Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 08:06:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: 1 2 [All]
  Print  
Author Topic: The Coming Digital Anarchy (must read!)  (Read 1941 times)
Beliathon (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 04:15:31 AM
 #1

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10881213/The-coming-digital-anarchy.html

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
Erdogan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 08:08:34 AM
 #2


Almost, but not entirely, untrue. Anyway it is good that a journalist starts to open his mind a bit.
Ilsk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 833
Merit: 1015



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 10:48:53 AM
 #3

Uh-Uh can't wait for the future
medUSA
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1003


--Signature Designs-- http://bit.ly/1Pjbx77


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 11:32:52 AM
Last edit: April 15, 2015, 07:26:42 PM by medUSA
 #4

This is a surprisingly long article on Bitcoin. The title used the word "anarchy" in a positive way as in "without government control". Not news for those who follow bitcoin developments. Fairly informative introduction to the ways in which "blockchain technologies" can be used to replace current non-transparent systems.
bitsmichel
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 11:37:58 AM
 #5

Nice to see a long article about Bitcoin and technology. For most bitcoiners it is not new, but I think to many people it is;

Mrrr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 617
Merit: 528


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 11:39:28 AM
 #6

A surprisingly unbiased and well informed article. Think we reached a new standard here.

burp...
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 12:03:54 PM
 #7

Quote
At a conference in 2009 he said: "There are quite a lot of people who think it's not possible. That's a good thing. We don't need to really worry about those people very much, because since they don't think it's possible they won't take us very seriously. And they will not actually try to stop us until it's too late."


runam0k
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001


Touchdown


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 02:12:09 PM
 #8

This is a surprisingly long article on Bitcoin.
Some would say overly long.

Still, nice to see some discussion of Bitcoin beyond the currency (and, dare I say, crypto beyond Bitcoin). Tongue
ljudotina
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1029


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 02:19:21 PM
 #9

Jesus christ...that is LONG. I like it tho...i got down to the last sentance....but still...damn...it's long!


Anyway comment to article. It's just one way world could go with BTC. Everything inside that article that was wrote as "replaced by blockchain" can adept and change, and use that blockchain as it's own advantage. They doesnt need to dissapear. Blockchain is just storage of information and people need more than just information. More than just security of their bitcoin. You need security in a way that you will receive your goods and many more. Nothing that blockchain can solve. But businesses around blockchain can.
For example PayPal. Many thing that they will perish with BTC on the rise.
What if PayPal embraces bitcoin?
What if they start using it to move money around the world (now they use banks).
What if they offer "buyer protection" and "seller protection" to BTC users? Will they perish?
No they ownt. They can turn it into their advantage and live out of it, just like they live out of fiat transactions. As security layer for buyer and seller.

There are many more examples where similar approach can be used. Businesses that we think will dissapear can adopt BTC and become stronger and better because of it.

jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 03:01:57 PM
 #10

pretty cool article...

I don't really agree with Mike Hearn's vision though.
Meaning that, I don't think computers will be smart enough
to run businesses, at least not in the next 50 years.


Beliathon (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 03:18:26 PM
Last edit: June 10, 2014, 03:52:21 PM by Beliathon
 #11

This is a surprisingly long article on Bitcoin. The title used the word "anarchy" in a positive way...
"The measure of the state’s success is that the word anarchy frightens people, while the word state does not. We are like those African slaves who believe that their master is their benefactor, or those Russians who still believe that Stalin was their guardian."
-Joseph Sobran

This is a surprisingly long article on Bitcoin.
Some would say overly long.
See what the age of Twitter has done to the attention span of readers?

Tragedy, travesty, disgrace, and shame. Nothing could be more important than patience and critical thinking skills in readers...

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
Shibboleth
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 03:41:52 PM
 #12

Read all of the article this morning. I can't remember a single instance in the past where a journalist working for a ( once hostile ) mainstream media mouthpiece has articulated Bitcoin and the blockchain so succinctly.

