[ANN] FujiCoin | Japan | Since 2014 | The Best Crypto Currency

[motty]

Fujicoin's gitian building manual has been completely revised. Building with gitian makes it possible to make exactly the same binary whom anyone runs. If you have a high-performance PC please try as a hobby. 

https://github.com/fujicoin/fujicoin/blob/master/doc/gitian-building.md

[motty]

Let's build Fujicoin's blockchain exproler and run it.
Refer to the following for the build procedure.

https://github.com/fujicoin/blockbook/blob/fujicoin/docs/server.md

If you use this you can publish the blockchain explorer or you can build a completely independent TREZOR wallet. 

Ref: https://explorer.fujicoin.org/

[motty]

Update electrum-FJC

We will update the version of the electrum-X server to 1.8.12 soon.
Along with this, electrom-FJC version 2.9.x can not be used.
Users using electrum-FJC 2.9.x should update to the latest version.

https://www.fujicoin.org/downloads.php

[wheelz1200]

Let's build Fujicoin's blockchain exproler and run it.
Refer to the following for the build procedure.

https://github.com/fujicoin/blockbook/blob/fujicoin/docs/server.md

If you use this you can publish the blockchain explorer or you can build a completely independent TREZOR wallet. 

Ref: https://explorer.fujicoin.org/

There already is a block explorer for fujicoin,

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/fjc/

Do you want a different explorer?

[motty]

Let's build Fujicoin's blockchain exproler and run it.
Refer to the following for the build procedure.

https://github.com/fujicoin/blockbook/blob/fujicoin/docs/server.md

If you use this you can publish the blockchain explorer or you can build a completely independent TREZOR wallet. 

Ref: https://explorer.fujicoin.org/

There already is a block explorer for fujicoin,

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/fjc/

Do you want a different explorer?

cryptoID is one of the best block explorer. However, TREZOR hardware wallet can not be connected to it. blockbook has been developed as a successor to the insight that was once a standard. So it's easy to use as a back end for various web wallets. Fujicoin is able to provide the best usability by having both block explorers. 

[motty]

BlockBid started swapping to the new BID of the token BID

TOKEN SWAP EXPLANATION
Token swap is a process by which your old tokens are being swapped for new ones. You will receive 100 new BID for every 1 old BID you send in. Blockbid believes the swap will improve token liquidity and utility.

TOKEN SWAP DEADLINE
Please make sure to swap all your BID by the 1st June, 2019


TOKEN SWAP INSTRUCTIONS

1. Send all your old BID tokens to 0x8bfbaf7F61946a847E8740970b93B95096F95867 (we recommend setting 120,000 gas limit and 50 gwei gas price) and wait for 60 minutes. Your transaction should have at least 3 confirmations.

2. You can check your balances and swap status by talking to this bot @blockbid_swap_bot
Check your balance with /check {address} command.
Type /help to display more available commands.

3. If your tokens have not arrived after two hours, please DM our Swap Bot Builder Nikita @ask_ai with your transaction hash and it will be looked into manually.


NEW TOKEN METRICS

Total supply = 108,177,988
100 BID = 1 hour free trading
5000 BID = 1 week free trading
1.5m BID = unlimited free trading


⚠️ DO NOT SEND TOKENS TO EITHER OF THE BELOW:

Old BID contract: 0xf1f64f6b8e17dd68c1db10b0eed3d2541a6c09ab

New BID contract: 0xdd5151da2ab25566e1d2a3c9a3e77396303f8a93

The new BID contract is the address to add to your Trezor or MEW etc

Contract: 0xdd5151da2ab25566e1d2a3c9a3e77396303f8a93
Symbol: BID
Decimal Points: 2

[Searing]

BlockBid started swapping to the new BID of the token BID

TOKEN SWAP EXPLANATION
Token swap is a process by which your old tokens are being swapped for new ones. You will receive 100 new BID for every 1 old BID you send in. Blockbid believes the swap will improve token liquidity and utility.

