cloudha$hers (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
July 06, 2014, 04:35:29 PM |
|
Blockchain.info is the most appropriate for small deposits. Great explanation! thanks a lot. finally it's clear what you meant with fees. Guys don't use wallets which charge you for incoming transactions. Just don't use them. it is crazy.
Cloudhashers.net, you still DO NOT UNDERSTAND .... So, what does my desktop wallet software (bitcoin-qt) do automatically? Bitcoin-QT wallet will send out 2000 transactions of 0.0025 BTC each (2000 x 0.0025 BTC = 0.5 BTC). So now Bitcoin-QT wallet has the 0.5 BTC to send, but what do you know.... Bitcoin-QT will add 0.0001 BTC FEE for each 1K in the transaction. Assuming here each transaction is 500 bytes, so for 2000 transactions, that's 1000K bytes. Bitcoin-QT will add 0.0001 BTC x 1000 = 0.1 BTC FEE. ... Exactly as you said. Tried to send all 0.019 BTC and Armory offer me 0.015 BTC fee so what now? shall I sweep address to blockchain wallet?
|
|
|
|
cloudha$hers (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
July 06, 2014, 05:32:19 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
sillywhim
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
July 06, 2014, 08:00:31 PM |
|
Exactly as you said. Tried to send all 0.019 BTC and Armory offer me 0.015 BTC fee so what now? shall I sweep address to blockchain wallet? ...and it is pretty bothersome cloudhashers initially did not understand this (I still think they really don't even now). What kind of confidence does this give you the customer? It is too late for existing payouts. Not worth "spending" it at all. What you can do though is like I outlined in past posts and go the way of CEX and let cloudhashers change the payout to what your bitcoin address is at CEX. And then setup your Armory bitcoin address as the sweep bitcoin address at CEX and CEX will send out the multitude of transactions into ONE DAILY transaction and NO FEES to your Armory bitcoin address. Cloudhashers has offered to create a once a day payout. Dunno exactly what they are waiting for.
|
|
|
|
sillywhim
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
July 06, 2014, 08:02:02 PM Last edit: July 06, 2014, 08:16:17 PM by sillywhim |
|
Blockchain.info is the most appropriate for small deposits.
No it isn't you stupid people. Everyone needs to do the "CEX shuffle dance".
|
|
|
|
sillywhim
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
July 06, 2014, 08:03:21 PM Last edit: July 06, 2014, 08:26:27 PM by sillywhim |
|
As promised A truly great PHOTOSHOP of the original photo. Everybody, compare it for yourselves and see... Frightening. It's the same photo! Wouldn't you think if this was legit, that after making the sign, you'd want to take a straight on shot, not angled? But basically this is the same photo as before... I believe the photoshop'd "cloudhashers.net" photo is way darker than the original because cloudhashers had problems putting in a realistic reflection of the words "cloudhashers.net" and gave up ---and made the photo darker to cover up his ineptitude and the lack of a reflection. The original photo has very nice natural reflections in the area of the subsequent photoshop'd cloudhashers.net sign. So dear "investors", how do you feel now?
|
|
|
|
Tweut
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
July 06, 2014, 08:34:13 PM |
|
Oh Cloudhashers, you're not even trying. Perspective on the 'sign' is all wrong, even if it wasn't the exact same photo, as pointed out by sillywhim.
|
|
|
|
qazan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 12:29:21 AM |
|
A truly great PHOTOSHOP of the original photo. Everybody, compare it for yourselves and see... Frightening. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BryuECvCUAAlxt-.jpg:largeIt's the same photo! Wouldn't you think if this was legit, that after making the sign, you'd want to take a straight on shot, not angled? But basically this is the same photo as before... I believe the photoshop'd "cloudhashers.net" photo is way darker than the original because cloudhashers had problems putting in a realistic reflection of the words "cloudhashers.net" and gave up ---and made the photo darker to cover up his ineptitude and the lack of a reflection. The original photo has very nice natural reflections in the area of the subsequent photoshop'd cloudhashers.net sign. So dear "investors", how do you feel now? I feeling lost my ivesting
|
|
|
|
qazan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 12:37:21 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
MisterGreen
|
|
July 07, 2014, 01:27:12 AM |
|
Well the mining hardware on the pictures still looks exactly like the 200 GHS Asic SHA256 Miner from Wawaminer.com. Is there a magic trick that they can mine scrypt coins?! Ah, and Wawaminer doesn't build any scrypt miner at the moment or did that in the past.
|
|
|
|
sillywhim
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
July 07, 2014, 01:53:34 AM Last edit: July 07, 2014, 02:03:38 AM by sillywhim |
|
wawaminer.com huh?
