WWC-DEV (OP)
|
|
May 28, 2014, 03:46:08 AM |
|
With regard to this Old Topic, the last post dates back to November 2013 and wild guesstimates ranged from 400K to 1 Million. Anyone wants to take a stab at this? More importantly, what would it take to put BTC (or another digital currency) in the hands of hundreds of millions of people around the world to use daily?
|
|
|
|
Snail2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:43:45 AM |
|
Make a lot more useful services for bitcoin and that will increase the numbers spontaneously .
|
|
|
|
klmist
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:45:34 AM |
|
With regard to this Old Topic, the last post dates back to November 2013 and wild guesstimates ranged from 400K to 1 Million. Anyone wants to take a stab at this? More importantly, what would it take to put BTC (or another digital currency) in the hands of hundreds of millions of people around the world to use daily? The number of 0.01BTC, 0.1BTC and 1BTC keys have all grown roughly 1.5x since Nov 1st. I expect that is roughly proportional to a 1.5x increase in the number of users.. however even 400k may still be a high estimate for the number of users who currently control as much as 0.01BTC.
|
|
|
|
Divinespark
|
|
May 28, 2014, 09:14:11 AM |
|
Can't help thinking 250k-500k is the number of core btc users Saw an article that explored this some weeks ago, but am unable to find it Total # massively overstated in the media
|
|
|
|
qwerty555
|
|
May 28, 2014, 10:34:35 AM Last edit: May 28, 2014, 12:35:25 PM by qwerty555 |
|
from last July there were 11.4m wallets
1) there were 11.4 M addresses 2) 94 % had a TOTAL of 37 coins. These are effectively dead 3) We only probably need to count the top 7 catagories of ownership in the table or 3.2% of wallets that own 99% of bitcoins The number of these wallets which is roughly the same as individuals who own 1 coin or more is ONLY 250,000Now there are 35.5 million wallets a 3 fold increase. http://bitcoinrichlist.com/charts/bitcoin-distribution-by-address?atblock=300000Once again a VERY rough estimate 1) 96% of wallets or 34.07 million have between 0 and .001 of a coin. These are effectively dead and not used or useable to any significant degree. (These wallets own a TOTAL of 227 coins) 2) Of the approx 4% that remain or 1.48Million 3.2% or approx 1.140 million wallets have less than 1 coin and are either inactive or insignificantly active. ( and represent ownership of a total of 113,000 coins) 3) the remaining 0.8% (owning 12 .6 million coins = 99% of ALL coins lol) or 340,000 wallets owning 1 coin or more could be considered as the active users ( of significance). This figure should at LEAST be cut by 50% to 170 thousand users as most if not all of these individuals have more than 1 wallet ( I have 4) Active users that are significant Est 170,000 Additional persons who can claim to be users but whose transactions are of no great significance in terms of volume or value, but can add to the number of transaction figures 1.48 M divided by 2 740,000 or divided by 3 ( lots of dead wallets in that group) 500,000.
|
|
|
|
DolanDuck
|
|
May 28, 2014, 12:29:11 PM |
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- block# 302155 22/05/2014 num %noOut %dead %of tot %of act diff prev value %noOut %vdead %TotVal diff prev --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 0 33637561 0.00% 0.00% 92.0432% 81981 0.00000 0.00% 0.00% 0.0000% 0.00000 = 1 satoshi (0.00000001 BTC) 403384 38.64% 8.88% 1.1038% 13.87% -3 0.00403 38.64% 8.88% 0.0000% -0.00000 > 1 satoshi <= 0.001 BTC ( ~1$ ) 1044595 81.80% 25.90% 2.8583% 35.92% 738 224.22368 75.86% 8.53% 0.0018% 0.34759 > 0.001 BTC <= 0.1 BTC 889843 71.66% 7.80% 2.4349% 30.60% 3470 18598.17536 72.50% 11.66% 0.1453% 61.42890 > 0.1 BTC <= 1 BTC 300736 70.30% 7.30% 0.8229% 10.34% -351 138071.40801 75.56% 9.28% 1.0786% -117.71700 > 1 BTC <= 5 BTC 127284 68.63% 7.05% 0.3483% 4.38% -15 309882.40453 70.39% 7.45% 2.4207% 29.96225 > 5 BTC <= 10 BTC 37791 71.91% 6.73% 0.1034% 1.30% -82 292107.79210 73.89% 6.77% 2.2819% -507.35484 > 10 BTC <= 25 BTC 29299 69.90% 7.23% 0.0802% 1.01% 53 485476.49528 71.23% 7.43% 3.7924% 1077.85979 > 25 BTC <= 50 BTC 52425 92.19% 70.45% 0.1435% 1.80% 57 2393407.49718 93.90% 76.65% 18.6967% 2016.09812 > 50 BTC <= 75 BTC 4923 69.57% 14.95% 0.0135% 0.17% 10 294134.96780 68.98% 13.56% 2.2977% 762.32306 > 75 BTC <= 100 BTC 6989 85.65% 6.10% 0.0191% 0.24% 8 664870.69471 86.61% 6.11% 5.1938% 772.28907 > 100 BTC <= 500 BTC 7855 68.40% 6.65% 0.0215% 0.27% -8 1744214.87135 70.14% 7.56% 13.6254% -1837.54032 > 500 btc <= 1000 BTC 1485 75.22% 6.26% 0.0041% 0.05% 0 1146862.15607 77.36% 6.56% 8.9590% -628.84321 > 1000 BTC 1219 69.65% 7.05% 0.0033% 0.04% 1 5313371.71440 69.83% 4.09% 41.5068% 2671.10510 Total Actives 2907828 70.83% 15.48% 7.9568% 100.00% 3878 12801222.40421 76.13% 19.01% 100.0000% 4299.95851 Total 36545389 5.64% 1.23% 100.0000% 85859 12801222.40421 76.13% 19.01% 100.0000% 4299.95851
