Megaupload's loads of $M seized & assets frozen but not one Bitcoin was, I wonder if any of them had any - probably not as they didn't bother to protect so much that's already been easily traced & locked down
http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/20/10199528-megaupload-founders-homes-raided-5m-in-luxury-cars-seizedhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204301404577174362457114578.html?mod=googlenews_wsj![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-oB-SZUvj3wo%2FTxmpFm83lDI%2FAAAAAAAAAS4%2F7VgHGlmiuhg%2Fs1600%2Fbanner.jpg&t=665&c=jeWFM2ptF80g7Q)
"So if we post this image, are we too in breach of copyright?"
edited to add the above image, also
re comment below about seized cars not being protected by buying them in BTC from Mr stating the bleeding obvious, that just happened to be part of the title of the link & sorry if you confused that with what I actually said, my OP is about seizing of $M cash & investment instruments & another $39M or so (too tired to check) being frozen in Hong Kong
re cars being seized, they've been charged with a/multiple criminal offences so I assume the authorities regard this bling/booty as the potential proceeds of crime/s (which includes what one may spend one's alleged ill gotten gains upon) & hence will be subject to forfeiture / restitution to said victims of their doings if they're found guilty of said crimes so get impounded until proven otherwise - normal practice I would have thought just about everywhere in the uncivilised world