TOKEN SWAP DEADLINE
Please make sure to swap all your BID by the 1st June, 2019


TOKEN SWAP INSTRUCTIONS

1. Send all your old BID tokens to 0x8bfbaf7F61946a847E8740970b93B95096F95867 (we recommend setting 120,000 gas limit and 50 gwei gas price) and wait for 60 minutes. Your transaction should have at least 3 confirmations.

2. You can check your balances and swap status by talking to this bot @blockbid_swap_bot
Check your balance with /check {address} command.
Type /help to display more available commands.

3. If your tokens have not arrived after two hours, please DM our Swap Bot Builder Nikita @ask_ai with your transaction hash and it will be looked into manually.


NEW TOKEN METRICS

Total supply = 108,177,988
100 BID = 1 hour free trading
5000 BID = 1 week free trading
1.5m BID = unlimited free trading


⚠️ DO NOT SEND TOKENS TO EITHER OF THE BELOW:

Old BID contract: 0xf1f64f6b8e17dd68c1db10b0eed3d2541a6c09ab

New BID contract: 0xdd5151da2ab25566e1d2a3c9a3e77396303f8a93

The new BID contract is the address to add to your Trezor or MEW etc

Contract: 0xdd5151da2ab25566e1d2a3c9a3e77396303f8a93
Symbol: BID
Decimal Points: 2

I have no idea what this means in relation to FJC?

[wheelz1200]

Yeah this is an odd announcement.  What does bid have to do with fjc, are you just shilling another coin motty?  For someone who only hold fjc why do I need to know about this bid swap

[motty]

Since Fujicoin recommended BlockBid, there may be people who bought BID.
Since this swap has a deadline, I announced it. 

[wheelz1200]

Since Fujicoin recommended BlockBid, there may be people who bought BID.
Since this swap has a deadline, I announced it. 

Ah makes sense, I just didnt know if it had something tied directly through fujicoin, thanks motty.

[Searing]

Add mimblewimble would be my suggestion...supposedly Litecoin is doing so and it is a major clone of Bitcoin...

as mimblewimble was originally designed for Bitcoin...this would be a nice 'hook' for attention for FJC from the rest of the altcoin herd. IMHO.

brad

edit: I realize that would not mean the end of current public FJC use as the same for LTC use. But it with LTC will probably

involve a wallet option like DASH for private transactions. Thus (I'm assuming) this is the angle for current coins to implement.

Giving the wallet holder a choice on which distribution system to use on their coin with mimblewimlble the 'legacy' public version or a 'private' version on

a transaction.

again, all supposition on my part .but seems to keep with the rumors I've heard (for what it is worth as a mental exercise)

[wheelz1200]

Add mimblewimble would be my suggestion...supposedly Litecoin is doing so and it is a major clone of Bitcoin...

as mimblewimble was originally designed for Bitcoin...this would be a nice 'hook' for attention for FJC from the rest of the altcoin herd. IMHO.

brad

edit: I realize that would not mean the end of current public FJC use as the same for LTC use. But it with LTC will probably

involve a wallet option like DASH for private transactions. Thus (I'm assuming) this is the angle for current coins to implement.

Giving the wallet holder a choice on which distribution system to use on their coin with mimblewimlble the 'legacy' public version or a 'private' version on

a transaction.

again, all supposition on my part .but seems to keep with the rumors I've heard (for what it is worth as a mental exercise)

If possible I think that would be something good to integrate.  Anon is not a bad thing towards looking at for fjc, and possibly some different exchanges to add to market liquidity

[Searing]

Add mimblewimble would be my suggestion...supposedly Litecoin is doing so and it is a major clone of Bitcoin...

as mimblewimble was originally designed for Bitcoin...this would be a nice 'hook' for attention for FJC from the rest of the altcoin herd. IMHO.

brad

edit: I realize that would not mean the end of current public FJC use as the same for LTC use. But it with LTC will probably

involve a wallet option like DASH for private transactions. Thus (I'm assuming) this is the angle for current coins to implement.