Bitcoin has definitely arrived - I don't know if this is good or bad. Perhaps this is the next question.
runam0k
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001


Touchdown


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 03:48:08 PM
 #13

Some would say overly long.
See what the age of Twitter has done to the attention speed of readers?

Tragedy, travesty, disgrace, and shame. Nothing could be more important than patience and critical thinking skills in readers...
I read it (patience) and I think it could be more concise (critical thinking). Grin
Beliathon (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 03:51:57 PM
 #14

Bitcoin has definitely arrived - I don't know if this is good or bad.
This should help clarify the issue for you.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
lihuajkl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 03:58:10 PM
 #15

decentralised system mentioned by the article is beyond the cryptocurrency and can solve many existing problems in society. A bit innovative idea.
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 04:18:03 PM
 #16

Bitcoin has definitely arrived - I don't know if this is good or bad.
This should help clarify the issue for you.

How could it be bad?

Shibboleth
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 04:35:49 PM
 #17


Once "they" get their hands on it they will pervert it.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 04:45:53 PM
 #18

digital anarchy? the cable companies, at least in the U.S., are basically decoupling themselves from net neutrality laws.. they are going to become absurdly powerful.
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 04:49:12 PM
 #19


Once "they" get their hands on it they will pervert it.

only if "we" let them.

Beliathon (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 05:01:07 PM
 #20

digital anarchy? the cable companies, at least in the U.S., are basically decoupling themselves from net neutrality laws.. they are going to become absurdly powerful.
That kind of blatant tyranny could be just the kind of spark the sleeping citizens need...


Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 05:02:58 PM
 #21

digital anarchy? the cable companies, at least in the U.S., are basically decoupling themselves from net neutrality laws.. they are going to become absurdly powerful.
That kind of blatant tyranny could be just the kind of spark the sleeping citizens need...



i doubt it. i've been saying that for a while, and nothing has happened. all they'll do is just put more money into lobbyists, while most people are occupied with working/providing for their families.. or occupied watching reality tv shows.
Beliathon (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 05:19:44 PM
 #22

Google will come to our rescue.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 05:31:57 PM
 #23

Once "they" get their hands on it they will pervert it.

No ... they must spend it.
Because, we, the people only want to be pay with "real" money.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 05:33:55 PM
 #24

Google will come to our rescue.

the cost for installing fiber optic connections is currently too expensive for google to make any significant splash. people are becoming more desperate for it though, so maybe google can pre-charge people for installations and then give them credits after everything is running.
Beliathon (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 05:43:47 PM
 #25

Google will come to our rescue.

the cost for installing fiber optic connections is currently too expensive for google to make any significant splash.
If the major ISPs get their way, you will find many wealthy people suddenly willing to throw massive funds at google to make cost a non-issue. I am one such person.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 05:49:31 PM
 #26

Google will come to our rescue.

the cost for installing fiber optic connections is currently too expensive for google to make any significant splash.
If the major ISPs get their way, you will find many wealthy people suddenly willing to throw massive funds at google to make cost a non-issue. I am one such person.

i don't know if that's quite enough.. the major ISPs already have a strong connection with lobbyists in washington.. and probably with the FCC as well. google can end up winning the fight though, but they'd have to go up against comcast/time warner/verizon/att/cox.. that's a pretty big task there.
Beliathon (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 05:50:50 PM
 #27

i don't know if that's quite enough.. the major ISPs already have a strong connection with lobbyists in washington.. and probably with the FCC as well.
Blockbuster video had strong connections with the rich and powerful too. So did the newspaper industry. So did the FAX industry. So did the Nazis, for that matter.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 05:56:16 PM
 #28

i don't know if that's quite enough.. the major ISPs already have a strong connection with lobbyists in washington.. and probably with the FCC as well.
Blockbuster video had strong connections with the rich and powerful too. So did the newspaper industry. So did the FAX industry. So did the Nazis, for that matter.

