratings.

Another trick is look at the account activity AFTER the rating - you'll find some of them don't log in after posting their rating (literally the last they logged in was to post the rating )

I do think you should do this retrospectively btw; or, wait till you get more reviews then replace the old fake ones with real ones from real people.

Unfortunately there will always be some questionable scores placed here and there is not a good way around it.  This is why I have the top and bottom 10% of scores taken off for the final rankings.  It is at least a way to prevent it a bit.  I feel that it has worked pretty well too.  But yeah, I totally get where you are coming from... After thinking about it a little more I am raising the post limit for a score to count will be 20 instead of 10.  Thanks for all the input everyone.  I just want this to be the most accurate place to really see what books are doing a good job!

[RyanK]

I am voting for Nitrogen !

They have good support and they answer my question quickly or even have any problem .

Give points between 1-5 not just I am voting for Nitrogen.

Yes please!

[RyanK]

directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2

PocketRockets is a 1 because of this - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=663326.msg7709902#msg7709902

Thanks for the scores

Updated 7/11

[degold]

directbet 5
nitrogen 3
anonibet 2

I'd really like to hear why anonibet was rated a 2 (TWO!)? Especially from a 3-day old account. Nothing against new players but I do think that he could have even made a '1' or '0' without any questions asked. Likewise, why 3 for nitrogen and 5 for direct bet? Seems like slightly suspicious ratings.

I think in order to turn this into a quality community review thread, you should require a 1 sentence reason behind each rating (as most have been doing anyway); and a sportsbook could jump in to say 'actually yes we do allow anonymous deposits' (or whatever the case may be). Otherwise it promotes shilling and prevents finding the 'true' crowd-wisdom-based ratings.

Another trick is look at the account activity AFTER the rating - you'll find some of them don't log in after posting their rating (literally the last they logged in was to post the rating )

I do think you should do this retrospectively btw; or, wait till you get more reviews then replace the old fake ones with real ones from real people.

Unfortunately there will always be some questionable scores placed here and there is not a good way around it.  This is why I have the top and bottom 10% of scores taken off for the final rankings.  It is at least a way to prevent it a bit.  I feel that it has worked pretty well too.  But yeah, I totally get where you are coming from... After thinking about it a little more I am raising the post limit for a score to count will be 20 instead of 10.  Thanks for all the input everyone.  I just want this to be the most accurate place to really see what books are doing a good job!

I was going to rate but after reading this I will wait till I will have more posts.

[ruggedman_dan]

Whatever happened to btcsportsbet and btcsportsmatch?

Also it looks like bitbook fell off big time.

[RyanK]

I was going to rate but after reading this I will wait till I will have more posts.

Thanks!  You are close, so come back soon!

[RyanK]

Whatever happened to btcsportsbet and btcsportsmatch?

Also it looks like bitbook fell off big time.

Not sure about the first two but bitbook closed shop early this year.

[DirectBet]

DirectBet voting 5 is a DirectBet shill. He voted low ratings for the top two books which doesn't make sense for a true voter.

We have been the victims of shill accounts, not the beneficiary.

3 users rated us 1 without any explanation, including yourself.

Ryan - I think you should disqualify all ratings of 1 that were made without any explanation on legitimate books. A rating of 1 is supposed to be reserved for scams.

[iram3130]

DirectBet voting 5 is a DirectBet shill. He voted low ratings for the top two books which doesn't make sense for a true voter.

We have been the victims of shill accounts, not the beneficiary.

3 users rated us 1 without any explanation, including yourself.

Ryan - I think you should disqualify all ratings of 1 that were made without any explanation on legitimate books. A rating of 1 is supposed to be reserved for scams.

It's true, if anyone want to give 1 he/she must explain why because it's clearly written in OP that 1 means terrible or most probably scam.

Ryank must not accept any rating of 1 without any proof.

[jambola2]

Add BetVIP ? I'd like to vote on 1.5

DirectBet 4.5

Predictious 3

[tins]

Nitrogen = 4

Would love to see live scores...

That's why I use DirectBet. Easily rated a 5! Live updated scores make for easy bets as the games progress... DirectBet is currentyly rated at the #1 sportsbook (not casino and sports.)
They are the top rates sportsbooks that does not pay The OP for ratings....I mean advertising.
I like not having to sign up an account. I don't want to keep coins on a site, seen too many "site hacked and all coins taken" threads. If the sportsbook REQUIRES registration and an online balance, they should never hold higher than a 'C' rating. It is a scam in progress.
DirectBet offers a ton of different betting options, including in-game betting.
I bet on mcxNOW, I like the personal touch of betting with someone and chatting with them. But, they are not available 24/7, so DirectBet fulfills the anytime aspect.
Plus, as I mentioned, the customer support is A+++! Somehow any issues I have ever email them about have received a response within 3 hours. I don't always care if their decision goes into my favor, just RESPOND and let me know where I stand.
Very friendly, very clear. They make sure to resolve misunderstandings above and beyond what most companies would.

Anyway...it is what it is. I like the site. DirectBet is the ONLY 'A' rated site to not pay the OP for advertising (aka, higher ratings and promoting them).

Good luck!
Let go Argentina!!!

[bOSsmarie]

Directbet.eu - 5 ( They have instant Bet and Instant Win withdrawals. They also offer betting using 3 different coins BTC, LTC and DogeCoin which is another plus. Very low minimum bet. They have a lot of Contest. Very fast support, you just post on their thread here on Bitcointalk and the admin will solve it for you. One thing they should add is live result on sports. that would be another plus, but still i will give them a 5)

Anonibet - 5 ( A great betting site, very fast update on results and live betting.)

[RyanK]

They are the top rates sportsbooks that does not pay The OP for ratings....I mean advertising.

I don't get payed by any of the sports books. I am independent, and the rankings are 100% from user scores which I have no control over.  Don't say things you have no clue about.  And speaking of advertising...  

Thanks for the score.

[mybtclove]

i vote for xbet.io 5/5

funds in escrow quick payouts

[RyanK]

i vote for xbet.io 5/5

funds in escrow quick payouts

We now only take scores from users with 20+ posts, so please come back when you have reached this mark.  Thanks