Giving the wallet holder a choice on which distribution system to use on their coin with mimblewimlble the 'legacy' public version or a 'private' version on

a transaction.

again, all supposition on my part .but seems to keep with the rumors I've heard (for what it is worth as a mental exercise)

If possible I think that would be something good to integrate.  Anon is not a bad thing towards looking at for fjc, and possibly some different exchanges to add to market liquidity

my view is FJC needs more to differentiate itself from the other bitcoin altcoins. Eventually (It has been 4.5 years or so since the ASIC KNC Titans..that are the ONLY ASICs

to my knowledge that can do scrypt-N coins (FJC) ...eventually they will die out cube by cube...so without new innovations to move FJC out of the pack..I'm afraid it will

simply fade. The KNC Titan's were NEVER robust and prone to melting power plugs and other issues. (notice how you see few on eBay...because the blew up)

Anyway, innovate or die ...FJC has 'copied' enough IMHO, time to try some new stuff. At worse it will be an add on novelty. At best it will pump the coin to more legitimate uses.

my 2 satoshi's worth

brad

[motty]

Add mimblewimble would be my suggestion...supposedly Litecoin is doing so and it is a major clone of Bitcoin...

as mimblewimble was originally designed for Bitcoin...this would be a nice 'hook' for attention for FJC from the rest of the altcoin herd. IMHO.

brad

edit: I realize that would not mean the end of current public FJC use as the same for LTC use. But it with LTC will probably

involve a wallet option like DASH for private transactions. Thus (I'm assuming) this is the angle for current coins to implement.

Giving the wallet holder a choice on which distribution system to use on their coin with mimblewimlble the 'legacy' public version or a 'private' version on

a transaction.

again, all supposition on my part .but seems to keep with the rumors I've heard (for what it is worth as a mental exercise)

If possible I think that would be something good to integrate.  Anon is not a bad thing towards looking at for fjc, and possibly some different exchanges to add to market liquidity

my view is FJC needs more to differentiate itself from the other bitcoin altcoins. Eventually (It has been 4.5 years or so since the ASIC KNC Titans..that are the ONLY ASICs

to my knowledge that can do scrypt-N coins (FJC) ...eventually they will die out cube by cube...so without new innovations to move FJC out of the pack..I'm afraid it will

simply fade. The KNC Titan's were NEVER robust and prone to melting power plugs and other issues. (notice how you see few on eBay...because the blew up)

Anyway, innovate or die ...FJC has 'copied' enough IMHO, time to try some new stuff. At worse it will be an add on novelty. At best it will pump the coin to more legitimate uses.

my 2 satoshi's worth

brad

I think that it is impossible to introduce mimblewimble to Fujicoin. There is no concept of address in mimblewimble. So it is impossible to connect with already constructed block chains.
Anonymity is an important qualification of the current fiat currency. I think that is preferable. However, the Japanese government has determined that it will be used for money laundering and is excluded from the whitelist of the crypto currency.
So I'm not going to make Fujicoin anonymous crypto currency. 

[Searing]

Add mimblewimble would be my suggestion...supposedly Litecoin is doing so and it is a major clone of Bitcoin...

as mimblewimble was originally designed for Bitcoin...this would be a nice 'hook' for attention for FJC from the rest of the altcoin herd. IMHO.

brad

edit: I realize that would not mean the end of current public FJC use as the same for LTC use. But it with LTC will probably

involve a wallet option like DASH for private transactions. Thus (I'm assuming) this is the angle for current coins to implement.

Giving the wallet holder a choice on which distribution system to use on their coin with mimblewimlble the 'legacy' public version or a 'private' version on

a transaction.

again, all supposition on my part .but seems to keep with the rumors I've heard (for what it is worth as a mental exercise)

If possible I think that would be something good to integrate.  Anon is not a bad thing towards looking at for fjc, and possibly some different exchanges to add to market liquidity

my view is FJC needs more to differentiate itself from the other bitcoin altcoins. Eventually (It has been 4.5 years or so since the ASIC KNC Titans..that are the ONLY ASICs

to my knowledge that can do scrypt-N coins (FJC) ...eventually they will die out cube by cube...so without new innovations to move FJC out of the pack..I'm afraid it will

simply fade. The KNC Titan's were NEVER robust and prone to melting power plugs and other issues. (notice how you see few on eBay...because the blew up)

Anyway, innovate or die ...FJC has 'copied' enough IMHO, time to try some new stuff. At worse it will be an add on novelty. At best it will pump the coin to more legitimate uses.

my 2 satoshi's worth

brad

I think that it is impossible to introduce mimblewimble to Fujicoin. There is no concept of address in mimblewimble. So it is impossible to connect with already constructed block chains.
Anonymity is an important qualification of the current fiat currency. I think that is preferable. However, the Japanese government has determined that it will be used for money laundering and is excluded from the whitelist of the crypto currency.
So I'm not going to make Fujicoin anonymous crypto currency.  

