srcxxx (OP)
|
|
August 02, 2014, 01:25:54 AM |
|
DMD transactions are sent out, but they are either not being confirmed or are confirmed very slowly. I would recommend to not mine DMD for now until the network stabilises.
You might want to try saffroncoin on port 60002 (myriadcoin-groestl algorithm). They are going to have block reward halved in a few days.
|
|
|
|
srcxxx (OP)
|
|
August 02, 2014, 02:18:27 AM Last edit: August 02, 2014, 07:12:38 PM by srcxxx |
|
OK, I am pretty sure that Diamondcoin on my pool is on the correct blockchain (transactions are visible in Diamond block explorer + when I synced Windows wallet as per steps on DMD OP, I can also see transactions). I hope it will stay this way. We'll see. As for the previous payouts... I have about 300 DMD that were not paid out while DMD blockchain was stuck. I'll pay them out manually once the network settles down. PS: The automatic payment should be working ok now, for example see: http://diamond.danbo.bg:2750/tx/1ac84c0f2ee8970054fb18460948b7430efd7680ad021ae3689e4d1e9951ba11#i6
|
|
|
|
psychofractor
|
|
August 03, 2014, 08:21:03 AM |
|
OK, I am pretty sure that Diamondcoin on my pool is on the correct blockchain (transactions are visible in Diamond block explorer + when I synced Windows wallet as per steps on DMD OP, I can also see transactions). I hope it will stay this way. We'll see. As for the previous payouts... I have about 300 DMD that were not paid out while DMD blockchain was stuck. I'll pay them out manually once the network settles down. PS: The automatic payment should be working ok now, for example see: http://diamond.danbo.bg:2750/tx/1ac84c0f2ee8970054fb18460948b7430efd7680ad021ae3689e4d1e9951ba11#i6Thanx for the effort, srcxxx! I hope quite a few of those 300 are coming my way, mined about 95Mh/s for some 30h, only 1,7 in payouts...
|
@PsychoFractor BTC 1CVirdfUpJLXTeFiRtgi2BRJmkUu4q2YjC CBX 5nqST1iUnGj62MQxjGEn6i2uKgzZCpMaFi DMD dMctVv2u1PN8tN2gwyzVgV7piUx2gvR1CD
|
|
|
istvandv
|
|
August 05, 2014, 10:24:35 AM |
|
SaffronCoin Coin new wallet v2.4.1 or v1.3.4 classic http://saffroncoin.com/#wallets<sfrdev_mob> These versions disconnect the older clients who haven't updated <sfrdev_mob> Do note that you need to redownload the blockchain current block is 171823
|
|
|
|
srcxxx (OP)
|
|
August 05, 2014, 06:47:57 PM |
|
SaffronCoin Coin new wallet v2.4.1 or v1.3.4 classic http://saffroncoin.com/#wallets<sfrdev_mob> These versions disconnect the older clients who haven't updated <sfrdev_mob> Do note that you need to redownload the blockchain current block is 171823 Thanks. > saffroncoind getinfo { "version" : 1030400, "protocolversion" : 70002, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : 4.68287255, "blocks" : 171902,
|
|
|
|
srcxxx (OP)
|
|
August 06, 2014, 12:52:06 AM Last edit: August 06, 2014, 06:16:48 AM by srcxxx |
|
These are the DMD payments that I sent 5 minutes ago for the time that payments were stuck (31 July - 1 August).
If you are not in the list, please PM me with your DMD wallet address and hashrate (don't write in the thread), I'll check the logs and we'll resolve this.