what did blockbuster need lobbied? and how strong was their connection? because i know one thing: ISPs have been lubing politicians for a long, long time now. and it's not just one, but 5 or more big ISPs that can throw tons of money at them. they have so much sway that they are now removing net neutrality laws, which gives them even more power.
Beliathon (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2014, 06:07:28 PM
 #29

i don't know if that's quite enough.. the major ISPs already have a strong connection with lobbyists in washington.. and probably with the FCC as well.
Blockbuster video had strong connections with the rich and powerful too. So did the newspaper industry. So did the FAX industry. So did the Nazis, for that matter.

what did blockbuster need lobbied? and how strong was their connection? because i know one thing: ISPs have been lubing politicians for a long, long time now. and it's not just one, but 5 or more big ISPs that can throw tons of money at them. they have so much sway that they are now removing net neutrality laws, which gives them even more power.
For every political action there is an equal and opposite political reaction. Haven't you been paying attention? The backlash against this breach of trust has been ENORMOUS and non-stop.

We still have until September to stop those net-rigging rules from becoming laws of the land.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
Ron~Popeil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 10:06:47 PM
 #30

digital anarchy? the cable companies, at least in the U.S., are basically decoupling themselves from net neutrality laws.. they are going to become absurdly powerful.
That kind of blatant tyranny could be just the kind of spark the sleeping citizens need...



They will destroy themselves. As alternative options grow we don't need the dinosaurs anymore. 

hloren70
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 10, 2014, 10:32:26 PM
 #31

I cant wait to see blockchain tech used for national votes! No more stuffing ballot boxes  Grin
Ron~Popeil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 10, 2014, 11:25:26 PM
 #32

I cant wait to see blockchain tech used for national votes! No more stuffing ballot boxes  Grin

That would be spectacular. We have never had an accurate election in the US.

Satan666
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123
Merit: 100

The love of fiat is the root of all good


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 12:32:44 AM
 #33


Once "they" get their hands on it they will pervert it.

Yes, we will.  We're working on some Bitcoin derivatives now.  Stay tuned.
beetcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 12:44:01 AM
 #34

digital anarchy? the cable companies, at least in the U.S., are basically decoupling themselves from net neutrality laws.. they are going to become absurdly powerful.
That kind of blatant tyranny could be just the kind of spark the sleeping citizens need...



They will destroy themselves. As alternative options grow we don't need the dinosaurs anymore.  

are you talking about the ISP companies? if this net neutrality issue continues, i really hope google, netflix, amazon, and other companies that rely on the internet band together to expand a fiber optic network that would destroy them.
shawshankinmate37927
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


Bitcoin: The People's Bailout


View Profile
June 11, 2014, 03:47:43 PM
 #35

Quote
But the developers who worked on Bitcoin believe that it represents a technological breakthrough that could sweep into obsolescence everything from social networks to stock markets... and even governments.

The world would be a much better place without fiat currencies.  However, if that happens, I don't see crypto-currencies making governments obsolete, just smaller.  Without the ability to borrow on a massive scale or impose an inflation tax and with the difficulty of enforcing an income tax, they'll have to rely on other sources of revenue like sales taxes and property taxes.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."   - Henry Ford
Beliathon (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


https://youtu.be/PZm8TTLR2NU


View Profile WWW
June 11, 2014, 06:57:52 PM
 #36

I don't see crypto-currencies making governments obsolete, just smaller.  Without the ability to borrow on a massive scale or impose an inflation tax and with the difficulty of enforcing an income tax, they'll have to rely on other sources of revenue like sales taxes and property taxes.
I agree, some governments will be hit harder than others. The ones that will suffer greatly are those that wager half their nation's economy on a military industrial complex, since they are entirely dependent on never-ending inflation to feed the monster. These types of violence-prone governments will be the hardest hit by the forced obsolescence of their fiat scrip. Places like Sweden will survive the transition relatively unscathed.

Remember Aaron Swartz, a 26 year old computer scientist who died defending the free flow of information.
Pages: 1 2 [All]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!