Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 05:47:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Is the West gearing up to invade Russia once again?  (Read 58227 times)
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 1217


View Profile
June 29, 2015, 12:02:53 PM
Last edit: July 06, 2015, 12:18:58 PM by bryant.coleman
 #721

Norwegian newspaper VG published an article, telling how a Norwegian politicians and an MP from FrP party Tor André Johnsen got several warnings from PST (Norwegian KGB) for "too close contact with the Russian embassy representatives", meeting them at social occasions at restaurants and such.

Just like most of the other countries in the Western Europe (such as Germany, France and the United Kingdom), Norway is a loyal vassal state of the United States. Tor André Johnsen was probably warned at the behest of the Americans. Norway doesn't have the sovereignity to take such decisions by itself.
deisik
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3458
Merit: 1280


English ⬄ Russian Translation Services


View Profile WWW
June 29, 2015, 01:01:39 PM
Last edit: June 29, 2015, 05:51:08 PM by deisik
 #722

Adding this item here.

Norwegian newspaper VG published an article, telling how a Norwegian politicians and an MP from FrP party Tor André Johnsen got several warnings from PST (Norwegian KGB) for "too close contact with the Russian embassy representatives", meeting them at social occasions at restaurants and such. However, he refuses to be intimidated (or as PST put it, they don't think they managed to reach through to him):

Original source in Norwegian http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/frp/pst-advarte-frp-er-paa-stortinget-for-naer-omgang-med-russlands-ambassade/a/23466955/
In Russian: http://www.newsru.com/world/23jun2015/norge.html

Three things come to mind:
1. When the likes of Navalnyj, K.Sobchak and Nemcov spent time in the US embassy in Moscow, at various "democracy-building" course and received dollars to implement those "teachings" on social unrest, that was quite OK by the Western double standards... When a Norwegian politician openly conducts meetings with some of the Russian diplomats to keep the lines of dialogue open, that is somehow a bad thing.
2. The politicians in Norway are under the hood, under total surveillance.
3. A few years ago, Russia settled a territorial dispute with Norway, which existed since 1920s. Though that was not a popular move among the Russian population, forfeiting some of the land to Norway, Russian government saw it as a good move in building friendly neighbourly relations. This is completely forgotten now in Norway...

Norway: definitely a free and democratic state.

Let's not forget that Norway is also a committed member of NATO. It is a home to a GLOBUS II surveillance radar deployed at Vardo in northern Norway near the Russian border. This system was allegedly deployed to monitor objects in space such as satellites and space debris, but in 2000 the globular enclosure protecting a radar antenna was torn off during a storm, and who would think, the radar-dish had been pointing directly towards Russia!

It will be wiped out among the first, Norwegians should understand this

Nemo1024 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014



View Profile WWW
July 06, 2015, 12:04:07 PM
 #723

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=129191

Quote
Concerns About Russia, Iran, North Korea

While the document notes Russia’s contributions in some security areas such as counternarcotics and counterterrorism, it also points to that nation’s willingness to use force to achieve its goals.

“It also has repeatedly demonstrated that it does not respect the sovereignty of its neighbors,” the strategy states. “Russia’s military actions are undermining regional security directly and through proxy forces.”

But Russia is not the only country of concern in the strategy document.

...

Well, and USA is all hugs and cuddles.  Roll Eyes

Also, notice how double-speak is used here. Russian military sits within Russian borders, yet it "undermining regional security directly and through proxy forces".
At the same time USA kills people in Donbass through proxies and occupied all of the Baltics, so that statement is what USA sees in itself and wants to project onto others, even in the face of any facts supporting their claims.

“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 1217


View Profile
July 07, 2015, 05:02:24 AM
 #724

At the same time USA kills people in Donbass through proxies and occupied all of the Baltics, so that statement is what USA sees in itself and wants to project onto others, even in the face of any facts supporting their claims.