dFqhVwNJVUoGnWyEAXunyTHzfwbF8dQmq3 0.121777 dVgn7vLJRNUn7oTTfqHHAbTU2YYsTd9C5H 14.2546 dYZfJWNn9tNd9dkxdeUZrL4FsNVAVxnh37 17.9042 dcWh5R6H698nb8CyA2mTmaJAVQ1NbeRxrk 1.715 dWB4uGp3JGk5TdLCSGMWjWprc3gaHJFxtw 5.0574 dFrbh72KkG9nJq5CcERK7enKVYXuV4hic5 15.2376 dP3JvmgUwaSRRBnPPLqCQADYpbJzfokiaC 15.1495 dPMEbYG6xyvwbznQvGeJq7mVpKoPqM7Sci 10.8993 dN5Uw5EJYApoaJqXqwFuq7oV2fe4pqim88 13.3596 dYnvY8M84AMkq2o6K3wQPSAfpCY4w8G4fw 8.6143 dLR8LaWySojvi3dmaB9ioz48eSzFqVGRDx 84.7235 dT9xGBQMFNsEet3uTbzLEhShPKoPaqH8J7 7.5302 dNq11HoLRZfCoFiSQcwrfAMRPSncL6QE3D 18.6692 dQUwgS3RZDqEnsdDgTdjPKuH3yJgBSGTtC 3.0153 dH5rj9E148FsgyYpxPUjE3ezSUapz5PyV4 14.4223 dX37iCdhQHgwnyAVGjcraYgNwg11XrudbF 4.7944 dZgy55s3LXhhkx66dYYSMEKhtdFYgKBFzm 3.4591 dE4iqdxASGxVhW6EnU9hYJwi5ACr4ABnAn 23.7168
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
srcxxx (OP)
|
|
August 06, 2014, 09:45:42 AM |
|
Just wanted to let you know that I'm working on further optimizations almost every day. It is really hard to squeeze more MHs. I tried 2 other algorithms and both achieved worse results. I'm hoping to get a 10%-30% speedup before I give up, so I'll keep on trying. Today I was able to optimize the existing algo a tiny bit. Perhaps 1% - 3%. Below are BOP files for R9 290 (Hawaii). groestlmyriad-groestlI'll try to optimize it a bit more and once finished, I'll do another release and include other videocards (1-3% is not worth a whole release). Thanks
|
|
|
|
katak
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
August 08, 2014, 10:17:16 AM |
|
Thanks a lot for your great job !
|
|
|
|
srcxxx (OP)
|
|
August 13, 2014, 05:22:38 AM Last edit: August 13, 2014, 07:47:25 AM by srcxxx |
|
Hi all! Some good news. A new version of grs-sgminer will be released within a couple of days: * merged optimized kernel (dynamic switching between groestl and myriad-groestl algo, no need to restart the miner) * optimized kernel hashrate improved a bit (33.6 vs 32.9 on Myriad and 20.5 vs 19.8 on Groestl [R9 290 TriX @ 1170 Mhz]) Also TrinityCoin (myriad-groestl) has been added on port 60003. Not sure how profitable it is, probably not so much. But it is traded at bittrex. BTW, if you know of any other groestl or myriadcoin worth mining - please let me know and I'll add it. And finally, I've added links to the coins threads on the main page ( http://cryptohunger.com:81/). MYR, SFR, GRS and DMD have links to calculators. I did some calculations for a single R9 290 using optimized kernel. BTC reward per day is: 0.00040709 if you mine GRS 0.00102124 if you mine DMD 0.00112975 if you mine Myriad 0.00539810 if you mine Saffron PS: Let me know if you are interested in a multipool with payouts in BTC. Thanks! srcxxx
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 13, 2014, 09:02:38 AM |
|
hi no change with 1.3 or 1.3M 15.7mhs on 6970, better than "older" 15 mhs. i'd like 18-20 mhs good job Weird... I can't reach 15MH with 6970... -g 4 slightly improves speed but top is 13MH, older badman built sgminer 4.0 (from march 26th) gives 15Mh on 6970 I'll try to change opencl files to see if there is difference
|
|
|
|
srcxxx (OP)
|
|
August 13, 2014, 09:42:55 AM |
|
hi no change with 1.3 or 1.3M 15.7mhs on 6970, better than "older" 15 mhs. i'd like 18-20 mhs good job Weird... I can't reach 15MH with 6970... -g 4 slightly improves speed but top is 13MH, older badman built sgminer 4.0 (from march 26th) gives 15Mh on 6970 I'll try to change opencl files to see if there is difference Hi! Please provide your command line / config file. Thanks
|
|
|
|
IMZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 13, 2014, 10:27:26 AM |
|
Hey, fellow krypto geeks! DOKDO?? It's alive and well. I exchange regular emails with the lead dev. But the English-language community is tiny, so trading is manual. But I have been following the coin for months now, and have confidence in the dev team. Indeed, we have had some bad luck (the first English-language exchange went belly up . . . ); but apparently btc kor will be online withing days. Mark (IndiaMikeZulu); Western Australia You can find us https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/6872-dokdocoin-dokdo-information/page-16
|
|
|
|
dokdocoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
August 13, 2014, 03:36:20 PM |
|
Thank you for your optimized pool for Dokdocoin! We got a really busy time in korea but in two weeks we can start to do more things for Dokdo and cryptocoin world Cheers!
