caish5
|
|
January 18, 2012, 12:47:14 PM |
|
Now it's fixed Thanks
|
|
|
|
ehmdjii
|
|
January 18, 2012, 12:54:19 PM |
|
what are the dependencies to compile? i am getting: root@sadfwww:~/Liquidcoin/src# make -f makefile.unix makefile.unix:131: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/nogui/scrypt.o' makefile.unix:128: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/nogui/scrypt.o' g++ -c -pthread -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -DNOPCH -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_SSL -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -MMD -o obj/nogui/crypter.o crypter.cpp In file included from crypter.cpp:9:0: headers.h:36:20: fatal error: db_cxx.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make: *** [obj/nogui/crypter.o] Error 1
|
BTC: 1LsD5HpnX1Kfyti7CnHiVB1rjUEXGqmR2H LTC: LQbpdMZmYyJa9bJG6NweBNxkSTfgZorkrG
|
|
|
caish5
|
|
January 18, 2012, 12:56:41 PM |
|
Have a look at the LTC/TBX/FBX info and do that!
|
|
|
|
drakahn
|
|
January 18, 2012, 01:12:47 PM |
|
anyone want to buy some liquidcoin?
let the bidding commence
|
14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
|
|
|
Schwede65
|
|
January 18, 2012, 03:58:48 PM |
|
i had a virus-alarm with downloaded "liquidcoinv2.zip" on w7-64
avast found and deleted Win32:Rootkit-gen(Rtk)
dont know what it is, but this doesn't inspire much confidence among...
|
|
|
|
Nicksasa (OP)
|
|
January 18, 2012, 04:06:59 PM |
|
i had a virus-alarm with downloaded "liquidcoinv2.zip" on w7-64
avast found and deleted Win32:Rootkit-gen(Rtk)
dont know what it is, but this doesn't inspire much confidence among...
Pooler's minerd is detected by some anti viruses, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=55038.0 (compare the MD5 hashes if you want) Same minerd is used with LTC.
|
|
|
|
Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
|
January 18, 2012, 04:55:56 PM |
|
- Fixed Diffs mean that pools are out of the game, so be it.
...until blocks start coming faster than the network's latency. Then everyone HAS to use a pool - and it needs to be the same one. Instant 100% centralization.
|
|
|
|
Nicksasa (OP)
|
|
January 18, 2012, 04:57:40 PM |
|
- Fixed Diffs mean that pools are out of the game, so be it.
...until blocks start coming faster than the network's latency. Then everyone HAS to use a pool - and it needs to be the same one. Instant 100% centralization. We picked a reasonable difficulty for higher hashrates. With the current 17Mhash network speed it's averaging 10-15s/block, not even close enough to cause much problems/orphans.
|
|
|
|
LZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1072
P2P Cryptocurrency
|
|
January 18, 2012, 05:25:11 PM |
|
Are there any differences between liquidcoin and liquidcoinv2?
|
My OpenPGP fingerprint: 5099EB8C0F2E68C63B4ECBB9A9D0993E04143362
|
|
|
Nicksasa (OP)
|
|
January 18, 2012, 05:38:01 PM |
|
Are there any differences between liquidcoin and liquidcoinv2?
V2 of the zip had a missing dll included and the minerd from pooler.
|
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
January 18, 2012, 07:00:17 PM |
|
For fairness since I've been attacking Realcoin. Yes, LQC is a "scam" just like every other altcoin. The difference is LQC isn't making claims of being anything more than it is [Speculation Based], and doesn't have a premine (other than the advantage Nicksasa had of being able to start it before anybody had a chance to read the thread).
I'm fine with altcoins that are just here for people to play around with. I'm not fine with altcoins which claim to be doing a bunch of development into usability/security without actually changing the protocol, since its a drain on development time which could be used to improve Bitcoin.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
ineededausername
|
|
January 18, 2012, 07:28:34 PM |
|
haha someone finally got around to doing Ponzicoin. We should have one every week so that everyone can play a round
|
(BFL)^2 < 0
|
|
|
Snapman
|
|
January 18, 2012, 07:29:15 PM |
|
For fairness since I've been attacking Realcoin. Yes, LQC is a "scam" just like every other altcoin. The difference is LQC isn't making claims of being anything more than it is [Speculation Based], and doesn't have a premine (other than the advantage Nicksasa had of being able to start it before anybody had a chance to read the thread).