Even the NATO allies, such as France and Germany have criticized the United States for their recent provocations in Eastern Ukraine. What was the need to send in heavy weapons to the junta, when a ceasefire was being observed for many months? Seems like someone would like to destroy the ceasefire agreement.
Nemo1024 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014



View Profile WWW
July 11, 2015, 12:34:09 PM
 #725

To understand the mechanism of the ongoing aggression against Russia, watch this (with English subtitles and a transcript in the comments):

Quote
Public statements by the US Government and Russia’s oligarchs indicate an ongoing negotiation for the extradition of Vladimir Putin and the dissolution of the Russian Federation.

That's the interpretation of Evgeny Fedorov, who details the mechanisms of leverage over Russia’s decision-makers in the business and state sectors.

Also explained is the opportunity for rapid industrialization and prosperity (in Russia, Greece and elsewhere) by introducing low interests rates and credit expansion for investment, in the context of the ongoing struggle for national sovereignty and self-determination.

SEGMENTS:

00:00 - Aggression against Russia.

08:00 - Construction of the coup d’état.

20:42 - Traitors in positions of power.

31:49 - Greece.

33:20 - Origins of NOD (National Liberation Movement).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCyUZjGV3Zg

“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
Nemo1024 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014



View Profile WWW
July 14, 2015, 06:49:07 PM
 #726

A good article by Paul Craig Roberts explaining the official Washington policy:

Pentagon Concludes America Not Safe Unless It Conquers The World — Paul Craig Roberts
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/07/10/pentagon-concludes-america-safe-unless-conquers-world-paul-craig-roberts-3/

Quote
The Pentagon has released its “National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2015,” June 2015. http://news.usni.org/2015/07/02/document-2015-u-s-national-military-strategy
The document announces a shift in focus from terrorists to “state actors” that “are challenging international norms.” It is important to understand what these words mean. Governments that challenge international norms are sovereign countries that pursue policies independently of Washington’s policies. These “revisionist states” are threats, not because they plan to attack the US, which the Pentagon admits neither Russia nor China intend, but because they are independent. In other words, the norm is dependence on Washington.

Be sure to grasp the point: The threat is the existence of sovereign states, whose independence of action makes them “revisionist states.” In other words, their independence is out of step with the neoconservative Uni-power doctrine that declares independence to be the right of Washington alone. Washington’s History-given hegemony precludes any other country being independent in its actions.

...

In the Pentagon document, Russia is under fire for not acting “in accordance with international norms,” which means Russia is not following Washington’s leadership.

In other words, this is a bullshit report written by neocons in order to foment war with Russia.

Nothing else can be said about the Pentagon report, which justifies war and more war. Without war and conquests, Americans are not safe.

...

This report tells us that war with Russia is our future unless Russia agrees to become a vassal state like every country in Europe, and Canada, Australia, Ukraine, and Japan. Otherwise, the neoconservatives have decided that it is impossible for Americans to tolerate living with a country that makes decisions independently of Washington. If American cannot be The Uni-Power dictating to the world, better that we are all dead. At least that will show the Russians

“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
ridery99
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 14, 2015, 06:53:20 PM
 #727

A good article by Paul Craig Roberts explaining the official Washington policy:

Pentagon Concludes America Not Safe Unless It Conquers The World — Paul Craig Roberts
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/07/10/pentagon-concludes-america-safe-unless-conquers-world-paul-craig-roberts-3/

Quote
The Pentagon has released its “National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2015,” June 2015. http://news.usni.org/2015/07/02/document-2015-u-s-national-military-strategy
The document announces a shift in focus from terrorists to “state actors” that “are challenging international norms.” It is important to understand what these words mean. Governments that challenge international norms are sovereign countries that pursue policies independently of Washington’s policies. These “revisionist states” are threats, not because they plan to attack the US, which the Pentagon admits neither Russia nor China intend, but because they are independent. In other words, the norm is dependence on Washington.

Be sure to grasp the point: The threat is the existence of sovereign states, whose independence of action makes them “revisionist states.” In other words, their independence is out of step with the neoconservative Uni-power doctrine that declares independence to be the right of Washington alone. Washington’s History-given hegemony precludes any other country being independent in its actions.

...

In the Pentagon document, Russia is under fire for not acting “in accordance with international norms,” which means Russia is not following Washington’s leadership.

In other words, this is a bullshit report written by neocons in order to foment war with Russia.