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 13, 2014, 07:14:17 PM |
|
hi no change with 1.3 or 1.3M 15.7mhs on 6970, better than "older" 15 mhs. i'd like 18-20 mhs good job Weird... I can't reach 15MH with 6970... -g 4 slightly improves speed but top is 13MH, older badman built sgminer 4.0 (from march 26th) gives 15Mh on 6970 I'll try to change opencl files to see if there is difference Hi! Please provide your command line / config file. Thanks bat file is: setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer -c example-myriad.conf --no-submit-stale --auto-fan -g 4 In the wallet I only changed wallet address and removed gpu-core/mem settings With older sgminer I use -g 4 -w 256 -I 20
|
|
|
|
srcxxx (OP)
|
|
August 13, 2014, 08:00:50 PM |
|
hi no change with 1.3 or 1.3M 15.7mhs on 6970, better than "older" 15 mhs. i'd like 18-20 mhs good job Weird... I can't reach 15MH with 6970... -g 4 slightly improves speed but top is 13MH, older badman built sgminer 4.0 (from march 26th) gives 15Mh on 6970 I'll try to change opencl files to see if there is difference Hi! Please provide your command line / config file. Thanks bat file is: setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer -c example-myriad.conf --no-submit-stale --auto-fan -g 4 In the wallet I only changed wallet address and removed gpu-core/mem settings With older sgminer I use -g 4 -w 256 -I 20 Hi! With Groestl and Myriad Groestl algorithms, you usually need to overclock GPU quite significally. For example, I'm using 1170Mhz on R9 290 (where standard frequency is 1000Mhz). This happens because these algorithms don't use power hungry memory exchange operations and thus GPU produces less heat and stays within TDP bounds. I don't have 6970, so cannot check for sure. What I'd recommend is to take your "old badman's sgminer 4.0" exact command line, change algorithm to "myriadcoin-optimized" and pool to stratum+tcp://cryptohunger.com:60001 and see what hashrate you'll get. If it'll be less - then grs-sgminer is not well suited for 6970 videocards and It'll be great if you could post your results before stopping with grs-sgminer. Thanks
|
|
|
|
rgm108
|
|
August 13, 2014, 09:55:47 PM |
|
@srcxxx Pretty new to Linux here but I have to say something at least. I made a build from your github repository today. It was the easiest, CLEANEST build I've done in my 3 months using Linux. (no errors/warnings) It looks like you spent some time developing and delivering a quality product. Nicely done
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 14, 2014, 08:53:28 AM |
|
Hi!
Please provide your command line / config file.
Thanks
conf file: { "pools" : [ { "url" : "stratum+tcp://cryptohunger.com:60001", "user" : "MAVh.................", "pass" : "xxx", "poolname" : "MyriadCoinOptimized" }, { "url" : "stratum+tcp://cryptohunger.com:60002", "user" : "Sf23.................", "pass" : "xxx", "poolname" : "SaffronCoinOptimized" } ],
"gpu-engine" : "900", "gpu-memclock" : "900", "intensity" : "20", "gpu-threads" : "1",
"auto-fan" : true, "temp-cutoff" : "90", "temp-overheat" : "80", "temp-target" : "70", "gpu-fan" : "40-80", "worksize" : "256",
"api-port" : "4028", "kernel" : "myriadcoin-groestl", "gpu-powertune" : "20" } Running on older sgminer speed is 14.1MH/s with 14.6 and 14.8MH/s with opencl files from 13.12 Same conf&bat run from grs-sgminer gives 12.3MH/s Running myriadcoin-optimized the speed is a bit lower ~ 11.9-12MH/s Also tested on 5850 - no gain either. But on 290 the speed increase is stunning
|
|
|
|
srcxxx (OP)
|
|
August 14, 2014, 09:24:47 AM |
|
> Running on older sgminer speed is 14.1MH/s with 14.6 and 14.8MH/s with opencl files from 13.12 > Same conf&bat run from grs-sgminer gives 12.3MH/s > Running myriadcoin-optimized the speed is a bit lower ~ 11.9-12MH/s > Also tested on 5850 - no gain either. But on 290 the speed increase is stunning Hi! OK, looks like the kernel is not good for the old hardware that you mentioned. So I don't recommend that you use grs-sgminer. I'm quite surprised that just plain myriad-groestl is slower in grs-sgminer, because it is based on OpenCL kernel from sph-sgminer. Anyways, I'm working on completely different groestl algo and hoping it'll be a lot faster. In the meantime, I recommend that you use your old miner and some other pool. I will post to coin threads once I have a faster miner. Thanks for your time.
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 14, 2014, 03:33:31 PM |
|
How many threads are launched per shader core? You mentioned that thread-concurrency is no longer used... but on 6xxx radeons that parameter is useful - maxing out at shaders*5 It seems by default when using simple myriad-groestl, your version is defaulting to shaders*2.
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
August 14, 2014, 03:36:12 PM |
|
How many threads are launched per shader core? You mentioned that thread-concurrency is no longer used... but on 6xxx radeons that parameter is useful - maxing out at shaders*5 It seems by default when using simple myriad-groestl, your version is defaulting to shaders*2.
"thread concurrecy" is actually a buffer size, which is used only on scrypt, as far as I now. surely not on groestl.
|
|
|
|
|