Bitcoin Forum
September 27, 2018, 11:24:27 PM *
News: ♦♦ New info! Bitcoin Core users absolutely must upgrade to previously-announced 0.16.3 [Torrent]. All Bitcoin users should temporarily trust confirmations slightly less. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: The more the merrier?  (Read 1594 times)
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:37:46 PM
 #21

Actually, I find that 99% of the people with "PrimeDice" adds in their sig are just posting random crap [...]

That 1% being shorena? Smiley

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
1538090667
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538090667

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538090667
Reply with quote  #2

1538090667
Report to moderator
1538090667
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538090667

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538090667
Reply with quote  #2

1538090667
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1538090667
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538090667

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538090667
Reply with quote  #2

1538090667
Report to moderator
1538090667
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1538090667

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1538090667
Reply with quote  #2

1538090667
Report to moderator
Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:41:20 PM
 #22

Wait... Is their payout directly based on the number of posts, or is primedice this some kind of ponzi scheme?

[...]
Hero Member - 0.0012BTC Per constructive post
Senior Member - 0.001BTC Per constructive post
Full Member - 0.0006BTC Per consutrctive post
Member - 0.0004BTC per constructive post
Jr. Member - Not allowed

Please note your signature must reflect your full user group rights. Example: Hero members must have large, colored & linked text.

50 Posts minimum to claim, must have 50+ activity. Rates can change at any given time.

[...]

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1373



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 07:26:15 PM
 #23

Actually, I find that 99% of the people with "PrimeDice" adds in their sig are just posting random crap to as many threads as they can to get their post count up and improve their payoff.  
Wait... Is their payout directly based on the number of posts, or is primedice this some kind of ponzi scheme?

Primedice is a gambling site.  Gamblers are paid based on their odds of winning and pure luck.  I assume Primedice has a an edge over the gamblers.

Primedice is paying people to advertise their website.  They get paid by including a primedice ad in their signature lines, and then making hundreds of posts to this forum.  I've taken to just clicking on "ignore" for just about everyone that has a primedice ad in their sig.

kuverty
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 07:37:41 PM
 #24

I did not realize the signatures get so much hate around here. I added one because they never bothered me and they pair a nice amount of money for a student, for posting. I still won't post just for the heck of it.

There are some signature campaigns though that I really don't approve of, namely ponzis that pay well to get people add their ads. But prime-dice seems fair. Well, maybe it's time to reconsider the signature.

DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1373



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 07:55:05 PM
 #25

I did not realize the signatures get so much hate around here. I added one because they never bothered me and they pair a nice amount of money for a student, for posting. I still won't post just for the heck of it.

There are some signature campaigns though that I really don't approve of, namely ponzis that pay well to get people add their ads. But prime-dice seems fair. Well, maybe it's time to reconsider the signature.

It's not the signature that's a problem.

It's the number of people who know nothing, and don't really care to pay attention to and participate in the discussions at hand, but rather create hundreds of nonsense posts and spread ridiculous amounts of bad advice in an attempt to both increase their post count (for a higher payout) and fool the sponsor into thinking that they are actively participating.

Initially, I wasn't even paying attention to the sigs.  I was just clicking ignore on people when I noticed they had posted a lot of junk.  Recently though I've noticed that the majority of the time, the people I'm "ignoring" have primedice ads in their sig.  Eventually, I found that it was easier to just click "ignore" on EVERY person with a primedice ad, and only "unignore" them if I see a quote from them in someone else's post indicating that they actually had something intelligent and useful to say.

It saves me a lot of time, since I don't have to read through all the junk trying to decide if I should "ignore" or not.  I'd love to have a script that searches though all users and if they have a "primedice" ad, just auto-adds them to my ignore list.

nishtrip15
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


My Skype: nishtrip15 Yahoo: tbnten


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 10:58:54 PM
 #26

Use different external IPs with each of your PCs to help transactions process faster.
spin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 360
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 17, 2014, 10:22:17 AM
 #27

Use different external IPs with each of your PCs to help transactions process faster.
Case in point... 

This is wrong.  It won't aid your transaction processing.

If you liked this post buy me a beer.  Beers are quite cheap where I live!
194YjsiwmGm3hcbPcJWWyzRAS9CQLX1fJL
TimS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 250
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 17, 2014, 01:59:25 PM
 #28

From what I can tell, it might strengthen the network a little if you did run all three, and used Tor on two, and prevented the computers from sharing peers with each other (by preventing communication between them; after you're set up, at least). Doing this would keep them from sharing peers, maximizing the number and distribution of distinct nodes that you connect to. It would make it less possible for a rogue group of nodes to be the only ones that you connect to (who could then do bad things like holding back transactions and blocks). It would also increase your resistance to a zero-confirmation double-spend attack: if three nodes all over the network (even though they're all in your house) see the same transaction, and no double spend attempt for it, then it's almost certainly going to be put in the blockchain.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!