...we are all gonna be crying "wawa" all the way home...
|
|
|
|
sillywhim
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
July 07, 2014, 02:09:35 AM |
|
omg, a watermark? why don't you, just write: "CLOUDHASHERS.NET - 05 JUL 2014" on piece of paper and put it on miners to be visible on picture?
Well I'll do that tomorrow, out of the office already. It is watermarked just in case. Watermark? Just in case what exactly?? Wawaminer should have watermarked it first so you couldn't steal it, you mean? Oh, about this "out of the office already..." what a j0ke. You don't have an office farm boy. You just got right on that photoshop, didn't you? AND did one heck of a lousy job of it!
|
|
|
|
vn2359
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 04:04:55 AM Last edit: July 20, 2014, 05:06:27 PM by vn2359 |
|
Scam - Scam they....the prison...
|
|
|
|
vn2359
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 05:31:37 AM Last edit: July 20, 2014, 05:06:42 PM by vn2359 |
|
Scam - Scam they....the prison...
|
|
|
|
vn2359
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 05:46:38 AM Last edit: July 20, 2014, 05:06:53 PM by vn2359 |
|
Scam - Scam they....the prison...
|
|
|
|
qazan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 06:41:51 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
vn2359
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 07:32:46 AM Last edit: July 20, 2014, 05:07:10 PM by vn2359 |
|
Scam - Scam they....the prison...
|
|
|
|
qazan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 07:45:06 AM |
|
Get 3 hours more may be have got holiday didnt answers
|
|
|
|
cloudha$hers (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 11:02:13 AM |
|
We received many complaints about the transaction fees. We will have to re-code the system to mitigate the effects of large transaction volume (in bytes). The update will be over within 3-4 days and the payouts will continue.
|
|
|
|
sillywhim
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
July 07, 2014, 12:35:17 PM Last edit: July 07, 2014, 01:30:28 PM by sillywhim |
|
AS PREDICTED: All Cloudhashers.net Payouts Have Stopped Cloudhashers is saying they are re-coding the system. You decide. And what about the "shills" I've uncovered? (see below) Last payout according to blockchain.info: TXID: https://blockchain.info/tx/03f617a8e534e2826090314d80688f5c058d4ca2119e20435569ec590b7f121bDate: 07 July 2014 10:18:45 GMT URL to Check on Cloudhashers: https://blockchain.info/address/15jBLCxe7bgGzG2Su4uXH2iSMZD9cefYfb "Investors" Count: 148 Suckers Total BTC "Invested": 212.864152 BTC (approx $135K USD) Blockchain.info says 120.5 BTC ($76K) was invested. I derived the above 212.864152 BTC based on the latest payouts times 800 (given 3 percent daily "return" divided by 24 hourly payments, thus to get the principal, times by 800.) If the blockchain.info is correct however, that means that many of these payout addresses are in fact SHILLS and most likely be payouts to cloudhashers' own wallet. Maybe a few hours will prove me wrong i.e. payouts continue but don't hold your breath. Note: As a more complete post mortem, if someone is willing to slave thru all the blockchain.info regarding cloudhashers bitcoin address of: 15jBLCxe7bgGzG2Su4uXH2iSMZD9cefYfb and attach as a file, I'll write a program to find out how much cloudhashers has paid out to us suckers. I will take blockchain.info's 120.5 BTC as correct and will adjust the results. My cloudhashers BTC paid out number will be accurate enough. UPDATE: I just realized I can figure out who the SHILL bitcoin addresses are. Stay tuned for the: "SHILL RESULTS SHOW"
|
|
|
|
vn2359
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
July 07, 2014, 02:14:17 PM Last edit: July 20, 2014, 05:07:27 PM by vn2359 |
|
Scam - Scam they....the prison...
|
|
|
|
|