Nothing else can be said about the Pentagon report, which justifies war and more war. Without war and conquests, Americans are not safe.

...

This report tells us that war with Russia is our future unless Russia agrees to become a vassal state like every country in Europe, and Canada, Australia, Ukraine, and Japan. Otherwise, the neoconservatives have decided that it is impossible for Americans to tolerate living with a country that makes decisions independently of Washington. If American cannot be The Uni-Power dictating to the world, better that we are all dead. At least that will show the Russians

USA must be stopped!  Sad
misterycoins
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 18, 2015, 06:48:01 PM
 #728

The WW2 was such a disaster for the humanity. It killed off the most intelligent people we had at that time. A possible WW3 won't be any different. though I think unlikely at the moment and in the next 10 years
Rassah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035



View Profile WWW
July 22, 2015, 02:51:15 AM
 #729

Russia rattles saber. Old rusty chunks fall out. Oops!
http://theweek.com/articles/565028/russian-air-force-falling-sky

Quote
The Russian Air Force is falling out of the sky
Kyle Mizokami



July 10, 2015
The flights began last year. The government of Russian President Vladimir Putin, eager to send a message, began flying nuclear bombers on training missions near the United States and its allies around the world.

The message was one of intimidation and defiance: Russia is still a power to be reckoned with, and meddling in the Ukraine, Syria, and Russia itself — particularly on human rights issues — is not appreciated.

Now, after months of aggressive flying, Russia's overworked air force is falling out of the sky. On July 5, a Su-24M tactical bomber crashed during takeoff at Khabarovsk in the Russian Far East. The plane banked sharply after takeoff and hit the ground. Both pilots were killed.

Five Russian combat planes have crashed in the past month. Russia's attempt to demonstrate strength has backfired spectacularly and demonstrated weakness instead.

In the past year, Russia has sent nuclear bombers to the borders of the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Poland, the Netherlands, and Japan. In May, a pair of Su-24 bombers made a low pass over the destroyer USS Ross in the Black Sea, and Russian fighters have demonstrated "reckless" and "unprofessional" behavior near American spy planes over the Baltic Sea, prompting protests from the Pentagon.

Russia's Air Force has been run at a high tempo, and the pace is catching up with an already-weary aircraft fleet. The toll in just the last month has been extraordinary: In addition to the fatal Su-24M accident, two MiG-29 fighters have crashed. Less than three hours after the second MiG crash, a Su-34 strike fighter flipped over while landing and went down south of Moscow.

On Monday July 6th, a Tu-95 strategic bomber suffered an engine fire and overshot the landing strip at Ukrainka Airbase in the Russian Far East, where flights against Japan and the Western United States are conducted. Both pilots were killed.

President Vladimir Putin has decided to mount frequent shows of force to remind other countries of Russia's military power. Unfortunately for him, all of Russia's options for a show of force are dicey. Russia's military suffered from neglect during the 1990s and early 2000s, the result of a weak economy that was unable to properly fund the armed forces. Armored vehicles, ships, and planes were inadequately serviced, and even fell into disrepair.

The Russian Army, being what it is, can't mount an effective show of force beyond the country's borders. The Russian Navy can't send its remaining aircraft carrier and cruisers abroad without a oceangoing tugboat shadowing them — in case one of the ships breaks down.

That leaves the Russian Air Force. The vast majority of Russia's Air Force was built and operated by the Soviet Union, making the youngest of these planes 24 years old. The Tu-95 "Bear", MiG-29 "Fulcrum," and Su-24 "Fencer" fighters and bombers that crashed in the last month were all inherited from the Soviet Union.

Compounding the problem is the inability to replace older aircraft with new models. Since the end of the Cold War the United States has introduced the all-new F-22 Raptor and is on the verge of introducing the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. Russia on the other hand has not introduced a new fighter design in 30 years. Russia's latest fighters, the Su-35 air superiority fighter and the Su-34 strike fighter, are updated designs dating to the late 1970s.

Russia recently announced an aggressive program to modernize its armed forces, and pledged to spend $400 billion on new armaments. But already the program is in trouble, as sanctions over the war in Ukraine, a ban on military sales to Russia, and declining oil prices have sapped the modernization effort.