I'm fine with altcoins that are just here for people to play around with. I'm not fine with altcoins which claim to be doing a bunch of development into usability/security without actually changing the protocol, since its a drain on development time which could be used to improve Bitcoin.
Couldnt have said it better myself.
|
BTCRadio: 17cafKShokyQCbaNuzaDo5HLoSnffMNPAs
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
January 18, 2012, 07:32:10 PM |
|
seems made to be solo mined, kind of anti pool (almost)
No because as network gets faster and faster the rate of orphans will only increase and your effective generation rate will decline. The only solution is to form a pool and continue your orphaned chain until it either becomes the longest chain or falls too far behind. The more hashing power the less you lose to orphans. Logically even if pools formed the most valuable pool is the largest pool and quickly one would see consolidation of hashing power to >51%. At that point anyone using other pools or solo is simply choosing a lower return on their hashing power. In time the single pool will have 100% hashing power.
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
January 18, 2012, 07:34:24 PM Last edit: January 18, 2012, 08:52:20 PM by DeathAndTaxes |
|
- Fixed Diffs mean that pools are out of the game, so be it.
...until blocks start coming faster than the network's latency. Then everyone HAS to use a pool - and it needs to be the same one. Instant 100% centralization. We picked a reasonable difficulty for higher hashrates. With the current 17Mhash network speed it's averaging 10-15s/block, not even close enough to cause much problems/orphans. And at 34 MH is is ~5s. And at 85 MH it is ~1s. And at 170 MH it is ~1s. At a hypothetical (lets pretend this has a future) 1 GH/s it is <0.2s. (5 blocks a second with burst as high as 3x that). At 1GH/s orphan rate would be 90%+ even w/ network propogation time of 1 sec (unrealistic). The only one immune to that would be a massive pool with 51%+ hashing power that would simply ignore other blocks and continue its own chain thus ensure it is never orphaned.
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1121
|
|
January 18, 2012, 08:00:51 PM |
|
I would prefer a coin with a large pre-mine (preferably all the coins) that are sold on an exchange.
Unfortunately Open Transactions turned out to need massive and deep re-writing otherwise my exchange would be open by now, but the re-write is almost complete to soon you will be able to use secure Open Transactions client<->sevrver technology to trade in a number of "fully pre-mined" coins. The catch however is that such coins cannot afford "miners" until their transaction volume, thus transaction fees, become large enough to "pay" miners. So initially they will be Open Transaactions based only, with only those that actually take off enough to justify the expense of usign a blockchain actually moving to an (open*) blockchain. (* They maybe however go back to the friend to friend blockchain method they used with their early testnets, or look again at "licensed miners" concepts.) -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
Nicksasa (OP)
|
|
January 18, 2012, 08:28:02 PM |
|
If your having trouble finding blocks with your cpu, try to adjust the scantime to 2 or even 1. Default is a bit too low for such network speeds.
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
|
January 18, 2012, 08:36:39 PM |
|
We picked a reasonable difficulty for higher hashrates. With the current 17Mhash network speed it's averaging 10-15s/block, not even close enough to cause much problems/orphans.
And at 34 MH is is ~5s. And at 68 MH it is ~2s. And at 136 MH it is ~1s. At a hypothetical (lets pretend this has a future) 1 GH/s it is <0.2s. And this is why this altcoin will implode. There is no future for it. Pump and dump asap.
|
Buy & Hold
|
|
|
ripper234
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003
Ron Gross
|
|
January 18, 2012, 08:43:05 PM |
|
First of all, this coin is in no way aiming to replace bitcoin. It was designed for speculation only. It is based on Tenebrix, wich means it's using the CPU friendly hashing algorithm. Unique Features- Fixed difficulty (0.05)
- Block reward reduces 4% every 1000 blocks, it does not increase ever. Minimum block reward is 1LQC
- Because of it's fixed difficulty, transactions will never be slow
- No pre mined coins
Liquidcoin's block reward will reach 10LQC after ~40.000 blocks. Without further BS, http://www.mediafire.com/?ecwv6j6m9o7ckbc (Windows client + daemon + source code) https://github.com/nicksasa/Liquidcoin#liquidcoin on irc.freenode.net Releasing a coin without announcing it at least a week before hand == premine.
|
|
|
|
Sherkel
aka Tombstoner
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
|
|
January 18, 2012, 10:21:03 PM |
|
Miner's not connecting EDIT: Never mind, one in the client seems to work.
|
What do you get when you cross dominoes and The Matrix? <A dominatrix!>
|
|
|
|