Again, to my point. FJC better  have somehing as a hook and innovative to carry on its function within the next year..when the knc titans go poof from age (4.5 years plus) ..just saying....2014 ideas are not that big a deal

with all the BTC clones direct..besides FJC...and i think mimblewimble will be added to the wallet for private transactions or at least I think that is what LTC is going for ...not the main chain..

but irregardless, without some kind of new hook FJC is likely toast when the KNC Titans go away...no way worth mining at GPU with the ASIC difficulty pump..so masternodes, mimblewimble, not sure what..but something

new has to happen or it is just the same as hundreds of bircoin clones...with the only difference is in the scrypt -n algo.

sad to say...knc asic titans revived the coin..but that can only go so long IMHO

brad

edit: mimblewimble may not be a good choice for the simple reason that MOST bitcoin clone coins will add this..i was told being originally designed for BTC ..but not done it is an easy hook..so I expect with the 95%

dump in price for most btc clone altcoins and not much to lose the vast majority will add this option, at least in wallet, as the LTC folk are doing...it right or wrong due to ease of addition is gonna be common as hell

so maybe it would make no diff if FJC does not have such...but FJC will have to evolve in some manner or it dies when the knc titans eventually 'croak' and die first.

[motty]

Add mimblewimble would be my suggestion...supposedly Litecoin is doing so and it is a major clone of Bitcoin...

as mimblewimble was originally designed for Bitcoin...this would be a nice 'hook' for attention for FJC from the rest of the altcoin herd. IMHO.

brad

edit: I realize that would not mean the end of current public FJC use as the same for LTC use. But it with LTC will probably

involve a wallet option like DASH for private transactions. Thus (I'm assuming) this is the angle for current coins to implement.

Giving the wallet holder a choice on which distribution system to use on their coin with mimblewimlble the 'legacy' public version or a 'private' version on

a transaction.

again, all supposition on my part .but seems to keep with the rumors I've heard (for what it is worth as a mental exercise)

If possible I think that would be something good to integrate.  Anon is not a bad thing towards looking at for fjc, and possibly some different exchanges to add to market liquidity

my view is FJC needs more to differentiate itself from the other bitcoin altcoins. Eventually (It has been 4.5 years or so since the ASIC KNC Titans..that are the ONLY ASICs

to my knowledge that can do scrypt-N coins (FJC) ...eventually they will die out cube by cube...so without new innovations to move FJC out of the pack..I'm afraid it will

simply fade. The KNC Titan's were NEVER robust and prone to melting power plugs and other issues. (notice how you see few on eBay...because the blew up)

Anyway, innovate or die ...FJC has 'copied' enough IMHO, time to try some new stuff. At worse it will be an add on novelty. At best it will pump the coin to more legitimate uses.

my 2 satoshi's worth

brad

I think that it is impossible to introduce mimblewimble to Fujicoin. There is no concept of address in mimblewimble. So it is impossible to connect with already constructed block chains.
Anonymity is an important qualification of the current fiat currency. I think that is preferable. However, the Japanese government has determined that it will be used for money laundering and is excluded from the whitelist of the crypto currency.
So I'm not going to make Fujicoin anonymous crypto currency.  

