[ANN] New Primecoin Pool + GPU Miner

[Yurka_god]

with 7950 card your miner have some problem with GPU activity !!!

in claymore miner activity 96% and more
in cgminer too

in your miner GPU load 64% up to 100% to 1-2 second down to 64% - 10-20 second and up down up down
and CPU clock i set 1100, in you miner this value jump 850 to 1100.
and CPU memory i set 1500, in you miner this value jump 1250 to 1500.

it is very interesting problem !!!

[liifer]

@Tall and Tiny.

Stop bringing your bible to others church.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -Gandhi.

Keed up good fight Mad.

[kev7112001]

im pretty sure beeeeer allows dev fees

[kev7112001]

this is the official announcement for our Primecoin mining pool www.beeeeer.org
As of writing this, ypool is not the only Primecoin pool any longer.

we have our own board now: board.beeeeer.org

Some stats/features:

    adjustable pool fee (per miner, default: 2%)
    integrated developer fee, depends on the used miner
    no registration needed, username is your primecoin-payout-address*
    custom protocol & miner (based on mikaelh's high-performance client)
    your payouts are executed, when you reach at least 3.01 XPMs
    CPPSRB-based payout system, you're paid per share, current share values are shown on the main page --> *click* READ ABOUT CPPSRB *click* (also: donate!)
    high end visual stunning plain-text web interface
    beta testing phase (i'll work on every little bug/problem ASAP)
    third party stats: e.g. http://xpm.syware.de/

[LongAndShort]

this is the official announcement for our Primecoin mining pool www.beeeeer.org
As of writing this, ypool is not the only Primecoin pool any longer.

we have our own board now: board.beeeeer.org

Some stats/features:

    adjustable pool fee (per miner, default: 2%)
    integrated developer fee, depends on the used miner
    no registration needed, username is your primecoin-payout-address*
    custom protocol & miner (based on mikaelh's high-performance client)
    your payouts are executed, when you reach at least 3.01 XPMs
    CPPSRB-based payout system, you're paid per share, current share values are shown on the main page --> *click* READ ABOUT CPPSRB *click* (also: donate!)
    high end visual stunning plain-text web interface
    beta testing phase (i'll work on every little bug/problem ASAP)
    third party stats: e.g. http://xpm.syware.de/

Yeah beer is a great pool there is one other that im thinking off too kev. I swear i saw him advertise in the pgpu or claymore thread a little while ago..know who i'm talking about?

[madMAx510510]

The problem with the other pools is, they have such high latency that you loose 5-10% to stale/invalid shares. That's why i made my own.

While i'm working on a more permanent solution i will now accept ip-addresses that will be able to connect to the sever.
Please PM me, your ip cannot be known publicly of course.

[LongAndShort]

The problem with the other pools is, they have such high latency that you loose 5-10% to stale/invalid shares. That's why i made my own.

While i'm working on a more permanent solution i will now accept ip-addresses that will be able to connect to the sever.
Please PM me, your ip cannot be known publicly of course.

Yeah i hear ya mate but there seems to be a reason they have high latency right cause they need to be protected as do the mining ports anyhow here is the pool i was referring to
http://www.minin.gs
and a cloudfare signup trial is free btw

i'm getting a ping of 200ms to that server which is the same as yours

[madMAx510510]

The problem with the other pools is, they have such high latency that you loose 5-10% to stale/invalid shares. That's why i made my own.

While i'm working on a more permanent solution i will now accept ip-addresses that will be able to connect to the sever.
Please PM me, your ip cannot be known publicly of course.

Yeah i hear ya mate but there seems to be a reason they have high latency right cause they need to be protected as do the mining ports anyhow here is the pool i was referring to
http://www.minin.gs
and a cloudfare signup trial is free btw

i'm getting a ping of 200ms to that server which is the same as yours

Ping is not the issue, it's the time it takes to create work for all connected miners.

[madMAx510510]

The first payments have just been executed.

They are even included in our own block height 532078
What a coincidence.

[pttx]

I kept getting this error;

warning: ran out of hashes. pipeline stalled

Anyone have this issue as well?

[madMAx510510]

I kept getting this error;

warning: ran out of hashes. pipeline stalled

Anyone have this issue as well?

It's only a warning and should happen rarely. It was only used for debugging, i just forgot to comment it out.

[madMAx510510]

Hello,can you add me to your pool my ip:199.68.218.78

This one is funny 

[RusBoy]

Sent you pm

The problem with the other pools is, they have such high latency that you loose 5-10% to stale/invalid shares. That's why i made my own.

While i'm working on a more permanent solution i will now accept ip-addresses that will be able to connect to the sever.
Please PM me, your ip cannot be known publicly of course.

[fudge]

is this a bug or what?
i was trying to run the miner a lot of times but result is the same

Connecting to frontend: 54.187.143.168:6666 ...

[gilad215]

Guys? the pool site is up and reporting that the pool is up but my miners cant connect?

[madMAx510510]

Guys? the pool site is up and reporting that the pool is up but my miners cant connect?

Right now your ip needs to be on the list, because of recent DOS attacks.
So send me a PM with your ip, then you can connect

[Raiden]

Guys? the pool site is up and reporting that the pool is up but my miners cant connect?

Right now your ip needs to be on the list, because of recent DOS attacks.
So send me a PM with your ip, then you can connect

I have sent it to you

[ap1]

I think I have found a BLOCK for height=532230 but not shown in the "Last Blocks found by Pool" on your server.
(Or it is shown as height 532231 instead?)

Work received: height=532230 diff=10.896351 latency=169ms
[GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105853 fermat=151145/sec cpd=2.31/day
[GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105098 fermat=150501/sec cpd=2.14/day
[GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105892 fermat=150452/sec cpd=2.30/day
[GPU 3] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105486 fermat=150831/sec cpd=2.22/day
[GPU 4] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105545 fermat=150883/sec cpd=2.24/day
(ST/INV/DUP): 9x 8ch(1/0/0) 3x 9ch(0/0/0)
GPU 4 found share: 10-ch type 2
GPU 4 found BLOCK!
Share accepted.
Work received: height=532231 diff=10.896364 latency=169ms
[GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105805 fermat=150336/sec cpd=2.28/day
[GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105113 fermat=150127/sec cpd=2.14/day
[GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105878 fermat=150168/sec cpd=2.30/day
[GPU 3] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105465 fermat=149805/sec cpd=2.20/day
[GPU 4] T=-1C A=-1% E=0 primes=0.105644 fermat=149644/sec cpd=2.24/day
(ST/INV/DUP): 9x 8ch(1/0/0) 3x 9ch(0/0/0) 1x 10ch(0/0/0)

[amartinz]

Now works great.

Can anybody say which sieve 12 or 13 is better for 290\290x in real tests?

[madMAx510510]

...
(Or it is shown as height 532231 instead?)

Yep