num : number of addresses in this range of balance %noOut : percentage of active addresses WITHOUT out operations %dead : percentage of active addresses with input and output operations prior to 2012 %of tot : percentage of the TOTAL number addresses %of act : percentage of the number of addresses with zero balance (active) diff prev: number variation compared to the previous table %noOut : % value transactions WITHOUT output ( % value of range) %vdead : % operations value prev 2012 ( % value of range)) %TotVal : % value of this range compared to the total value diff prev: change in value compared to the previous table
credits to gbianchi bitcointalk.org
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ PRIMEDICE The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
qwerty555
|
|
May 28, 2014, 12:38:27 PM |
|
Dolan..that is more up to date and has greater info..but its a bu##er to read..is there a link
|
|
|
|
Predatorian
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 12:44:58 PM |
|
Nowadays many ppl starting to use btc as currency and i know will be much more than now.
|
|
|
|
exocytosis
|
|
May 28, 2014, 12:45:13 PM |
|
More importantly, what would it take to put BTC (or another digital currency) in the hands of hundreds of millions of people around the world to use daily?
For Bitcoin to reach the point where as much as 0.1 % of the world's population are using it, we'd need a reliable, user-friendly infrastructure. We'd need trustworthy exchanges and "Bitcoin banks". All of this is clearly impossible without some type of regulations, since exchange owners and other BTC service providers currently have every incentive to steal from their customers, as proven by Bitcoin's history.
|
|
|
|
turvarya
|
|
May 28, 2014, 12:49:01 PM |
|
More importantly, what would it take to put BTC (or another digital currency) in the hands of hundreds of millions of people around the world to use daily?
For Bitcoin to reach the point where as much as 0.1 % of the world's population are using it, we'd need a reliable, user-friendly infrastructure. We'd need trustworthy exchanges and "Bitcoin banks". All of this is clearly impossible without some type of regulations, since exchange owners and other BTC service providers currently have every incentive to steal from their customers, as proven by Bitcoin's history. What do you mean by "Bitcoin Banks"? The whole idea of Bitcoins is, that you don't need a bank.
|
|
|
|
qwerty555
|
|
May 28, 2014, 12:52:15 PM |
|
The recent quickcoin app http://www.quickcoin.co/ that allows you to send fb to fb has the potential to add a few million users sending birthday and xmas gifts to friends and family..it seems to be really easy to use once you have loaded ur (quickcoin/"fb") wallet. It will depend on how they promote, what is the total cost of use including exchange rate spreads, and how easy is it to use it or cash it at the receivers end.
|
|
|
|
bananaControl
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Decentralize All The Things!
|
|
May 28, 2014, 01:03:20 PM |
|
from last July there were 11.4m wallets
1) there were 11.4 M addresses 2) 94 % had a TOTAL of 37 coins. These are effectively dead 3) We only probably need to count the top 7 catagories of ownership in the table or 3.2% of wallets that own 99% of bitcoins The number of these wallets which is roughly the same as individuals who own 1 coin or more is ONLY 250,000Now there are 35.5 million wallets a 3 fold increase. http://bitcoinrichlist.com/charts/bitcoin-distribution-by-address?atblock=300000Once again a VERY rough estimate 1) 96% of wallets or 34.07 million have between 0 and .001 of a coin. These are effectively dead and not used or useable to any significant degree. (These wallets own a TOTAL of 227 coins) 2) Of the approx 4% that remain or 1.48Million 3.2% or approx 1.140 million wallets have less than 1 coin and are either inactive or insignificantly active. ( and represent ownership of a total of 113,000 coins) 3) the remaining 0.8% (owning 12 .6 million coins = 99% of ALL coins lol) or 340,000 wallets owning 1 coin or more could be considered as the active users ( of significance). This figure should at LEAST be cut by 50% to 170 thousand users as most if not all of these individuals have more than 1 wallet ( I have 4) Active users that are significant Est 170,000 Additional persons who can claim to be users but whose transactions are of no great significance in terms of volume or value, but can add to the number of transaction figures 1.48 M divided by 2 740,000 or divided by 3 ( lots of dead wallets in that group) 500,000. You are confusing addresses with wallets. We don't know how many wallets there are, and most people (hopefully) use a new address for each new transaction. So all in all, no one knows really.
