Bitcoin Forum
September 27, 2016, 07:00:47 AM *
News: Due to DDoS attacks, there may be periodic downtime.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: BitSlack - bitcoin OS in development  (Read 2028 times)
wobber
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


View Profile
July 29, 2010, 07:37:00 AM
 #1

I started a little project, a minimalistic install of slackware for people that use bitcoin and I need your feedback to know what software would you like in it.
So far we have Tor, Privoxy and it's GUI, Vidalia and as a WM, XFCE.
I'd like to know if Tor should be enabled system-wide by default too.

PS. The project will be free.

If you hate me, you can spam me here: 19wdQNKjnATkgXvpzmSrkSYhJtuJWb8mKs
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1474959647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474959647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474959647
Reply with quote  #2

1474959647
Report to moderator
1474959647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474959647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474959647
Reply with quote  #2

1474959647
Report to moderator
eugene2k
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37


View Profile
July 29, 2010, 10:12:26 AM
 #2

I think you should first define your priorities. Why would anybody want to use your OS? Surely not just because it has a few programs installed by default?
Anonymous
Guest

July 29, 2010, 10:19:49 AM
 #3

I think you should first define your priorities. Why would anybody want to use your OS? Surely not just because it has a few programs installed by default?

Something lightweight like this would be nice on a low powered device I call a "transaction computer".You could transfer your coin to your ultra secure "transaction computer" and know there is an extremely small chance any trading is trackable or logged.Maybe such a device would only connect to the network to send and receive your coins and then close up tighter than a fish's bum otherwise lol.
lachesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


View Profile
July 29, 2010, 10:33:45 PM
 #4

Do you have a project page?

Bitcoin Calculator | Scallion | GPG Key | WoT Rating | 1QGacAtYA7E8V3BAiM7sgvLg7PZHk5WnYc
jgarzik
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


View Profile
July 29, 2010, 10:40:45 PM
 #5

Something lightweight like this would be nice on a low powered device I call a "transaction computer".You could transfer your coin to your ultra secure "transaction computer" and know there is an extremely small chance any trading is trackable or logged.Maybe such a device would only connect to the network to send and receive your coins and then close up tighter than a fish's bum otherwise lol.

The transaction database isn't really lightweight in terms of disk space, especially if bitcoins become popular.

So, if a transaction computer needs disk space, why not install a normal distro with better support?

Any micro-distribution is going to be under-audited, and suffer a lag time on security patches to the base OS -- not exactly the ideal target for a "locked up tight" transaction computer.

Jeff Garzik, bitcoin core dev team and BitPay engineer; opinions are my own, not my employer.
Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
Anonymous
Guest

July 30, 2010, 06:53:12 AM
 #6

Something lightweight like this would be nice on a low powered device I call a "transaction computer".You could transfer your coin to your ultra secure "transaction computer" and know there is an extremely small chance any trading is trackable or logged.Maybe such a device would only connect to the network to send and receive your coins and then close up tighter than a fish's bum otherwise lol.

The transaction database isn't really lightweight in terms of disk space, especially if bitcoins become popular.

So, if a transaction computer needs disk space, why not install a normal distro with better support?

Any micro-distribution is going to be under-audited, and suffer a lag time on security patches to the base OS -- not exactly the ideal target for a "locked up tight" transaction computer.

Is a client device possible with your server/desktop sitting at home which you could vpn into?
jgarzik
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


View Profile
July 30, 2010, 06:58:56 AM
 #7

Is a client device possible with your server/desktop sitting at home which you could vpn into?

Sure.  That's reinventing the client terminal, a dumb hardware device that communicates with a backend payment system.

Jeff Garzik, bitcoin core dev team and BitPay engineer; opinions are my own, not my employer.
Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
jgarzik
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


View Profile
July 31, 2010, 09:01:03 PM
 #8

Another thing to consider is patent issues inherent in the bitcoin implementation.

bitcoin requires EC-DSA, which has been disabled in Fedora after legal review:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECC_patents

I wanted to package bitcoind for Fedora, but gave up, because we cannot distribute binaries due to these patent issues.

Jeff Garzik, bitcoin core dev team and BitPay engineer; opinions are my own, not my employer.
Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
wobber
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


View Profile
September 04, 2010, 10:36:10 AM
 #9

Project discontinued due to lack of positive feedback.

If you hate me, you can spam me here: 19wdQNKjnATkgXvpzmSrkSYhJtuJWb8mKs
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!