WE PAY FOR SIGNATURE EVEN MORE. UP TO 0.0016 BTCs PER POST. W

[UpDown.BT]

I have some questions regarding the program.I pmed Updown about these but he didn't reply that's why I am asking them here:

Do I start to get paid after 1 week and so on from my signup in the program?

How do I claim my payment actually?

Do I have to count constructive posts myself or will Updown check it?

If I have to count my constructive posts and lets say I claimed 100 posts and after Updown checked,5 posts didn't seem constructive to him,do I get disqualified for wrong counting than?It can happen you know.

I've answered to your PM but will reply there too

1) You will be paid on the next payout date

2) No need to claim, we will pay on our paydate

3) We will check by ourselves

4) You will be disqualified only in case if you generate a lot of spammy and other not allowed posts. 5 of 100 is not a lot, so we will just withdraw this amount from your payment.

Suppose if 20% or 30% of my claimed posts didn't count under 'constructive post'.Will I get disqualified than?

How much percentage of my miscount is okay with you?

Can you tell me what a constructive post is in simple language please.

Campaign member who have more than 30% of posts that didn't feet a discussion, contains agree/yes/no or actual spam may be banned from the campaign. But all decisions will be made individually and we will discuss it personally (at least while we have not so huge amount of members)

[888]

Name:   888
Posts:   63
Activity:   62
Position:   Member
Pay out address: 1AqQpDYEa8L3ZbFGX21LJfb9fiV5K5caMc

Please confirm,Thanks

[ranlo]

I have some questions regarding the program.I pmed Updown about these but he didn't reply that's why I am asking them here:

Do I start to get paid after 1 week and so on from my signup in the program?

How do I claim my payment actually?

Do I have to count constructive posts myself or will Updown check it?

If I have to count my constructive posts and lets say I claimed 100 posts and after Updown checked,5 posts didn't seem constructive to him,do I get disqualified for wrong counting than?It can happen you know.

I've answered to your PM but will reply there too

1) You will be paid on the next payout date

2) No need to claim, we will pay on our paydate

3) We will check by ourselves

4) You will be disqualified only in case if you generate a lot of spammy and other not allowed posts. 5 of 100 is not a lot, so we will just withdraw this amount from your payment.

Suppose if 20% or 30% of my claimed posts didn't count under 'constructive post'.Will I get disqualified than?

How much percentage of my miscount is okay with you?

Can you tell me what a constructive post is in simple language please.

Campaign member who have more than 30% of posts that didn't feet a discussion, contains agree/yes/no or actual spam may be banned from the campaign. But all decisions will be made individually and we will discuss it personally (at least while we have not so huge amount of members)

For what it's worth, I want to point out that you shouldn't be doing these things anyways. Whether you're afraid of not being paid for them or not is irrelevant. Anything that isn't constructive in some way is spam and only works to degrade the entire forum experience.

[u9y42]

For what it's worth, I want to point out that you shouldn't be doing these things anyways. Whether you're afraid of not being paid for them or not is irrelevant. Anything that isn't constructive in some way is spam and only works to degrade the entire forum experience.

And eventually get the person banned from the forum altogether, once the mods get tired of the spam; I don't know if they are still in "banning mode", but I wouldn't risk it. 

[Mitchell]

I have added this campaign to the "Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns"-list. Could you please check if everything is correct and that I didn't miss anything/assumed something incorrectly?

Kind Regards,
BitcoinInformation

[UpDown.BT]

Name:   888
Posts:   63
Activity:   62
Position:   Member
Pay out address: 1AqQpDYEa8L3ZbFGX21LJfb9fiV5K5caMc

Please confirm,Thanks

Confirmed

[Brewins]

Name: Brewins
Posts: 490
Activty: 266
Position: Sr Member
Payout Address: 1JvSYkcvrdkrpRTZJNBDD4wiKCRfHMC63G


Confirm for me please

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

You should allow hero members with negative trust

[CEG5952]

You should allow hero members with negative trust

Good old TradeFortress. Funny, was just signing up for another signature service after having long given up on the prospect following your "hack" and subsequent no-pay.