|
|
|
|
WWC-DEV (OP)
|
|
May 28, 2014, 01:41:27 PM |
|
Dolan..that is more up to date and has greater info..but its a bu##er to read..is there a link Yeah hard to read/interpret. But I can see from the first 7 lines of data that between 98 and 99% of ALL BTC addresses (not wallets) hold less than 10 BTC each., with about 92% (first line) having zero BTC in them. Am I reading this correctly? The table has the key to interesting answers, I will take another more detailed look, when I have some more free time, and try to interpret it.
|
|
|
|
qwerty555
|
|
May 28, 2014, 01:45:10 PM Last edit: May 28, 2014, 01:57:43 PM by qwerty555 |
|
. Most of the 12.8 M coins are accounted for in the link which does show addresses not wallets.... .and that some wallets may have multiple addresses.
If that is the case then the active users would be even lower if they use multiple addresses..does that sound logical? and yes we cannot know for sure but this is an attempt at a guestimate.
I should have written
3) the remaining 0.8% (owning 12 .6 million coins = 99% of ALL coins lol) or 340,000 addresses owning 1 coin or more could be considered as the active users ( of significance). This figure should at LEAST be cut by 50% to 170 thousand users as most if not all of these individuals have more than 1 address
|
|
|
|
master-P
|
|
May 28, 2014, 03:28:27 PM |
|
I think most people who own BTC have them spread over multiple addresses, so the number of total BTC users is probably much lower than the addresses with at least 0.01 BTC. I have over half a dozen funded addresses myself and I'm sure there are people who control tens or even hundreds of funded addresses.
|
|
|
|
WWC-DEV (OP)
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:07:15 PM Last edit: May 28, 2014, 07:03:28 PM by WWC-DEV |
|
What do you mean by "Bitcoin Banks"? The whole idea of Bitcoins is, that you don't need a bank.
So... how about we changed "Bitcoin Banks" to "Bitcoin-accepting banks", or "Bitcoin-Friendly Banks"? Assuming "banks" will never go away. How about I arrive at a foreign city's airport and I head straight to one of those currency exchange kiosks right there inside the terminal and I exchange some Bitcoins for some local currency? I then take a taxi from the airport to my hotel, in my pocket, I have: - my smartphone with the Android Bitcoin wallet, loaded with 15 BTCs - Some local currency I just got at the exchange kiosk - A Paypal Mastercard debit card with $1000 in my Paypal account Which payment do you think the taxi driver will take? When I get to my hotel, I go to the Reception desk and I have to either pre-pay for my stay or show a debit/credit card. Unless I have done some research online BEFORE traveling, and found a hotel that accepts Bitcoin (yeah they are out there!!), my payment choices are limited.
|
|
|
|
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:21:53 PM |
|
There is an easy way to determine the core number of Bitcoin users. Total the number of small time con artists world wide and add the total amount of young idealistic computer literate suckers worldwide. That number will be your core users.
|
|
|
|
WWC-DEV (OP)
|
|
May 28, 2014, 07:01:33 PM |
|
There is an easy way to determine the core number of Bitcoin users. Total the number of small time con artists world wide and add the total amount of young idealistic computer literate suckers worldwide. That number will be your core users.
LOL "Small time con artists"? The hackers - who allegedly stole hundreds of thousands of Bitcoins from MtGox - were not "small time" by any means!
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:13:41 PM |
|
There is an easy way to determine the core number of Bitcoin users. Total the number of small time con artists world wide and add the total amount of young idealistic computer literate suckers worldwide. That number will be your core users.
Not sure if the following is the correct equation, but... cumulative normal distribution at the extremes, x one or two standard deviations above the mean
|
|
|
|
Bibop
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:29:13 PM |
|
There is an easy way to determine the core number of Bitcoin users. Total the number of small time con artists world wide and add the total amount of young idealistic computer literate suckers worldwide. That number will be your core users.
Not sure if the following is the correct equation, but... cumulative normal distribution at the extremes, x one or two standard deviations above the mean LOL.. can not be that.
|
|
|
|
|