Again, to my point. FJC better  have somehing as a hook and innovative to carry on its function within the next year..when the knc titans go poof from age (4.5 years plus) ..just saying....2014 ideas are not that big a deal

with all the BTC clones direct..besides FJC...and i think mimblewimble will be added to the wallet for private transactions or at least I think that is what LTC is going for ...not the main chain..

but irregardless, without some kind of new hook FJC is likely toast when the KNC Titans go away...no way worth mining at GPU with the ASIC difficulty pump..so masternodes, mimblewimble, not sure what..but something

new has to happen or it is just the same as hundreds of bircoin clones...with the only difference is in the scrypt -n algo.

sad to say...knc asic titans revived the coin..but that can only go so long IMHO

brad

edit: mimblewimble may not be a good choice for the simple reason that MOST bitcoin clone coins will add this..i was told being originally designed for BTC ..but not done it is an easy hook..so I expect with the 95%

dump in price for most btc clone altcoins and not much to lose the vast majority will add this option, at least in wallet, as the LTC folk are doing...it right or wrong due to ease of addition is gonna be common as hell

so maybe it would make no diff if FJC does not have such...but FJC will have to evolve in some manner or it dies when the knc titans eventually 'croak' and die first.

https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/blob/82cacfef8100809ad950b48a01db98e52a6f6877/src/crypto/scrypt.cpp#L271

This is the code of Litecoin's algorithm scrypt. There are 1024 numbers in two places. This indicates the iteration count of the operation. Fujicoin has this number 2048. Simply it is the difference. In other words, Litecoin is scrypt-n (n = 10) and Fujicoin is scrypt-n (n = 11).
Is not the ASIC chip for scrypt making this iteration number programmable? If so, setting the number of iterations is a work of the driver software. So, the manufacturer supplying the scrypt ASIC can supply the driver software for Fujicoin quite easily?

[Searing]

Add mimblewimble would be my suggestion...supposedly Litecoin is doing so and it is a major clone of Bitcoin...

as mimblewimble was originally designed for Bitcoin...this would be a nice 'hook' for attention for FJC from the rest of the altcoin herd. IMHO.

brad

edit: I realize that would not mean the end of current public FJC use as the same for LTC use. But it with LTC will probably

involve a wallet option like DASH for private transactions. Thus (I'm assuming) this is the angle for current coins to implement.

Giving the wallet holder a choice on which distribution system to use on their coin with mimblewimlble the 'legacy' public version or a 'private' version on

a transaction.

again, all supposition on my part .but seems to keep with the rumors I've heard (for what it is worth as a mental exercise)

If possible I think that would be something good to integrate.  Anon is not a bad thing towards looking at for fjc, and possibly some different exchanges to add to market liquidity

my view is FJC needs more to differentiate itself from the other bitcoin altcoins. Eventually (It has been 4.5 years or so since the ASIC KNC Titans..that are the ONLY ASICs

to my knowledge that can do scrypt-N coins (FJC) ...eventually they will die out cube by cube...so without new innovations to move FJC out of the pack..I'm afraid it will

simply fade. The KNC Titan's were NEVER robust and prone to melting power plugs and other issues. (notice how you see few on eBay...because the blew up)

Anyway, innovate or die ...FJC has 'copied' enough IMHO, time to try some new stuff. At worse it will be an add on novelty. At best it will pump the coin to more legitimate uses.

my 2 satoshi's worth

brad

I think that it is impossible to introduce mimblewimble to Fujicoin. There is no concept of address in mimblewimble. So it is impossible to connect with already constructed block chains.
Anonymity is an important qualification of the current fiat currency. I think that is preferable. However, the Japanese government has determined that it will be used for money laundering and is excluded from the whitelist of the crypto currency.
So I'm not going to make Fujicoin anonymous crypto currency.  

Again, to my point. FJC better  have somehing as a hook and innovative to carry on its function within the next year..when the knc titans go poof from age (4.5 years plus) ..just saying....2014 ideas are not that big a deal

with all the BTC clones direct..besides FJC...and i think mimblewimble will be added to the wallet for private transactions or at least I think that is what LTC is going for ...not the main chain..

but irregardless, without some kind of new hook FJC is likely toast when the KNC Titans go away...no way worth mining at GPU with the ASIC difficulty pump..so masternodes, mimblewimble, not sure what..but something

new has to happen or it is just the same as hundreds of bircoin clones...with the only difference is in the scrypt -n algo.