[monbux]

You should allow hero members with negative trust

Good old TradeFortress. Funny, was just signing up for another signature service after having long given up on the prospect following your "hack" and subsequent no-pay.

I believe his account his hacked, taken over with a new troll.  Let him be, don't feed the troll, ignore it.

[ranlo]

You should allow hero members with negative trust

Good old TradeFortress. Funny, was just signing up for another signature service after having long given up on the prospect following your "hack" and subsequent no-pay.

I believe his account his hacked, taken over with a new troll.  Let him be, don't feed the troll, ignore it.

I am 100% behind you on this. As someone who actually dealt with TF a lot (off BCT), this just doesn't seem like him at all. As soon as I saw the first few posts I could tell that either:

1) TF is completely different now
or
2) He was hacked

[dree12]

You should allow hero members with negative trust

Good old TradeFortress. Funny, was just signing up for another signature service after having long given up on the prospect following your "hack" and subsequent no-pay.

I believe his account his hacked, taken over with a new troll.  Let him be, don't feed the troll, ignore it.

I am 100% behind you on this. As someone who actually dealt with TF a lot (off BCT), this just doesn't seem like him at all. As soon as I saw the first few posts I could tell that either:

1) TF is completely different now
or
2) He was hacked

I wouldn't be surprised if he were hacked. This isn't the first time, after all... Luckily, this time, he didn't lose any customer funds.

[newIndia]

You should allow hero members with negative trust

Good old TradeFortress. Funny, was just signing up for another signature service after having long given up on the prospect following your "hack" and subsequent no-pay.

I believe his account his hacked, taken over with a new troll.  Let him be, don't feed the troll, ignore it.

I am 100% behind you on this. As someone who actually dealt with TF a lot (off BCT), this just doesn't seem like him at all. As soon as I saw the first few posts I could tell that either:

1) TF is completely different now
or
2) He was hacked

I wouldn't be surprised if he were hacked. This isn't the first time, after all... Luckily, this time, he didn't lose any customer funds.

Why someone from the first generation of Bitcoin, who has seen 4100+ bitcoin in his wallet, will ever want to sign up for a Sig campaign with second generation chap like me, for whom 1000 BTC can change the life ?

[Echoes]

Name:   Echoes
Posts:   1362
Activity:   686
Position:   Hero Member
1Mcpe26uh5yMPr8DH917XWrEjQRSEXLcyA

Confirm for me please.

[yatsey87]

Signing up:

Starting posts: 949
Address 1BboFVHxkocfZHSEwvwG8NkqJRve7qwVeP

Please confirm so I can start posting. Thanks!

[UpDown.BT]

Signing up:

Starting posts: 949
Address 1BboFVHxkocfZHSEwvwG8NkqJRve7qwVeP

Please confirm so I can start posting. Thanks!

Confirmed

[UpDown.BT]

Name: Brewins
Posts: 490
Activty: 266
Position: Sr Member
Payout Address: 1JvSYkcvrdkrpRTZJNBDD4wiKCRfHMC63G


Confirm for me please

Name:   Echoes
Posts:   1362
Activity:   686
Position:   Hero Member
1Mcpe26uh5yMPr8DH917XWrEjQRSEXLcyA

Confirm for me please.

Confirmed

[umair127]

Enrolling

starting post 286

19FLPc1RvfbBAmWfSQ3s4ZjQXr7uH6ScLf

Thank you

[Rigon]

joinin today

starting post 209

1EnaKAbDuDDXUzr365Hx8xT3Rbkkkn3hAK


thanks!!!

[newIndia]

Thats not trade fortress.. also tradefortress wasnt in the first generation.. just invested heavily in 2012

Oh ! 2012 is somewhere between first & second generation. U can consider it first as well, because the Winklevoss brothers, the 1% holder of total bitcoin, came later. By the way, was not Inputs.io a ground up development ? Was it bought through investment ?