Russia recently cut its initial buy of the new PAK-FA fighter, it's first stealthy, so-called "fifth generation" design, from 52 to a mere 12. The troubled aircraft program is suffering from technical difficulties and cost overruns. Russia will likely buy more fighters down the road, but it's an example of the problems Moscow faces in procuring new equipment.

Moscow is caught between a rock and a hard place. Russia can no longer rely on older equipment to project an image of strength and power. But increasingly it cannot afford to replace that equipment with modern designs the equal of American and Western equipment.

Four airmen serving their country have died, a tragedy regardless of nationality. But the upshot of this recent spate of crashes may be a more realistic view of Russian power by those wielding it. The Russian military is simply not ready for war — or even saber rattling.
Nemo1024 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014



View Profile WWW
August 05, 2015, 06:16:41 PM
Last edit: August 05, 2015, 08:53:35 PM by Nemo1024
 #730

First notice how Obama literally promises another war in Middle East:
Without Iran deal, there will be another war in the Middle East – Obama
http://www.rt.com/usa/311678-obama-iran-deal-debate/

An then follow-up with some interesting political expressions from Lavrov today. Maybe the strongest yet:
Quote
In 2009, President Obama has publicly said that if the Iranian nuclear issue will be resolved, there will be no need for missile defense in Europe. I think he lied.

Lavrov also said that Russia does not intend to get entangled in another arms race and that it has enough technical means to give a "not so expensive" response.

In addition he said that creation of such terrorist organisations as ISIS is the direct consequence of USA's policy of unseating legitimate governments and creation of colour revolutions.

http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2649225&cid=5

“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
futurebit640
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 05, 2015, 06:55:02 PM
 #731

There won't be WWIII or anything. Europe and US are not escalating tensions as much. They are really doing the bare minimum when it comes to aggressive foreign policy.
YarkoL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 996
Merit: 1013


View Profile
August 05, 2015, 07:10:04 PM
 #732

There won't be WWIII or anything. Europe and US are not escalating tensions as much. They are really doing the bare minimum when it comes to aggressive foreign policy.

Yet it only takes a tiny spark to burn
down an entire forest  Sad

“God does not play dice"
Nemo1024 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014



View Profile WWW
August 07, 2015, 09:27:33 PM
 #733

American tanks are going to be stationed 300 km from Russian border in Polish town Cehanuv:
That's how invasion staging is usually done.
http://www.kp.ru/online/news/2130546/


“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
Rassah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035



View Profile WWW
August 09, 2015, 11:45:14 PM
 #734

That's actually how a response to an invasion is usually done. They are not there because US expressed interest in invading Russia, they are there because Poland and other small Eastern European countries are scared shirtless that Russia will invade them the way it did Ukraine (and because Russia literally threatened some of them), and have asked US and Europe to help protect them.
Souldream
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1110
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 10, 2015, 10:55:43 AM
 #735

That's actually how a response to an invasion is usually done. They are not there because US expressed interest in invading Russia, they are there because Poland and other small Eastern European countries are scared shirtless that Russia will invade them the way it did Ukraine (and because Russia literally threatened some of them), and have asked US and Europe to help protect them.

+1

Russia do not invaded Crimea ... like they have not ton and thousands soldier on Ukraina border ...

Of course simple civil in Donbass brought weapons, rockets on supermarket .... without any help from Russia ...

In crimea now you have 3 type of people ...

1 )  We were expecting much better ... and still wait ...
2 ) We warned you about this situation...
3 ) We are too scared to speak ...

Crimea is fully loaded with Russian tourist .... go on web and look Webcam online ... all places are empty LoL ... but Russian propaganda do his job ...

Let's fall again the russian empire .. and hope this time no one will be there to help them ... ! Better to build weapons and let the people drink and live in poverty !