sad to say...knc asic titans revived the coin..but that can only go so long IMHO

brad

edit: mimblewimble may not be a good choice for the simple reason that MOST bitcoin clone coins will add this..i was told being originally designed for BTC ..but not done it is an easy hook..so I expect with the 95%

dump in price for most btc clone altcoins and not much to lose the vast majority will add this option, at least in wallet, as the LTC folk are doing...it right or wrong due to ease of addition is gonna be common as hell

so maybe it would make no diff if FJC does not have such...but FJC will have to evolve in some manner or it dies when the knc titans eventually 'croak' and die first.

https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/blob/82cacfef8100809ad950b48a01db98e52a6f6877/src/crypto/scrypt.cpp#L271

This is the code of Litecoin's algorithm scrypt. There are 1024 numbers in two places. This indicates the iteration count of the operation. Fujicoin has this number 2048. Simply it is the difference. In other words, Litecoin is scrypt-n (n = 10) and Fujicoin is scrypt-n (n = 11).
Is not the ASIC chip for scrypt making this iteration number programmable? If so, setting the number of iterations is a work of the driver software. So, the manufacturer supplying the scrypt ASIC can supply the driver software for Fujicoin quite easily?

been tried since 2013 onward. there are memory considerations for scrypt-n that makes it NOT do'able with out a complete asic remake for scrypt-n specific (like knc titans) thus not gonna happen...not with the only

2 exchanges and 10x the sell vs 1x the buy on the only 2 exchanges still having FJC. Indeed almost 2/3 of all FJC for sale now is only 1 satoshi...and no coin on any exchange continues to be listed a 1 satoshi.

contact gentraken on here and lightfoot ..they are the ones that looked into this in the past and where I get my info from (lightfoot? reply?)

No way will anyone make a FJC or other scrypt N coin for ONLY 1 coin or at these prices...any NEW ASIC miner and for above reasons, old miners can't be tweaked,

also remember electric for knc titans in the usa goes to summer rates on may 15th (in my case 33% increase with no more

winter heat in the basement benifits) ...again, IMHO it is too little too late..but we will see ...chump or champ that is how this kinda thing usually shakes out

brad

[motty]

Add mimblewimble would be my suggestion...supposedly Litecoin is doing so and it is a major clone of Bitcoin...

as mimblewimble was originally designed for Bitcoin...this would be a nice 'hook' for attention for FJC from the rest of the altcoin herd. IMHO.

brad

edit: I realize that would not mean the end of current public FJC use as the same for LTC use. But it with LTC will probably

involve a wallet option like DASH for private transactions. Thus (I'm assuming) this is the angle for current coins to implement.

Giving the wallet holder a choice on which distribution system to use on their coin with mimblewimlble the 'legacy' public version or a 'private' version on

a transaction.

again, all supposition on my part .but seems to keep with the rumors I've heard (for what it is worth as a mental exercise)

If possible I think that would be something good to integrate.  Anon is not a bad thing towards looking at for fjc, and possibly some different exchanges to add to market liquidity

my view is FJC needs more to differentiate itself from the other bitcoin altcoins. Eventually (It has been 4.5 years or so since the ASIC KNC Titans..that are the ONLY ASICs

to my knowledge that can do scrypt-N coins (FJC) ...eventually they will die out cube by cube...so without new innovations to move FJC out of the pack..I'm afraid it will

simply fade. The KNC Titan's were NEVER robust and prone to melting power plugs and other issues. (notice how you see few on eBay...because the blew up)

Anyway, innovate or die ...FJC has 'copied' enough IMHO, time to try some new stuff. At worse it will be an add on novelty. At best it will pump the coin to more legitimate uses.

my 2 satoshi's worth

brad

I think that it is impossible to introduce mimblewimble to Fujicoin. There is no concept of address in mimblewimble. So it is impossible to connect with already constructed block chains.
Anonymity is an important qualification of the current fiat currency. I think that is preferable. However, the Japanese government has determined that it will be used for money laundering and is excluded from the whitelist of the crypto currency.
So I'm not going to make Fujicoin anonymous crypto currency.  

Again, to my point. FJC better  have somehing as a hook and innovative to carry on its function within the next year..when the knc titans go poof from age (4.5 years plus) ..just saying....2014 ideas are not that big a deal

with all the BTC clones direct..besides FJC...and i think mimblewimble will be added to the wallet for private transactions or at least I think that is what LTC is going for ...not the main chain..

but irregardless, without some kind of new hook FJC is likely toast when the KNC Titans go away...no way worth mining at GPU with the ASIC difficulty pump..so masternodes, mimblewimble, not sure what..but something

new has to happen or it is just the same as hundreds of bircoin clones...with the only difference is in the scrypt -n algo.

sad to say...knc asic titans revived the coin..but that can only go so long IMHO

brad

edit: mimblewimble may not be a good choice for the simple reason that MOST bitcoin clone coins will add this..i was told being originally designed for BTC ..but not done it is an easy hook..so I expect with the 95%

dump in price for most btc clone altcoins and not much to lose the vast majority will add this option, at least in wallet, as the LTC folk are doing...it right or wrong due to ease of addition is gonna be common as hell

so maybe it would make no diff if FJC does not have such...but FJC will have to evolve in some manner or it dies when the knc titans eventually 'croak' and die first.

https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/blob/82cacfef8100809ad950b48a01db98e52a6f6877/src/crypto/scrypt.cpp#L271

This is the code of Litecoin's algorithm scrypt. There are 1024 numbers in two places. This indicates the iteration count of the operation. Fujicoin has this number 2048. Simply it is the difference. In other words, Litecoin is scrypt-n (n = 10) and Fujicoin is scrypt-n (n = 11).
Is not the ASIC chip for scrypt making this iteration number programmable? If so, setting the number of iterations is a work of the driver software. So, the manufacturer supplying the scrypt ASIC can supply the driver software for Fujicoin quite easily?

been tried since 2013 onward. there are memory considerations for scrypt-n that makes it NOT do'able with out a complete asic remake for scrypt-n specific (like knc titans) thus not gonna happen...not with the only

2 exchanges and 10x the sell vs 1x the buy on the only 2 exchanges still having FJC. Indeed almost 2/3 of all FJC for sale now is only 1 satoshi...and no coin on any exchange continues to be listed a 1 satoshi.

contact gentraken on here and lightfoot ..they are the ones that looked into this in the past and where I get my info from (lightfoot? reply?)

No way will anyone make a FJC or other scrypt N coin for ONLY 1 coin or at these prices...any NEW ASIC miner and for above reasons, old miners can't be tweaked,

also remember electric for knc titans in the usa goes to summer rates on may 15th (in my case 33% increase with no more

winter heat in the basement benifits) ...again, IMHO it is too little too late..but we will see ...chump or champ that is how this kinda thing usually shakes out

brad

understood. Anyway, I think that the price of fujicoin will be sluggish until the price of bitcoin starts to rise. I will explore exchanges that will be an alternative to cryptopia.

[wheelz1200]

Yeah I think we should explore some other exchanges with volume now that cryptopia is not an option.  Never went on blue trade but doesn't seem like they get enough volume.  Liquidity is needed to be able to hold up the price

[motty]

electrum-FJC-3.3.4 has been released

・Several bugfixes and usability improvements.
・CoinGecko was added to the source of Fiat currency, and it became the default. Available currency units are as follows.
   AED,ARS,AUD,BCH,BDT,BHD,BMD,BNB,BRL,BTC,CAD,CHF,CLP,CNY,CZK,DKK,EOS,
   ETH,EUR,GBP,HKD,HUF,IDR,ILS,INR,JPY,KRW,KWD,LKR,LTC,MMK,MXN,MYR,NOK,
   NZD,PHP,PKR,PLN,RUB,SAR,SEK,SGD,THB,TRY,TWD,USD,VEF,XAG,XAU,XDR,XLM,
   XRP,ZAR
・Notify users of new releases.
・Supported hardware wallet: TREZOR, Safe-T mini, keep key.
・Please see the release note below for details.
RELEASE-NOTES

Download: https://www.fujicoin.org/downloads.php