Crimea Webcam ... picture tell the truth again ... fully loaded with russians tourists .. LoL ....

http://www.worldincams.com/europe/ukraine/crimea/
Rassah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035



View Profile WWW
August 12, 2015, 07:47:04 PM
 #736

Why would the west have to invade Russia, when Russia already does shit like this all on their own, despite their citizens having a lack of food?

http://uatoday.tv/society/russia-raises-stakes-in-war-on-western-food-473113.html

Just sit it out and let Russia collapse itself.
Balthazar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359



View Profile
August 13, 2015, 05:19:38 PM
 #737

Why would the west have to invade Russia, when Russia already does shit like this all on their own, despite their citizens having a lack of food?

http://uatoday.tv/society/russia-raises-stakes-in-war-on-western-food-473113.html

Just sit it out and let Russia collapse itself.

I'll try to help you in your attempts to find another useless article.

https://www.google.com/search?sclient=tablet-gws&num=40&newwindow=1&q=destroys+food&oq=destroys+food&gs_l=tablet-gws.3..0i7i30l3.154823.155352.0.156144.3.3.0.0.0.0.177.340.0j2.2.0....0...1c..64.tablet-gws..1.2.339.cjSeBoh_bto

Don't forget to fill the form. Cheesy
Souldream
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1110
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 14, 2015, 09:36:58 AM
 #738

.... Poutintroll have nice days .... as they are well paid !

Russia’s top five myths about NATO 

Myth 1: NATO leaders promised at the time of German reunification that the Alliance would not expand to  the East
Fact:
No such promise was ever made, and Russia has never produced any evidence to back up its claim.
Every formal decision which NATO takes is adopted by consensus and recorded in writing. There is no written record of any
such decision having been taken by the Alliance.   
Moreover, at the time of the alleged promise, the Warsaw Pact still existed. Its members did not agree on its dissolution until
1991. Therefore, it is not plausible to suggest that the idea of their accession to NATO was on the agenda in 1989.
This was confirmed by the former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev himself. This is what Mr Gorbachev said on 15
October 2014 in an interview with Rossiiskaya Gazeta and Russia Beyond The Headlines:
“The topic of ‘NATO expansion’ was not discussed at all, and it wasn’t brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not
a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn’t bring
it up, either.”
Finally, any comparison between NATO and the Warsaw Pact or the Soviet bloc is an utter distortion of history. The fact
is that when the countries of Central and Eastern Europe applied for NATO membership, it was of their own free choice,
through their own national democratic processes, and after conducting the required reforms - unlike their incorporation into
the Soviet bloc and the Warsaw Pact, which was carried out under conditions of military occupation, one-party dictatorship
and the brutal suppression of dissent.

Myth 2: Russia has the right to demand a “100% guarantee” that Ukraine will not join NATO
Fact:
 According to Article I of the Helsinki Final Act which established the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in 1975, every country has the right
“to belong or not to belong to international organizations, to be or not to be a party to bilateral or multilateral treaties including the right to be or not to be a party to treaties of alliance.”
 All the OSCE member
states, including Russia, have sworn to uphold those principles.
In line with those principles, Ukraine has the right to choose for itself whether it joins any treaty of alliance, including NATO’s
founding treaty.
Moreover, when Russia signed the Founding Act, it pledged to uphold
“respect for sovereignty, independence and territorial
integrity of all states and their inherent right to choose the means to ensure their own security”
.
Thus Ukraine has the right to choose its own alliances, and Russia has, by its own repeated agreement, no right to dictate that choice.


Myth 3: NATO has advanced its infrastructure towards Russia’s borders   
Fact:
 Relations between NATO and Russia are governed by the Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security,
agreed in 1997 and reaffirmed at NATO-Russia summits in Rome in 2002, and in Lisbon in 2010.
In the Act, the sides agreed that:
“In the current and foreseeable security environment, the Alliance will carry out its collective defence and other missions by ensuring
the necessary interoperability, integration, and capability for reinforcement rather than by additional permanent stationing of
substantial combat forces. Accordingly, it will have to rely on adequate infrastructure commensurate with the above tasks.”
This is exactly what NATO has done, transparently and in full accordance with the Founding Act.
December 2014
North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Myth 4: NATO’s response to the Russia-Ukraine crisis and its reinforcement of Allies in Central and Eastern Europe breaches the Alliance’s international commitments
Fact:
 In addressing NATO’s collective defence responsibilities, the Founding Act states that:
“In this context, reinforcement may take place, when necessary, in the event of defence against a threat of aggression and missions in
support of peace consistent with the United Nations Charter and the OSCE governing principles, as well as for exercises consistent
with the adapted CFE Treaty, the provisions of the Vienna Document 1994 and mutually agreed transparency measures. Russia will
exercise similar restraint in its conventional force deployments in Europe.”
NATO’s defensive response to the Russia-Ukraine crisis is therefore fully in line with the Alliance’s undertakings.

Myth 5: NATO has a Cold War mentality
Fact:
 The Cold War ended over 20 years ago. It was characterized by the opposition of two ideological blocs, the presence of
massive standing armies in Europe, and the military, political and economic domination by the Soviet Union of almost all its
European neighbours. 
The modern world does not feature competing ideological blocs: Russia has neither a credible ideology to export, nor
significant international allies who support its aggressive actions in and around Ukraine. In fact, in a vote in the United
Nations General Assembly on 23 March 2014, 100 countries voted that Russia’s attempted annexation of Crimea was illegal,
and just 10, other than Russia, supported it.
The end of the Cold War was a victory for the people of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, and opened
the way to overcoming the division of Europe.  At pathbreaking Summit meetings in the years after the fall of the Berlin
Wall, Russia played its part in building a new, inclusive European security architecture, including the Charter of Paris, the
establishment of the OSCE, and the NATO-Russia Founding Act.
Over the past decades, NATO reached out to Russia with a series of partnership initiatives, culminating in the foundation of
the NATO-Russia Council in 2002. No other country has ever been offered such a privileged relationship with NATO.
As stated by NATO heads of state and government at the Wales Summit in September,
“the Alliance does not seek confrontation
and poses no threat to Russia. But we cannot and will not compromise on the principles on which our Alliance and security in Europe
and North America rest.”



And the last ... so commong Russia Troll ... Truth is always .... bad for the nosense propaganda !

Nemo1024 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2015, 06:40:30 PM
Last edit: August 21, 2015, 06:55:44 PM by Nemo1024
 #739

Opinion moulding and black-painting or Russia in the minds of sheeple continues.

Some news from Norway. Norwegian TV2 will film a serial called "Occupiers", in which Russia invades and occupies Norway, after an ecologist party becomes a ruling party. Russia then supposedly takes over the Norwegian oil and gas sector (as if Russia does not have its own  Roll Eyes ).

This is the most expensive TV production in Norway, costing €9,7 million (I wonder who foots the bill?)

Russian embassy expressed regret that Norway decides to scare its citizens with an ephemeral threat. An on the 70th anniversary of Russia liberating Norway from the Nazi occupation. But Russia will not be reacting to it in any other way (such as hysteria) as it is not the Russian way.

Quote
“Russia is unfortunately presented as the aggressor,” Andrey Kulikov, a press officer at the Russian embassy in Oslo told TV2 of the series.
 
“It is of course a pity that on the 70th anniversary of victory in World War II,” he adds, “the show’s writers decide to intimidate Norwegian viewers with a non-existent threat from the East.”


The memorial to the Soviet liberators in Northern Norway.

In English:
http://www.thelocal.no/20150820/russia-protests-unfortunate-norway-invasion-drama

In Russian: http://regnum.ru/news/polit/1955427.html

What can I say. I can quote Master Yoda:

“Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.”

And fear (of Russia) is exactly what is being instilled in the minds of the Western audience.

“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 1217


View Profile
August 21, 2015, 06:49:47 PM
 #740

Some news from Norway. Norwegian TV2 will film a serial called "Occupiers", in which Russia invades and occupies Norway, after an ecologist party becomes a ruling party. Russia then supposedly takes over the Norwegian oil and gas sector (as if Russia does not have its own  Roll Eyes ).

These Scandinavians (with the notable exception of the Danes) need to stop shitting in their pants when they hear anything about Russia. These people used to be quite brave and courageous a few generations ago. But decades of radical feminist rule has reduced the Scandinavian males to a bunch of feminized pussies.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!